do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11929 – MET / MEGA)
Date: 2025-04-15
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Belgium, Netherlands, biogas, economic concentration, energy supply, gas, merger control, mobile communication, retail trade








C_202502453EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2453


24.4.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11929 – MET / MEGA)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/2453)

On 15 April 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M11929. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2453/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Notice of a request concerning the applicability of Article 34 of Directive 2014/25/EU – Request made by the Republic of Estonia
Date: 2025-04-15
Institutions: Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, European Commission
Subjects: Estonia, award of contract, postal service, provision of services








C_202502295EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2295


15.4.2025






Notice of a request concerning the applicability of Article 34 of Directive 2014/25/EU
Request made by the Republic of Estonia
(C/2025/2295)

On 1 April 2025 the Commission received a request pursuant to Article 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (1). The first working day following receipt of the request is 2 April 2025.
This request concerns activities relating to the provision of postal services and other services as referred to in Article 13 (2)(b) and (c) of Directive 2014/25/EU in Estonia.
Article 34 of Directive 2014/25/EU provides that ‘contracts intended to enable an activity mentioned in Articles 8 to 14 to be carried out shall not be subject to this Directive if the Member State or the contracting entities having introduced the request pursuant to Article 35 can demonstrate that, in the Member State in which it is performed, the activity is directly exposed to competition on markets to which access is not restricted; nor shall design contests that are organised for the pursuit of such an activity in that geographic area be subject to this Directive’. The assessment of direct exposure to competition that can be carried out in the context of Directive 2014/25/EU is without prejudice to the full-fledged application of competition law.
The Commission is allowed a period of 105 (2) working days to take a decision on this request, commencing on the working day referred to above. The period therefore expires on 8 September 2025.
According to Article 35(5) of Directive 2014/25/EU, further requests concerning the same activities in Estonia submitted before the expiry of the period opened in respect of this request shall not be considered as new procedures and shall be treated in the context of this request.


(1)  Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on procurement procedures by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC (OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 243).

(2)  Pursuant to paragraph 1a of Annex IV to Directive 2014/25/EU in combination with the second subparagraph of said paragraph 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2295/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Notice pursuant to Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations – Publication of a vacancy for the function of Director DIGIT.C Digital Workplace & Infrastructure (Grade AD 14) – Directorate-General Informatics (DG DIGIT) – COM/2025/10469
Date: 2025-04-15
Institutions: Directorate-General for Human Resources and Security, European Commission
Subjects: administrator, competition (EU), digital transformation, innovation, job vacancy, managing director, recruitment








C_202502305EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2305


15.4.2025







            NOTICE PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 29(2) OF THE STAFF REGULATIONS
         
Publication of a vacancy for the function of Director DIGIT.C ‘Digital Workplace & Infrastructure’
         
(Grade AD 14)
Directorate-General Informatics (DG DIGIT)
COM/2025/10469
(C/2025/2305)


          
      
The European Commission has published a vacancy notice (reference COM/2025/10469) for the function of Director DIGIT.C ‘Digital Workplace & Infrastructure’ (Grade AD 14) in Directorate-General Digital Services (DG DIGIT) in Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.
To consult the text of the vacancy notice in 24 languages and to submit your application, please visit this dedicated webpage on the European Commission’s website: https://europa.eu/!Fgnq6k.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2305/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-251/25: Action brought on 15 April 2025 – Mordalski v EUIPO – Anita Food (ANITA)
Date: 2025-04-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, catering industry, cereal product, coffee, condiment, confectionery, foodstuff, registered trade mark, tea, trade-mark law








C_202502917EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2917


2.6.2025






Action brought on 15 April 2025 – Mordalski v EUIPO – Anita Food (ANITA)


(Case T-251/25)

(C/2025/2917)
Language in which the application was lodged: Polish

Parties


Applicant: Grzegorz Mordalski (Działoszyn, Poland) (represented by: A. Korbela, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Anita Food, SA (Lima, Peru)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark ‘ANITA’ – EU trade mark No 8 109 993
         

Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 February 2025 in Case R 1567/2024-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 February 2025 in Case R 1567/2024-4, dismissing the appeal; and also










—


annul the decision of EUIPO’s Cancellation Division of 7 June 2024 in Case 47 087 C (preceding the abovementioned decision), which rejected the application for a declaration of invalidity of the EU word and figurative mark ANITA No 8 109 993; and










—


refer back to the EUIPO for reconsideration the application dated 1 November 2020 for a declaration of invalidity of the registration of the EU word and figurative mark No 8 109 993, registration of which was sought on 18 February 2009 and which was protected until 18 February 2019, registered in the name and on behalf of Anita Food S.A;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of the second sentence of recital 3 of Directive (EU) 2015/2436 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2015 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks, (1), which ensures that ‘Trade mark protection in the Member States coexists with protection at Union level’ – whereas, as a result of the interpretation of the law made in the contested decision, the protection of a trade mark available at EU level excludes the protection of a trade mark in a Member State;










—


Infringement of Article 7 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.






(1)  Directive (EU) 2015/2436 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2015 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (OJ 2015 L 336, p. 1).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2917/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Reykjavik District Court dated 15 April 2025 in the case of Ólafur Þór Jónsson and others v The National Energy Authority of Iceland and Benchmark Genetics Iceland hf. (Case E-7/25)
Date: 2025-04-15
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: European Economic Area, Iceland, environmental impact, groundwater, industrial project, project evaluation, water protection, water quality, water resources








C_202505023EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/5023


11.9.2025






Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Reykjavik District Court dated 15 April 2025 in the case of Ólafur Þór Jónsson and others v The National Energy Authority of Iceland and Benchmark Genetics Iceland hf.
(Case E-7/25)
(C/2025/5023)

A request has been made to the EFTA Court dated 15 April 2025 from Reykjavik District Court (Héraðsdómur Reykjavíkur), which was received at the Court Registry on 5 May 2025, for an Advisory Opinion in the case of Ólafur Þór Jónsson and others v The National Energy Authority of Iceland and Benchmark Genetics hf., on the following question:
Whether the provisions of Directive 2000/60/EC, in particular the provisions of that Directive’s Article 4, must be interpreted as precluding the granting of authorisation for a project which may potentially affect the status of a groundwater body for which classification and status assessment in the river basin management plan are required under that directive, prior to such assessment having been conducted and its results set forth in a river basin management plan in accordance with that directive’s provisions. That the provision bars the authorisation of a project, irrespective of whether a status assessment has been conducted, if the assessment results have not been set forth in the river basin management plan.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/5023/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)