do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-325/24: Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2025 – EL v Commission (Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Internal competition COM/AD6/2022 – Decision not to admit the applicant to the next stage of the competition – Neutralisation of certain questions in the multiple-choice questionnaire test – Method of neutralisation – Lack of rounding)
Date: 2025-04-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: administrator, competition (EU), recruitment, staff regulations (EU)








C_202503290EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3290


24.6.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2025 – EL v Commission


(Case T-325/24)
                (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Recruitment - Internal competition COM/AD6/2022 - Decision not to admit the applicant to the next stage of the competition - Neutralisation of certain questions in the multiple-choice questionnaire test - Method of neutralisation - Lack of rounding)
(C/2025/3290)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: EL (represented by: P. Billiet, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Talabér-Ritz and L. Hohenecker, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of 28 June 2023 by which the selection board for internal competition COM/AD 6/2022 (‘the internal competition’) informed her that she had not qualified for the next stage of that competition and, second, an order requiring the European Commission to readmit her to the internal competition.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders EL to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/5109, 26.8.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3290/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Joined Cases C-832/24 to C-834/24, Satel Film: Order of the President of the Court of 30 April 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht – Austria) – SATEL Film GmbH, in the presence of: Telekom-Control-Kommission, Salzburg AG für Energie, Verkehr und Telekommunikation (C-832/24), A1 Telekom Austria AG (C-833/24), Hutchison Drei Austria GmbH (C-834/24)
Date: 2025-04-30
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Internet access provider, access to information, copyright, data processing, data protection, equal treatment, provision of services, regulation of telecommunications, right of establishment








C_202503885EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3885


21.7.2025






Order of the President of the Court of 30 April 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht – Austria) – SATEL Film GmbH, in the presence of: Telekom-Control-Kommission, Salzburg AG für Energie, Verkehr und Telekommunikation (C-832/24), A1 Telekom Austria AG (C-833/24), Hutchison Drei Austria GmbH (C-834/24)


(Joined Cases C-832/24 to C-834/24,
                (1)
Satel Film)

(C/2025/3885)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C, C/2025/1526, C/2025/1527, C/2025/1528.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3885/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-284/25: Action brought on 30 April 2025 – Amber Latvijas balzams v EUIPO – Foodcare (BLACK)
Date: 2025-04-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, alcoholic beverage, dairy ice cream, processed food product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202503424EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3424


30.6.2025






Action brought on 30 April 2025 – Amber Latvijas balzams v EUIPO – Foodcare (BLACK)


(Case T-284/25)

(C/2025/3424)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Amber Latvijas balzams AS (Riga, Latvia) (represented by: B. Wojtkowska, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Foodcare sp. z o.o. (Zabierzów, Poland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark BLACK – European Union trade mark No 18 100 614
         

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 March 2025 in Case R 824/2024-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3424/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-251/24: Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2025 – Serana Europe v EUIPO – Cytogen Produkte für Medizin + Forschung (Marrowgrow) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Marrowgrow – Non-registered earlier signs Marrowgrow – Relative ground for refusal – Use in the course of trade of a sign of more than mere local significance – Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-04-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cytology, genetics, pharmaceutical industry, registered trade mark, research method, trade-mark law








C_202503286EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3286


24.6.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2025 – Serana Europe v EUIPO – Cytogen Produkte für Medizin + Forschung (Marrowgrow)


(Case T-251/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark Marrowgrow - Non-registered earlier signs Marrowgrow - Relative ground for refusal - Use in the course of trade of a sign of more than mere local significance - Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/3286)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Serana Europe GmbH (Pessin, Germany) (represented by: T. Bösling and I. George, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Stoyanova-Valchanova, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Cytogen Produkte für Medizin + Forschung GmbH (Greven, Germany) (represented by: C. Röhl, J. Haßold and P. Richnow, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and the alteration of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 12 March 2024 (Case R 1706/2023-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Serana Europe GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by CYTOGEN – Produkte für Medizin + Forschung GmbH;










3.


Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/3802, 24.6.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3286/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Statement of revenue and expenditure for the 2025 financial year – Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CdT) – amending budget No 1
Date: 2025-04-30
Institutions: Translation Centre
Subjects: EU expenditure, amending budget, budgetary resources, financial year, general budget (EU), publication of accounts




C_202502141EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2141


30.4.2025






Statement of revenue and expenditure for the 2025 financial year – Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CdT) – amending budget No 1 (1)

(C/2025/2141)


REVENUE










Title
Chapter


Heading


2025 estimate


Amending budget No 1/2025


New amount





1




PAYMENTS FROM THE AGENCIES, OFFICES, INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES





1 0


PAYMENTS FROM THE AGENCIES AND BODIES


37 569 400 


1 570 000 


39 139 400 




1 1


PAYMENTS FROM THE INSTITUTIONS


3 634 400 


189 000 


3 823 400 




 



Title 1 — Total




41 203 800 




1 759 000 




42 962 800 






2




SUBSIDY FROM THE COMMISSION





2 0


SUBSIDY FROM THE COMMISSION


p.m.


