do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-265/23: Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2025 – VDK v Commission (Fisheries – Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 – Conservation of the biological resources of the sea – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/340– Fisheries conservation measures – Restrictions – North Sea – German exclusive economic zone – Protection of the environment – Directive 92/43/EEC – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Directive 2008/56/EC – Marine strategy – Equal treatment – Proportionality)
Date: 2025-05-21
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Germany, North Sea, conservation of fish stocks, conservation of resources, equal treatment, exclusive economic zone, fishing area, principle of proportionality, protected area, resources of the sea








C_202503515EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3515


7.7.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2025 – VDK v Commission


(Case T-265/23)
                (1)

(Fisheries - Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 - Conservation of the biological resources of the sea - Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/340– Fisheries conservation measures - Restrictions - North Sea - German exclusive economic zone - Protection of the environment - Directive 92/43/EEC - Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora - Directive 2008/56/EC - Marine strategy - Equal treatment - Proportionality)
(C/2025/3515)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Verband der Deutschen Kutter- und Küstenfischer eV (VDK) (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: M. Waller, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Hermes, A. Dawes, B. Hofstötter and C. Calvo Langdon, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: M. Bulterman and C. Schillemans, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Delegated Regulation (UE) 2023/340 of 8 December 2022, amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/118 as regards conservation measures in Sylter Aussenriff, Borkum-Riffgrund, Doggerbank and Östliche Deutsche Bucht, and in Klaverbank, Friese Front and Centrale Oestergronden (OJ L 2023/48), in so far as it concerns only conservation measures covered by that regulation which apply in the German Exclusive Economic Zone in the North Sea.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Verband der Deutschen Kutter- und Küstenfischer eV (VDK) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;










3.


Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 235, 3.7.2023



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3515/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Notice for the attention of the natural and legal persons, entities and bodies subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2025/936, and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/933 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine
Date: 2025-05-21
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russia, Russo-Ukrainian issue, Ukraine, economic sanctions, freezing of assets, international sanctions, legal person, natural person, territorial dispute, territorial law








C_202502929EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2929


21.5.2025






Notice for the attention of the natural and legal persons, entities and bodies subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2025/936, and Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/933 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine
(C/2025/2929)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons, entities and bodies that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2025/936 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (3) as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/933 (4) concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine.
Article 9(2) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 requires that those persons, entities or bodies must report, before 1 September 2022 or within 6 weeks from the date of listing in Annex I, whichever is latest, funds or economic resources within the jurisdiction of a Member State belonging to, owned, held or controlled by them, to the competent authority of the Member State where those funds or economic resources are located. They must cooperate with the national competent authority in any verification of such information. Failure to comply with these obligations will be considered as circumvention of the measures on the freezing of funds and of economic resources.
The information to be reported must be sent to the competent authority of the relevant Member State, via its website as indicated in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 (5).


(1)  
            OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 16.

(2)  
            OJ L, 2025/936, 20.5.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2025/936/oj.

(3)  
            OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, p. 6.

(4)  
            OJ L, 2025/933, 20.5.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2025/933/oj.

(5)  Last consolidated version available at EUR-Lex - 02014R0269-20250316 - EN - EUR-Lex



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2929/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-344/25, Eurovo: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 21 May 2025 – EUROVO S.r.l. v Zimmerer Erben GmbH
Date: 2025-05-21
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU law - national law, damage, defective product, establishment, launching of a product, private international law, producer's liability








C_202504574EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4574


25.8.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 21 May 2025 – EUROVO S.r.l. v Zimmerer Erben GmbH


(Case C-344/25, Eurovo)

(C/2025/4574)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant on a point of law: EUROVO S.r.l.

Respondent on a point of law: Zimmerer Erben GmbH

Questions referred







1.


Is the term ‘market[ing]’ within the meaning of Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) 864/2007 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that a product is marketed in the country in which the final consumer acquires it from the distributor even in the case where the manufacturer, which is established in another country, has previously handed over the product, at its place of establishment, to a carrier which has delivered the product directly to the place where the final consumer is established, or, in those circumstances, does the marketing take place, also in relation to the final consumer, in the country in which the manufacturer is established?










2.


