do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-419/20: Order of the General Court of 14 May 2025 – Deutsche Kreditbank v SRB (2020 ex ante contributions) (Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2020 ex ante contributions – Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Action manifestly well founded – Limitation of the temporal effects of the order)
Date: 2025-05-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank, bank resolution, company in difficulties, financing method, financing plan








C_202504299EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4299


11.8.2025






Order of the General Court of 14 May 2025 – Deutsche Kreditbank v SRB (2020 ex ante contributions)


(Case T-419/20)
                (1)

(Economic and monetary union - Banking union - Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Single Resolution Fund (SRF) - Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2020 
ex ante
 contributions - Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 - Action manifestly well founded - Limitation of the temporal effects of the order)
(C/2025/4299)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Deutsche Kreditbank AG (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: H. Berger and M. Weber, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: T. Wittenberg and D. Ceran, acting as Agents, and by H.-G. Kamann, V. Wettner and F. Louis, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and A. Steiblytė, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Decision SRB/ES/2022/80 of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 7 December 2022, withdrawing Decision SRB/ES/2020/24 of the SRB of 15 April 2020, on the calculation of the 2020 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRF), in so far as it concerns the institutions mentioned in Annex I to this Decision, and recalculating the 2020 ex ante contributions to the SRF of these institutions, to the extent that it concerns the applicant.

Operative part of the order







1.


Decision SRB/ES/2022/80 of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 7 December 2022 on the calculation of the 2020 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRF) is annulled in so far as it concerns Deutsche Kreditbank AG.










2.


The effects of Decision SRB/ES/2022/80 in so far as it concerns Deutsche Kreditbank are maintained until the SRB has taken the measures necessary to implement the present order, which must occur within a reasonable period that cannot exceed six months from the day on which the present order becomes final.










3.


The SRB shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Deutsche Kreditbank.










4.


The European Commission shall bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 279, 24.8.2020.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4299/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Joined Cases T-362/21 and T-363/21: Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2025 – Telly and Česká asociace satelitních operátorů v Commission (Actions for annulment – State aid – Digital terrestrial television (DTT) – Extension by the Czech Republic of frequency usage rights allocated to certain operators for the broadcasting of DTT – Decision finding no State aid – Provider of satellite and internet television services – Trade association – Locus standi – No individual concern – Non-regulatory act – Inadmissibility)
Date: 2025-05-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Czechia, Internet, State aid, control of State aid, right of action, satellite communications, television, transmission network, waveband








C_202503408EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3408


30.6.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2025 – Telly and Česká asociace satelitních operátorů v Commission


(Joined Cases T-362/21 and T-363/21)
                (1)

(Actions for annulment - State aid - Digital terrestrial television (DTT) - Extension by the Czech Republic of frequency usage rights allocated to certain operators for the broadcasting of DTT - Decision finding no State aid - Provider of satellite and internet television services - Trade association - Locus standi - No individual concern - Non-regulatory act - Inadmissibility)
(C/2025/3408)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Telly s. r. o. (Prague, Czech Republic), Česká asociace satelitních operátorů z. s. (Prague) (represented by R. Kubáč, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Nicolae and C. Kovács, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Czech Republic (represented by: M. Smolek, J. Vláčil, J. Očková and L. Halajová, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their actions under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of Commission Decision C(2021) 1601 final of 15 March 2021 on State aid SA.55805 (2020/FC) – Czech Republic – Extension of digital terrestrial television (DTT) network operators’ frequency licenses (OJ 2021 C 177, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the actions as inadmissible;










2.


Orders Telly s. r. o. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in Case T-362/21;










3.


Orders Česká asociace satelitních operátorů z. s. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission in Case T-363/21;










4.


Orders the Czech Republic to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 368, 13.9.2021.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3408/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-4/24: Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2025 – LA v Commission (Civil Service – Officials – Recruitment – Open competition EPSO/AD/371/19 – Decision not to include the applicant on the reserve list – Equal treatment – Legitimate expectations – Obligation to state reasons)
Date: 2025-05-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: administrator, competition (EU), equal treatment, recruitment, scientific profession, scientific research, staff regulations (EU)








C_202503521EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3521


7.7.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2025 – LA v Commission


(Case T-4/24)
                (1)

(Civil Service - Officials - Recruitment - Open competition EPSO/AD/371/19 - Decision not to include the applicant on the reserve list - Equal treatment - Legitimate expectations - Obligation to state reasons)
(C/2025/3521)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: LA (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Bruti Liberati, acting as Agent)

Re:

By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the selection board of 28 March 2023 rejecting her request for review of the decision not to include her on the reserve list for open competition EPSO/AD/371/19.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action.










