do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Calls for proposals and related activities under the work programme for 2025-2027 (Work Programme 2025) under Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021-2027)
Date: 2025-05-15
Institutions: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, European Commission
Subjects: EU programme, Framework Programme for Research and Development, action programme, call for proposals, innovation, research and development, scientific research








C_202502795EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2795


15.5.2025






Calls for proposals and related activities under the work programme for 2025-2027 (‘Work Programme 2025’) under Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021-2027)
(C/2025/2795)

Notice is hereby given of the launch of calls for proposals and related activities under the ‘Work Programme 2025’ under Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021-2027).
The Commission has adopted by Decision C(2025) 2779 of 14 May 2025 the above mentioned work programme, which includes calls for proposals and related activities.
These are subject to the availability of the appropriations provided for in the draft general budget of the Union for the corresponding years by the budgetary authority or, if the budget for a specific year is not adopted, as provided for in the system of provisional twelfths.
The Commission reserves its right to cancel or make corrigendum to the actions.
This work programme, including deadlines and budgets for the actions, are available through the European Commission Funding & Tenders Portal website (https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/programmes/horizon) along with information on the modalities of the actions, and guidance for applicants on how to submit proposals. All this information will be updated as necessary on the same Funding & Tenders Portal.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2795/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
C-487/24 P: Judgment of the Court (Eight Chamber) of 15 May 2025 – Kiene and Others v Parliament and Council (Appeal – Environment – Regulation (EU) 2023/851 – Performance standards for carbon dioxide emissions – New passenger cars – Taking into account emissions outside the use of the vehicle – Carbon dioxide-neutral synthetic fuels – Action for annulment – Condition that the applicant must be individually concerned by the contested measure – Lack – Complete system of legal remedies – Fundamental right to effective judicial protection)
Date: 2025-05-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: environmental protection, environmental standard, fuel, greenhouse gas, motor car, motor fuel, motor vehicle pollution, renewable fuel, right to an effective remedy








C_202503492EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3492


7.7.2025






Judgment of the Court (Eight Chamber) of 15 May 2025 – Kiene and Others v Parliament and Council


(C-487/24 P
                (1)
)

(Appeal - Environment - Regulation (EU) 2023/851 - Performance standards for carbon dioxide emissions - New passenger cars - Taking into account emissions outside the use of the vehicle - Carbon dioxide-neutral synthetic fuels - Action for annulment - Condition that the applicant must be individually concerned by the contested measure - Lack - Complete system of legal remedies - Fundamental right to effective judicial protection)
(C/2025/3492)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellants: Lorenz Kiene, Classic Tankstellen GmbH & Co. KG, eFuel GmbH, eFuel Projektentwicklung GmbH (represented by: A. Dlouhy, E. Macher and M. Soppe, Rechtsanwälte)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: D. Kuzmienko and L. Taïeb, Council of the European Union (represented by: N. Brzezinski and L. Hamtcheva, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal.










2.


Orders Mr Lorenz Kiene, Classic Tankstellen GmbH & Co. KG, eFuel GmbH and eFuel Projektentwicklung GmbH to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C, C/2024/5311.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3492/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-331/25, Menhoff: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep (Netherlands) lodged on 15 May 2025 – RV v Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank
Date: 2025-05-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: health insurance, private insurance, social-security harmonisation








C_202504735EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4735


8.9.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep (Netherlands) lodged on 15 May 2025 – RV v Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank


(Case C-331/25, Menhoff
                (1)
)

(C/2025/4735)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Centrale Raad van Beroep

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: RV

Defendant: Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank

Question referred

Must Article 3(1) of Regulation No 883/2004, (2) read in conjunction with Article 1(l) thereof, be interpreted as meaning that German private health insurance with a basic rate, such as is at issue here, must be regarded as legislation governing sickness benefits, with the result that that health insurance falls within the material scope of that regulation?


(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(2)  Regulation (EC) No. 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems (OJ 2004, L 166, p. 1).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4735/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-793/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 May 2025 – Sberbank v SRB (Appeal – Economic and Monetary Union – Banking Union – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail – Decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) not to adopt a resolution scheme – Shareholders – Lack of direct concern)
Date: 2025-05-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU banking union, aid to undertakings, bank, bank resolution, company in difficulties, shareholder








C_202503490EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3490


7.7.2025






Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 May 2025 – Sberbank v SRB


(Case C-793/23 P)
                (1)

(Appeal - Economic and Monetary Union - Banking Union - Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 - Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail - Decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) not to adopt a resolution scheme - Shareholders - Lack of direct concern)
(C/2025/3490)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Sberbank of Russia PAO (represented by: M. Campa, M. Moretto, M. Pirovano, D. Rovetta and V. Villante, avvocati)

Other party to the proceedings: Single Resolution Board (SRB) (represented by: H. Ehlers, L. Forestier and J. Rius Riu, acting as Agents, and by M. Françon and C. Vannini, avocats)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Sberbank of Russia PAO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Single Resolution Board (SRB).