Is the term ‘market[ing]’ within the meaning of Article 5(1) of Regulation 864/2007 to be interpreted as meaning that a product can be marketed not only by the manufacturer itself but also by a third party such as, for example, a distributor which has acquired it from the manufacturer?










3.


If Question 2 is to be answered in the affirmative, is the ‘marketing’ of the specific defective/damaging product in the country of the end customer precluded in that event if the end customer acquires or leases the product from the distributor as a component of a larger technical system which the distributor installs at the purchaser’s premises?










4.


Which national law is applicable if none of the connecting factors provided for in Article 5(1) of Regulation 864/2007 is present?










5.


When assessing whether a product has been marketed in a particular country within the meaning of Article 5(1) of Regulation 864/2007, must regard be had to the specific defective/damaging product, or is it sufficient if, in any case, an identical product or a product of the same type has been marketed in the particular country?






(1)  Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (Rome II) (OJ 2007 L 199, p. 40).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4574/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 20 May 2025
Date: 2025-05-21
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202502318EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2318


21.5.2025






Euro exchange rates (1)


            20 May 2025
         
(C/2025/2318)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1241 




JPY


Japanese yen


162,59 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4595 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84180 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,8835 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9366 




ISK


Iceland króna


145,90 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,5955 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,920 




HUF


Hungarian forint


402,65 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2488 




RON


Romanian leu


5,0733 




TRY


Turkish lira


43,6708 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,7538 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5683 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,7968 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,9035 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4568 




KRW


South Korean won


1 567,69 




ZAR


South African rand


20,2073 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,1154 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


18 461,54 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,8325 




PHP


Philippine peso


62,674 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


37,163 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,3444 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,6729 




INR


Indian rupee


96,1840 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2318/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-94/24: Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2025 – Airbnb v EUIPO – Airtasker (AIRBNB) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark AIRBNB – Genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-05-21
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, consultancy, digital content, on line data service, property leasing, provision of services, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, virtual community








C_202503523EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3523


7.7.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2025 – Airbnb v EUIPO – Airtasker (AIRBNB)


(Case T-94/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark AIRBNB - Genuine use of the mark - Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/3523)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Airbnb, Inc. (San Francisco, California, United States) (represented by: M. Maier and A. Nordemann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Stoyanova-Valchanova, D. Hanf and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Airtasker Pty Ltd (Sydney, Australia)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment in part of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 18 December 2023 (Joined Cases R 886/2022-2 and R 893/2022-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 18 December 2023 (Joined Cases R 886/2022-2 and R 893/2022-2) in so far as it dismissed the appeal filed by Airbnb, Inc. (Case R 893/2022-2) [and upheld the revocation of EU trade mark No 9 376 468] in relation to the services ‘providing reviews and feedback about listers and renters of real estate, from virtual communities and from social networking sites’ in Class 36 of the Nice Agreement Concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks of 15 June 1957, as revised and amended;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/2449, 8.4.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3523/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-476/23: Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2025 – Norddeutsche Landesbank – Girozentrale v SRB (Economic and Monetary Union – Banking Union – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the ex ante contributions for the 2023 contribution period – Risk indicators – Data not available)
Date: 2025-05-21
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank, bank resolution, company in difficulties, financing method, financing plan, fund (EU)








C_202503516EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3516


7.7.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2025 – Norddeutsche Landesbank – Girozentrale v SRB


(Case T-476/23)
                (1)

(Economic and Monetary Union - Banking Union - Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Single Resolution Fund (SRF) - Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 
ex ante
 contributions for the 2023 contribution period - Risk indicators - Data not available)
(C/2025/3516)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Norddeutsche Landesbank – Girozentrale (Hanover, Germany) (represented by: J. Seitz, C. Marx, M. Hamberger and F. Jacksch, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: C. De Falco and T. Wittenberg, acting as Agents, and G. Coppo and K. Bongs, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Decision SRB/ES/2023/23 of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 2 May 2023 on the calculation of the 2023 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund, in so far as that decision concerns it.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Norddeutsche Landesbank – Girozentrale to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 329, 18.9.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3516/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Cases T-135/24 to T-137/24: Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2025 – Ty v EUIPO – Carletto Management & Logistik (Glubschi and Glubschis) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Glubschi – International registrations designating the European Union – Word and figurative marks Glubschis – Absolute ground for invalidity – No bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Date: 2025-05-21
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, book trade, clothing, electronic game, pulp and paper industry, registered trade mark, sports equipment, textile product, toy industry, trade-mark law








