do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.117429
Date: 2025-04-11
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: France, French overseas department and region, State aid, control of State aid, farming sector, fishing industry, forestry policy








C_202502272EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2272


11.4.2025






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.117429
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/2272)








Date of adoption of the decision


27.2.2025




Aid number


SA.117429




Member State


France




Region


RUP FR — Régions Ultrapériphériques Françaises




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Régime d’aide relatif au fonds de garantie pour le secteur agricole, la pêche, la filière bois et l’aquaculture (FOGAP)




Legal basis


Article 167 de la Loi n°2023-1322 du 29 décembre 2023




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Agriculture; Forestry; Rural areas, Aid for the outermost regions and the smaller Aegean islands, Fisheries and aquaculture, Aid for the outermost regions and the smaller Aegean islands




Form of aid


Guarantee




Budget


Overall budget: 0 EUR
Annual budget: 0 EUR




Intensity


 




Duration


Until 31.12.2026




Economic sectors


SECTION A – AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHING




Name and address of the granting authority







Agence française de développement (AFD)




5 rue Roland-Barthès 75012 PARIS








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2272/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community – Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services
Date: 2025-04-11
Institutions: Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, European Commission
Subjects: Italy, Latium, Lombardy, Sicily, air transport, inland transport, services of general interest, transport regulations








C_202502268EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2268


11.4.2025






Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/2268)







Member State


Italy




Routes concerned


Comiso-Rome Fiumicino and vice versa
Comiso-Milan Linate and vice versa
Comiso-Milan Malpensa and vice versa Comiso-Bergamo Orio al Serio and vice versa




Date of entry into force of the public service obligations


1 November 2025




Address where the text and any information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained


For further information:





Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport




Department of Transport and Navigation




Directorate-General for Airports, Air Transport and Satellite Services




Via Giuseppe Caraci, 36




00157 Rome




ITALY




Tel. +39 0644127190





National Civil Aviation Authority (ENAC)




Air transport and licensing department




Viale Castro Pretorio, 118




00185 Rome




ITALY




Tel. +39 0644596532
Websites: http://www.mit.gov.it


http://www.enac.gov.it

Email: dg.ta@pec.mit.gov.it


osp@enac.gov.it







ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2268/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Special report 11/2025: Transparency of EU funding granted to NGOs – Despite progress, the overview is still not reliable
Date: 2025-04-11
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: EU expenditure, administrative transparency, disclosure of information, distribution of EU funding, financial aid, financial control, financial transparency, non-governmental organisation, non-profit organisation








C_202502266EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2266


11.4.2025






Special report 11/2025:

            ‘Transparency of EU funding granted to NGOs – Despite progress, the overview is still not reliable’
         
(C/2025/2266)

The European Court of Auditors has published its special report 11/2025: ‘Transparency of EU funding granted to NGOs – Despite progress, the overview is still not reliable’.
The report can be consulted directly or downloaded at the European Court of Auditors’ website: https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/publications/sr-2025-11.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2266/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-276/25, RÖSLE GROUP: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud (Czech Republic) lodged on 11 April 2025 – RÖSLE GROUP GmbH v EVROmat a.s.
Date: 2025-04-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: disclosure of information, intellectual property, right to information








C_202503406EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3406


30.6.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud (Czech Republic) lodged on 11 April 2025 – RÖSLE GROUP GmbH v EVROmat a.s.


(Case C-276/25, RÖSLE GROUP)

(C/2025/3406)
Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Nejvyšší soud

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: RÖSLE GROUP GmbH

Defendant: EVROmat a.s.

Question referred

Must the provisions of Article 8(1) and (2) of Directive 2004/48/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights be interpreted as meaning that a national court must, on the application of an applicant, order an infringer (or another person referred to therein) not only to provide the information referred to therein itself, but also impose the obligation to demonstrate the accuracy and completeness of the information by presenting the relevant documents to the applicant?


(1)  
            OJ 2004 L 157, p. 45.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3406/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by the Supreme Court of Norway dated 11 April 2025 in the case of Saga Subsea AS v Akselsen and Granlund (Case E-6/25)
Date: 2025-04-11
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: European Economic Area, Norway, equal treatment, offshore drilling, offshore oil, temporary employment, temporary employment agency, vessel








C_202504333EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4333


31.7.2025






Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by the Supreme Court of Norway dated 11 April 2025 in the case of Saga Subsea AS v Akselsen and Granlund
(Case E-6/25)
(C/2025/4333)

A request has been made to the EFTA Court dated 11 April 2025 from the Supreme Court of Norway (Norges Høyesterett), which was received at the Court Registry on 11 April 2025, for an Advisory Opinion in the case of Saga Subsea AS v Akselsen and Granlund, on the following question:
Should Article 5 of the European Parliament and Council Directive 2008/104/EC of 19 November 2008 on temporary agency work (the Temporary Agency Work Directive) be interpreted to mean that the provision applies to employees of a temporary work agency domiciled in an EEA State during the period they are hired out for labour to an undertaking domiciled in the same EEA State on board a vessel used in connection with petroleum activities on that State’s continental shelf?


