do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Decision (EU) 2025/1180 of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of 11 June 2025 appointing a Judge to the Court of Justice
Date: 2025-06-11
Institutions: Representatives of the Governments of the Member States
Subjects: Court of Justice (EU), appointment of members, member of the Court of Justice (EU)








L_202501180EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2025/1180


12.6.2025







            DECISION (EU) 2025/1180 OF THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES
         
of 11 June 2025
         
appointing a Judge to the Court of Justice


THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 19 thereof,


Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 253 and 255 thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Under Article 7 of Protocol No 3 on the Court of Justice of the European Union, and following the death of Mr Marko ILEŠIČ, a Judge should be appointed to the Court of Justice for the remainder of Mr Marko ILEŠIČ’s term of office, which runs until 6 October 2027.












(2)


Mr Marko BOŠNJAK has been nominated for the vacant post.












(3)


The panel set up by Article 255 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union has given a favourable opinion on the suitability of this candidate to perform the duties of Judge of the Court of Justice,





HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Mr Marko BOŠNJAK is hereby appointed Judge to the Court of Justice for the period from the date of entry into force of this Decision to 6 October 2027.


Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Brussels, 11 June 2025.


The President

A. BARTOL
            





ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2025/1180/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Case T-368/24: Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – EO v Parliament (Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Contract of indefinite duration – Article 2(c) of the CEOS – Termination of the contract – Article 47(c)(i) of the CEOS – Breakdown in the relationship of trust – Obligation to state reasons – Article 3 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Misuse of power or abuse of process – Presumption of innocence – Right to be heard – Manifest error of assessment – Principle of proportionality – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Liability – Material and non-material harm)
Date: 2025-06-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: abuse of power, damages, full-time employment, indemnification, principle of proportionality, rights of the defence, servant (EU), staff regulations (EU), temporary employment, termination of employment








C_202504046EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4046


28.7.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – EO v Parliament


(Case T-368/24)
                (1)

(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Contract of indefinite duration - Article 2(c) of the CEOS - Termination of the contract - Article 47(c)(i) of the CEOS - Breakdown in the relationship of trust - Obligation to state reasons - Article 3 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations - Misuse of power or abuse of process - Presumption of innocence - Right to be heard - Manifest error of assessment - Principle of proportionality - Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials - Liability - Material and non-material harm)
(C/2025/4046)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: EO (represented by: L. Levi and P. Baudoux, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Seyr, I. Lázaro Betancor and K. Zejdová, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of 15 September 2023 by which the European Parliament terminated his contract as a member of the temporary staff and, second, compensation for the material and non-material harm he claims to have suffered as a result of that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders EO to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/5827, 7.10.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4046/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-46/24: Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – Coinbase v EUIPO – bitFlyer (coinbase) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark coinbase – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Date: 2025-06-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, commodities exchange, electronic commerce, financial management, financial services, registered trade mark, software, stock exchange, trade-mark law, virtual currency








C_202504044EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4044


28.7.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – Coinbase v EUIPO – bitFlyer (coinbase)


(Case T-46/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark coinbase - Absolute ground for invalidity - Bad faith - Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(C/2025/4044)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Coinbase, Inc. (Oakland, California, United States) (represented by: M. Maier and A. Nordemann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Klee, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: bitFlyer Inc. (Tokyo, Japan)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and the alteration of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 29 November 2023 (Case R 1751/2020-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Coinbase, Inc. to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/2053, 18.3.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4044/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-342/23: Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – Aquind v ACER (Non-contractual liability – Energy – Proposed electricity interconnector connecting the electricity transmission systems in the United Kingdom and France – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals)
Date: 2025-06-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: France, United Kingdom, damages, electrical energy, energy grid, energy transport, rule of law








C_202503893EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3893


21.7.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – Aquind v ACER


(Case T-342/23)
                (1)

(Non-contractual liability - Energy - Proposed electricity interconnector connecting the electricity transmission systems in the United Kingdom and France - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals)
(C/2025/3893)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Aquind Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Goldberg, Solicitor, E. White and J. Bille, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (represented by: P. Martinet and E. Tremmel, acting as Agents, and by B. Creve and T. Kölsch, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 268 TFEU, the applicant seeks compensation for the damage which it claims to have suffered as a result of a number of unlawful acts and omissions on the part of the European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Aquind Ltd to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 278, 7.8.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3893/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-335/24: Order of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – Ferrocarriles de Gran Canaria v CINEA (Action for annulment – Transport – Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) – Call for proposals CEF-T-2023-COREGEN – Tren de Gran Canaria project – Rejection of the applicant’s proposal for failure to comply with the conditions of admissibility – Late submission of a document required by the call for proposals – Request for review – Circumscribed powers – Manifest lack of jurisdiction in part – Action in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Date: 2025-06-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Canary Islands, admissibility, call for proposals, jurisdiction, rail network, trans-European network








C_202504793EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4793


8.9.2025






Order of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – Ferrocarriles de Gran Canaria v CINEA


(Case T-335/24)
                (1)

(Action for annulment - Transport - Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) - Call for proposals CEF-T-2023-COREGEN - ‘Tren de Gran Canaria’ project - Rejection of the applicant’s proposal for failure to comply with the conditions of admissibility - Late submission of a document required by the call for proposals - Request for review - Circumscribed powers - Manifest lack of jurisdiction in part - Action in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(C/2025/4793)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Ferrocarriles de Gran Canaria, SA (Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain) (represented by: J. Navas Marqués, lawyer)

Defendant: European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency (represented by: I. Ramallo, N. Kopietz and P. Matczak, acting as Agents, and by M. Troncoso Ferrer and L. Lence de Frutos, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency (CINEA) of 3 May 2024 rejecting its request for review and confirming the decision of 28 February 2024 declaring inadmissible the project proposal which the applicant had submitted in response to the call for proposals CEF-T-2023-COREGEN.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed in part on the ground of manifest lack of jurisdiction and in part as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.










