do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates – 25 April 2025
Date: 2025-04-28
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202501961EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1961


28.4.2025






Euro exchange rates (1)


            25 April 2025
         
(C/2025/1961)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1357 




JPY


Japanese yen


162,80 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4656 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85310 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,0015 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9421 




ISK


Iceland króna


144,90 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,8415 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,929 




HUF


Hungarian forint


406,53 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2683 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9776 




TRY


Turkish lira


43,6289 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,7797 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5754 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,8089 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,9063 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4930 




KRW


South Korean won


1 634,83 




ZAR


South African rand


21,3608 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,2773 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


19 140,75 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,9676 




PHP


Philippine peso


63,918 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


38,091 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,4566 




MXN


Mexican peso


22,2874 




INR


Indian rupee


97,0205 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1961/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-201/24, A.En. Slovensko: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 April 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší správny súd Slovenskej republiky – Slovakia) – A.En. Slovensko s.r.o. v Úrad pre vybrané hospodárske subjekty, Finančné riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Common system of taxation applicable to companies – Directive 2009/133/EC – National legislation charging a special levy on capital gains resulting from a transfer of assets between companies established in the same Member State – Article 4(1) and Article 9 – Requirement that capital gains resulting from a transfer of assets not be subject to tax – Purely internal situation – Jurisdiction of the Court)
Date: 2025-04-28
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: capital gains tax, jurisdiction, tax collection, tax law, transfer of property








C_202503858EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3858


21.7.2025






Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 April 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší správny súd Slovenskej republiky – Slovakia) – A.En. Slovensko s.r.o. v Úrad pre vybrané hospodárske subjekty, Finančné riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky


(Case C-201/24,
                (1)
A.En. Slovensko)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Approximation of laws - Common system of taxation applicable to companies - Directive 2009/133/EC - National legislation charging a special levy on capital gains resulting from a transfer of assets between companies established in the same Member State - Article 4(1) and Article 9 - Requirement that capital gains resulting from a transfer of assets not be subject to tax - Purely internal situation - Jurisdiction of the Court)
(C/2025/3858)
Language of the case: Slovak

Referring court

Najvyšší správny súd Slovenskej republiky

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: A.En. Slovensko s.r.o.

Respondents: Úrad pre vybrané hospodárske subjekty, Finančné riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly lacks jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Najvyšší správny súd Slovenskej republiky (Supreme Administrative Court of the Slovak Republic), by decision of 29 February 2024 (Case C-201/24).


(1)  OJ C, C/2024/3895.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3858/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-46/24, Ayuntamiento de Humanes de Madrid: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 April 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 19, Madrid – Spain) – RB v Ayuntamiento de Humanes de Madrid (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive (EU) 2019/1023 – Procedures concerning restructuring, insolvency and discharge of debt – Article 23(4) – Exclusion of claims governed by public law from discharge of debt – Duly justified nature of such an exclusion)
Date: 2025-04-28
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: claim, financial solvency








C_202504255EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4255


11.8.2025






Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 April 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 19, Madrid – Spain) – RB v Ayuntamiento de Humanes de Madrid


(Case C-46/24, Ayuntamiento de Humanes de Madrid)
                (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Directive (EU) 2019/1023 - Procedures concerning restructuring, insolvency and discharge of debt - Article 23(4) - Exclusion of claims governed by public law from discharge of debt - ‘Duly justified’ nature of such an exclusion)
(C/2025/4255)
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 19, Madrid

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: RB

Defendant: Ayuntamiento de Humanes de Madrid

Operative part of the order







1.


Article 23(4) of Directive (EU) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on preventive restructuring frameworks, on discharge of debt and disqualifications, and on measures to increase the efficiency of procedures concerning restructuring, insolvency and discharge of debt, and amending Directive (EU) 2017/1132 (Directive on restructuring and insolvency),
must be interpreted as meaning that






—


there must be an assessment, in accordance with the detailed arrangements laid down in the national law concerned, as to whether the exclusion of claims governed by public law from discharge of debt is ‘duly justified’;










—


it does not preclude a national law which provides for a general exclusion of claims governed by public law from the discharge of debt on the ground that the satisfaction of those claims has particular importance for a fair and inclusive society based on the rule of law, except in circumstances and limited amounts that are very restrictive, provided that that exclusion is ‘duly justified’ under national law.














