do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT of 7 May 2025 in Case E-28/24 – EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland (Failure by an EFTA State to fulfil its obligations – Failure to implement Directive (EU) 2016/2341 – Activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision)
Date: 2025-05-07
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: European Economic Area, Iceland, consumer information, frontier worker, investment company, national implementing measure, regulation of investments, supplementary pension








C_202504714EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4714


25.8.2025






JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
of 7 May 2025
         
in Case E-28/24
EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland


(Failure by an EFTA State to fulfil its obligations – Failure to implement Directive (EU) 2016/2341 – Activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision)


(C/2025/4714)

In Case E-28/24, EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland – APPLICATION seeking a declaration that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the act referred to at points 1 and 31d of Annex IX to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive (EU) 2016/2341 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2016 on the activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision (IORPs)), as adapted by Protocol 1 to that Agreement, and under Article 7 of the EEA Agreement, by failing to adopt the measures necessary to implement the act within the time prescribed, or in any event, by failing to inform the EFTA Surveillance Authority thereof, the Court, composed of Páll Hreinsson, President, Bernd Hammermann and Michael Reiertsen (Judge-Rapporteur), Judges, gave judgment on 7 May 2025, the operative part of which is as follows:
The Court hereby:






1.


Declares that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the act referred to at points 1 and 31d of Annex IX to the EEA Agreement (Directive (EU) 2016/2341 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2016 on the activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision (IORPs)), as adapted by Protocol 1 to the EEA Agreement, and under Article 7 of the EEA Agreement, by failing to adopt the measures necessary to implement the act within the time prescribed.










2.


Orders Iceland to bear the costs of the proceedings.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4714/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-43/24: Order of the General Court of 7 May 2025 – Penta system v Commission
Date: 2025-05-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: access to information, award of contract, equal treatment, radioactive waste, supplies contract, tendering, waste management








C_202504329EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4329


11.8.2025






Order of the General Court of 7 May 2025 – Penta system v Commission


(Case T-43/24)
                (1)

(C/2025/4329)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/2168, 25.3.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4329/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT of 7 May 2025 in Case E-29/24 – EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland (Failure by an EFTA State to fulfil its obligations – Failure to implement Regulation (EU) 2019/933 – Supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products)
Date: 2025-05-07
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: European Economic Area, Iceland, administrative formalities, export (EU), market approval, medicinal product, national implementing measure, pharmaceutical legislation, public health, single market








C_202504715EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4715


25.8.2025






JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
of 7 May 2025
         
in Case E-29/24
EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland


(Failure by an EFTA State to fulfil its obligations – Failure to implement Regulation (EU) 2019/933 – Supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products)


(C/2025/4715)

In Case E-29/24, EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland – APPLICATION seeking a declaration that Iceland has failed to adopt the measures necessary to make the act referred to at point 6 of Annex XVII to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Regulation (EU) 2019/933 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2019 amending Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 concerning the supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products), as adapted by Protocol 1 to the Agreement, part of its internal legal order, the Court, composed of Páll Hreinsson, President, Bernd Hammermann and Michael Reiertsen (Judge-Rapporteur), Judges, gave judgment on 7 May 2025, the operative part of which is as follows:
The Court hereby:






1.


Declares that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 7 of the EEA Agreement by failing to make the act referred to at point 6 of Annex XVII to the EEA Agreement (Regulation (EU) 2019/933 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2019 amending Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 concerning the supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products), as adapted by Protocol 1 to the EEA Agreement, part of its internal legal order.










2.


Orders Iceland to bear the costs of the proceedings.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4715/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-316/25, Regione Umbria: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 7 May 2025 – Regione Umbria v Ge.Fi.L. – Gestione Fiscalità Locale SpA
Date: 2025-05-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: public contract, public procurement, public sector








C_202503510EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3510


7.7.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 7 May 2025 – Regione Umbria v Ge.Fi.L. – Gestione Fiscalità Locale SpA


(Case C-316/25, Regione Umbria)

(C/2025/3510)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Regione Umbria

Respondent: Ge.Fi.L. – Gestione Fiscalità Locale SpA

Question referred

Is Article 51(2a) and (2b) of decreto-legge n. 124 (Decree-Law No 124) of 2019, converted into law, with amendments, by legge n. 157 (Law No 157) of 2019, compatible with Article 12(4) of Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement? (1)



(1)  Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (OJ 2014 L 94, p. 65).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3510/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1089/23: Judgment of the General Court of 7 May 2025 – RTL Group Markenverwaltung v EUIPO – Örtl (RTL) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark RTL – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Submission of facts and evidence for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Misuse of rights)
Date: 2025-05-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, registered trade mark, sales promotion, trade-mark law








