do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the application of certain provisions of Council Decision 2008/615/JHA on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime, of Council Decision 2008/616/JHA on the implementation of Decision 2008/615/JHA on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime, and the Annex thereto, and of Council Framework Decision 2009/905/JHA on accreditation of forensic service providers carrying out laboratory activities [2025/710]
Date: 2025-04-08
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Liechtenstein, biometrics, cooperation agreement (EU), crime, cross-border cooperation, exchange of information, genetic database, police cooperation, terrorism, vehicle registration








L_202500710EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2025/710


8.4.2025






Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the application of certain provisions of Council Decision 2008/615/JHA on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime, of Council Decision 2008/616/JHA on the implementation of Decision 2008/615/JHA on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime, and the Annex thereto, and of Council Framework Decision 2009/905/JHA on accreditation of forensic service providers carrying out laboratory activities [2025/710]

The Agreement between the European Union and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the application of certain provisions of Council Decision 2008/615/JHA on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime, of Council Decision 2008/616/JHA on the implementation of Decision 2008/615/JHA on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime, and the Annex thereto, and of Council Framework Decision 2009/905/JHA on accreditation of forensic service providers carrying out laboratory activities, signed in Brussels on 27 June 2019
          (1), will enter into force on 1 June 2025, the procedure provided for in Article 8(1) of the Agreement having been completed on 12 March 2025.


(1)  
            OJ L 184, 10.7.2019, p. 3.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/info/2025/710/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Case C-268/25, ETS and Others: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 8 April 2025 – ETS Srl and Others v Rete Ferroviaria Italiana SpA
Date: 2025-04-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: debt, group of companies, principle of proportionality, public procurement, tax law, tendering








C_202503404EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3404


30.6.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 8 April 2025 – ETS Srl and Others v Rete Ferroviaria Italiana SpA


(Case C-268/25, ETS and Others)

(C/2025/3404)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: ETS Srl, Minnucci Associati Srl, Mi.Cos. SpA, Itesa Srl, Maceg Srl, Tekno Kons Innovation Srl, Cartorender Srl, Rilievi Topografici di Boninsegna G. & C. Snc, Tecno top Srl, I.G. Service Srl, Sub-Service Srl

Defendant: Rete Ferroviaria Italiana SpA

Questions referred







1.


Do Article 57 of Directive 2014/24/EU, (1) Article 80 of Directive 2014/25/EU (2) and the [EU law] principle of proportionality preclude the introduction or interpretation of a national rule which does not allow for the exclusion or substitution of a principal of a grouping of undertakings which has infringed tax rules that have been definitively established prior to the expiry of the time limit for submitting the tender; in particular, by way of a provision according to which, in any event, the extinction, payment or commitment to pay must have taken place before the expiry of that time limit, even if the reason for exclusion ceased to exist during the tender procedure and before the adoption of the measure excluding the grouping;










2.


if the first question is answered in the affirmative, do the same rules and principles preclude the introduction or interpretation of a national rule that does not allow for the exclusion or substitution of a principal of a grouping irrespective of the agent’s actual knowledge of the reason for the exclusion of the principal?










3.


if the first and second questions are answered in the affirmative, do those same rules and principles preclude the introduction or interpretation of a national rule that does not allow for the exclusion or substitution of a principal where the reason for the exclusion of that principal came to the knowledge of the agent only following notification of the contracting authority’s checks?






(1)  Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (OJ 2014 L 94, p. 65).

(2)  Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC (OJ 2014 L 94, p. 243).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3404/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Notice pursuant to Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations – Publication of a vacancy for the function of Director Defence Policy DEFIS.A (Grade AD 14) – Directorate-General Defence Industry and Space – COM/2025/10466
Date: 2025-04-08
Institutions: Directorate-General for Human Resources and Security, European Commission
Subjects: Brussels region, administrator, competition (EU), defence policy, job vacancy, managing director, recruitment, space policy








C_202502152EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2152


8.4.2025







            NOTICE PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 29(2) OF THE STAFF REGULATIONS
         
Publication of a vacancy for the function of Director ‘Defence Policy’ DEFIS.A
(Grade AD 14)
Directorate-General Defence Industry and Space
COM/2025/10466
(C/2025/2152)


          
      
The European Commission has published a vacancy notice (reference COM/2025/10466) for the function of Director ‘Defence Policy’ (DEFIS.A) (Grade AD 14) in Directorate-General Defence Industry and Space in Brussels.
To consult the text of the vacancy notice in 24 languages and to submit your application, please visit this dedicated webpage on the European Commission’s website: https://europa.eu/!jVRdYN.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2152/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11880 – CDPE / TRILANTIC / AGRI HOLDING)
Date: 2025-04-08
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Italy, computer equipment, consultancy, economic concentration, information technology, investment company, merger control, precision agriculture, real estate business, software