2.


Ferrocarriles de Gran Canaria, SA shall pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/4976, 19.8.2024



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4793/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 10 June 2025
Date: 2025-06-11
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202503104EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3104


11.6.2025






Euro exchange rates (1)


            10 June 2025
         
(C/2025/3104)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1429 




JPY


Japanese yen


165,23 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4596 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84640 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,9460 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9389 




ISK


Iceland króna


143,80 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,5073 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,771 




HUF


Hungarian forint


400,90 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2533 




RON


Romanian leu


5,0353 




TRY


Turkish lira


44,8327 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,7529 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5647 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,9700 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,8883 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4695 




KRW


South Korean won


1 561,83 




ZAR


South African rand


20,1984 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,2115 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


18 589,44 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,8408 




PHP


Philippine peso


63,819 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


37,304 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,3549 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,7568 




INR


Indian rupee


97,8069 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3104/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-461/24: Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – SHS v EUIPO (Pure Steel+) (EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark Pure Steel+ – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Assessment of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion – Article 94(1) and Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-06-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, building industry, hand tool, machinery, metal product, metals, metalworking, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, vehicle








C_202504047EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4047


28.7.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – SHS v EUIPO (Pure Steel+)


(Case T-461/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU figurative mark Pure Steel+ - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Obligation to state reasons - Assessment of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion - Article 94(1) and Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)
(C/2025/4047)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: SHS – Stahl-Holding-Saar GmbH & Co. KGaA (Dillingen, Germany) (represented by: J. Meyer, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Ringelhann, acting as Agent)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 19 June 2024 (Case R 189/2024-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders SHS – Stahl-Holding-Saar GmbH & Co. KGaA to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/6109, 21.10.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4047/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1036/23: Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – Fattorie Garofalo – Società Cooperativa Agricola v EUIPO – Pastificio Lucio Garofalo (fattorie garofalo) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark FATTORIE GAROFALO – Earlier EU figurative mark GAROFALO – Relative ground for refusal – Damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Taking unfair advantage of the distinctive character or repute of the earlier mark – No due cause)
Date: 2025-06-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, catering industry, consultancy, hotel industry, prepared foodstuff, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202504152EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4152


4.8.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – Fattorie Garofalo – Società Cooperativa Agricola v EUIPO – Pastificio Lucio Garofalo (fattorie garofalo)


(Case T-1036/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark FATTORIE GAROFALO - Earlier EU figurative mark GAROFALO - Relative ground for refusal - Damage to reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Taking unfair advantage of the distinctive character or repute of the earlier mark - No due cause)
(C/2025/4152)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Fattorie Garofalo – Società Cooperativa Agricola (Capua, Italy) (represented by: S. Cutolo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: R. Raponi, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Pastificio Lucio Garofalo SpA (Gragnano, Italy)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 16 August 2023 (Case R 2138/2022–4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2023/1175, 4.12.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4152/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union
Date: 2025-06-11
Institutions: Directorate-General for Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, common customs tariff, plastics








C_202503232EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3232


11.6.2025






Explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union
(C/2025/3232)

Pursuant to Article 9(1), point (a), of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1), the Explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are amended as follows:

On page 198, the first paragraph in the Explanatory note to CN subheadings 
               ‘
               3907 61 00  and 3907 69 00  Poly(ethylene terephthalate)
            ’ is deleted.



(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/1987/2658/oj).

(2)  
            OJ C 119, 29.3.2019, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3232/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11918 – SAEME / ID LOGISTICS / ID LOGISTICS POLSKA 4)
Date: 2025-06-11
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: carriage of goods, economic concentration, logistics, merger control, mineral water, storage








C_202503668EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3668


3.7.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11918 – SAEME / ID LOGISTICS / ID LOGISTICS POLSKA 4)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/3668)

On 11 June 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M11918. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3668/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-230/23: Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – Hitit Seramik v Commission (Commercial policy – Dumping – Imports of ceramic tiles originating in India and Türkiye – Definitive anti-dumping duties – Constructed normal value – Product control number – Article 2(3), (5) and (6) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Comparison between the normal value and the export price – Article 2(10) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Currency conversion – Injury to the Union industry – Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Sampling – Article 17(1) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Manifest error of assessment – Error of law)
Date: 2025-06-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: India, Türkiye, anti-dumping duty, ceramics, economic value, export price, floor coverings, foreign currency, import (EU), originating product








C_202503889EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3889


21.7.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – Hitit Seramik v Commission


(Case T-230/23)
                (1)

(Commercial policy - Dumping - Imports of ceramic tiles originating in India and Türkiye - Definitive anti-dumping duties - Constructed normal value - Product control number - Article 2(3), (5) and (6) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 - Comparison between the normal value and the export price - Article 2(10) of Regulation 2016/1036 - Currency conversion - Injury to the Union industry - Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036 - Sampling - Article 17(1) of Regulation 2016/1036 - Manifest error of assessment - Error of law)
(C/2025/3889)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Hitit Seramik Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ (Istanbul, Türkiye) (represented by: A. Willems and B. Natens, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Luengo, R. Pethke and J. Zieliński, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/265 of 9 February 2023 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ceramic tiles originating in India and Türkiye (OJ 2023 L 41, p. 1), in so far as it concerns the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Hitit Seramik Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 223, 26.6.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3889/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)