do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-76/24: Judgment of the General Court of 4 June 2025 – Benschop v EUIPO – Seven Bell Group (ALWAYS RUN 4PRESIDENT) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark ALWAYS RUN 4PRESIDENT – Earlier EU figurative mark PRESIDENT’s – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier mark acquired through use)
Date: 2025-06-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, business administration, business management, clothing, footwear industry, leather, registered trade mark, sports equipment, trade-mark law








C_202503898EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3898


21.7.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 4 June 2025 – Benschop v EUIPO – Seven Bell Group (ALWAYS RUN 4PRESIDENT)


(Case T-76/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark ALWAYS RUN 4PRESIDENT - Earlier EU figurative mark PRESIDENT’s - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier mark acquired through use)
(C/2025/3898)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Sven Benschop (Montfoort, Netherlands) (represented by: T. Berendsen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Stoyanova-Valchanova, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Seven Bell Group (Campi Bisenzio, Italy) (represented by: M. De Vietro, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 14 December 2023 (Case R 1341/2023-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 14 December 2023 (Case R 1341/2023-2);










2.


Rejects the opposition brought by Seven Bell Group;










3.


Orders EUIPO and Seven Bell Group to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/2327, 2.4.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3898/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11978 – CENTRAL GROUP / CARSCHHAUS)
Date: 2025-06-04
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: catering industry, economic concentration, merchandising, merger control, real estate business, real property, retail trade








C_202503577EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3577


27.6.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11978 – CENTRAL GROUP / CARSCHHAUS)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/3577)

On 4 June 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M11978. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3577/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-450/24: Judgment of the General Court of 4 June 2025 – EZ v Commission (Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Fixed-term contract – Non-renewal – End-of-probation report – Appraisal report – Manifest error of assessment – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Rule of correspondence – Liability)
Date: 2025-06-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: contract staff, indemnification, servant (EU), staff assessment, temporary employment, termination of employment, work contract








C_202503902EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3902


21.7.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 4 June 2025 – EZ v Commission


(Case T-450/24)
                (1)

(Civil service - Members of the contract staff - Fixed-term contract - Non-renewal - End-of-probation report - Appraisal report - Manifest error of assessment - Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials - Rule of correspondence - Liability)
(C/2025/3902)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: EZ (represented by: K. Djaber, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Niddam and A. Sauka, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, in the first place, the annulment of the European Commission’s decision of 25 October 2023 not to renew his employment contract and, in so far as necessary, annulment of the decision of the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment with the Commission of 29 May 2024 rejecting the applicant’s complaint against that decision and, in the second place, his reinstatement in the Commission or, in the alternative, compensation for the harm he has suffered as a result of those decisions.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders EZ to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/6107, 21.10.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3902/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-551/23: Judgment of the General Court of 4 June 2025 – Baltic International Bank v ECB (Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the ECB – Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation – Infringement of national legislation on the prevention of money laundering and the financing of terrorism – Article 83(2) of Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 and Article 4(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Scope of the ECB’s assessment of the circumstances justifying withdrawal – Competence of the national competent authorities and of the ECB within the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) – Conditions for withdrawal – Obligation to state reasons – Right to good administration)
Date: 2025-06-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank, banking supervision, competence of the institution, credit institution, money laundering, national law, terrorism financing, trade licence








C_202503894EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3894


21.7.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 4 June 2025 – Baltic International Bank v ECB


(Case T-551/23)
                (1)

(Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the ECB - Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation - Infringement of national legislation on the prevention of money laundering and the financing of terrorism - Article 83(2) of Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 and Article 4(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 - Scope of the ECB’s assessment of the circumstances justifying withdrawal - Competence of the national competent authorities and of the ECB within the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) - Conditions for withdrawal - Obligation to state reasons - Right to good administration)
(C/2025/3894)
Language of the case: Latvian

Parties


Applicant: Baltic International Bank SE (Riga, Latvia) (represented by: M. Supe and V. Supe, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: E. Yoo, J. Poscia, K. Drēviņa and M. Puidokas, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the European Central Bank (ECB) of 3 July 2023 on the withdrawal of the authorisation of a supervised credit institution, adopted in its regard.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Baltic International Bank SE to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2023/148, 16.10.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3894/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-199/24: Judgment of the General Court of 4 June 2025 – Toya Development v EUIPO – Szmidt (TOYA) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark TOYA – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Date: 2025-06-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, building industry, carriage of goods, education, insurance, legal profession, provision of services, real estate business, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202503900EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3900


21.7.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 4 June 2025 – Toya Development v EUIPO – Szmidt (TOYA)


(Case T-199/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark TOYA - Absolute ground for invalidity - Bad faith - Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(C/2025/3900)
Language of the case: Polish

Parties


Applicant: Toya Development sp. z o.o. sp.k. (Kryniczno, Poland) (represented by: J. Sikocińska, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Chylińska and J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Jan Szmidt (Wrocław, Pologne) (represented by: T. Gawliczek, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 6 February 2024 (Case R 470/2023-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Toya Development sp. z o.o. sp.k. to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/3479, 10.6.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3900/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-146/24: Judgment of the General Court of 4 June 2025 – CV v Commission (Civil Service – Officials – Remuneration – Family allowances – Household allowance – Divorce – Payment of maintenance to the former spouse – Family responsibilities actually assumed by the official)
Date: 2025-06-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, divorce, divorced person, family benefit, maintenance obligation, remuneration of work








C_202503899EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3899


21.7.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 4 June 2025 – CV v Commission


(Case T-146/24)
                (1)

(Civil Service - Officials - Remuneration - Family allowances - Household allowance - Divorce - Payment of maintenance to the former spouse - Family responsibilities actually assumed by the official)
(C/2025/3899)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: CV (represented by: F. Moyse, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Hohenecker and A. Sipos, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Office for the Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO) of the European Commission of 9 August 2023 rejecting his application for a household allowance.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders CV to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/2957, 6.5.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3899/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
European water resilience strategy.
Date: 2025-06-04
Institutions: Directorate-General for Environment
Subjects: EU strategy, decontamination, disaster resilience, water consumption, water policy, water protection, water resources

Sustaining our quality of life: 
food security, water and nature

European
Water Resilience
Strategy

June 2025

The European Water Resilience Strategy paves the way for a water-smart Europe for 
people, the economy and our ecosystems.

