do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-688/17: Order of the General Court of 15 May 2025 – Hola v SRB
Date: 2025-05-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, aid for restructuring, company in difficulties, credit institution, damages, financial solvency, interest, ownership, right to justice, securities








C_202504322EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4322


11.8.2025






Order of the General Court of 15 May 2025 – Hola v SRB


(Case T-688/17)
                (1)

(C/2025/4322)
Language of the case: Spanish
The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 412, 4.12.2017.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4322/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 14 May 2025
Date: 2025-05-15
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202502314EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2314


15.5.2025






Euro exchange rates (1)


            14 May 2025
         
(C/2025/2314)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1214 




JPY


Japanese yen


164,01 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4592 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84150 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,8540 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9390 




ISK


Iceland króna


145,10 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,5715 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,928 




HUF


Hungarian forint


404,20 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2425 




RON


Romanian leu


5,1043 




TRY


Turkish lira


43,4551 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,7340 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5632 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,7519 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,8869 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4563 




KRW


South Korean won


1 567,22 




ZAR


South African rand


20,4644 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,0794 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


18 542,91 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,8108 




PHP


Philippine peso


62,640 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


37,315 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,2927 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,7282 




INR


Indian rupee


95,7558 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2314/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-686/17: Order of the General Court of 15 May 2025 – Policlínico Centro Médico de Seguros and Medicina Asturiana v SRB
Date: 2025-05-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, aid for restructuring, bond, company in difficulties, credit institution, damages, financial solvency, ownership








C_202504321EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4321


11.8.2025






Order of the General Court of 15 May 2025 – Policlínico Centro Médico de Seguros and Medicina Asturiana v SRB


(Case T-686/17)
                (1)

(C/2025/4321)
Language of the case: Spanish
The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 424, 11.12.2017.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4321/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-685/17: Order of the General Court of 15 May 2025 – Miralla Inversiones v SRB
Date: 2025-05-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, abuse of power, access to information, aid for restructuring, company in difficulties, credit institution, damages, financial solvency, ownership, right to justice








C_202504320EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4320


11.8.2025






Order of the General Court of 15 May 2025 – Miralla Inversiones v SRB


(Case T-685/17)
                (1)

(C/2025/4320)
Language of the case: Spanish
The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 424, 11.12.2017.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4320/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-100/24, bonprix: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 May 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof – Germany) – Verbraucherzentrale Hamburg e.V. v bonprix Handelsgesellschaft mbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Electronic commerce – Directive 2000/31/EC – Commercial communications – Article 6(c) – Concept of promotional offers – Online advertising setting out a specific payment arrangement – Purchase on invoice involving a deferral of payment of the sales price – Information on the need for a prior assessment of the consumer’s creditworthiness only during the online ordering process)
Date: 2025-05-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: advertising, consumer protection, contract terms, credit rating, deadline for payment, electronic commerce, invoicing, purchase, sales promotion








C_202503491EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3491


7.7.2025






Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 May 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof – Germany) – Verbraucherzentrale Hamburg e.V. v bonprix Handelsgesellschaft mbH


(Case C-100/24,
                (1)
bonprix)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Electronic commerce - Directive 2000/31/EC - Commercial communications - Article 6(c) - Concept of ‘promotional offers’ - Online advertising setting out a specific payment arrangement - Purchase on invoice involving a deferral of payment of the sales price - Information on the need for a prior assessment of the consumer’s creditworthiness only during the online ordering process)
(C/2025/3491)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Verbraucherzentrale Hamburg e.V.

Defendant: bonprix Handelsgesellschaft mbH

Operative part of the judgment

Article 6(c) of Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (‘Directive on electronic commerce’)
must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of ‘promotional offer’, within the meaning of that provision, covers an advertising message appearing on the website of an undertaking active in online trading and referring to a particular payment arrangement, in so far as that undertaking procures for the recipient of that message an advantage which is objective, certain and capable of influencing his or her behaviour in the choice of goods or services.


(1)  OJ C, C/2024/3152.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3491/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-731/17: Order of the General Court of 15 May 2025 – Escribà Serra and Others v SRB
Date: 2025-05-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, abuse of power, aid for restructuring, bond, company in difficulties, credit institution, damages, interest, investment, ownership








C_202504326EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4326


11.8.2025






Order of the General Court of 15 May 2025 – Escribà Serra and Others v SRB


(Case T-731/17)
                (1)

(C/2025/4326)
Language of the case: Spanish
The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 22, 22.1.2018.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4326/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-431/20: Order of the General Court of 15 May 2025 – UniCredit Bank v SRB (2020 ex ante contributions) (Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2020 ex ante contributions – Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Action manifestly well founded – Limitation of the temporal effects of the order)
Date: 2025-05-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank, bank resolution, company in difficulties, financing method, financing plan








