do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-477/19 RENV: Order of the General Court of 5 May 2025 – Medici v Parliament (Law governing the institutions – Single Statute for Members of the European Parliament – Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies – Surviving spouse of a Member of the European Parliament – Adoption by the Italian Chamber of Deputies of a decision on pensions – Change in the amounts of the pensions of members of the Italian Parliament – Corresponding change, by the European Parliament, in the amount of the survivor’s pension – Replacement of the decision of the Parliament – No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2025-05-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Italy, Member of Parliament, Member of the European Parliament, national law, pension scheme, social security legislation, survivor's benefit








C_202504173EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4173


4.8.2025






Order of the General Court of 5 May 2025 – Medici v Parliament


(Case T-477/19 RENV)
                (1)

(Law governing the institutions - Single Statute for Members of the European Parliament - Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies - Surviving spouse of a Member of the European Parliament - Adoption by the Italian Chamber of Deputies of a decision on pensions - Change in the amounts of the pensions of members of the Italian Parliament - Corresponding change, by the European Parliament, in the amount of the survivor’s pension - Replacement of the decision of the Parliament - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2025/4173)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Rita Medici (Bologna, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Seyr and S. Alves, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the Note of 11 April 2019 drawn up by the Head of the ‘Members’ Salaries and Social Entitlements Unit’ of the Parliament’s Directorate-General for Finance and concerning the adjustment of the survivor’s pension she receives following the entry into force, on 1 January 2019, of Decision No 14/2018 of the Ufficio di Presidenza della Camera dei deputati (Office of the President of the Chamber of Deputies, Italy).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


Each party must bear their own costs relating to the present proceedings and to the proceedings in Cases T-477/19 and C-431/20 P.






(1)  
            OJ C 295, 2.9.2019.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4173/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-288/25: Action brought on 5 May 2025 – Dana Astra v Council
Date: 2025-05-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Belarus, EU restrictive measure, Russia, Russo-Ukrainian issue, Ukraine, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person








C_202503543EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3543


7.7.2025






Action brought on 5 May 2025 – Dana Astra v Council


(Case T-288/25)

(C/2025/3543)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Dana Astra IOOO (Minsk, Belarus) (represented by: K. Van Maldegem, lawyer, M. Lester and M. Bridling, Barristers-at-Law)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul, pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, first, Council Decision (CFSP) 2025/385 of 24 February 2025 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine; (1) and, second, Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/386 of 24 February 2025 implementing Article 8a of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine (2) (‘the 2025 measures’), in so far as they relate and/or refer to the applicant;










—


Order the Council to pay the costs.





Plea in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, being that the 2025 measures are vitiated by a manifest error of assessment.


(1)  OJ L 2025/385.

(2)  OJ L 2025/386.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3543/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-443/19 RENV: Order of the General Court of 5 May 2025 – Arroni v Parliament (Law governing the institutions – Single Statute for Members of the European Parliament – Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies – Adoption by the Italian Chamber of Deputies of a decision on pensions – Change in the amounts of the pensions of members of the Italian Parliament – Corresponding change, by the European Parliament, in the amounts of the pensions of certain former Members of the European Parliament elected in Italy – Replacement of the decision of the Parliament – No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2025-05-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Italy, Member of Parliament, Member of the European Parliament, national law, pension scheme, social security legislation








C_202504164EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4164


4.8.2025






Order of the General Court of 5 May 2025 – Arroni v Parliament


(Case T-443/19 RENV)
                (1)

(Law governing the institutions - Single Statute for Members of the European Parliament - Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies - Adoption by the Italian Chamber of Deputies of a decision on pensions - Change in the amounts of the pensions of members of the Italian Parliament - Corresponding change, by the European Parliament, in the amounts of the pensions of certain former Members of the European Parliament elected in Italy - Replacement of the decision of the Parliament - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2025/4164)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Aldo Arroni (Milan, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola and L. Florio, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Seyr and S. Alves, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the Note of 11 April 2019 drawn up by the Head of the ‘Members’ Salaries and Social Entitlements Unit’ of the Parliament’s Directorate-General for Finance and concerning the adjustment of the retirement pension he receives following the entry into force, on 1 January 2019, of Decision No 14/2018 of the Ufficio di Presidenza della Camera dei deputati (Office of the President of the Chamber of Deputies, Italy).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


Each party must bear their own costs relating to the present proceedings and to the proceedings in Cases T-443/19 and C-431/20 P.






