do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-374/25: Action brought on 6 June 2025 – EO v Parliament
Date: 2025-06-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: damages, disclosure of information, indemnification, press release, termination of employment








C_202504468EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4468


18.8.2025






Action brought on 6 June 2025 – EO v Parliament


(Case T-374/25)

(C/2025/4468)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: EO (represented by: L. Levi and P. Baudoux, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the defendant’s decision of 12 July 2024 rejecting the applicant’s claim for compensation of 14 March 2024;










—


if need be, annul the defendant’s decision of 6 March 2025 rejecting the complaint of the applicant dated 10 October 2024;










—


order the defendant to compensate the applicant for all the damage suffered; and,










—


order the defendant to pay all the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

This action for damages is brought against the defendant on account of an unlawful conduct committed in the applicant’s case:
The defendant published a press release in which it alleged that the applicant had been involved in a scandal and that it supported the applicant’s suspension. The applicant’s name was not explicitly mentioned, but it was obvious that the defendant was referring to the applicant, given that when it published this press release, it decided to delete the applicant’s profile on the official website of the political group to which he belonged. Besides, sources inside the Institution confirmed to journalists that this was the applicant referred to in the press release. These wrongful actions occurred simultaneously - making it obvious for the public/journalists to identify the applicant as the alleged offender. Following these wrongful actions, journalists wrote press articles about the applicant’s alleged involvement in the scandal and people made several negative comments about the applicant on social media.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4468/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-509/24: Order of the General Court of 6 June 2025 – Research Investments and Others v European Public Prosecutor’s Office (Enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Letters from the European Delegated Prosecutor – Article 42(1) to (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 – Lack of jurisdiction)
Date: 2025-06-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: criminal procedure, fraud against the EU, operation of the Institutions, public prosecution, public prosecutor's department








C_202504607EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4607


25.8.2025






Order of the General Court of 6 June 2025 – Research Investments and Others v European Public Prosecutor’s Office


(Case T-509/24)
                (1)

(Enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office - Letters from the European Delegated Prosecutor - Article 42(1) to (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 - Lack of jurisdiction)
(C/2025/4607)
Language of the case: Czech

Parties


Applicants: Research Investments s. r. o. (Zákolany, Czech Republic), Areál Zákolany s. r. o. (Zákolany), Simon Cihelník, (Krupka, Czech Republic) (represented by: J. Mašek, lawyer)

Defendant: European Public Prosecutor’s Office (represented by: L. De Matteis and E. Farhat, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants request the annulment of three letters of the Czech European Delegated Prosecutor dated 1 and 15 August 2024, by which the Czech European Delegated Prosecutor responded to the letters entitled ‘Invitation to act pursuant to Article 265 (and Article 263) TFEU’ which the applicants had sent to the EPPO.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.










2.


Research Investments s. r. o., Areál Zákolany s. r. o. and Mr Simon Cihelník shall pay the costs, including those relating to the interim proceedings.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/7179, 9.12.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4607/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-376/25: Action brought on 6 June 2025 – Puma v EUIPO – Sir Safety System (Representation of footwear sole)
Date: 2025-06-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: designs and models, footwear industry








C_202504315EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4315


11.8.2025






Action brought on 6 June 2025 – Puma v EUIPO – Sir Safety System (Representation of footwear sole)


(Case T-376/25)

(C/2025/4315)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: M. Schunke and P. Trieb, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sir Safety System SpA (Assisi, Italy)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Design at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of design No DM/214 918 (Representation of footwear sole)

Proceedings before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 March 2025 in Case R 1137/2024-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision and declare the design at issue as invalid;










—


order the EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred before the Board of Appeal.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 25(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4315/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-165/24: Order of the General Court of 6 June 2025 – Trabelsi v Council (Action for annulment – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Tunisia – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Inadmissibility)
Date: 2025-06-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Tunisia, economic sanctions, freezing of assets, international sanctions, natural person








C_202504604EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4604


25.8.2025






Order of the General Court of 6 June 2025 – Trabelsi v Council


(Case T-165/24)
                (1)

(Action for annulment - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Tunisia - Freezing of funds - List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources - Failure to comply with procedural requirements - Inadmissibility)
(C/2025/4604)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Belhassen Ben Mohamed Ben Rhouma Trabelsi (Paris, France) (represented by: M. Ceccaldi and M. Hazguer, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: E. Kübler and E. Nadbath, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of ‘the annex to Council Decision 2011/72 CFSP of 31 January 2011 concerning restrictive measures to the extent that they concern the applicant – file No 8 – in so far as that annex was extended, without reason, by Council Decision 2024/426 of 29 January 2024, and the effects thereof’.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


Mr Belhassen Ben Mohamed Ben Rhouma Trabelsi shall pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/4088, 8.7.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4604/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-166/24: Order of the General Court of 6 June 2025 – Ben Ali v Council (Action for annulment – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Tunisia – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Inadmissibility)
Date: 2025-06-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Tunisia, economic sanctions, freezing of assets, international sanctions, natural person








C_202504605EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4605


25.8.2025






Order of the General Court of 6 June 2025 – Ben Ali v Council


(Case T-166/24)
                (1)

(Action for annulment - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Tunisia - Freezing of funds - List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources - Failure to comply with procedural requirements - Inadmissibility)
(C/2025/4605)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Nesrine Ben Ali (Jeddah, Saudi Arabia) (represented by: M. Ceccaldi and M. Hazguer, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: E. Kübler and E. Nadbath, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of ‘the annex to Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP of 31 January 2011 concerning restrictive measures to the extent that it concerns Ms Nesrine BEN ALI (file No 6), in so far as that annex was extended by Council Decision 2023/159 of 19 January 2024, and the effects thereof’.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


