do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11910 – MAPFRE / VAS / MAWDY SERVICES / VSL)
Date: 2025-06-11
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: broker, economic concentration, financial services, insurance, maintenance, management, merger control, pension fund, provision of services, software








C_202504363EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4363


1.8.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11910 – MAPFRE / VAS / MAWDY SERVICES / VSL)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/4363)

On 11 June 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M11910. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4363/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-681/22: Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – Spain v Commission (Common Fisheries Policy – Article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2016/2336 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1614 – Methods and criteria for determining areas where vulnerable marine ecosystems are known to occur or are likely to occur – Establishment of a list of areas where the presence of vulnerable marine ecosystems is proven or probable – Establishment of buffer zones – Plea of illegality – Proportionality)
Date: 2025-06-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Atlantic Ocean, EU waters, catch by species, conservation of fish stocks, deep-sea fishing, fishing area, fishing rights, international waters, marine ecosystem, principle of proportionality, sea fish








C_202504041EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4041


28.7.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – Spain v Commission


(Case T-681/22)
                (1)

(Common Fisheries Policy - Article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2016/2336 - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1614 - Methods and criteria for determining areas where vulnerable marine ecosystems are known to occur or are likely to occur - Establishment of a list of areas where the presence of vulnerable marine ecosystems is proven or probable - Establishment of buffer zones - Plea of illegality - Proportionality)
(C/2025/4041)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: A. Gavela Llopis and J. Ruiz Sánchez, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Dawes and I. Galindo Martín, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by I. Terwinghe, C. Ionescu Dima and C. Burgos, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by L. Hamtcheva, F. Naert and G. Rugge, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the Kingdom of Spain seeks the annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1614 of 15 September 2022 determining the existing deep-sea fishing areas and establishing a list of areas where vulnerable marine ecosystems are known to occur or are likely to occur (OJ 2022 L 242, p. 1, ‘the contested regulation’), as regards the establishment of the list set out in Article 2 of and Annex II to that regulation.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;










3.


Orders the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union to bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 24, 23.1.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4041/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-231/23: Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – Akgün Seramik and Others v Commission (Commercial policy – Dumping – Imports of ceramic tiles originating in India and Türkiye – Definitive anti-dumping duties – Definition of Union industry – Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Sampling – Article 17(1) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Injury to the Union industry – Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Causal link – Article 3(6) and (7) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Export price – Adjustment – Functions comparable to those of an agent working on a commission basis – Article 2(10)(i) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Single economic entity – Manifest error of assessment)
Date: 2025-06-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: India, Türkiye, anti-dumping duty, ceramics, commission agent, export price, floor coverings, import (EU), originating product, sampling








C_202503890EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3890


21.7.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – Akgün Seramik and Others v Commission


(Case T-231/23)
                (1)

(Commercial policy - Dumping - Imports of ceramic tiles originating in India and Türkiye - Definitive anti-dumping duties - Definition of Union industry - Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 - Sampling - Article 17(1) of Regulation 2016/1036 - Injury to the Union industry - Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036 - Causal link - Article 3(6) and (7) of Regulation 2016/1036 - Export price - Adjustment - Functions comparable to those of an agent working on a commission basis - Article 2(10)(i) of Regulation 2016/1036 - Single economic entity - Manifest error of assessment)
(C/2025/3890)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Akgün Seramik Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ (Pazaryeri, Türkiye) and the fourteen other applicants whose names are listed in the annex (represented by: F. Di Gianni, A. Scalini and G. Coppo, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Luengo, R. Pethke and J. Zieliński, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/265 of 9 February 2023 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ceramic tiles originating in India and Türkiye (OJ 2023 L 41, p. 1), in so far as it concerns them.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Akgün Seramik Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 223, 26.6.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3890/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.115027
Date: 2025-06-11
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Cyprus, State aid, animal production, control of State aid








C_202503213EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3213


11.6.2025






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.115027
(C/2025/3213)








Date of adoption of the decision


31.1.2025




Aid number


SA.115027




Member State


Cyprus




Region


Cyprus




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Σχέδιο για την κατεδάφιση οχληρών κτηνοτροφικών υποστατικών για υγειονομικούς και περιβαλλοντικούς λόγους




Legal basis


Απόφαση Υπουργικού Συμβουλίου Aρ. Απόφασης 95.407 και Αρ. Πρότασης 1156/2023, ημερ. 25/10/2023, ΑΝΝΕΧ_ΙΙ




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Agriculture; Forestry; Rural areas, Environmental protection, Closure aid




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 900 000  EUR
Annual budget: 300 000  EUR




Intensity


 




Duration


Until 31.12.2027




Economic sectors


Animal production




Name and address of the granting authority







ΤΜΗΜΑ ΓΕΩΡΓΙΑΣ




ΛΕΩΦΟΡΟΣ ΛΟΥΚΗ ΑΚΡΙΤΑ, 1412 ΛΕΥΚΩΣΙΑ








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3213/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-38/24: Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – OMV v EUIPO (Combination of the colours blue and green) (EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Mark consisting in a combination of the colours blue and green – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Legal certainty – Equal treatment – Sound administration – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-06-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, adjuvant, chemical industry, electric vehicle, electrical energy, motor fuel, registered trade mark, retail selling, trade-mark law, wholesale selling








C_202503897EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3897


21.7.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – OMV v EUIPO (Combination of the colours blue and green)


(Case T-38/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - International registration designating the European Union - Mark consisting in a combination of the colours blue and green - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Legal certainty - Equal treatment - Sound administration - Obligation to state reasons - Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)
(C/2025/3897)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: OMV AG (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: C. Schumacher and B. Kapeller-Hirsch, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Nicolás Gómez, acting as Agent)

