do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community – Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations
Date: 2025-04-30
Institutions: Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, European Commission
Subjects: Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France, Nouvelle-Aquitaine, air transport, inland transport, invitation to tender, services of general interest, transport regulations








C_202502598EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2598


30.4.2025






Commission notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/2598)







Member State


France




Route concerned


Poitiers–Lyon (Saint-Exupéry)




Period of validity of the contract


29 September 2025–28 September 2029




Deadline for the submission of applications and tenders


30 June 2025 (12:00, Paris time)




Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained







Syndicat Mixte de l’Aéroport de Poitiers-Biard




Place Aristide Briand




CS 80319




86 008 Poitiers Cedex




Tel. +33 549629145
Email: smapb@departement86.fr

Buyer profile: https://www.marches-securises.fr







ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2598/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community – Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services
Date: 2025-04-30
Institutions: Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, European Commission
Subjects: Campania, Italy, Latium, Lombardy, Marches, air transport, inland transport, services of general interest, transport regulations








C_202502600EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2600


30.4.2025






Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/2600)







Member State


Italy




Routes concerned


Ancona – Milan Linate and vice versa
Ancona – Rome Fiumicino and vice versa
Ancona – Naples and vice versa




Date of entry into force of the public service obligations


1 November 2025




Address where the text and any information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained


For further information:





Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport




Department of Transport and Navigation




Directorate-General for Airports, Air Transport and Satellite Services




Via Giuseppe Caraci, 36




00157 Rome




ITALY




Tel. +39 0644127190




National Civil Aviation Authority (ENAC)




Air transport and licensing department




Viale Castro Pretorio, 118




00185 Rome




ITALY




Tel. +39 0644596532




Websites: http://www.mit.gov.it


http://www.enac.gov.it

Email: dg.ta@pec.mit.gov.it


osp@enac.gov.it.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2600/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-249/24: Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2025 – Serana Europe v EUIPO – Cytogen Produkte für Medizin + Forschung (Amniogrow) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Amniogrow – Non-registered earlier signs Amniogrow and Amniogrow Plus – Relative ground for refusal – Use in the course of trade of a sign of more than mere local significance – Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-04-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, biotechnology, cytology, genetics, medical research, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202503284EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3284


24.6.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2025 – Serana Europe v EUIPO – Cytogen Produkte für Medizin + Forschung (Amniogrow)


(Case T-249/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark Amniogrow - Non-registered earlier signs Amniogrow and Amniogrow Plus - Relative ground for refusal - Use in the course of trade of a sign of more than mere local significance - Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/3284)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Serana Europe GmbH (Pessin, Germany) (represented by: T. Bösling and I. George, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Stoyanova-Valchanova, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Cytogen Produkte für Medizin + Forschung GmbH (Greven, Germany) (represented by: C. Röhl, J. Haßold and P. Richnow, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and the alteration of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 12 March 2024 (Case R 1705/2023-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Serana Europe GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by CYTOGEN – Produkte für Medizin + Forschung GmbH;










3.


Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/3800, 24.6.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3284/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-324/25, Novo Banco: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) lodged on 30 April 2025 – Novo Banco S. A. v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira
Date: 2025-04-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: VAT, basis of tax assessment, tax law, tax relief, tax return








C_202505589EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5589


27.10.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) lodged on 30 April 2025 – Novo Banco S. A. v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira


(Case T-324/25, Novo Banco)

(C/2025/5589)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Central Administrativo

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Novo Banco S. A.

Defendant: Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

Question referred for a preliminary ruling

Having regard to the principle of neutrality and the extensive nature of the exercise of the right of deduction, do Article 178 et seq of Council Directive 2006/112/EC (1) of 28 November 2006 preclude the exercise of the right of deduction under Articles 22(2) and 98(2) of the VAT Code, following the recalculation of the determination of the basis of assessment and by the mere submission of a periodic tax return after the taxable events and the annual tax period in which they occurred have been established, until the expiry of the general four-year limitation period?


(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5589/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-630/23, AxFina Hungary (Continued existence of the contract): Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 30 April 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria – Hungary) – ZH, KN v AxFina Hungary Zrt. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Leasing agreement denominated in a foreign currency – Articles 6 and 7 – Unfair term placing the exchange rate risk on the consumer – Effects of a finding that the term is unfair – Invalidity of the contract – Effects of the annulment of the contract in its entirety)
Date: 2025-04-30
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: claim, consumer credit, consumer protection, exchange transaction, financial risk, foreign currency, unfair terms of contract








C_202503246EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3246


24.6.2025






Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 30 April 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria – Hungary) – ZH, KN v AxFina Hungary Zrt.