C_202502292EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2292


14.4.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11880 – CDPE / TRILANTIC / AGRI HOLDING)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/2292)

On 8 April 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M11880. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2292/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-267/25, I-Sete: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Administrativo e Fiscal do Porto (Portugal) lodged on 8 April 2025 – I-Sete – Inovação, Soluções Económicas e Tecnologias Ecológicas, Lda. v EDIA – Empresa de Desenvolvimento e Infra-estruturas do Alqueva, S. A.
Date: 2025-04-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: award of contract, principle of proportionality, public procurement, rights of the defence, tendering








C_202504137EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4137


4.8.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Administrativo e Fiscal do Porto (Portugal) lodged on 8 April 2025 – I-Sete – Inovação, Soluções Económicas e Tecnologias Ecológicas, Lda. v EDIA – Empresa de Desenvolvimento e Infra-estruturas do Alqueva, S. A.


(Case C-267/25, I-Sete)

(C/2025/4137)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Administrativo e Fiscal do Porto

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: I-Sete – Inovação, Soluções Económicas e Tecnologias Ecológicas, Lda.

Defendant: EDIA – Empresa de Desenvolvimento e Infra-estruturas do Alqueva, S. A.

Questions referred







1.


Does the provisional lifting of the automatic suspensive effect, without hearing the opposing party, enshrined in Article 25-A(2) and (3) of Law No 30/2021 of 21 May, as amended by Law No 43/202[4] of 2 December, comply with Article 2d of Directive … 2007/66/EC of the [European] Parliament and of the Council … of 11 December 2007, (1) when the latter is interpreted as meaning that the lifting of such an effect always depends on hearing the opposing party and a prior merit-based assessment of all aspects for the purposes of the decision to be taken?










2.


Must Article 2d of that directive be interpreted as not precluding national legislation that makes the economic interest in a possible loss of European funds, on account of a delay in the implementation of a funded project, an overriding reason relating to the general interest justifying the lifting of automatic suspensive effect? Is a mere economic loss a disproportionate consequence, taking into account the interests intended to be safeguarded by the operation of the automatic suspensive effect, compatible with the provisions of the second subparagraph of Article 2d(3)?






(1)  Directive 2007/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2007 amending Council Directives 89/665/EEC and 92/13/EEC with regard to improving the effectiveness of review procedures concerning the award of public contracts (OJ L 335, 20.12.2007, p. 31).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4137/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-266/25, I-Sete: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Administrativo e Fiscal do Porto (Portugal) lodged on 8 April 2025 – I-Sete – Inovação, Soluções Económicas e Tecnologias Ecológicas, Lda. v EDIA – Empresa de Desenvolvimento e Infra-estruturas do Alqueva, S. A.
Date: 2025-04-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: award of contract, principle of proportionality, public procurement, rights of the defence, tendering








C_202504136EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4136


4.8.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Administrativo e Fiscal do Porto (Portugal) lodged on 8 April 2025 – I-Sete – Inovação, Soluções Económicas e Tecnologias Ecológicas, Lda. v EDIA – Empresa de Desenvolvimento e Infra-estruturas do Alqueva, S. A.


(Case C-266/25, I-Sete)

(C/2025/4136)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Administrativo e Fiscal do Porto

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: I-Sete – Inovação, Soluções Económicas e Tecnologias Ecológicas, Lda.

Defendant: EDIA – Empresa de Desenvolvimento e Infra-estruturas do Alqueva, S. A.

Questions referred







1.


Does the provisional lifting of the automatic suspensive effect, without hearing the opposing party, enshrined in Article 25-A(2) and (3) of Law No 30/2021 of 21 May, as amended by Law No 43/202[4] of 2 December, comply with Article 2d of Directive … 2007/66/EC of the [European] Parliament and of the Council … of 11 December 2007, (1) when the latter is interpreted as meaning that the lifting of such an effect always depends on hearing the opposing party and a prior merit-based assessment of all aspects for the purposes of the decision to be taken?










2.


Must Article 2d of that directive be interpreted as not precluding national legislation that makes the economic interest in a possible loss of European funds, on account of a delay in the implementation of a funded project, an overriding reason relating to the general interest justifying the lifting of automatic suspensive effect? Is a mere economic loss a disproportionate consequence, taking into account the interests intended to be safeguarded by the operation of the automatic suspensive effect, compatible with the provisions of the second subparagraph of Article 2d(3)?