It contains concrete actions up to 2030 to make Europe water resilient.

Water is a finite resource. 34% of the EU is affected by water scarcity.

The European Water Resilience Strategy aims to: 

Restore
and protect
the water cycle

Build a 
water-smart economy 
to boost competitiveness 
and attract investments

Clean and affordable 
water and sanitation 
for all

Water efficiency first principle

Improve awareness, 
governance and 
implementation through 
dialogues with Member 
States and public 
debate

Enhance security 
and preparedness 
by reducing disaster 
risk and improving 
recovery

Concrete actions 
to support Member 
States and all sectors to 
become water-resilient

Boost innovation 
and skills fora more 
competitive water 
sector

Secure investments and 
modernise infrastructure 
with increased EU financing 
for water resilience 
and greater cooperation 
with the EIB

Support digitalisation by 
using satellite data and 
Copernicus

© European Union, 2025

Reuse of this document is allowed, provided appropriate credit is given and any changes are indicated (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 
International license). For any use or reproduction of elements that are not owned by the EU, permission may need to be sought directly 
from the respective right holders. All images under licence from Adobe Stock and Copernicus Sentinel-2 imagery.

Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2025

PDF 

ISBN 978-92-68-28240-3  doi: 10.2779/0686902 

KH-01-25-113-EN-N
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11968 – BANK J SAFRA SARASIN / SAXO BANK)
Date: 2025-06-04
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electronic commerce, financial occupation, investment bank, merger control, retail trade








C_202504364EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4364


1.8.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11968 – BANK J SAFRA SARASIN / SAXO BANK)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/4364)

On 4 June 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M11968. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4364/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-50/25: Order of the General Court of 4 June 2025 – KD v EUIPO
Date: 2025-06-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: damages, reintegration into working life, rights of the defence, servant (EU), staff assessment, work contract








C_202504642EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4642


25.8.2025






Order of the General Court of 4 June 2025 – KD v EUIPO


(Case T-50/25)
                (1)

(C/2025/4642)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C, C/2025/1772, 31.3.2025.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4642/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1061/23: Judgment of the General Court of 4 June 2025 – Delta-Sport Handelskontor v EUIPO – Decathlon (Diving mask) (Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a diving mask – Grounds for invalidity – Characteristics of the appearance of a product dictated exclusively by its technical function – Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – No individual character – Article 4(1) and Article 6(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002)
Date: 2025-06-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: designs and models, sports equipment








C_202503896EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3896


21.7.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 4 June 2025 – Delta-Sport Handelskontor v EUIPO – Decathlon (Diving mask)


(Case T-1061/23)
                (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing a diving mask - Grounds for invalidity - Characteristics of the appearance of a product dictated exclusively by its technical function - Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - No individual character - Article 4(1) and Article 6(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002)
(C/2025/3896)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Delta-Sport Handelskontor (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: N. Boespflug, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: C. Bovar and E. Nicolás Gómez, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Decathlon (Villeneuve-d'Ascq, France) (represented by: P. Böhner, A. von Mühlendahl, A. Munier and C. Eckhartt, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks, in essence, the annulment and alteration of the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 11 August 2023 (Case R 1731/2022-3).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Delta-Sport Handelskontor GmbH to pay the costs, including the costs necessarily incurred by Decathlon for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/411, 3.1.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3896/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Withdrawal of notification of a concentration (Case M.11944 – MMG / BRAZILIAN NICKEL BUSINESS OF ANGLO AMERICAN)
Date: 2025-06-04
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Brazil, copper, economic concentration, merger control, metalworking, mining industry, nickel, sale, zinc








C_202503142EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3142


4.6.2025






Withdrawal of notification of a concentration
(Case M.11944 – MMG / BRAZILIAN NICKEL BUSINESS OF ANGLO AMERICAN)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/3142)

On 23 April 2025, the European Commission received notification (1) of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) (‘Merger Regulation’).
On 23 May 2025, the notifying party informed the Commission that it withdrew its notification.


(1)  
            OJ C, C/2025/2625, 7.5.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2625/oj.

(2)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3142/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-subsidy measures
Date: 2025-06-04
Institutions: Directorate-General for Trade and Economic Security, European Commission
Subjects: China, countervailing charge, glass fibre, import (EU), originating product








C_202503092EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3092


4.6.2025






Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-subsidy measures
(C/2025/3092)

1.   As provided for in Article 18(4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the countervailing measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.
2.   Procedure

Union producers may submit a written request for an expiry review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of subsidisation and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.
3.   Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit G-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.
4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 18(4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037.









Product


Country(ies) of origin or exportation


Measures


Reference


Date of expiry (3)





Continuous filament glass fibre products


The People’s Republic of China


Countervailing duty


Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/328 of 24 February 2021 imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of continuous filament glass fibre products originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 18 of the Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 65, 25.2.2021, p. 1)


26.2.2026






(1)  
            OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 55, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/1037/oj.

(2)  
            TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu.

(3)  The measure expires at midnight (00:00) of the day mentioned in this column.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3092/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)