do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-595/24: Order of the General Court of 20 May 2025 – Capgemini España and UniSystems Luxembourg v EUIPO
Date: 2025-05-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: abuse of power, equal treatment, framework agreement, information technology, withdrawal from an agreement








C_202504483EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4483


18.8.2025






Order of the General Court of 20 May 2025 – Capgemini España and UniSystems Luxembourg v EUIPO


(Case T-595/24)
                (1)

(C/2025/4483)
Language of the case: French
The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C, C/2025/576, 3.2.2025.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4483/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 19 May 2025
Date: 2025-05-20
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202502317EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2317


20.5.2025






Euro exchange rates (1)


            19 May 2025
         
(C/2025/2317)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1262 




JPY


Japanese yen


163,26 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4608 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84190 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,9015 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9394 




ISK


Iceland króna


145,90 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,5955 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,907 




HUF


Hungarian forint


402,35 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2688 




RON


Romanian leu


5,0413 




TRY


Turkish lira


43,7446 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,7471 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5707 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,8062 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,9048 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4577 




KRW


South Korean won


1 564,04 




ZAR


South African rand


20,3248 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,1225 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


18 531,73 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,8325 




PHP


Philippine peso


62,727 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


37,227 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,3853 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,9137 




INR


Indian rupee


96,2175 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2317/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Publication of a vacancy for a Chief Technology Officer at grade AD 14 – Directorate-General for Competition (DG COMP) – Engagement of a Temporary Agent under Article 2(a) of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants – COM/2025/10470
Date: 2025-05-20
Institutions: Directorate-General for Human Resources and Security, European Commission
Subjects: EU competition policy, administrator, competition (EU), job vacancy, recruitment, servant (EU), technology








C_202502804EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2804


20.5.2025






Publication of a vacancy for a Chief Technology Officer at grade AD 14
Directorate-General for Competition (DG COMP)
Engagement of a Temporary Agent under Article 2(a) of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants
COM/2025/10470
(C/2025/2804)

The European Commission has published a vacancy notice (reference COM/2025/10470) for the function of Chief Technology Officer in the Directorate-General for Competition (grade AD 14).
To consult the text of the vacancy notice in 24 languages and to submit your application, please visit this dedicated webpage on the European Commission’s website: https://europa.eu/!DNQJKQ.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2804/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11970 – TPG / MAVCO / PJ / COBRA OPCO)
Date: 2025-05-20
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: India, economic concentration, investment company, merger control, natural person, private sector, turbine, wind energy








C_202502995EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2995


26.5.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11970 – TPG / MAVCO / PJ / COBRA OPCO)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/2995)

On 20 May 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M11970. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2995/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.11879 – XEROX / LEXMARK)
Date: 2025-05-20
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: cloud computing, economic concentration, merger control, printer, provision of services, screen








C_202502812EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2812


20.5.2025






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.11879 – XEROX / LEXMARK)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/2812)


1.   
On 7 May 2025, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


Xerox Holdings Corporation (‘Xerox’, USA),










—


Lexmark International II, LLC (‘Lexmark’, USA), controlled by Ninestar Holdings Company Limited (USA).




Xerox will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Lexmark.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:






—


Xerox supplies globally (except Asia and Australia) digital print technology and related services, software, and solutions, including the supply (but not manufacture) of office printers, production solutions, and on-site and cloud-based managed print services,










—


Lexmark manufactures and sells globally printing and imaging products, software solutions and related services, including printers and cloud-based managed print services.






3.   

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.



4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.11879 – XEROX / LEXMARK
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2812/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.114648
Date: 2025-05-20
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: State aid, Sweden, air transport, control of State aid








C_202502780EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2780


20.5.2025






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.114648
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/2780)








Date of adoption of the decision


9.7.2024




Aid number


SA.114648




Member State


Sweden




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Amendment to SA.57543 and SA.58342 (2020/NN)(ex 2020/N), implemented by the Kingdom of Danmark and the Kingdom of Sweden for Scandinavian Airlines System AB




Legal basis


legal basis of case SA.58342




Type of measure


Ad Hoc Case


 




Objective


Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy




Form of aid


Other forms of equity intervention




Budget


 




