do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Corrigendum to the list and description of the files of the OIV Code of Oenological Practices referred to in Article 3(2) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/934 (OJ C, C/2025/1829, 31.3.2025)
Date: 2025-04-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: alcohol, distillation, food additive, production standard, quality control of agricultural products, regulation of agricultural production, vinification, viticulture, wine








C_202590035EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/90035


22.4.2025






Corrigendum to the list and description of the files of the OIV Code of Oenological Practices referred to in Article 3(2) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/934

(

Official Journal of the European Union C, C/2025/1829, 31 March 2025

)


On page 11, in Section 2.1.3.1.1.1. ‘CALCIUM SULFATE (OENO 583/2017)’, under Prescriptions, in point c):
for:


                  ‘The dose must not exceed 2 g/l of calcium sulphate because it allows to reach the adequate Tel. 3,2 in the winemaking of these musts and to obtain equilibrated wines even in years of adverse weather conditions.’,

read:


                  ‘The dose must not exceed 2 g/l of calcium sulphate because it allows to reach the adequate pH 3,2 in the winemaking of these musts and to obtain equilibrated wines even in years of adverse weather conditions’.



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1829/corrigendum/2025-04-22/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to Directive (EU) 2024/2749 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2024 amending Directives 2000/14/EC, 2006/42/EC, 2010/35/EU, 2014/29/EU, 2014/30/EU, 2014/33/EU, 2014/34/EU, 2014/35/EU, 2014/53/EU and 2014/68/EU as regards emergency procedures for the conformity assessment, presumption of conformity, adoption of common specifications and market surveillance due to an internal market emergency (OJ L, 2024/2749, 8.11.2024)
Date: 2025-04-22
Institutions: Council of the European Union, European Parliament
Subjects: EC conformity marking, European standard, crisis management, goods, harmonisation of standards, market approval, market supervision, security of supply, single market, technical specification




L_202590340EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2025/90340


22.4.2025






Corrigendum to Directive (EU) 2024/2749 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2024 amending Directives 2000/14/EC, 2006/42/EC, 2010/35/EU, 2014/29/EU, 2014/30/EU, 2014/33/EU, 2014/34/EU, 2014/35/EU, 2014/53/EU and 2014/68/EU as regards emergency procedures for the conformity assessment, presumption of conformity, adoption of common specifications and market surveillance due to an internal market emergency
(
Official Journal of the European Union L, 2024/2749, 8 November 2024
)

On page 14, Article 3, point (2), concerning Article 33c(9) of Directive 2010/35/EU:







for:





‘9.   The use of the authorisation procedure set out in paragraphs 1 to 4 of this Article shall not affect the application on the territory of the Member State concerned of the relevant conformity assessment procedures laid down in Article 18.’

,










read:





‘9.   The use of the authorisation procedure set out in paragraphs 1 to 4 of this Article shall not affect the application on the territory of the Member State concerned of the relevant conformity assessment procedures laid down in Article 12.’.








ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/2749/corrigendum/2025-04-22/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Case C-293/25, Moguchev: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Apelativen sad Sofia (Bulgaria) lodged on 22 April 2025 – Criminal proceedings against RT
Date: 2025-04-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European arrest warrant, enforcement of ruling, imprisonment








C_202503407EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3407


30.6.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Apelativen sad Sofia (Bulgaria) lodged on 22 April 2025 – Criminal proceedings against RT


(Case C-293/25, Moguchev)
                (1)

(C/2025/3407)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Apelativen sad Sofia

                   
               

Party to the main proceedings

RT

Respondent

Sofiyska apelativna prokuratura

Question referred

Must Article 8(1) and Article 25 of Council Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA (2) of 27 November 2008 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty for the purpose of their enforcement in the European Union be interpreted as permitting national legislation and case-law under which a national court seised of the enforcement of a ‘custodial sentence’ and a certificate as referred to in Article 5(1) of that framework decision to follow a procedure, provided for by national law, for the recognition and enforcement of that judgment, other than the procedure provided for by the national law transposing that framework decision, if the certificate and the judgment have been forwarded after a court of the same State has refused to execute the European arrest warrant and has undertaken to enforce the sentence in accordance with point 6 of Article 4 of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA (3) of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States?


(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(2)  
            OJ 2008 L 327, p. 27.

(3)  
            OJ 2002 L 190, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3407/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 16 April 2025
Date: 2025-04-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202501953EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1953


22.4.2025






Euro exchange rates (1)


            16 April 2025
         
(C/2025/1953)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1355 




JPY


Japanese yen


162,09 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4672 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85618 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,1550 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9260 




ISK


Iceland króna


145,30 




NOK


Norwegian krone


12,0725 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,995 




HUF


Hungarian forint


407,73 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2933 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9778 




TRY


Turkish lira


43,2901 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,7816 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5807 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,8124 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,9200 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4926 




KRW


South Korean won


1 610,21 




ZAR


South African rand


21,4054 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,2961 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