(1)  
            OJ C 295, 2.9.2019.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4164/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-464/19 RENV: Order of the General Court of 5 May 2025 – Podestà v Parliament (Law governing the institutions – Single Statute for Members of the European Parliament – Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies – Adoption by the Italian Chamber of Deputies of a decision on pensions – Change in the amounts of the pensions of members of the Italian Parliament – Corresponding change, by the European Parliament, in the amounts of the pensions of certain former Members of the European Parliament elected in Italy – Replacement of the decision of the Parliament – No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2025-05-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Italy, Member of Parliament, Member of the European Parliament, national law, pension scheme, social security legislation








C_202504171EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4171


4.8.2025






Order of the General Court of 5 May 2025 – Podestà v Parliament


(Case T-464/19 RENV)
                (1)

(Law governing the institutions - Single Statute for Members of the European Parliament - Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies - Adoption by the Italian Chamber of Deputies of a decision on pensions - Change in the amounts of the pensions of members of the Italian Parliament - Corresponding change, by the European Parliament, in the amounts of the pensions of certain former Members of the European Parliament elected in Italy - Replacement of the decision of the Parliament - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2025/4171)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Guido Podestà (Vila Real de António, Portugal) (represented by: M. Merola, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Seyr and S. Alves, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the Note of 11 April 2019 drawn up by the Head of the ‘Members’ Salaries and Social Entitlements Unit’ of the Parliament’s Directorate-General for Finance and concerning the adjustment of the retirement pension he receives following the entry into force, on 1 January 2019, of Decision No 14/2018 of the Ufficio di Presidenza della Camera dei deputati (Office of the President of the Chamber of Deputies, Italy).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


Each party must bear their own costs relating to the present proceedings and to the proceedings in Cases T-464/19 and C-431/20 P.






(1)  
            OJ C 295, 2.9.2019.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4171/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-460/24, Schoger: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 May 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht – Austria) – ***X*** v Finanzambt für Großbetriebe (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – State aid – Tax exemption for supplies made between undertakings carrying out transactions primarily in the banking, insurance or pension funds sector – Requirement to set out the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Lack of sufficient information – Subject matter of the dispute – Requirement that the questions must be necessary – Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2025-05-05
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: State aid, VAT, admissibility, financial services, group of companies, insurance company, pension fund, personnel administration, provision of services, tax exemption








C_202504256EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4256


11.8.2025






Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 May 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht – Austria) – ***X*** v Finanzambt für Großbetriebe


(Case C-460/24,
                (1)
Schoger
                (2)
)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - State aid - Tax exemption for supplies made between undertakings carrying out transactions primarily in the banking, insurance or pension funds sector - Requirement to set out the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings - Lack of sufficient information - Subject matter of the dispute - Requirement that the questions must be necessary - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2025/4256)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzgericht

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: ***X***

Defendant: Finanzamt für Großbetriebe

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling submitted by the Bundesfinanzgericht (Federal Finance Court, Austria), by decision of 28 June 2024, is manifestly inadmissible.


(1)  OJ C, C/2024/5498.

(2)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4256/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1152/23: Order of the General Court of 5 May 2025 – Servier and Others v Commission
Date: 2025-05-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: cardiovascular disease, cartel, dominant position, exclusive purchasing agreement, inflation, interest, medicinal product, sanction (EU)








C_202504068EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4068


28.7.2025






Order of the General Court of 5 May 2025 – Servier and Others v Commission


(Case T-1152/23)
                (1)

(C/2025/4068)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/1252, 12.2.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4068/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-41/21: Order of the General Court of 5 May 2025 – Albertini v Parliament (Law governing the institutions – Single Statute for Members of the European Parliament – Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies – Adoption by the Italian Chamber of Deputies of a decision on pensions – Change in the amounts of the pensions of members of the Italian Parliament – Corresponding change, by the European Parliament, in the amounts of the pensions of certain former Members of the European Parliament elected in Italy – Replacement of the decision of the Parliament – No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2025-05-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Italy, Member of Parliament, Member of the European Parliament, national law, pension scheme, social security legislation








C_202504174EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4174


4.8.2025






Order of the General Court of 5 May 2025 – Albertini v Parliament


(Case T-41/21)
                (1)

(Law governing the institutions - Single Statute for Members of the European Parliament - Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies - Adoption by the Italian Chamber of Deputies of a decision on pensions - Change in the amounts of the pensions of members of the Italian Parliament - Corresponding change, by the European Parliament, in the amounts of the pensions of certain former Members of the European Parliament elected in Italy - Replacement of the decision of the Parliament - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2025/4174)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Gabriele Albertini (Milan, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Seyr and S. Alves, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Quaestors of the European Parliament of 11 November 2020, which confirmed the decision of the Parliament’s Secretary General of 18 May 2020, which in turn confirmed the Note of 11 June 2019 from the Head of the ‘Members’ Salaries and Social Entitlements Unit’ of the Parliament’s Directorate-General (DG) for Finance, concerning the establishment of the applicant’s retirement pension entitlements.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


