do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-405/20: Order of the General Court of 14 May 2025 – DZ Hyp v SRB (2020 ex ante contributions) (Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2020 ex ante contributions – Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Action manifestly well founded – Limitation of the temporal effects of the order)
Date: 2025-05-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank, bank resolution, company in difficulties, financing method, financing plan








C_202504293EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4293


11.8.2025






Order of the General Court of 14 May 2025 – DZ Hyp v SRB (2020 ex ante contributions)


(Case T-405/20)
                (1)

(Economic and monetary union - Banking union - Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Single Resolution Fund (SRF) - Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2020 
ex ante
 contributions - Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 - Action manifestly well founded - Limitation of the temporal effects of the order)
(C/2025/4293)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: DZ Hyp AG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: H. Berger and M. Weber, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: T. Wittenberg and D. Ceran, acting as Agents, and by H.-G. Kamann, V. Wettner and F. Louis, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and A. Steiblytė, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Decision SRB/ES/2022/80 of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 7 December 2022, withdrawing Decision SRB/ES/2020/24 of the SRB of 15 April 2020, on the calculation of the 2020 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRF), in so far as it concerns the institutions mentioned in Annex I to this Decision, and recalculating the 2020 ex ante contributions to the SRF of these institutions, to the extent that it concerns the applicant.

Operative part of the order







1.


Decision SRB/ES/2022/80 of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 7 December 2022 on the calculation of the 2020 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRF) is annulled in so far as it concerns DZ Hyp AG.










2.


The effects of Decision SRB/ES/2022/80 in so far as it concerns DZ Hyp are maintained until the SRB has taken the measures necessary to implement the present order, which must occur within a reasonable period that cannot exceed six months from the day on which the present order becomes final.










3.


The SRB shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by DZ Hyp.










4.


The European Commission shall bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 271, 17.8.2020.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4293/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.11818 – INTERPARKING / SABA)
Date: 2025-05-14
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, holding company, merger control, parking area, real estate business








C_202502760EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2760


14.5.2025






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.11818 – INTERPARKING / SABA)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/2760)


1.   
On 5 May 2025, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


Interparking S.A. (‘Interparking’, Belgium), controlled by Ageas SA, (Belgium),










—


Saba Infraestructuras, S.A. (‘Saba’, Spain), currently controlled by Criteria, (Spain).




Interparking will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Saba.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:






—


Interparking is the holding of Interparking Group, which is active in the design, construction and management of paid public on-street and off-street car parks. It has a presence in Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania and Spain,










—


Saba is the holding company of Saba Group, which is active in the management of paid public car parks. It has a presence in Andorra, Chile, the Czech Republic, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain and the United Kingdom.






3.   

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.



4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.11818 – INTERPARKING / SABA
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2760/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-411/20: Order of the General Court of 14 May 2025 – Bayerische Landesbank v SRB (2020 ex ante contributions) (Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2020 ex ante contributions – Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Action manifestly well founded – Limitation of the temporal effects of the order)
Date: 2025-05-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank, bank resolution, company in difficulties, financing method, financing plan








C_202504297EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4297


11.8.2025






Order of the General Court of 14 May 2025 – Bayerische Landesbank v SRB


(2020 ex ante contributions)


(Case T-411/20)
                (1)

(Economic and monetary union - Banking union - Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Single Resolution Fund (SRF) - Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2020 
ex ante
 contributions - Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 - Action manifestly well founded - Limitation of the temporal effects of the order)
(C/2025/4297)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Bayerische Landesbank (Munich, Germany) (represented by: H. Berger and M. Weber, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: T. Wittenberg and D. Ceran, acting as Agents, and by H.-G. Kamann, V. Wettner and F. Louis, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and A. Steiblytė, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Decision SRB/ES/2022/80 of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 7 December 2022, withdrawing Decision SRB/ES/2020/24 of the SRB of 15 April 2020, on the calculation of the 2020 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRF), in so far as it concerns the institutions mentioned in Annex I to this Decision, and recalculating the 2020 ex ante contributions to the SRF of these institutions, to the extent that it concerns the applicant.