(1)  OJ C C/2024/2286.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3490/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-680/17: Order of the General Court of 15 May 2025 – Helibética v SRB
Date: 2025-05-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, aid for restructuring, bond, company in difficulties, credit institution, damages, financial solvency, ownership








C_202504319EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4319


11.8.2025






Order of the General Court of 15 May 2025 – Helibética v SRB


(Case T-680/17)
                (1)

(C/2025/4319)
Language of the case: Spanish
The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 424, 11.12.2017.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4319/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-707/17: Order of the General Court of 15 May 2025 – Euroways v SRB
Date: 2025-05-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, abuse of power, aid for restructuring, company in difficulties, credit institution, damages, financial solvency, ownership, right to justice








C_202504324EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4324


11.8.2025






Order of the General Court of 15 May 2025 – Euroways v SRB


(Case T-707/17)
                (1)

(C/2025/4324)
Language of the case: Spanish
The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 424, 11.12.2017.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4324/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
State aid – Decision to close an existing aid case as a result of acceptance of appropriate measures by an EFTA State
Date: 2025-05-15
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: European Economic Area, Iceland, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid, corporation tax, tax exemption








C_202502774EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2774


15.5.2025






State aid – Decision to close an existing aid case as a result of acceptance of appropriate measures by an EFTA State
(C/2025/2774)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority has proposed appropriate measures, which were accepted by the Icelandic authority, on the following state aid measure:






Date of adoption of the decision


29 January 2025




Case No


81738




Decision No


005/25/COL




EFTA State


Iceland




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


Sorpa bs.




Legal basis


The Icelandic Income Tax Act No 90/2003




Type of measure


No State aid




Other information


The EFTA Surveillance Authority (ESA) has proposed appropriate measures to abolish existing State aid in the form of an income tax exemption enjoyed by Sorpa bs. according to the Income Tax Act No 90/2003. The Icelandic authorities accepted the appropriate measures, and ESA records the acceptance in the present Decision.




The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2774/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-689/17: Order of the General Court of 15 May 2025 – Top Cable v SRB
Date: 2025-05-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, aid for restructuring, company in difficulties, credit institution, damages, financial solvency, interest, ownership, right to justice, securities








C_202504323EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4323


11.8.2025






Order of the General Court of 15 May 2025 – Top Cable v SRB


(Case T-689/17)
                (1)

(C/2025/4323)
Language of the case: Spanish
The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 412, 4.12.2017.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4323/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-782/23, Tauritus: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 May 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas – Lithuania) – Tauritus UAB v Muitinės departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Union Customs Code – Method for determining the customs value – Article 70 – Transaction value – Goods imported on the basis of a provisional purchase price – Definitive price dependent on various factors not known on the date of acceptance of the customs declaration)
Date: 2025-05-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: customs, customs formalities, customs valuation, economic value, export (EU), free circulation, goods and services, import (EU), prices








C_202503487EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3487


7.7.2025






Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 May 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas – Lithuania) – ‘Tauritus’ UAB v Muitinės departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos


(Case C-782/23,
                (1)
Tauritus)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Customs union - Union Customs Code - Method for determining the customs value - Article 70 - Transaction value - Goods imported on the basis of a provisional purchase price - Definitive price dependent on various factors not known on the date of acceptance of the customs declaration)
(C/2025/3487)
Language of the case: Lithuanian

Referring court

Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant:
            ‘Tauritus’ UAB

Defendant: Muitinės departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos

Intervening party: Kauno teritorinė muitinė

Operative part of the judgment

Article 70 of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code
must be interpreted as meaning that, where, at the time when goods are imported into the customs territory of the European Union, only their provisional price, which appears on a pro forma invoice, is known, with the sales contract stipulating that their final price will subsequently be fixed by a final invoice on the basis of certain predetermined objective factors the value of which is beyond the control of the parties and unknown to them at the time of acceptance of the customs declaration, such as an average of the exchange rate of certain currencies or of the price of certain products in a given period, the customs value of those goods must be determined by applying the transaction value method provided for in that article, by using, as a general rule, the simplified customs declaration procedure provided for in Articles 166 and 167 of that regulation.