C_202503278EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3278


24.6.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 7 May 2025 – RTL Group Markenverwaltung v EUIPO – Örtl (RTL)


(Case T-1089/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU figurative mark RTL - Lack of genuine use of the mark - Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Submission of facts and evidence for the first time before the Board of Appeal - Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 - Misuse of rights)
(C/2025/3278)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: RTL Group Markenverwaltungs GmbH (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: W. Prinz and I. Leroux, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Ringelhann, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Marcella Örtl (Selb, Germany) (represented by: J. Pröll, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment or alteration of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 19 September 2023 (Case R 87/2023-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Alters the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 19 September 2023 (Case R 87/2023-2) so as to dismiss the application for revocation in respect of all the services in Class 35 of the Nice Agreement Concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks of 15 June 1957, as revised and amended, and corresponding to the following description: ‘Advertising, marketing and promotional services’;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders RTL Group Markenverwaltungs GmbH, EUIPO and Ms Marcella Örtl to each bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/567, 8.1.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3278/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-424/20: Order of the General Court of 7 May 2025 – Portigon v SRB (2020 ex ante contributions)
Date: 2025-05-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, banking supervision, company in difficulties, credit institution, financing plan, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, right to justice, rights of the defence, use of languages








C_202504328EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4328


11.8.2025






Order of the General Court of 7 May 2025 – Portigon v SRB


(2020 ex ante contributions)


(Case T-424/20)
                (1)

(C/2025/4328)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition, has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 279, 24.8.2020.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4328/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-373/24: Order of the General Court of 7 May 2025 – D&A Pharma v EMA (Action for annulment – Medicinal products for human use – Marketing authorisation for Alcover granules – Unfavourable scientific opinion of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use – Refusal of a request for retraction – No interest in bringing proceedings – Inadmissibility)
Date: 2025-05-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: delegation of power, drug surveillance, limitation of legal proceedings, medicinal product, scientific report








C_202504309EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4309


11.8.2025






Order of the General Court of 7 May 2025 – D&A Pharma v EMA


(Case T-373/24)
                (1)

(Action for annulment - Medicinal products for human use - Marketing authorisation for Alcover granules - Unfavourable scientific opinion of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use - Refusal of a request for ‘retraction’ - No interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)
(C/2025/4309)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Debrégeas et associés Pharma (D&A Pharma) (Houdan, France) (represented by: N. Viguié, E. Gouesse and V. Durget, lawyers)

Defendant: European Medicines Agency (represented by: S. Drosos, G. Gavriilidou, M. van Egmond and G. Ramo, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) of 13 May 2024 by which that agency refused (i) to retract a final opinion of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use of 12 October 2017 concerning the medicinal product Alcover granules, (ii) to provide an update relating to that procedure on the EMA website, and (iii) to publish on that website its correspondence of 30 January and 12 April 2024.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


Debrégeas et associés Pharma (D&A Pharma) shall pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/5426, 16.9.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4309/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-53/24: Judgment of the General Court of 7 May 2025 – Schmidt Spiele v EUIPO – de Gea Quintana (DDG) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark DDG – International registration of the earlier figurative mark DOG – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-05-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, decorative item, electronic game, registered trade mark, sports equipment, toy industry, trade-mark law








C_202503280EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3280


24.6.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 7 May 2025 – Schmidt Spiele v EUIPO – de Gea Quintana (DDG)


(Case T-53/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark DDG - International registration of the earlier figurative mark DOG - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/3280)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Schmidt Spiele GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: T. Urek, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Ringelhann, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: David de Gea Quintana (Hale Barns, United Kingdom)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and, in essence, the alteration of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 4 December 2023 (Case R 1039/2023-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/2169, 25.3.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3280/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11893 – RETHMANN / TRANSDEV)
Date: 2025-05-07
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: carriage of goods, economic concentration, farming sector, ferryboat, international transport, merger control, pharmaceutical industry, public transport, service, water management








C_202502783EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2783


16.5.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11893 – RETHMANN / TRANSDEV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/2783)

On 7 May 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M11893. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2783/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.114137
Date: 2025-05-07
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Spain, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid








C_202502616EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2616


7.5.2025






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.114137
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/2616)








Date of adoption of the decision


26.7.2024




Aid number


SA.114137




Member State


Spain




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Incentivos para proyectos de producción y consumo de hidrógeno renovable (clústeres o valles)




Legal basis


Proyecto de orden por la que se establecen las bases reguladoras para las convocatorias del programa de incentivos para proyectos de producción y consumo de hidrógeno renovable (clústeres o valles) en el marco del plan de recuperación, transformación y resiliencia, financiado por la unión europea – NextGenerationEU