Operative part of the order







1.


Decision SRB/ES/2022/80 of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 7 December 2022 on the calculation of the 2020 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRF) is annulled in so far as it concerns Bayerische Landesbank.










2.


The effects of Decision SRB/ES/2022/80 in so far as it concerns Bayerische Landesbank are maintained until the SRB has taken the measures necessary to implement the present order, which must occur within a reasonable period that cannot exceed six months from the day on which the present order becomes final.










3.


The SRB shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Bayerische Landesbank.










4.


The European Commission shall bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 271, 17.8.2020.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4297/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-282/24: Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2025 – Sumol + Compal Marcas v EUIPO – Bosca Cora (IT’S B) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark IT’S B – Earlier national figurative mark B – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-05-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, alcoholic beverage, non-alcoholic beverage, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202503409EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3409


30.6.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2025 – Sumol + Compal Marcas v EUIPO – Bosca Cora (IT’S B)


(Case T-282/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark IT’S B - Earlier national figurative mark B - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/3409)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Sumol + Compal Marcas S. A. (Carnaxide, Portugal) (represented by: R. Milhões, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Ringelhann, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Bosca Cora SpA (Canelli, Italy) (represented by: M. Baccarelli, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 27 March 2024 (Case R 939/2023-4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Sumol + Compal Marcas S. A., in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay those incurred by Bosca Cora SpA;










3.


Declares that the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/4105, 8.7.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3409/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-9/24: Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2025 – Zardini v Commission (Civil Service – Officials – Recruitment – Open competition EPSO/AD/371/19 – Decision not to place the applicant’s name on the reserve list – Rules on languages – Plea of illegality – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons – Legitimate expectations)
Date: 2025-05-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: administrator, competition (EU), equal treatment, linguistic discrimination, recruitment, scientific profession, scientific research, staff regulations (EU)








C_202503522EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3522


7.7.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2025 – Zardini v Commission


(Case T-9/24)
                (1)

(Civil Service - Officials - Recruitment - Open competition EPSO/AD/371/19 - Decision not to place the applicant’s name on the reserve list - Rules on languages - Plea of illegality - Equal treatment - Obligation to state reasons - Legitimate expectations)
(C/2025/3522)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Alessandro Zardini (Marano di Valpollicella, Italy) (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Hohenecker and A. Sipos, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the selection board of 22 March 2023 not to include his name on the reserve list for Open Competition EPSO/AD/371/19.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


The action is dismissed;










2.


The parties shall each bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/1707, 4.3.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3522/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1154/23: Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2025 – Taxolutions v EUIPO – Haufe-Lexware (TAXMARC) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark TAXMARC – Earlier EU figurative mark X TAXMAN – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Relevant public – Conceptual similarity)
Date: 2025-05-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, accounting, advertising, business management, consultancy, financial services, information technology industry, registered trade mark, research, trade-mark law








C_202503279EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3279


24.6.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2025 – Taxolutions v EUIPO – Haufe-Lexware (TAXMARC)


(Case T-1154/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark TAXMARC - Earlier EU figurative mark X TAXMAN - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Relevant public - Conceptual similarity)
(C/2025/3279)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Taxolutions BV (Sint-Michielsgestel, Netherlands) (represented by: R. Stoop, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Stoyanova-Valchanova and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Haufe-Lexware GmbH & Co. KG (Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany) (represented by: N. Hebeis, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the partial annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 10 October 2023 (Case R 131/2021-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 10 October 2023 (Case R 131/2021-5) in so far as it dismissed the appeal brought by Taxolutions BV;










2.


Orders EUIPO to pay the costs of the present proceedings;










3.


Orders Haufe-Lexware GmbH & Co. KG to bear its own costs and to pay the costs necessarily incurred by Taxolutions for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/1254, 12.2.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3279/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)