2.


Orders each party to bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/1705, 4.3.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3521/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-283/24: Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2025 – Sumol + Compal Marcas v EUIPO – Bosca Cora (It’s B) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark It’s B – Earlier national figurative mark B – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-05-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, alcoholic beverage, non-alcoholic beverage, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202503410EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3410


30.6.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2025 – Sumol + Compal Marcas v EUIPO – Bosca Cora (It’s B)


(Case T-283/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark It’s B - Earlier national figurative mark B - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/3410)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Sumol + Compal Marcas S. A. (Carnaxide, Portugal) (represented by: R. Milhões, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Ringelhann, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Bosca Cora SpA (Canelli, Italy) (represented by: M. Baccarelli, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 27 March 2024 (Case R 940/2023-4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Sumol + Compal Marcas S. A., in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay those incurred by Bosca Cora SpA;










3.


Declares that the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/4106, 8.7.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3410/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-401/24: Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2025 – BDSwiss v EUIPO (BDSwiss) (EU trade mark – EU word mark BDSwiss – Refusal to forward the international application to the International Bureau of WIPO – Article 184(5)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Concept of real and effective industrial or commercial establishment – Article 2(1)(ii) of the Protocol relating to the Madrid Agreement)
Date: 2025-05-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, broker, financial services, option contract, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202503413EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3413


30.6.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2025 – BDSwiss v EUIPO (BDSwiss)


(Case T-401/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - EU word mark BDSwiss - Refusal to forward the international application to the International Bureau of WIPO - Article 184(5)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Concept of ‘real and effective industrial or commercial establishment’ - Article 2(1)(ii) of the Protocol relating to the Madrid Agreement)
(C/2025/3413)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: BDSwiss AG (Zug, Switzerland) (represented by: J.-A. Fortmeyer, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Stoyanova-Valchanova, acting as Agent)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 22 May 2024 (Case R 206/2024-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders each party to bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/5829, 7.10.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3413/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-418/24: Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2025 – Biogena v EUIPO – ACRAF (BIOGENA MOMENTS) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark BIOGENA MOMENTS – Earlier national word mark MOMENT – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-05-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, baby food, dietary product, food additive, powdered milk, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202503414EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3414


30.6.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2025 – Biogena v EUIPO – ACRAF (BIOGENA MOMENTS)


(Case T-418/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Word mark BIOGENA MOMENTS - Earlier national word mark MOMENT - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/3414)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Biogena GmbH & Co. KG (Salzburg, Austria) (represented by: I. Schiffer, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Aziende Chimiche Riunite Angelini Francesco SpA (ACRAF SpA) (Rome, Italy) (represented by: R. Almaraz Palmero, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks, in essence, the annulment and alteration of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 11 June 2024 (Case R 1978/2023-4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Biogena GmbH & Co. KG to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Aziende Chimiche Riunite Angelini Francesco SpA (ACRAF SpA);










3.


Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/5836, 7.10.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3414/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-332/25, Friends of the Irish Environment: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Court of Appeal (Ireland) made on 14 May 2025 – Friends of the Irish Environment CLG v Government of Ireland, Minister for Agriculture Food and the Marine, Ireland, Attorney General
Date: 2025-05-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Ireland, biotope, development policy, environmental impact, environmental law, plan, protected area








C_202504570EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4570


25.8.2025






Reference for a preliminary ruling from Court of Appeal (Ireland) made on 14 May 2025 – Friends of the Irish Environment CLG v Government of Ireland, Minister for Agriculture Food and the Marine, Ireland, Attorney General


(Case C-332/25, Friends of the Irish Environment)

(C/2025/4570)
Language of the case: English

Referring court

Court of Appeal

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Friends of the Irish Environment CLG

Defendant(s): Government of Ireland, Minister for Agriculture Food and the Marine, Ireland, Attorney General

Questions referred







1.


Is a high-level strategic policy such as FV2030 capable of constituting or being deemed a ‘plan or project’ within the meaning of Article 6(3) of the Habitats Directive (1)?
In this regard the key characteristics of the policy are that it was adopted on a voluntary basis by a stakeholder committee; it is formally supported by a decision of the Government; it does not authorise or limit any activity; it does not have any mandatory or binding effects on downstream decision makers but may have some influence in that it may be considered by such decision makers; it does not set criteria by reference to which development consent decisions will be made; it does not set criteria by reference to which other plans or programmes will be adopted.