2.


Article 23(4) of Directive 2019/1023
must be interpreted as precluding a national law which lays down a general exclusion of claims governed by public law from discharge of debts, except in circumstances and limited amounts that are very restrictive, without that exclusion being ‘duly justified’, nor even justified by the national legislature.






(1)  Date of lodging: 23.1.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4255/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-243/24: Order of the General Court of 28 April 2025 – Ehrenreiter v EUIPO – Podersdorf Tourismus- und Freizeitbetriebsgesellschaft (PODOBEACH) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark PODOBEACH – Earlier national figurative mark PODO – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Date: 2025-04-28
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, cultural event, footwear industry, leisure, marketing, parking area, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202503911EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3911


21.7.2025






Order of the General Court of 28 April 2025 – Ehrenreiter v EUIPO – Podersdorf Tourismus- und Freizeitbetriebsgesellschaft (PODOBEACH)


(Case T-243/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark PODOBEACH - Earlier national figurative mark PODO - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(C/2025/3911)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Johannes Ehrenreiter (Podersdorf am See, Austria) (represented by: S. Salomonowitz, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Klee, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Podersdorf Tourismus- und Freizeitbetriebsgesellschaft m.b.H. (Podersdorf am See) (represented by: W.M. Mosing, lawyer)

Re:

By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and alteration of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 26 February 2024 (Case R 790/2023-2).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.










2.


Mr Johannes Ehrenreiter shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by Podersdorf Tourismus- und Freizeitbetriebsgesellschaft m.b.H.










3.


The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/3797, 24.6.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3911/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
C-656/24, Prefettura di Bari and ANAC: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 April 2025 (request for a preliminary ruiling from the Consiglio di Stato – Italy) – Ufficio Territoriale del Governo (UTG) – Prefettura di Bari, Autorità nazionale anticorruzione (ANAC). v Dmeco Engineering Srl, Regione Puglia, BG (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Freedom to conduct a business – Freedom of establishment – Purely domestic situation – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court – Requirement to state the link existing between the provisions of EU law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2025-04-28
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: award of contract, public procurement, right of establishment, services contract, supplies contract, tendering, works contract








C_202503860EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3860


21.7.2025






Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 April 2025 (request for a preliminary ruiling from the Consiglio di Stato – Italy) – Ufficio Territoriale del Governo (UTG) – Prefettura di Bari, Autorità nazionale anticorruzione (ANAC). v Dmeco Engineering Srl, Regione Puglia, BG


(C-656/24,
                (1)
Prefettura di Bari and ANAC)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Freedom to conduct a business - Freedom of establishment - Purely domestic situation - Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court - Requirement to state the link existing between the provisions of EU law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation - Lack of sufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2025/3860)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties


Applicants: Ufficio Territoriale del Governo (UTG) – Prefettura di Bari, Autorità nazionale anticorruzione (ANAC)

Defendants: Dmeco Engineering Srl, Regione Puglia, BG

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Council of State, Italy), made by decision of 4 October 2024, is manifestly inadmissible


(1)  JO C, C/2025/147.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3860/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-17/23: Order of the General Court of 28 April 2025 – Feport v Commission (State aid – Aid scheme granted by Greece to the maritime sector concerning tonnage tax and related aid measures – Action for failure to act – Position taken ending the inaction – Action which has become devoid of purpose – No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2025-04-28
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Greece, State aid, control of State aid, corporation tax, international tax law, maritime transport








C_202503910EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3910


21.7.2025






Order of the General Court of 28 April 2025 – Feport v Commission


(Case T-17/23)
                (1)

(State aid - Aid scheme granted by Greece to the maritime sector concerning tonnage tax and related aid measures - Action for failure to act - Position taken ending the inaction - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2025/3910)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Federation of European Private Port Operators (Feport) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: B. Le Bret and M. Gouraud, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Abenhaïm, C.-M. Carrega and L. Nicolae, acting as Agents)