C_202503525EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3525


7.7.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2025 – Ty v EUIPO – Carletto Management & Logistik (Glubschi and Glubschis)


(Cases T-135/24 to T-137/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark Glubschi - International registrations designating the European Union - Word and figurative marks Glubschis - Absolute ground for invalidity - No bad faith - Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(C/2025/3525)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Ty, Inc. (Westmont, Illinois, United States) (represented by: V. von Bomhard, J. Fuhrmann and A. Malkmes, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Carletto Management & Logistik AG (Wollerau, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Müller-Mergenthaler, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of three decisions of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 13 December 2023 (Cases R 1918/2022-2, R 750/2023-2 and R 1835/2021-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Joins Cases T-135/24, T-136/24 and T-137/24 for the purposes of the judgment;










2.


Dismisses the actions;










3.


Orders Ty, Inc. to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/2642, 22.4.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3525/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-72/22: Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2025 – Interneto žiniasklaidos asociacija and Others v Commission (State aid – State measures amending the existing aid granted to the Lithuanian public service broadcasting organisation LRT – Rejection of a complaint – Decision not to raise any objections – Action for annulment – Status as an interested party – Safeguarding of procedural rights – Admissibility – Serious difficulties – Substantial alteration to existing aid)
Date: 2025-05-21
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Lithuania, State aid, aid to undertakings, broadcasting, control of State aid, public sector, television








C_202503513EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3513


7.7.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2025 – Interneto žiniasklaidos asociacija and Others v Commission


(Case T-72/22)
                (1)

(State aid - State measures amending the existing aid granted to the Lithuanian public service broadcasting organisation LRT - Rejection of a complaint - Decision not to raise any objections - Action for annulment - Status as an interested party - Safeguarding of procedural rights - Admissibility - Serious difficulties - Substantial alteration to existing aid)
(C/2025/3513)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Interneto žiniasklaidos asociacija (Vilnius, Lithuania), All Media Lithuania UAB (Vilnius), All Media Radijas UAB (Vilnius) (represented by: K. Kačerauskas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Nicolae, acting as Agent)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Lietuvos nacionalinis radijas ir televizija VšĮ (Vilnius, Lithuania) (represented by: D. Miniotas, lawyer), European Broadcasting Union (EBU) (Grand-Saconnex, Switzerland) (represented by: D. Waelbroeck, D. Fosselard and J. Bracker, lawyers)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of the letter from the European Commission bearing the reference COMP.C.4/KK/ASz/ao D(2021)7942463 of 25 November 2021 on State aid SA.57787 (2020/FC) – Lithuania – State aid to public service broadcaster LRT – LT.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the letter from the European Commission bearing the reference COMP.C.4/KK/ASz/ao D(2021)7942463 of 25 November 2021 on State Aid SA.57787 (2020/FC) – Lithuania – State aid to public service broadcaster LRT – LT;










2.


Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Interneto žiniasklaidos asociacija, All Media Lithuania UAB and All Media Radijas UAB;










3.


Orders Lietuvos nacionalinis radijas ir televizija VšĮ and European Broadcasting Union (EBU) to bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 171, 25.4.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3513/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1032/23: Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2025 – Airbnb v EUIPO – Airtasker (AIRBNB) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark AIRBNB – Genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-05-21
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, business management, consultancy, hotel industry, legal aid, property leasing, registered trade mark, software, trade-mark law, travel








C_202503517EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3517


7.7.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2025 – Airbnb v EUIPO – Airtasker (AIRBNB)


(Case T-1032/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark AIRBNB - Genuine use of the mark - Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/3517)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Airbnb, Inc. (San Francisco, California, United States) (represented by: A. Nordemann, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Stoyanova-Valchanova, D. Hanf and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Airtasker Pty Ltd (Sydney, Australia)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment in part of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 10 August 2023 (Joined Cases R 885/2022-2 and R 894/2022-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Airbnb, Inc. to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2023/991, 27.11.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3517/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)