C_202504301EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4301


11.8.2025






Order of the General Court of 15 May 2025 – UniCredit Bank v SRB (2020 ex ante contributions)


(Case T-431/20)
                (1)

(Economic and monetary union - Banking union - Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Single Resolution Fund (SRF) - Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2020 
ex ante
 contributions - Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 - Action manifestly well founded - Limitation of the temporal effects of the order)
(C/2025/4301)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: UniCredit Bank GmbH, formerly UniCredit Bank AG (Munich, Germany) (represented by: F. Schäfer, H. Großerichter, F. Kruis and N. Bartmann, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: C. Flynn and D. Ceran, acting as Agents, and by G. Coppo, S. Reinart and K. Bongs, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Decision SRB/ES/2022/80 of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 7 December 2022, withdrawing Decision SRB/ES/2020/24 of the SRB of 15 April 2020, on the calculation of the 2020 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRF), in so far as it concerns the institutions mentioned in Annex I to this Decision, and recalculating the 2020 ex ante contributions to the SRF of these institutions, to the extent that it concerns the applicant.

Operative part of the order







1.


Decision SRB/ES/2022/80 of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 7 December 2022 on the calculation of the 2020 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRF) is annulled in so far as it concerns UniCredit Bank GmbH, formerly UniCredit Bank AG.










2.


The effects of Decision SRB/ES/2022/80 in so far as it concerns UniCredit Bank, formerly UniCredit Bank are maintained until the SRB has taken the measures necessary to implement the present order, which must occur within a reasonable period that cannot exceed six months from the day on which the present order becomes final.










3.


The SRB shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by UniCredit Bank, formerly UniCredit.






(1)  
            OJ C 279, 24.8.2020.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4301/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-714/17: Order of the General Court of 15 May 2025 – Aeris Invest v SRB
Date: 2025-05-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, aid for restructuring, bond, company in difficulties, credit institution, damages, financial solvency, ownership








C_202504325EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4325


11.8.2025






Order of the General Court of 15 May 2025 – Aeris Invest v SRB


(Case T-714/17)
                (1)

(C/2025/4325)
Language of the case: Spanish
The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 437, 18.12.2017.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4325/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-414/23, Metsä Fibre: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 May 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Helsingin hallinto-oikeus – Finland) – Metsä Fibre Oy (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading – Union Registry – Regulation (EU) No 389/2013 – Record of a surrender of such allowances in that registry – Finality of transactions – Article 40 – Reversal of finalised processes – Article 70 – Surrender under a provision of EU law subsequently invalidated by the Court of Justice – Impossibility, for the operator, to recover the allowances concerned for the period in question – Validity)
Date: 2025-05-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Emissions Trading Scheme, EU emission allowance, greenhouse gas, industrial pollution, tradeable emission permit








C_202503484EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3484


7.7.2025






Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 May 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Helsingin hallinto-oikeus – Finland) – Metsä Fibre Oy


(Case C-414/23,
                (1)
Metsä Fibre)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading - Union Registry - Regulation (EU) No 389/2013 - Record of a surrender of such allowances in that registry - Finality of transactions - Article 40 - Reversal of finalised processes - Article 70 - Surrender under a provision of EU law subsequently invalidated by the Court of Justice - Impossibility, for the operator, to recover the allowances concerned for the period in question - Validity)
(C/2025/3484)
Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Helsingin hallinto-oikeus

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Metsä Fibre Oy

Intervening party: Energiavirasto

Operative part of the judgment

The examination of the first question referred has disclosed no factor of such a kind as to affect the validity of the provisions of Articles 40 and 70 of Commission Regulation (EU) No 389/2013 of 2 May 2013 establishing a Union Registry pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Decisions No 280/2004/EC and No 406/2009/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Commission Regulations (EU) No 920/2010 and No 1193/2011, regarding the final and irrevocable nature of the transactions and the time frames for their reversal.


(1)  
            OJ C 338, 25.9.2025.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3484/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
C-717/23, Bundesminister für Gesundheit: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 May 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof – Austria) – Bundesminister für Soziales, Gesundheit, Pflege und Konsumentenschutz v MM (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products – Directive 2014/40/EU – Article 2(40) – Concept of placing on the market – Article 23(2) – Enforcement – Scope – Placing on the market of tobacco products the packaging of which includes non-compliant elements – Supply of tobacco products by a wholesaler to a retail outlet – Fine imposed on the managing director of a company acting as a wholesaler)
Date: 2025-05-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative sanction, approximation of laws, managing director, market approval, retail trade, supply, tobacco, tobacco industry, wholesale trade