Mr Gabriele Albertini is ordered to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 88, 15.3.2021.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4174/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-437/19 RENV: Order of the General Court of 5 May 2025 – Torbesi v Parliament (Law governing the institutions – Single Statute for Members of the European Parliament – Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies – Adoption by the Italian Chamber of Deputies of a decision on pensions – Change in the amounts of the pensions of members of the Italian Parliament – Corresponding change, by the European Parliament, in the amounts of the pensions of certain former Members of the European Parliament elected in Italy – Replacement of the decision of the Parliament – No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2025-05-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Italy, Member of Parliament, Member of the European Parliament, national law, pension scheme, social security legislation








C_202504163EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4163


4.8.2025






Order of the General Court of 5 May 2025 – Torbesi v Parliament


(Case T-437/19 RENV)
                (1)

(Law governing the institutions - Single Statute for Members of the European Parliament - Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies - Adoption by the Italian Chamber of Deputies of a decision on pensions - Change in the amounts of the pensions of members of the Italian Parliament - Corresponding change, by the European Parliament, in the amounts of the pensions of certain former Members of the European Parliament elected in Italy - Replacement of the decision of the Parliament - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2025/4163)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Loris Torbesi, as heir of Mr Eugenio Melandri (Rome, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Seyr and S. Alves, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the Note of 11 April 2019 drawn up by the Head of the ‘Members’ Salaries and Social Entitlements Unit’ of the Parliament’s Directorate-General for Finance and concerning the adjustment of the retirement pension which Mr Eugenio Melandri received following the entry into force, on 1 January 2019, of Decision No 14/2018 of the Ufficio di Presidenza della Camera dei deputati (Office of the President of the Chamber of Deputies, Italy).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


Each party must bear its own costs relating to the present proceedings and to the proceedings in Cases T-437/19 and C-431/20 P.






(1)  
            OJ C 295, 2.9.2019.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4163/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11926 – HIGHLANDS / NPM / NTS)
Date: 2025-05-05
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, holding company, investment company, mechatronics, merger control, new technology








C_202502750EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2750


12.5.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11926 – HIGHLANDS / NPM / NTS)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/2750)

On 5 May 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M11926. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2750/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11949 – INVESCO / MITEL)
Date: 2025-05-05
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: communications policy, economic concentration, investment company, merger control, provision of services








C_202502753EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2753


13.5.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11949 – INVESCO / MITEL)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/2753)

On 5 May 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M11949. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2753/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-469/19 RENV: Order of the General Court of 5 May 2025 – Barzanti v Parliament (Law governing the institutions – Single Statute for Members of the European Parliament – Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies – Adoption by the Italian Chamber of Deputies of a decision on pensions – Change in the amounts of the pensions of members of the Italian Parliament – Corresponding change, by the European Parliament, in the amounts of the pensions of certain former Members of the European Parliament elected in Italy – Replacement of the decision of the Parliament – No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2025-05-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Italy, Member of Parliament, Member of the European Parliament, national law, pension scheme, social security legislation








C_202504172EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4172


4.8.2025






Order of the General Court of 5 May 2025 – Barzanti v Parliament


(Case T-469/19 RENV)
                (1)

(Law governing the institutions - Single Statute for Members of the European Parliament - Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies - Adoption by the Italian Chamber of Deputies of a decision on pensions - Change in the amounts of the pensions of members of the Italian Parliament - Corresponding change, by the European Parliament, in the amounts of the pensions of certain former Members of the European Parliament elected in Italy - Replacement of the decision of the Parliament - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2025/4172)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Roberto Barzanti (Siena, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Seyr and S. Alves, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the Note of 11 April 2019 drawn up by the Head of the ‘Members’ Salaries and Social Entitlements Unit’ of the Parliament’s Directorate-General for Finance and concerning the adjustment of the retirement pension he receives following the entry into force, on 1 January 2019, of Decision No 14/2018 of the Ufficio di Presidenza della Camera dei deputati (Office of the President of the Chamber of Deputies, Italy).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


Each party must bear their own costs relating to the present proceedings and to the proceedings in Cases T-469/19 and C-431/20 P.






(1)  
            OJ C 295, 2.9.2019.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4172/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)