Intervening party, in support of the defendant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: K. Boskovits and V. Baroutas, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 265 TFEU, the applicant asks the Court to declare that the European Commission unlawfully failed to act in Case SA.33828 relating to the Greek tonnage tax scheme, by failing to adopt a decision to initiate a formal State aid investigation procedure or by failing to take a position on whether or not the appropriate measures which it had sent to the Hellenic Republic on 18 December 2015 and which were not accepted by the latter continued to be necessary.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


Federation of European Private Port Operators (Feport) shall bear half of its own costs.










3.


The European Commission shall bear its own costs and shall pay half of those incurred by Feport.










4.


The Hellenic Republic shall bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 179, 22.5.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3910/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-305/25 P: Appeal brought on 28 April 2025 by eBilet Polska sp. z o.o. against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 26 February 2025 in Case T-197/24, eBilet Polska v EUIPO (eBilet)
Date: 2025-04-28
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, computer equipment, cultural event, registered trade mark, retail selling, service, software, sporting event, ticket, trade-mark law








C_202506117EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/6117


8.12.2025






Appeal brought on 28 April 2025 by eBilet Polska sp. z o.o. against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 26 February 2025 in Case T-197/24, eBilet Polska v EUIPO (eBilet)


(Case C-305/25 P)

(C/2025/6117)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: eBilet Polska sp. z o.o. (represented by: P. Kurcman, radca prawny)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
By order of 28 October 2025, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that eBilet Polska sp. z o.o. should bear its own costs.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/6117/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-306/25 P: Appeal brought on 28 April 2025 by Robin Messiaen, Ferenc Ballegeer against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 March 2025 in Case T-451/24, Messiaen and Ballegeer v Parliament and Council
Date: 2025-04-28
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: admissibility, confidentiality, fight against crime, lawyer, legal aid, money laundering, personal data, protection of communications, terrorism financing








C_202505928EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5928


17.11.2025






Appeal brought on 28 April 2025 by Robin Messiaen, Ferenc Ballegeer against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 March 2025 in Case T-451/24, Messiaen and Ballegeer v Parliament and Council


(Case C-306/25 P)

(C/2025/5928)
Language of the case: Dutch

Parties


Appellants: Robin Messiaen, Ferenc Ballegeer (represented by: P. Verhaeghe, lawyer)

Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union, European Parliament
By order of 2 October 2025, the Court of Justice (Seventh Chamber) dismissed the appeal as manifestly unfounded and ordered Robin Messiaen and Ferenc Ballegeer to bear their own costs.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5928/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Notice to economic operators – New round of requests for the suspension of the autonomous Common Customs Tariff duties on certain industrial and agricultural products
Date: 2025-04-28
Institutions: Directorate-General for Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission
Subjects: CCT duties, agricultural product, common customs tariff, import (EU), industrial product, suspension of customs duties








C_202502486EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2486


28.4.2025






Notice to economic operators
New round of requests for the suspension of the autonomous Common Customs Tariff duties on certain industrial and agricultural products
(C/2025/2486)

Economic operators are informed that the Commission has received requests in accordance with the administrative arrangements foreseen in the Commission Communication concerning autonomous tariff suspensions and quotas (2011/C 363/02) (1) for the January round of 2026.
The list of the products for which a duty suspension is requested is now available on the Commission's thematic (Europa) website on the customs union (2).
Economic operators are also informed that the deadline for objections against new requests to reach the Commission, via the national administrations, is 17 June 2025 which is the date of the second scheduled meeting of the Economic Tariff Questions Group.
Interested operators are advised to consult the list regularly in order to be informed on the status as the requests.
More information on the autonomous tariff suspension procedure can be found on the Europa website:

Suspensions (Autonomous Tariff Suspensions) (europa.eu)



(1)  
            OJ C 363, 13.12.2011, p. 6.

(2)  
            Suspensions - Home Page (europa.eu)



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2486/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)