 


p.m.




 



Title 2 — Total




p.m.



 



p.m.






3




INTERINSTITUTIONAL COOPERATION





3 0


INTERINSTITUTIONAL COOPERATION


870 200 


 


870 200 




 



Title 3 — Total




870 200 



 



870 200 






4




OTHER REVENUE





4 0


OTHER REVENUE


598 700 


 


598 700 




 



Title 4 — Total




598 700 



 



598 700 






5




SURPLUS CARRIED OVER FROM THE PREVIOUS FINANCIAL YEAR





5 0


SURPLUS CARRIED OVER FROM THE PREVIOUS FINANCIAL YEAR


2 474 600 


–1 759 000 


715 600 




 



Title 5 — Total




2 474 600 




–1 759 000 




715 600 






6




REFUNDS





6 0


REFUNDS TO CLIENTS


p.m.


 


p.m.




6 1


EXTRAORDINARY REFUNDS


p.m.


 


p.m.




 



Title 6 — Total




p.m.



 



p.m.







 



GRAND TOTAL




45 147 300 




0 




45 147 300 







(1)  All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euro unless otherwise indicated.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2141/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Special report 12/2025: The EU’s strategy for microchips – Reasonable progress in its implementation but the Chips Act is very unlikely to be sufficient to reach the overly ambitious Digital Decade target
Date: 2025-04-30
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: EU financing, EU production, advanced technology industry, competitiveness, digital technology, electronic component, investment, joint venture, labour shortage, value chain








C_202502605EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2605


30.4.2025






Special report 12/2025:

            ‘The EU’s strategy for microchips – Reasonable progress in its implementation but the Chips Act is very unlikely to be sufficient to reach the overly ambitious Digital Decade target’
         
(C/2025/2605)

The European Court of Auditors has published its special report 12/2025: ‘The EU’s strategy for microchips – Reasonable progress in its implementation but the Chips Act is very unlikely to be sufficient to reach the overly ambitious Digital Decade target’.
The report can be consulted directly or downloaded at the European Court of Auditors’ website: https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/publications/sr-2025-12.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2605/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-263/23: Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2025 – Symrise v Commission (Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Administrative procedure – Decision ordering an inspection – Article 20(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Subject matter and purpose of the inspection – Obligation to state reasons – Sufficiently serious indicia – Protection of privacy)
Date: 2025-04-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: administrative procedure, cartel, control of restrictive practices, parent company, protection of privacy, restriction on competition, subsidiary








C_202503044EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3044


10.6.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2025 – Symrise v Commission


(Case T-263/23)
                (1)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Administrative procedure - Decision ordering an inspection - Article 20(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Subject matter and purpose of the inspection - Obligation to state reasons - Sufficiently serious indicia - Protection of privacy)
(C/2025/3044)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Symrise AG (Holzminden, Germany) (represented by: T. Kuhn, M. Rust, T.-M. Wienke, L. Bär and G. Forwood, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Domecq, T. Franchoo and B. Cullen, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision C(2023) 1103 final of 10 February 2023, ordering it and all the companies directly or indirectly controlled by it to submit to an inspection in accordance with Article 20(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (Case AT.40826 – Rose).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Symrise AG to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 235, 3.7.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3044/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-312/24: Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2025 – Real Pharm Group v EUIPO – real (REAL PHARM) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark REAL PHARM – Earlier EU figurative mark real,- – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-04-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, baby food, dietary product, food supplement, registered trade mark, retail trade, trade-mark law, vitamin, wholesale trade








C_202503288EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3288


24.6.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2025 – Real Pharm Group v EUIPO – real (REAL PHARM)


(Case T-312/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark REAL PHARM - Earlier EU figurative mark real,- - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/3288)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Real Pharm Group sp. z o.o. (Czaplinek, Poland) (represented by: A.-M. Sobczak, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Nicolás Gómez, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: real GmbH (Mönchengladbach, Germany)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and the alteration of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 24 April 2024 (Case R 1376/2023-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Real Pharm Group sp. z o.o. and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to each bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/4862, 12.8.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3288/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community – Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations
Date: 2025-04-30
Institutions: Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, European Commission
Subjects: Italy, Latium, Marches, air transport, inland transport, invitation to tender, services of general interest, transport regulations