C_202503486EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3486


7.7.2025






Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 May 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof – Austria) – Bundesminister für Soziales, Gesundheit, Pflege und Konsumentenschutz v MM


(C-717/23,
                (1)
Bundesminister für Gesundheit)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Approximation of laws - Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products - Directive 2014/40/EU - Article 2(40) - Concept of ‘placing on the market’ - Article 23(2) - Enforcement - Scope - Placing on the market of tobacco products the packaging of which includes non-compliant elements - Supply of tobacco products by a wholesaler to a retail outlet - Fine imposed on the managing director of a company acting as a wholesaler)
(C/2025/3486)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Bundesminister für Soziales, Gesundheit, Pflege und Konsumentenschutz

Defendant: MM

Interested party: Bezirkshauptmannschaft Grieskirchen

Operative part of the judgment

Article 23(2) of Directive 2014/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products and repealing Directive 2001/37/EC, read in conjunction with Article 2(40) of Directive 2014/40,
must be interpreted as meaning that the obligation of the Member States to ensure that tobacco products whose unit packet labelling infringes the requirements relating to their presentation are not placed on the market is not limited to the stage at which those products are supplied by a retail outlet to the consumer.


(1)  OJ C, C/2024/1840.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3486/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11965 – BCI / BROOKFIELD / CGM GROSVENOR / SHEPHERDS FLAT WIND)
Date: 2025-05-15
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electrical energy, electricity supply, energy production, investment company, merger control, wind energy








C_202502937EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2937


21.5.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11965 – BCI / BROOKFIELD / CGM GROSVENOR / SHEPHERDS FLAT WIND)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/2937)

On 15 May 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M11965. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2937/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-312/25: Action brought on 15 May 2025 – JE v Commission
Date: 2025-05-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, harassment at work, indemnification, legality, rights of the defence, staff assessment, staff regulations (EU)








C_202504177EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4177


4.8.2025






Action brought on 15 May 2025 – JE v Commission


(Case T-312/25)

(C/2025/4177)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: JE (represented by: N. Flandin, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare the application admissible and founded;
consequently,










—


annul the applicant’s appraisal report of 2023;










—


subsidiarily annul the 2023 appraisal report in so far it contains the contested comments;










—


together with, and in so far as necessary, annul the defendant’s decision of 5 February 2025 rejecting the complaint lodged by the applicant against the contested appraisal report;










—


order the compensation of the damages suffered by the applicant;










—


order the defendant to pay all the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on six pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging manifest errors of assessment in the contested appraisal report and in the contested decision.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging a violation of Article 41(1) of the Charter, a violation of the principle of good administration and a violation of the right of defence and principle of impartiality.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging a violation of Article 5, of Article 1.3 of annex I and of Article 7(3) of the Commission Decision of 16 December 2013 laying down general provisions for implementing Article 43 Staff Regulations and Article 44(1) Staff Regulations.










4.


Fourth plea in law, alleging a violation of the duty of care and of Article 41(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU.










5.


Fifth plea in law, alleging an illegality of the contested comments due to the situation of harassment.










6.


Sixth plea in law, alleging a breach of the duty to state reasons, a breach of Article 41(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU and a breach of Article 2(3) of the Commission Decision of 16 December 2013 laying down general provisions for implementing Article 43 Staff Regulations and Article 44(1) Staff Regulations.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4177/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-791/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 May 2025 – Sberbank v Commission and SRB (Appeal – Economic and Monetary Union – Banking union – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail – Adoption of a resolution scheme by the Single Resolution Board (SRB) – Preparatory act – Act not open to challenge – Endorsement decision by the Commission – Lack of direct concern – Inadmissibility)
Date: 2025-05-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU banking union, aid to undertakings, bank, bank resolution, company in difficulties, shareholder








C_202503488EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3488


7.7.2025






Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 May 2025 – Sberbank v Commission and SRB


(Case C-791/23 P)
                (1)

(Appeal - Economic and Monetary Union - Banking union - Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 - Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail - Adoption of a resolution scheme by the Single Resolution Board (SRB) - Preparatory act - Act not open to challenge - Endorsement decision by the Commission - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility)
(C/2025/3488)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Sberbank of Russia PAO (represented by: M. Campa, M. Moretto, M. Pirovano, D. Rovetta and V. Villante, avvocati)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: P. Messina and D. Triantafyllou, acting as Agents), Single Resolution Board (SRB) (represented by: H. Ehlers, L. Forestier and J. Rius Riu, acting as Agents, and by M. Françon and C. Vannini, avocats)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Sberbank of Russia PAO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission and the Single Resolution Board (SRB).






(1)  OJ C C/2024/2284.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3488/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)