(Case C-630/23,
                (1)
AxFina Hungary (Continued existence of the contract))

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Consumer protection - Directive 93/13/EEC - Unfair terms in consumer contracts - Leasing agreement denominated in a foreign currency - Articles 6 and 7 - Unfair term placing the exchange rate risk on the consumer - Effects of a finding that the term is unfair - Invalidity of the contract - Effects of the annulment of the contract in its entirety)
(C/2025/3246)
Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Kúria

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellants: ZH, KN

Respondent: AxFina Hungary Zrt.

Operative part of the judgment

Article 6(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts, read in conjunction with Article 7(1) thereof,
must be interpreted as not permitting the inference that a leasing agreement that is denominated in a foreign currency, and that has been rendered invalid following the removal from it of a term considered unfair that places the exchange rate risk associated with that foreign currency on the consumer concerned, is capable of ‘continuing in existence without the unfair terms’, within the meaning of the first of those provisions, where that agreement is covered by national legislation that requires, as a legal consequence of the invalidity of such an agreement, that the consumer be freed entirely from the detrimental effects of the unfair term only, while the other elements of that agreement remain valid and binding. In such a situation, since the agreement is not capable of continuing in existence without that term, those provisions require the restoration of the legal and factual situation which the consumer would have been in if that agreement had not existed.


(1)  OJ C C/2024/629.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3246/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Opinion 02/2025 (pursuant to Article 322(1), TFEU) concerning the proposal 2025/0084 (COD) for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) 2021/1058 and (EU) 2021/1056 as regards specific measures to address strategic challenges in the context of the mid-term review and the proposal 2025/0085 (COD) for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1057 establishing the European Social Fund + (ESF+) as regards specific measures to address strategic challenges
Date: 2025-04-30
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: Cohesion Fund, European Social Fund, European arms policy, European defence policy, European social policy, education policy, eligibility criteria, housing policy, investment, twin transition








C_202502988EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2988


23.5.2025






Opinion 02/2025


(pursuant to Article 322(1), TFEU)


concerning the proposal 2025/0084 (COD) for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) 2021/1058 and (EU) 2021/1056 as regards specific measures to address strategic challenges in the context of the mid-term review and the proposal 2025/0085 (COD) for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1057 establishing the European Social Fund + (ESF+) as regards specific measures to address strategic challenges
(C/2025/2988)

The European Court of Auditors has published its opinion 02/2025 (pursuant to Article 322(1), TFEU) concerning the proposal 2025/0084 (COD) for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) 2021/1058 and (EU) 2021/1056 as regards specific measures to address strategic challenges in the context of the mid-term review and the proposal 2025/0085 (COD) for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1057 establishing the European Social Fund + (ESF+) as regards specific measures to address strategic challenges.
The opinion can be consulted directly or downloaded at the European Court of Auditors’ website:






 



https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/publications/OP-2025-02.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2988/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by the Princely Court of Appeal, dated 30 April 2025 in the case of Dommages Aréas v Gable Insurance AG in Konkurs (Case E-8/25)
Date: 2025-04-30
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: European Economic Area, Liechtenstein, civil procedure, damages, insurance company, insurance indemnity








C_202505236EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5236


25.9.2025






Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by the Princely Court of Appeal, dated 30 April 2025 in the case of Dommages Aréas v Gable Insurance AG in Konkurs
(Case E-8/25)
(C/2025/5236)

A request has been made to the EFTA Court dated 30 April 2025 from the Princely Court of Appeal (Fürstliches Obergericht), which was received at the Court Registry on 6 May 2025, for an Advisory Opinion in the case of Dommages Aréas v Gable Insurance AG in Konkurs, on the following questions:






1.


Is an insurance claim within the meaning of Article 268(1)(g) of Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II), OJ L 335, 17.12.2009, p. 1, incorporated in the EEA Agreement by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 78/2011 of 1 July 2011, LGBl 2012/384, still to be given precedence in accordance with Article 275(1) of that directive even where the claim at issue is the claim of an injured party having a direct right of action against the insurance undertaking which, by way of statutory subrogation, has been subrogated to a fourth party?