19 074,81 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,0081 




PHP


Philippine peso


64,421 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


37,716 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,6671 




MXN


Mexican peso


22,7237 




INR


Indian rupee


97,2595 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1953/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 17 April 2025
Date: 2025-04-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202501954EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1954


22.4.2025






Euro exchange rates (1)


            17 April 2025
         
(C/2025/1954)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1360 




JPY


Japanese yen


161,98 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4672 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85873 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,0278 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9291 




ISK


Iceland króna


145,10 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,9655 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,009 




HUF


Hungarian forint


407,60 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2743 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9776 




TRY


Turkish lira


43,2604 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,7845 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5773 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,8195 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,9118 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4905 




KRW


South Korean won


1 609,12 




ZAR


South African rand


21,3927 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,2900 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


19 162,33 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,0069 




PHP


Philippine peso


64,387 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


37,800 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,6810 




MXN


Mexican peso


22,6247 




INR


Indian rupee


97,0185 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1954/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-167/25, Swiss International Air Lines: Order of the President of the Court of 22 April 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nederlandstalige Ondernemingsrechtbank Brussel – Belgium) – A v Swiss International Air Lines AG
Date: 2025-04-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Switzerland, agreement (EU), airline, carrier, civil aviation, indemnification, passenger rights, third country, traveller








C_202503887EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3887


21.7.2025






Order of the President of the Court of 22 April 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nederlandstalige Ondernemingsrechtbank Brussel – Belgium) – A v Swiss International Air Lines AG


(Case C-167/25,
                (1)
Swiss International Air Lines)

(C/2025/3887)
Language of the case: Dutch
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C, C/2025/2650.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3887/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.11931 – LONE STAR / RADICI) – Candidate case for simplified procedure
Date: 2025-04-22
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: consultancy, economic concentration, electrical energy, investment company, merger control, natural gas, polymer, special chemicals, subsidiary, thermal energy








C_202502427EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2427


22.4.2025






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.11931 – LONE STAR / RADICI)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/2427)


1.   
On 9 April 2025, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


Lone Star Fund XII, L.P. (‘Lone Star’, USA),










—


Radici Partecipazioni S.p.A. (‘Radici’, Italy), controlled by Radicifin S.a.p.A., (Italy).




Lone Star will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of Radici.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:






—


Lone Star is a private equity firm advising funds that invest globally in real estate, equity, credit, and other financial assets,










—


Radici is an Italian company active in specialty chemicals and polymers globally as well as in electricity, natural gas and thermal energy in Italy, through its subsidiary GeoEnergie S.p.A.






3.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified treatment for certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.11931 – LONE STAR / RADICI
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  
            OJ C 160, 5.5.2023, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2427/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-298/25, Ofsets: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 22 April 2025 – Ofsets Limited v Sabena Technics Helicopters, Stoltd Partner Limited
Date: 2025-04-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: civil liability proceedings, commercial law, law of obligations, restriction on competition








C_202504035EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4035


28.7.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 22 April 2025 – Ofsets Limited v Sabena Technics Helicopters, Stoltd Partner Limited


(Case C-298/25, Ofsets)

(C/2025/4035)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Ofsets Limited

Respondents: Sabena Technics Helicopters, Stoltd Partner Limited

Question referred

Must Article 1(1) of the Rome Convention of 19 June 1980 on the law applicable to contractual obligations and Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (Rome II) (1) be interpreted as meaning that an action for damages for the abrupt termination of an established business relationship, assessed on the basis of legislative provisions governing practices regarded as restrictive of competition, and thus of a legal obligation to refrain from a certain type of conduct, falls within the ambit of matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict, irrespective of any contractual relationship that may have been established between the parties?


(1)  
            OJ 2007 L 199, p. 40.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4035/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11955 – APAX PARTNERS / NORVA24 GROUP)
Date: 2025-04-22
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: consultancy, economic concentration, investment, maintenance, merger control, provision of services, public sanitation








C_202502484EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2484


29.4.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11955 – APAX PARTNERS / NORVA24 GROUP)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/2484)

On 22 April 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M11955. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2484/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-259/25: Action brought on 22 April 2025 – Pumpyanskiy v Council
Date: 2025-04-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russo-Ukrainian issue, economic sanctions, fundamental rights, international sanctions, maladministration, natural person, principle of proportionality, rights of the defence








C_202503079EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3079


10.6.2025






Action brought on 22 April 2025 – Pumpyanskiy v Council


(Case T-259/25)

(C/2025/3079)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Alexander Dmitrievich Pumpyanskiy (Conches, Switzerland) (represented by: T. Bontinck, M. Brésart, J. Goffin and F. Patuelli, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2025/528 of 14 March 2025 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, in so far as it maintains the applicant’s name on the list set out in the annex to that decision; and










—


annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/527 of 14 March 2025 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, in so far as it includes the applicant’s name on the list set out in Annex I to that regulation;










—


order the Council to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging an error of assessment on the part of the Council.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging failure to implement the judgment of the General Court in Case T-221/24 and breach of the principle of sound administration.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging breach of the principle of proportionality.










4.


Fourth plea in law, alleging infringement of fundamental rights.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3079/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)