do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-296/25, Lidikar: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 16 April 2025 – Direktor na Teritorialna Direktsia Mitnitsa Burgas v Lidikar OOD
Date: 2025-04-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: customs territory (EU), customs valuation, export, goods, third country








C_202503545EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3545


7.7.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 16 April 2025 – Direktor na Teritorialna Direktsia Mitnitsa Burgas v Lidikar OOD


(Case T-296/25, Lidikar)

(C/2025/3545)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Varhoven administrativen sad

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant on a point of law: Direktor na Teritorialna Direktsia Mitnitsa Burgas

Respondent on a point of law: Lidikar OOD

Questions referred







1.


Can Article 74(3) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 (1) be interpreted as meaning that the value of goods that is declared on export of the goods from a non-member country may be regarded as ‘data available in the customs territory of the Union’?










2.


Can Article 74(3) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 be interpreted as meaning that determination of the customs value of goods on the basis of the value declared on export of those goods from a non-member country may constitute reasonable means for determining the customs value within the meaning of Article 74(3) of that regulation?






(1)  Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code (OJ 2013 L 269, p. 1).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3545/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.117554
Date: 2025-04-16
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Germany, State aid, aquaculture, control of State aid, fishing industry, forestry holding, forestry policy








C_202502319EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2319


16.4.2025






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.117554
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/2319)








Date of adoption of the decision


17.2.2025




Aid number


SA.117554




Member State


Germany




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Bund: Tarifermäßigung für Einkünfte aus Land- und Forstwirtschaft (einschließlich Binnenfischerei und Aquakultur)




Legal basis


§ 32c Einkommenssteuergesetz




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Sectorial development




Form of aid


Tax base reduction




Budget


Overall budget: 30 000 000  EUR
Annual budget: 5 000 000  EUR




Intensity


100,0 %




Duration


1.1.2023 - 31.12.2028




Economic sectors


Forestry and logging, Fishing and aquaculture




Name and address of the granting authority







Finanzämter der Länder




Die Anschriften der Finanzämter sind unter der folgenden Internetadresse abrufbar: https://www.steuerklassen.com/finanzaemter/









Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2319/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-254/25: Action brought on 16 April 2025 – Skechers USA v EUIPO (HANDS-FREE SLIP-INS)
Date: 2025-04-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, footwear industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202503078EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3078


10.6.2025






Action brought on 16 April 2025 – Skechers USA v EUIPO (HANDS-FREE SLIP-INS)


(Case T-254/25)

(C/2025/3078)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Skechers USA, Inc. II (Manhattan Beach, California, United States) (represented by: J. Bogatz, Y. Stone, J. Feigl and J. Graf Wrangel, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark HANDS-FREE SLIP-INS – Application for registration No 1 776 722
         

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 February 2025 in Case R 1233/2024-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3078/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-290/25, Aero VIM: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Mainz (Germany) lodged on 16 April 2025 – Sprocure LLC v Aero VIM GmbH
Date: 2025-04-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, delivery, economic sanctions, international sanctions, payment, purchase, purchase price, supplier








C_202503872EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3872


21.7.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Mainz (Germany) lodged on 16 April 2025 – Sprocure LLC v Aero VIM GmbH


(Case C-290/25, Aero VIM)

(C/2025/3872)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Mainz

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Sprocure LLC

Defendant: Aero VIM GmbH

Questions referred







1.


Must Article 11(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 (1) be interpreted as also covering situations where the person concerned acts as a ‘straw man’ for one of the persons, entities or bodies referred to in points (a) or (b) of that paragraph, that is to say, on their behalf, but without disclosing this?










2.


Must Article 11(1)(c) of Regulation EU No 833/2014 be interpreted as also covering the reimbursement of down payments or advance payments that have already been made on the purchase price, in the event of a refusal to deliver the goods (invoking the sanctions laid down in the Regulation)?
If so: what consequence in law does this prohibition on payment have? Can the supplier, as the other party to the contract, simply retain the down payment or advance payment?










3.