2.


If the answer to the Question 1 is in the affirmative:
Must legal costs incurred in the assertion of an insurance claim be regarded as an insurance claim within the meaning of Article 268(1)(g) of Directive 2009/138/EC and thus also be given precedence in accordance with Article 275(1) of that directive?






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5236/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-246/24, Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Frankfurt am Main (Export of cash to Russia): Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 April 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt am Main – Germany) – Criminal proceedings against ZZ (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Article 5i(2)(a) – Prohibition on exporting euro-denominated banknotes – Exemption in case of export necessary for personal use – Banknotes intended to cover medical expenses)
Date: 2025-04-30
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russia, Russo-Ukrainian issue, Ukraine, economic sanctions, euro, export, health expenditure, international sanctions, paper money








C_202503251EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3251


24.6.2025






Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 April 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt am Main – Germany) – Criminal proceedings against ZZ


(Case C-246/24,
                (1)
Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Frankfurt am Main (Export of cash to Russia))

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine - Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 - Article 5i(2)(a) - Prohibition on exporting euro-denominated banknotes - Exemption in case of export necessary for personal use - Banknotes intended to cover medical expenses)
(C/2025/3251)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt am Main

Party in the main proceedings


Applicant: ZZ

Other party: Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Frankfurt am Main

Operative part of the judgment

Article 5i(2)(a) of Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/595 of 11 April 2022,
must be interpreted as meaning that the export by a person travelling to Russia of euro-denominated banknotes for the purposes of financing medical treatments which that person wishes to receive in that third country does not constitute an export necessary for the personal use of that person, within the meaning of that provision.


(1)  OJ C C/2024/4309.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3251/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-218/18 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2025 – Deutsche Lufthansa v Commission (Action for annulment – State aid – Aviation sector – Operating aid granted by Germany to Frankfurt-Hahn airport – Direct subsidy intended to cover the airport’s expected operating losses over the 2017-2021 period – Decision not to raise objections – Action not seeking to safeguard procedural rights – Inadmissibility)
Date: 2025-04-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Germany, Rhineland-Palatinate, State aid, airport, control of State aid








C_202503271EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3271


24.6.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2025 – Deutsche Lufthansa v Commission


(Case T-218/18 RENV)
                (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Aviation sector - Operating aid granted by Germany to Frankfurt-Hahn airport - Direct subsidy intended to cover the airport’s expected operating losses over the 2017-2021 period - Decision not to raise objections - Action not seeking to safeguard procedural rights - Inadmissibility)
(C/2025/3271)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Deutsche Lufthansa (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: A. Martin-Ehlers, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Georgieva, L. Wildpanner and T. Maxian Rusche, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Land Rheinland-Pfalz (represented by: R. van der Hout, C. Wagner and V. Lemonnier, lawyers), Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: J. Möller and R. Kanitz, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Commission Decision C(2017) 5289 final of 31 July 2017 on State aid SA.47969 (2017/N) implemented by Germany concerning operating aid granted to Frankfurt-Hahn airport.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Deutsche Lufthansa AG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;










3.


Orders the Federal Republic of Germany and Land Rheinland-Pfalz (Land of Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany) each to bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 190, 4.6.2018.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3271/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-241/24: Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2025 – AirPlus International v EUIPO – Repsol (R+) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark R+ – Earlier EU word marks AirPlus International, AirPlus Connect and AirPlus CardControl and figurative mark AirPlus INTERNATIONAL – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Well-known facts – Refusal of the request for oral proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Article 96(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-04-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, electronic money, financial services, insurance, payment, registered trade mark, sales promotion, trade-mark law








C_202503282EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3282


24.6.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2025 – AirPlus International v EUIPO – Repsol (R+)


(Case T-241/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark R+ - Earlier EU word marks AirPlus International, AirPlus Connect and AirPlus CardControl and figurative mark AirPlus INTERNATIONAL - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion - Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Well-known facts - Refusal of the request for oral proceedings before the Board of Appeal - Article 96(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)
(C/2025/3282)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: AirPlus International GmbH, formerly Lufthansa AirPlus Servicekarten GmbH (Neu-Isenburg, Germany) (represented by: R. Kunze, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Repsol, SA (Madrid, Spain)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 27 February 2024 (Case R 1433/2023-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders AirPlus International GmbH to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/3795, 24.6.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3282/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)