(1)  OJ C, C/2024/1546.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3487/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11980 – PSPIB / CPPIB / CINTRA / 407)
Date: 2025-05-15
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Canada, civil engineering, economic concentration, investment company, land transport, merger control, pension scheme, provision of services, transport infrastructure








C_202502989EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2989


26.5.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11980 – PSPIB / CPPIB / CINTRA / 407)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/2989)

On 15 May 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M11980. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2989/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-792/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 May 2025 – Sberbank v Commission and SRB (Appeal – Economic and Monetary Union – Banking union – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail – Adoption of a resolution scheme by the Single Resolution Board (SRB) – Preparatory act – Act not open to challenge – Endorsement decision by the Commission – Lack of direct concern – Inadmissibility)
Date: 2025-05-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU banking union, aid to undertakings, bank, bank resolution, company in difficulties








C_202503489EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3489


7.7.2025






Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 May 2025 – Sberbank v Commission and SRB


(Case C-792/23 P)
                (1)

(Appeal - Economic and Monetary Union - Banking union - Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 - Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Resolution procedure applicable where an entity is failing or is likely to fail - Adoption of a resolution scheme by the Single Resolution Board (SRB) - Preparatory act - Act not open to challenge - Endorsement decision by the Commission - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility)
(C/2025/3489)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Sberbank of Russia PAO (represented by: M. Campa, M. Moretto, M. Pirovano, D. Rovetta and V. Villante, avvocati)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: P. Messina and D. Triantafyllou, acting as Agents), Single Resolution Board (SRB) (represented by: H. Ehlers, L. Forestier and J. Rius Riu, acting as Agents, and by M. Françon and C. Vannini, avocats)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Sberbank of Russia PAO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission and the Single Resolution Board (SRB).






(1)  OJ C C/2024/2285.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3489/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1774 of 13 March 2024 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying ICT risk management tools, methods, processes, and policies and the simplified ICT risk management framework (OJ L, 2024/1774, 25.6.2024)
Date: 2025-05-15
Institutions: Directorate-General for Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union, European Commission
Subjects: computer crime, digital single market, digitisation, financial services, financial supervision, financial technology, information security, information technology, risk management, technical standard








L_202590420EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2025/90420


15.5.2025






Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1774 of 13 March 2024 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying ICT risk management tools, methods, processes, and policies and the simplified ICT risk management framework

(
Official Journal of the European Union L, 2024/1774, 25 June 2024
)


On page 23, in Article 22 (‘ICT-related incident management policy’), first subparagraph, point (d):
for:






‘(d)


retain all evidence relating to ICT-related incidents for a period that shall be no longer than necessary for the purposes for which the data are collected, commensurate with the criticality of the affected business functions, supporting processes, and ICT and information assets, in accordance with Article 15 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1772 (12) and with any applicable retention requirement pursuant to Union law;’,




read:






‘(d)


retain all evidence relating to ICT-related incidents for a period that shall be no longer than necessary for the purposes for which the data are collected, commensurate with the criticality of the affected business functions, supporting processes, and ICT and information assets, in accordance with Article 8(2) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1772 (12) and with any applicable retention requirement pursuant to Union law;’.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2024/1774/corrigendum/2025-05-15/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006)
Date: 2025-05-15
Institutions: Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, European Commission
Subjects: chemical product, chromium, firearms and munitions, health control, health risk, market approval, marketing standard, metal coating, oxide








C_202502615EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2615


15.5.2025






Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)


(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006
                (1)
)


(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/2615)


Decision granting an authorisation













Reference of the decision (2)



Date of decision


Substance name


Holder of the authorisation


Authorisation number


Authorised use


Date of expiry of review period


Reasons for the decision




C(2025) 2701


8 May 2025


chromium trioxide (EC No 215-607-8; CAS No 1333-82-0)


Fabbrica d’armi Pietro Beretta SPA, Via Pietro Beretta 18, 25063 Gardone Valtrompia (BS), Italy


REACH/25/23/0
REACH/25/23/1


Chromium trioxide based functional plating of gun barrel bores and auxiliary parts for assault rifles, carbines and pistols for non-civilian uses
Chromium trioxide based functional chrome plating of gun barrel bores and auxiliary parts for semi-automatic shotguns, over/under, side-by-side shotguns, pistols and carbines for civilian uses


13 April 2034


In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies.






(1)  
            OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: Authorisation (europa.eu)



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2615/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)