Ms Nesrine Ben Ali shall pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/4089, 8.7.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4605/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 5 June 2025
Date: 2025-06-06
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202503101EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3101


6.6.2025






Euro exchange rates (1)


            5 June 2025
         
(C/2025/3101)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1423 




JPY


Japanese yen


163,66 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4595 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84190 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,9430 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9365 




ISK


Iceland króna


144,40 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,5265 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,812 




HUF


Hungarian forint


403,65 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2840 




RON


Romanian leu


5,0505 




TRY


Turkish lira


44,9330 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,7550 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5603 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,9635 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,8889 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4676 




KRW


South Korean won


1 550,55 




ZAR


South African rand


20,2755 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,2008 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


18 568,54 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,8319 




PHP


Philippine peso


63,515 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


37,142 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,4325 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,9570 




INR


Indian rupee


98,0400 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3101/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-810/22: Order of the General Court of 6 June 2025 – Nobilia v Parliament (Law governing the institutions – Single statute for Members of the European Parliament – Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies – Adoption by the Office of the President of the Italian Chamber of Deputies of a pension decision – Change in the amounts of the pensions of members of the Italian Parliament – Corresponding change, by the European Parliament, in the amounts of the pensions of certain former Members of the European Parliament elected in Italy – Death of the applicant – Proceedings not resumed by successors – No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2025-06-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Member of the European Parliament, interest, ownership, pension scheme, powers of the institutions (EU), principle of legal certainty








C_202504603EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4603


25.8.2025






Order of the General Court of 6 June 2025 – Nobilia v Parliament


(Case T-810/22)
                (1)

(Law governing the institutions - Single statute for Members of the European Parliament - Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies - Adoption by the Office of the President of the Italian Chamber of Deputies of a pension decision - Change in the amounts of the pensions of members of the Italian Parliament - Corresponding change, by the European Parliament, in the amounts of the pensions of certain former Members of the European Parliament elected in Italy - Death of the applicant - Proceedings not resumed by successors - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2025/4603)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Mauro Nobilia (Rome, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Seyr and S. Alves, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of 12 October 2022 by the Head of the ‘Members’ Salaries and Social Entitlements’ Unit of the Directorate-General for Finance of the European Parliament concerning the adjustment of his pension following the adoption of Decision No 150/2022 of the Ufficio di Presidenza della Camera dei deputati (Office of the President of the Chamber of Deputies, Italy) on 3 March 2022.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


Each party shall bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 94, 13.3.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4603/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-205/24: Order of the President of the Seventh Chamber of the Court of 6 June 2025 – Commission v Ireland (Invasive alien species – Provisions on penalties)
Date: 2025-06-06
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: biodiversity, ecosystem, environmental risk prevention, infringement of EU law, invasive species, penalty, protection of animal life, protection of plant life








C_202505324EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5324


13.10.2025






Order of the President of the Seventh Chamber of the Court of 6 June 2025 – Commission v Ireland (Invasive alien species – Provisions on penalties)


(Case C-205/24)
                (1)

(C/2025/5324)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C, C/2024/3162.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5324/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.118757
Date: 2025-06-06
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: France, State aid, beverage industry, control of State aid, spirits, viticulture








C_202503184EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3184


6.6.2025






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.118757
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/3184)








Date of adoption of the decision


8.5.2025




Aid number


SA.118757




Member State


France




Region


France




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Cap Francexport




Legal basis


Articles L.432-21° e) and R.442-8-9 and following of Code des assurances




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Promotion of export and internationalisation




Form of aid


Guarantee




Budget


Overall budget: 5 000 000 000  EUR




Intensity


 




Duration


Until 8.7.2025




Economic sectors


Distilling, rectifying and blending of spirits, Growing of grapes, Manufacture of wine from grape




Name and address of the granting authority







Direction générale du Trésor/Bpifrance Assurance Export




139 rue de Bercy 75012 PARIS








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3184/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-378/25, Smetna palata: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Silistra (Bulgaria) lodged on 6 June 2025 – KX v Predsedatel na Smetnata palata na Republika Bulgaria
Date: 2025-06-06
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russia, Russo-Ukrainian issue, Ukraine, economic sanctions, equal treatment, free competition, international sanctions, public contract, public procurement, trade restriction








C_202504974EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4974


22.9.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Silistra (Bulgaria) lodged on 6 June 2025 – KX v Predsedatel na Smetnata palata na Republika Bulgaria


(Case C-378/25, Smetna palata)

(C/2025/4974)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Administrativen sad Silistra

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant on a point of law: KX

Respondent in the appeal on a point of law: Predsedatel na Smetnata palata na Republika Bulgaria

Questions referred







1.


Is Article 5k of Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 (1) to be interpreted as also applying to public contracts with a value estimated to be below the thresholds laid down in Article 4 of Directive 2014/24/EU (2) where the contracting [authority] is required under national law to apply the provisions of that directive?










2.


Does the requirement to make a declaration as to the absence of the grounds set out in Article 5k of Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 constitute a breach of the principles of equal treatment, non-discrimination and free competition or of the prohibition on unduly restricting participants laid down in Article 2(2) of the [Law on public procurement] [ZOP] where that requirement is imposed in a procedure in which a contract value is below the thresholds laid down in Directive 2014/24/EU?










3.


Is Article 5k of Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 to be interpreted as permitting a public contracting [authority]’s practice which, in applying the national legislation transposing the provisions of Directive 2014/24/EU in procedures concerning contract values below the thresholds, requires participants to make a declaration as to the absence of the grounds set out in that provision?






(1)  Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2014 L 229, p. 1).

(2)  Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (OJ 2014 L 94, p. 65).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4974/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)