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Renewable energy, Energy infrastructures, Energy efficiency, Environmental protection, Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy, Sectorial development, SMEs




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 1 200 000 000  EUR
Annual budget: 1 200 000 000  EUR




Intensity


 




Duration


Until 31.12.2025




Economic sectors


All economic sectors eligible to receive aid




Name and address of the granting authority







INSTITUTO PARA LA DIVERSIFICACIÓN Y AHORRO DE LA ENERGÍA (IDAE)




C/ Madera no 8 28004 MADRID








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2616/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-339/20: Order of the General Court of 7 May 2025 – Portigon v SRB (2016 ex ante contributions)
Date: 2025-05-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, banking supervision, company in difficulties, equal treatment, financial institution, financial risk, financing plan, fund (EU), right to justice








C_202504327EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4327


11.8.2025






Order of the General Court of 7 May 2025 – Portigon v SRB


(2016 ex ante contributions)


(Case T-339/20)
                (1)

(C/2025/4327)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition, has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 240, 20.7.2020.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4327/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-159/20 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 7 May 2025 – Hamers v Cedefop (Civil service – Temporary staff – OLAF investigation – National criminal proceedings – Acquittal – Cedefop’s conduct in relation to the national criminal proceedings – Rejection of the claim for compensation – Requirement of impartiality – Conflict of interest – Liability – Non-material and health damage)
Date: 2025-05-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Anti-fraud Office, conflict of interest, criminal proceedings, damages, indemnification, servant (EU)








C_202503272EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3272


24.6.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 7 May 2025 – Hamers v Cedefop


(Case T-159/20 RENV)
                (1)

(Civil service - Temporary staff - OLAF investigation - National criminal proceedings - Acquittal - Cedefop’s conduct in relation to the national criminal proceedings - Rejection of the claim for compensation - Requirement of impartiality - Conflict of interest - Liability - Non-material and health damage)
(C/2025/3272)
Language of the case: Greek

Parties


Applicant: Helene Hamers (Angelochori, Greece) (represented by: V. Christianos, A. Politis, M. Rodopoulos and G. Kelepouri, lawyers)

Defendant: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (represented by: J. Siebel and A. Graziosi, acting as Agents and by B. Wägenbaur and C. Meïdanis, lawyers)

Re:

By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, the annulment of the decision of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) of 3 July 2019 rejecting a claim for compensation for the damage she allegedly suffered and, secondly, compensation for that damage as well as for the damage she allegedly suffered as a result of that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) of 3 July 2019 rejecting a claim for compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by Ms Helene Hamers;










2.


Orders Cedefop to pay Ms Hamers EUR 5 000 in compensation for the non-material damage suffered;










3.


Dismisses the action as for the remainder;










4.


Orders Cedefop to pay the costs of the proceedings before the General Court and the Court of Justice.






(1)  
            OJ C 201, 15.6.2020.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3272/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Judgment of the Court of 7 May 2025 in Case E-9/23 – EFTA Surveillance Authority v The Kingdom of Norway (Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Inpatient treatment abroad – Alternative schemes – Effective protection of EEA rights – Legal certainty – Article 20(2) of Regulation No 883/2004 – Article 36 EEA – Admissibility – Article 31 SCA)
Date: 2025-05-07
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: European Economic Area, Norway, cross-border cooperation, health care, health legislation, medical examination, patient's rights, principle of legal certainty, right to health, therapeutics








C_202504684EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4684


21.8.2025







            JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
         
of 7 May 2025
         
in Case E-9/23
EFTA Surveillance Authority v The Kingdom of Norway


(Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Inpatient treatment abroad – Alternative schemes – Effective protection of EEA rights – Legal certainty – Article 20(2) of Regulation No 883/2004 – Article 36 EEA – Admissibility – Article 31 SCA)


(C/2025/4684)

In Case E-9/23, EFTA Surveillance Authority v The Kingdom of Norway – APPLICATION seeking a declaration that, in relation to certain national rules and practices governing access to inpatient treatment in other EEA States, the Kingdom of Norway has breached Article 36 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area, Article 20(2) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems and/or Article 3 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as well as the principle of legal certainty, the Court, composed of Páll Hreinsson, President, Bernd Hammermann and Michael Reiertsen (Judge-Rapporteur), Judges, gave judgment on 7 May 2025, the operative part of which is as follows:
The Court hereby:






1.


Dismisses the application.










2.


Orders the EFTA Surveillance Authority to bear their own costs and those of the Kingdom of Norway.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4684/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)