Interveners in support of the applicant: Marques (Leicester, United Kingdom) (represented by: R. Chalmers Hoynck van Papendrecht, A. Padial Martínez, J. Słupski and S. Fischoeder, lawyers), International Trademark Association (INTA) (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: N. Parrotta, M. Perraki, Y. Øyehaug Opsvik and T. de Haan, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 8 November 2023 (Case R 798/2023-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/1711, 4.3.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3897/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-388/25, Compagnie Européenne de Garanties et Cautions II: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal judiciaire de Montbéliard (France) lodged on 11 June 2025 – Compagnie Européenne de Garanties et Cautions (CEGC) v EO, LA
Date: 2025-06-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: case-law (EU), claim, consumer credit, consumer law, deadline for payment, guarantee, real estate credit, unfair terms of contract








C_202505810EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5810


10.11.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal judiciaire de Montbéliard (France) lodged on 11 June 2025 – Compagnie Européenne de Garanties et Cautions (CEGC) v EO, LA


(Case C-388/25, Compagnie Européenne de Garanties et Cautions II)

(C/2025/5810)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal judiciaire de Montbéliard

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Compagnie Européenne de Garanties et Cautions (CEGC)

Defendants: EO, LA

Questions referred







1.


Should Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993, (1) the principle of the effectiveness of EU law and the principle of the binding force of contracts, implicitly provided for by Directive 93/13 and the Court’s case-law, be interpreted to mean that they make it possible or necessary to deviate from a rule of national law which prohibits a judge from assessing and penalising a bank’s breach of a clause in a credit agreement for immovable property relating to the conditions under which the contract can be terminated by the bank in the event that the borrower defaults, where the professional guarantor guaranteeing this loan has paid off the bank’s claim against the consumer after the bank accelerated the amounts outstanding?










2.


Should Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 and the principle of the effectiveness of EU law be interpreted to mean that they make it possible or necessary to make a finding of unfairness in respect of a term in a credit agreement for immovable property stipulating that the consumer will repay the guarantee paid by a professional guarantor if that consumer has not been informed that the guarantor’s payment of the debt, in the event that the borrower defaults, will result in the guarantor having a right of individual redress against the borrower, rendering unenforceable against the guarantor any breaches of the provisions of the credit agreement and any breaches of national and EU consumer law committed by the creditor?






(1)  Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993, on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993, L 95, p. 29).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5810/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-477/23: Order of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – DZ Bank v SRB (Action for annulment – Economic and monetary policy – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Directive 2014/59/EU – Joint decision on the determination of minimum requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Lack of direct concern – Inadmissibility)
Date: 2025-06-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, admissibility, bank, bank resolution, financial requirements, jurisdiction








C_202504791EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4791


8.9.2025






Order of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – DZ Bank v SRB


(Case T-477/23)
                (1)

(Action for annulment - Economic and monetary policy - Banking union - Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 - Directive 2014/59/EU - Joint decision on the determination of minimum requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities - Jurisdiction of the General Court - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility)
(C/2025/4791)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: DZ Bank AG Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank, Frankfurt am Main (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: H. Berger, M. Weber and D. Schoo, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: H. Ehlers, M. Fernández Rupérez, A. Lapresta Bienz and J. Rius Riu, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks, primarily, the annulment of Joint Decision RC/JD/2022/22 of 6 April 2023, concerning the determination of the minimum requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities for itself and five subsidiaries, and, in the alternative, a finding that that decision is legally non-existent.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene of the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission.










3.


DZ Bank AG Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank, Frankfurt am Main, shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Single Resolution Board (SRB), with the exception of those relating to the applications to intervene.










4.


DZ Bank AG Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank, Frankfurt am Main, the SRB, the Parliament, the Council and the Commission shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications to intervene.






(1)  
            OJ C 338, 25.9.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4791/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Tunisia
Date: 2025-06-11
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Tunisia, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








C_202503330EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3330


11.6.2025






Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Tunisia
(C/2025/3330)

The following information is brought to the attention of Mr Mohamed Mourad Ben Mohamed Ben Rhouma TRABELSI that appears in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP (1), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 (2), concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Tunisia.
The Council has received information from the Tunisian authorities that will be considered within the framework of the review of the restrictive measures concerning persons listed in the Annex to Decision 2011/72/CFSP and in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 101/2011.The persons concerned are hereby informed that they may submit a request to the Council to obtain the information that relates to them, before 
            15 June 2025
         , to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




RELEX.1




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu





Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council's periodic review, in accordance with Article 5 of Decision 2011/72/CFSP and Article 12(4) of Regulation (EU) No 101/2011.


(1)  
            OJ L 28, 2.2.2011, p. 62.

(2)  
            OJ L 31, 5.2.2011, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3330/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Tunisia
Date: 2025-06-11
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Tunisia, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








C_202503329EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3329


11.6.2025






Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Tunisia
(C/2025/3329)

The following information is brought to the attention of Mr Mohamed Naceur Ben Mohamed Ben Rhouma TRABELSI that appears in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP (1), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 (2), concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Tunisia.
The Council has received information from the Tunisian authorities that will be considered within the framework of the review of the restrictive measures concerning persons listed in the Annex to Decision 2011/72/CFSP and in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 101/2011.The persons concerned are hereby informed that they may submit a request to the Council to obtain the information that relates to them, before 
            15 June 2025
         , to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




RELEX.1




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu





Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council's periodic review, in accordance with Article 5 of Decision 2011/72/CFSP and Article 12(4) of Regulation (EU) No 101/2011.


(1)  
            OJ L 28, 2.2.2011, p. 62.

(2)  
            OJ L 31, 5.2.2011, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3329/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)