C_202502597EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2597


30.4.2025






Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/2597)







Member State


Italy




Routes concerned


Ancona – Rome Fiumicino and vice versa




Period of validity of the contract


From 1 November 2025 to 31 October 2027




Deadline for submission of tenders


Two months after the date of publication of this notice




Address from which the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained







National Civil Aviation Authority (ENAC)




Air transport and licensing department




Viale Castro Pretorio, 118




00185 Rome




ITALY




Tel. +39 0644596247
Email: osp@enac.gov.it

Websites: http://www.mit.gov.it


http://www.enac.gov.it







ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2597/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-242/24: Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2025 – Versiontech v EUIPO – Verizon Trademark Services (VersionTech) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark VersionTech – Earlier EU word mark VERIZON – Relative ground for invalidity – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-04-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, computer equipment, electrical equipment, electronic equipment, household electrical appliance, lighting, lighting equipment, measuring equipment, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202503283EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3283


24.6.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2025 – Versiontech v EUIPO – Verizon Trademark Services (VersionTech)


(Case T-242/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark VersionTech - Earlier EU word mark VERIZON - Relative ground for invalidity - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/3283)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Versiontech, Inc. (Brooklyn, New York, United States) (represented by: I. Díaz de Bustamante y Terminel, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Verizon Trademark Services LLC (Washington, DC, United States) (represented by J. Bogatz, Y. Stone and J. Feigl, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and alteration of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 6 March 2024 (Case R 31/2023-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 6 March 2024 (Case R 31/2023-1) in so far as it annulled the decision of the Cancellation Division of 14 December 2022 relating to the EU word mark VersionTech and declared that mark invalid;










2.


Dismisses the appeal brought by Verizon Trademark Services LLC before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO against the decision of the Cancellation Division of 14 December 2022;










3.


Orders Verizon Trademark Services to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Versiontech, Inc. in the present proceedings and in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal;










4.


Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/3796, 24.6.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3283/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-330/24, Celní jednatelství Zelinka: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 30 April 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud – Czech Republic) – Celní jednatelství Zelinka s. r. o. v Generální ředitelství cel (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Union Customs Code – Article 116(7) – Reinstatement of the customs debt – Concept of repayment granted in error – Incorrect tariff classification)
Date: 2025-04-30
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: customs debt, customs drawback, customs union, tariff nomenclature








C_202503253EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3253


24.6.2025






Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 30 April 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud – Czech Republic) – Celní jednatelství Zelinka s. r. o. v Generální ředitelství cel


(Case C-330/24,
                (1)
Celní jednatelství Zelinka)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Customs union - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 - Union Customs Code - Article 116(7) - Reinstatement of the customs debt - Concept of repayment granted ‘in error’ - Incorrect tariff classification)
(C/2025/3253)
Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Nejvyšší správní soud

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Celní jednatelství Zelinka s. r. o.

Defendant: Generální ředitelství cel

Operative part of the judgment

Article 116(7) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code
must be interpreted as meaning that it covers not only situations in which the customs duties were repaid following an unintentional error on the part of the customs authorities, but also situations in which those authorities deliberately made a tariff classification and that classification subsequently proved to be incorrect.


(1)  OJ C C/2024/4954.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3253/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-338/24: Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2025 – Mobility Trader v EUIPO – Cala and Ruiz (hey car select) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark hey car select – Earlier national figurative mark geicar vehículos seminuevos y de ocasión – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Similarity of the services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-04-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, browser, electronic commerce, registered trade mark, software, trade-mark law, vehicle rental








C_202503291EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3291


24.6.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2025 – Mobility Trader v EUIPO – Cala and Ruiz (hey car select)


(Case T-338/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark hey car select - Earlier national figurative mark geicar vehículos seminuevos y de ocasión - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Similarity of the services - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/3291)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Mobility Trader Holding GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: C. Rehaag and C. Goldstein, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Gestión e intermediación Cala and Ruiz SL (Móstoles, Spain) (represented by: A. Vela Ballesteros and S. Fernandez Malvar, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks, in essence, the annulment and alteration of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 24 April 2024 (Joined Cases R 1094/2023-1 and R 1105/2023-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mobility Trader Holding GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Gestión e intermediación Cala and Ruiz SL during the proceedings before the General Court;










3.


Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/5112, 26.8.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3291/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)