Intensity


 




Duration


 




Economic sectors


Air transport




Name and address of the granting authority







Regeringskansliet




103 33 Stockholm








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2780/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-374/24: Order of the General Court of 20 May 2025 – AirPlus International v EUIPO – Comeig Ramírez (R+ CASHLAB) (Action for annulment – EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark R+ CASHLAB – Earlier EU word marks AirPlus International, AirPlus Connect and AirPlus Travel Expense Card and earlier EU figurative mark AirPlus INTERNATIONAL – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Well-known facts – Refusal of the request for oral proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Article 96(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Date: 2025-05-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cloud computing, consultancy, economic analysis, financial services, investment company, registered trade mark, software, trade-mark law








C_202504465EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4465


18.8.2025






Order of the General Court of 20 May 2025 – AirPlus International v EUIPO – Comeig Ramírez (R+ CASHLAB)


(Case T-374/24)
                (1)

(Action for annulment - EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark R+ CASHLAB - Earlier EU word marks AirPlus International, AirPlus Connect and AirPlus Travel Expense Card and earlier EU figurative mark AirPlus INTERNATIONAL - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion - Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Well-known facts - Refusal of the request for oral proceedings before the Board of Appeal - Article 96(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(C/2025/4465)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: AirPlus International GmbH (Neu-Isenburg, Germany) (represented by: R. Kunze, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Irene Comeig Ramírez (Valencia, Spain)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 13 May 2024 (Case R 2171/2023-2).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


AirPlus International GmbH and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall each bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/5505, 23.9.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4465/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.114657
Date: 2025-05-20
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Denmark, State aid, air transport, control of State aid








C_202502781EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2781


20.5.2025






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.114657
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/2781)








Date of adoption of the decision


9.7.2024




Aid number


SA.114657




Member State


Denmark




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Amendment to SA.57543 and SA.58342 (2020/NN) (ex 2020/N), implemented by the Kingdom of Denmark and the Kingdom of Sweden for Scandinavian Airlines System AB




Legal basis


legal basis of case SA.57543




Type of measure


Ad Hoc Case


 




Objective


Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy




Form of aid


Other forms of equity intervention




Budget


Overall budget: 0 DKK
Annual budget: 0 DKK




Intensity


 




Duration


 




Economic sectors


 




Name and address of the granting authority







Finansministeriet




Christiansborg Slotsplads 1, 1218 København K








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2781/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-342/25, Stogenchev: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 20 May 2025 – Criminal proceedings against DS, KW
Date: 2025-05-20
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: charge, criminal proceedings, evidence, protection of privacy, right to information, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_202504573EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4573


25.8.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 20 May 2025 – Criminal proceedings against DS, KW


(Case C-342/25, Stogenchev
                (1)
)

(C/2025/4573)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Sofiyski gradski sad

Parties to the main proceedings

DS, KW

Questions referred







1.


Is an interpretation of a constitutional provision which confers on the accused person a right to legal protection in court proceedings (Article 122(1) of the Constitution of the Republic of Bulgaria) to the effect that:






—


the right to legal protection against an infringement of the privacy of the accused persons committed in the taking of evidence is expressed in the prohibition on using the evidence concerned; and










—


the right to legal protection against prosecution is also expressed in the prohibition on using that evidence,




compatible with the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU and the first and second paragraphs of Article 47 of the Charter, where the privacy of the accused persons has been minimally infringed; the infringement has not affected the reliability of the evidence obtained; that evidence is exclusively exculpatory and is essential to supporting the accused persons’ plea of innocence; the accused persons, having been duly informed of the infringement committed in the taking of that evidence, expressly state, after consulting their defence counsel, that they wish to use the evidence?










2.


Is an interpretation of national law to the effect that the court, on finding that the use of certain evidence may not be permissible on account of breaches of procedure committed while that evidence was being taken, or that its use is not permissible on account of such breaches, informs the accused persons thereof so that they can prepare their defence accordingly, compatible with Article 7(2) and (3) of Directive 2012/13 (2) and the second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter?






(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(2)  Directive 2012/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 on the right to information in criminal proceedings (OJ 2012 L 142, p. 1).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4573/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)