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4333/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-246/25: Action brought on 11 April 2025 – Ella Hotels and Resorts v EUIPO – Hachette Filipacchi Presse (ELLA RESORTS)
Date: 2025-04-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, business administration, business management, catering industry, hairdressing and beauty care, health care, hotel industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202503072EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3072


10.6.2025






Action brought on 11 April 2025 – Ella Hotels and Resorts v EUIPO – Hachette Filipacchi Presse (ELLA RESORTS)


(Case T-246/25)

(C/2025/3072)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Ella Hotels and Resorts single member SA (Athens, Greece) (represented by: M. Kosmopoulos, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Hachette Filipacchi Presse (Paris, France)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union trade mark figurative mark ELLA RESORTS – Application for registration No 18 648 497
         

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 February 2025 in Case R 2144/2023-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the Contested Decision to the extent that it upholds the Opposition;










—


order the Defendant and the other party to the proceedings to bear the costs incurred by the Applicant in both the proceedings before the EUIPO and the proceedings before the General Court.





Plea in law

Infringement of Article 8(5) Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3072/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-245/25: Action brought on 11 April 2025 – Ella Hotels and Resorts v EUIPO – Hachette Filipacchi Presse (ELLA HOTELS AND RESORTS)
Date: 2025-04-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, business administration, business management, catering industry, hairdressing and beauty care, health care, hotel industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202503071EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3071


10.6.2025






Action brought on 11 April 2025 – Ella Hotels and Resorts v EUIPO – Hachette Filipacchi Presse (ELLA HOTELS AND RESORTS)


(Case T-245/25)

(C/2025/3071)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Ella Hotels and Resorts single member SA (Athens, Greece) (represented by: M. Kosmopoulos, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Hachette Filipacchi Presse (Paris, France)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark ELLA HOTELS AND RESORTS – Application for registration No 18 648 135
         

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 February 2025 in Case R 2143/2023-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the Contested Decision to the extent that it upholds the Opposition;










—


order the Defendant and the other party to the proceedings to bear the costs incurred by the Applicant in both the proceedings before the EUIPO and the proceedings before the General Court.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(5) Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3071/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-287/25, Groisweber: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg (Austria) lodged on 11 April 2025 – A***** and B***** v C***** GmbH
Date: 2025-04-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: airline, civil aviation, indemnification, package travel, passenger rights, reservation, traveller








C_202503425EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3425


30.6.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg (Austria) lodged on 11 April 2025 – A***** and B***** v C***** GmbH


(Case T-287/25, Groisweber)
                (1)

(C/2025/3425)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landesgericht Korneuburg

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellants: A***** and B*****

Respondent: C***** GmbH

Questions referred







1.


Must Article 2(f) and (j) of Regulation No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (2) be interpreted as meaning that Regulation No 261/2004 is applicable when a tour operator, with which [an air carrier] has no contractual relationship, and of whose activity on behalf of the passenger [the air carrier] is unaware, books a flight with that air carrier on behalf of the passenger, in respect of which the air carrier issues a booking confirmation?










2.


Must Article 7(1), Article 4(3) and Article 2(f) and (j) of Regulation No 261/2004 be interpreted as meaning that the operating air carrier is obliged to compensate a passenger if a tour operator with which it has no contractual relationship, and of whose activity on behalf of the passenger it is unaware, books a flight with that air carrier on behalf of the passenger, in respect of which the air carrier issues a booking confirmation; the tour operator – without being prompted by the air carrier – informed the passenger a few hours before the planned flight that the flight had been rescheduled due to a change in flight number, flight time and final destination; the passenger – although already checked in for the flight – did not, therefore, present himself for boarding under the conditions laid down in Article 3(2) of the regulation; however, the flight originally booked was actually operated as planned; and the air carrier would have carried the passenger if he had presented himself for boarding under the conditions laid down in Article 3(2) of the regulation?






(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(2)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3425/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-658/24 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 11 April 2025 – Warbud v Frontex (Interim relief – Public works contracts – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency)
Date: 2025-04-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: award of contract, public procurement, tendering, works contract








C_202502901EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2901


2.6.2025






Order of the President of the General Court of 11 April 2025 – Warbud v Frontex


(Case T-658/24 R)

(Interim relief - Public works contracts - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)
(C/2025/2901)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Warbud S.A. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: K. Kuźma, M. Gajdek, W. Hartung and D. Sarmiento Ramírez-Escudero, lawyers)

Defendant: European Border and Coast Guard Agency (represented by: C. Carroll and R.-A. Popa, acting as Agents, and by M. Troncoso Ferrer and L. Lence de Frutos, lawyers)

Re:

By its application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, the applicant requests, in the first place, suspension of operation of the decision of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex), as notified on 23 October 2024 and 7 February 2025 in the award procedure bearing the reference FRONTEX/CD/1217/2021/RS – FRONTEX Permanent Premises, informing it that the tender it submitted had not been successful and that the framework agreement had been awarded to another tenderer and, in the second place, suspension of the signature of the framework agreement with the successful tenderer.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


The order of 13 February 2025, Warbud v Frontex (T-658/24 R), is cancelled.










3.


The costs are reserved.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2901/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)