2.


If the answer to question 1 is ‘Yes’, can a policy such as FV2030 constitute a plan or programme within the meaning of Article 6(3) of the Habitats Directive if it does not contain measures of adequate specificity to allow them to be quantified and assessed and it is not possible to identify any specific Natura 2000 site or sites which might be affected by its implementation so as to enable an assessment to be carried out by reference to the site(s) conservation measures?










3.


If the answer to question 2 is ‘Yes’, is it sufficient for an appropriate assessment of such policy to identify generally the environmental risks posed by activities coming within the sector covered by the policy and the effects those activities might have generally on protected habitat types and species in Natura 2000 sites in Ireland without identifying specific risks that might impact upon individually identified sites?






(1)  Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora; (OJ 1992 L 206, p.7).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4570/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-332/24: Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2025 – Karneolis v EUIPO – Match Group (KinkySwipe) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark KinkySwipe – Earlier national word mark SWIPE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-05-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, provision of services, registered trade mark, social media, trade-mark law








C_202503412EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3412


30.6.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2025 – Karneolis v EUIPO – Match Group (KinkySwipe)


(Case T-332/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark KinkySwipe - Earlier national word mark SWIPE - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/3412)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Karneolis LTD (Nicosia, Cyprus) (represented by: E. Henao Hoyos, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Match Group LLC (Dallas, Texas, United States) (represented by: J. Güell Serra, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 2 May 2024 (Case R 1430/2023-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Karneolis LTD to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Match Group, LLC;










3.


Declares that the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/4974, 19.8.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3412/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1184/23: Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2025 – LD v Commission (Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Open competition EPSO/AD/371/19 – Decision not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list – Rules on languages – Plea of illegality – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons – Legitimate expectations)
Date: 2025-05-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: administrator, competition (EU), equal treatment, linguistic discrimination, recruitment, scientific profession, scientific research, staff regulations (EU)








C_202503520EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3520


7.7.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2025 – LD v Commission


(Case T-1184/23)
                (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Recruitment - Open competition EPSO/AD/371/19 - Decision not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list - Rules on languages - Plea of illegality - Equal treatment - Obligation to state reasons - Legitimate expectations)
(C/2025/3520)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: LD (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Hohenecker and A. Sipos, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Selection Board of 22 May 2023 to dismiss her request for review of the decision not to include her on the reserve list for open competition EPSO/AD/371/19.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/1425, 19.2.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3520/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Withdrawal of notification of a concentration (Case M.11751 – TPG / TECHEM)
Date: 2025-05-14
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: consultancy, economic concentration, information system, information technology, investment company, measuring equipment, merger control, provision of services, software, water analysis








C_202502758EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2758


14.5.2025






Withdrawal of notification of a concentration
(Case M.11751 – TPG / TECHEM)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/2758)

On 14 March 2025, the European Commission received notification (1) of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) (‘Merger Regulation’).
On 7 May 2025, the notifying party informed the Commission that it withdrew its notification.


(1)  
            OJ C, C/2025/1838, 21.3.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1838/oj.

(2)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2758/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-427/20: Order of the General Court of 14 May 2025 – Max Heinr. Sutor v SRB (2020 ex ante contributions) (Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2020 ex ante contributions – Obligation to state reasons – Plea of illegality – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Date: 2025-05-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank, bank resolution, company in difficulties, financing method, financing plan








C_202504300EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4300


11.8.2025






Order of the General Court of 14 May 2025 – Max Heinr. Sutor v SRB (2020 ex ante contributions)


(Case T-427/20)
                (1)

(Economic and monetary union - Banking union - Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Single Resolution Fund (SRF) - Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2020 
ex ante
 contributions - Obligation to state reasons - Plea of illegality - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(C/2025/4300)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Max Heinr. Sutor OHG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: A. Glos, M. Rätz, H.-U. Klöppel and M. Meisgeier, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: C. De Falco and T Wittenberg, acting as Agents, and by B. Meyring, T. Klupsch and S. Ianc, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and A. Steiblytė, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Decision SRB/ES/2022/80 of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 7 December 2022, withdrawing Decision SRB/ES/2020/24 of the SRB of 15 April 2020, on the calculation of the 2020 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund, in so far as it concerns the institutions mentioned in Annex I to this Decision, and recalculating the 2020 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund of these institutions, to the extent that it concerns the applicant.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


Each party shall bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 279, 24.8.2020.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4300/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)