If Questions 1 and 2 are answered in the affirmative:
Must Article 11(1) of Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 be interpreted as meaning that, in the case of contracts for the purchase of several items, where only the delivery of particular items would be in breach of the measures imposed by the Regulation, the prohibition on reimbursement laid down therein covers only claims to reimbursement in respect of the purchase price for those particular items or reimbursement claims in respect of the purchase price for all the items purchased?






(1)  Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2014 L 229, p. 1).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3872/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 15 April 2025
Date: 2025-04-16
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202501952EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1952


16.4.2025






Euro exchange rates (1)


            15 April 2025
         
(C/2025/1952)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1324 




JPY


Japanese yen


161,85 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4641 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85570 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,0611 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9242 




ISK


Iceland króna


145,53 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,9726 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,064 




HUF


Hungarian forint


407,73 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2844 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9778 




TRY


Turkish lira


43,1829 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,7794 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5711 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,8238 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,9104 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4915 




KRW


South Korean won


1 615,76 




ZAR


South African rand


21,4541 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,2835 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


19 084,70 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,0034 




PHP


Philippine peso


64,537 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


38,026 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,6207 




MXN


Mexican peso


22,7215 




INR


Indian rupee


97,2557 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1952/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2024/1623 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2024 amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 as regards requirements for credit risk, credit valuation adjustment risk, operational risk, market risk and the output floor (OJ L, 2024/1623, 19.6.2024)
Date: 2025-04-16
Institutions: Council of the European Union, European Parliament
Subjects: EU banking union, banking policy, credit institution, credit policy, financial legislation, financial requirements, financial risk, financial supervision, investment company




L_202590328EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2025/90328


16.4.2025






Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2024/1623 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2024 amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 as regards requirements for credit risk, credit valuation adjustment risk, operational risk, market risk and the output floor
(
Official Journal of the European Union L, 2024/1623, 19 June 2024
)

On page 185, Article 1, point (252):







for:









‘(252)


in Article 514, the following paragraph is added:

“2.   On the basis of the EBA report referred to in paragraph 1 …”’,
















read:









‘(252)


in Article 514, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following:

“2.   On the basis of the EBA report referred to in paragraph 1 …”’.











ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1623/corrigendum/2025-04-16/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Case T-256/25: Action brought on 16 April 2025 – Telefónica Germany v EUIPO – ePlus (E-PLUS GRUPPE)
Date: 2025-04-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, audiovisual equipment, civil engineering, electronic commerce, electronic device, maintenance, provision of services, registered trade mark, telecommunications, trade-mark law








C_202503418EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3418


30.6.2025






Action brought on 16 April 2025 – Telefónica Germany v EUIPO – ePlus (E-PLUS GRUPPE)


(Case T-256/25)

(C/2025/3418)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Telefónica Germany GmbH & Co. OHG (Munich, Germany) (represented by: P. Neuwald, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: ePlus Inc. (Herndon, Virginia, United States)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark E-PLUS GRUPPE – European Union trade mark No 6 287 528
         

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 February 2025 in Case R 395/2024-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision and reject the application for revocation;










—


order EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant in the proceedings before the General Court, the Cancellation Division and the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO;










—


order any intervener to bear its own costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of the right to sound administration;










—


Infringement of essential procedural requirements.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3418/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-255/25: Action brought on 16 April 2025 – Telefónica Germany v EUIPO – ePlus (e plus)
Date: 2025-04-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, electronic commerce, provision of services, registered trade mark, telecommunications, trade-mark law








C_202503417EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3417


30.6.2025






Action brought on 16 April 2025 – Telefónica Germany v EUIPO – ePlus (e plus)


(Case T-255/25)

(C/2025/3417)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Telefónica Germany GmbH & Co. OHG (Munich, Germany) (represented by: P. Neuwald, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: ePlus Inc. (Herndon, Virginia, United States)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark e plus – European Union trade mark No 4 475 232
         

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 February 2025 in Case R 396/2024-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision and reject the application for revocation;










—


order EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant in the proceedings before the General Court, the Cancellation Division and the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO;










—


order any intervener to bear its own costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of the right to sound administration;










—


Infringement of essential procedural requirements.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3417/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)