do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-80/24: Order of the General Court of 7 April 2025 – Skechers USA v EUIPO (GO HANDS FREE) (EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark GO HANDS FREE – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Equal treatment – Principle of good administration – Articles 20 and 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Date: 2025-04-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, footwear industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202503528EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3528


7.7.2025






Order of the General Court of 7 April 2025 – Skechers USA v EUIPO (GO HANDS FREE)


(Case T-80/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark GO HANDS FREE - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Equal treatment - Principle of good administration - Articles 20 and 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(C/2025/3528)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Skechers USA, Inc. II (Manhattan Beach, California, United States) (represented by: J. Bogatz, Y. Stone and J. Feigl, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl, acting as Agent)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 13 December 2023 (Case R 1664/2023-4).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


The parties shall each bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/2445, 8.4.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3528/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-254/24: Order of the General Court of 7 April 2025 – Skechers USA v EUIPO (HANDS FREE FIT) (EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark HANDS FREE FIT – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Equal treatment – Principle of good administration – Articles 20 and 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Date: 2025-04-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, footwear industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202503532EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3532


7.7.2025






Order of the General Court of 7 April 2025 – Skechers USA v EUIPO (HANDS FREE FIT)


(Case T-254/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark HANDS FREE FIT - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Equal treatment - Principle of good administration - Articles 20 and 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(C/2025/3532)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Skechers USA, Inc. II (Manhattan Beach, California, United States) (represented by: J. Bogatz, Y. Stone and J. Feigl, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl, acting as Agent)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 19 March 2024 (Case R 2417/2023-4).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


The parties shall each bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/3922, 1.7.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3532/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-259/25, Juminek: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 7 April 2025 – Bank Millennium S.A. v PP and SP
Date: 2025-04-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: access to the courts, bank, claim, consumer protection, limitation of legal proceedings, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, unfair terms of contract








C_202504132EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4132


4.8.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 7 April 2025 – Bank Millennium S.A. v PP and SP


(Case C-259/25, Juminek
                (1)
)

(C/2025/4132)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Bank Millennium S.A.

Defendants: PP and SP

Question referred

Must Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts, (2) Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the principles of effectiveness, equivalence, proportionality, legal certainty and of the right of access to a court or tribunal be interpreted as precluding a judicial interpretation of national legislation according to which the limitation period for a seller or supplier’s claim against a consumer for the reimbursement of undue payments made under a contract that has become null and void because it contains unfair terms starts to run from the date on which the consumer questioned the bank regarding the binding nature of the contractual terms?


(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(2)  
            OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4132/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-260/25, Olteski: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 7 April 2025 – mBank S.A. v AWP and KP
Date: 2025-04-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: access to the courts, bank, claim, consumer protection, limitation of legal proceedings, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, unfair terms of contract








C_202504133EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4133


4.8.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 7 April 2025 – mBank S.A. v AWP and KP


(Case C-260/25, Olteski
                (1)
)

(C/2025/4133)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: mBank S.A.

Defendants: AWP and KP

Question referred

Must Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts, (2) Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the principles of effectiveness, equivalence, proportionality, legal certainty and of the right of access to a court or tribunal be interpreted as precluding a judicial interpretation of national legislation according to which the limitation period for a seller or supplier’s claim against a consumer for the reimbursement of undue payments made under a contract that has become null and void because it contains unfair terms starts to run from the date on which the consumer questioned the bank regarding the binding nature of the contractual terms?


(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(2)  
            OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4133/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-261/25, Ścierbek: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 7 April 2025 – Bank BPH S.A. v AS and NS
Date: 2025-04-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: access to the courts, bank, claim, consumer protection, limitation of legal proceedings, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, unfair terms of contract








C_202504134EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4134


4.8.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 7 April 2025 – Bank BPH S.A. v AS and NS


(Case C-261/25, Ścierbek
                (1)
)

(C/2025/4134)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings


Party initiating proceedings before the referring court: Bank BPH S.A.

Defendants: AS and NS

Question referred

Must Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts, (2) Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the principles of effectiveness, equivalence, proportionality, legal certainty and of the right of access to a court or tribunal be interpreted as precluding a judicial interpretation of national legislation according to which the limitation period for a seller or supplier’s claim against a consumer for the reimbursement of undue payments made under a contract that has become null and void because it contains unfair terms starts to run from the date on which the consumer questioned the bank regarding the binding nature of the contractual terms?


(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(2)  
            OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4134/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)