(1)  Directive 2007/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2007 amending Council Directives 89/665/EEC and 92/13/EEC with regard to improving the effectiveness of review procedures concerning the award of public contracts (OJ L 335, 20.12.2007, p. 31).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4136/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 7 April 2025
Date: 2025-04-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202501939EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1939


8.4.2025






Euro exchange rates (1)


            7 April 2025
         
(C/2025/1939)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0967 




JPY


Japanese yen


160,58 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4638 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85588 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,0780 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9377 




ISK


Iceland króna


145,10 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,9545 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,195 




HUF


Hungarian forint


407,95 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2940 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9774 




TRY


Turkish lira


41,6868 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,8174 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5657 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,5198 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,9651 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4767 




KRW


South Korean won


1 606,51 




ZAR


South African rand


21,2745 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,0155 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


18 591,26 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,9132 




PHP


Philippine peso


62,940 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


37,847 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,4415 




MXN


Mexican peso


22,6772 




INR


Indian rupee


94,0590 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1939/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11847 – HARTREE / ED&F MAN COMMODITIES)
Date: 2025-04-08
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: animal feedingstuffs, coffee, commodities market, economic concentration, energy market, fertiliser industry, financial market, merger control, molasses, sugar, wholesale selling








C_202502329EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2329


15.4.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11847 – HARTREE / ED&F MAN COMMODITIES)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/2329)

On 8 April 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M11847. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2329/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-230/25: Action brought on 8 April 2025 – Ionfarma v EUIPO – Manola and Simeone (DESMOMED)
Date: 2025-04-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetic product, dental medicine, dietary product, essential oil, registered trade mark, toiletries, trade-mark law








C_202502912EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2912


2.6.2025






Action brought on 8 April 2025 – Ionfarma v EUIPO – Manola and Simeone (DESMOMED)


(Case T-230/25)

(C/2025/2912)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Ionfarma, SL (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: T. González Martínez, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Carmelo Manola (Milan, Italy), Irene Simeone (Terranuova Bracciolini, Italy)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicants of the trade mark at issue: Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word trade mark DESMOMED – Application for registration No 18 806 324
         

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 February 2025 in Case R 1599/2024-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


reject the European Union trademark application No 18 806 324 DESMOMED for Classes 3 and 5 in its entirety;










—


order the defendant, and if applicable, the interveners, to pay the costs.





Plea in law

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2912/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-273/25, Erser: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Erfurt (Germany) lodged on 8 April 2025 – S v Meta Platforms Ireland Limited
Date: 2025-04-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Internet, data protection, data-processing law, disclosure of information, indemnification, personal data








C_202503866EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3866


21.7.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Erfurt (Germany) lodged on 8 April 2025 – S v Meta Platforms Ireland Limited


(Case C-273/25, Erser)
                (1)

(C/2025/3866)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Erfurt

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: S

Defendant: Meta Platforms Ireland Limited

Questions referred







1.


Is Article 82(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) (2) to be interpreted as meaning that a national court must, in the event of an infringement of the GDPR, award compensation to a data subject who has merely demonstrated that a third party (and not the defendant data controller) has published the data subject’s personal data on the internet? In other words: does the mere loss of control, even for a short time, over one’s own data constitute non-material damage within the meaning of Article 82(1) of the GDPR?










2.


If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative: to what extent does the answer differ, or does it make any difference, if the data published consist only of certain personal data (including, at most, numerical user ID, name and gender) that the data subject himself or herself had already published on the internet, together with the data subject’s telephone number, which a third party (who is not the defendant data controller) has linked to those personal data?






(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(2)  Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ 2016 L 119, p. 1).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3866/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-229/25: Action brought on 8 April 2025 – Ionfarma v EUIPO – Manola and Simeone (DESMOMED)
Date: 2025-04-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetic product, dental medicine, dietary product, essential oil, registered trade mark, toiletries, trade-mark law








C_202502911EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2911


2.6.2025






Action brought on 8 April 2025 – Ionfarma v EUIPO – Manola and Simeone (DESMOMED)


(Case T-229/25)

(C/2025/2911)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Ionfarma, SL (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: T. González Martínez, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Carmelo Manola (Milan, Italy), Irene Simeone (Terranuova Bracciolini, Italy)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicants of the trade mark at issue: Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative trade mark DESMOMED – Application for registration No 18 806 325
         

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 February 2025 in Case R 1316/2024-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


reject the European Union trademark application No 18 806 325 DESMOMED for Classes 3 and 5 in its entirety;










—


order the defendant, and if applicable, the interveners, to pay the costs.





Plea in law

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2911/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)