do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-528/19: Order of the General Court of 2 April 2025 – Arranz de Miguel and Others v ECB and SRB
Date: 2025-04-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, banking supervision, damages, interest, right to justice, share








C_202503318EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3318


24.6.2025






Order of the General Court of 2 April 2025 – Arranz de Miguel and Others v ECB and SRB


(Case T-528/19)
                (1)

(C/2025/3318)
Language of the case: Spanish
The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 305, 9.9.2019.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3318/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-222/25: Action brought on 2 April 2025 – Freixenet v EUIPO – Alvear (CB)
Date: 2025-04-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, sparkling wine, trade-mark law








C_202502908EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2908


2.6.2025






Action brought on 2 April 2025 – Freixenet v EUIPO – Alvear (CB)


(Case T-222/25)

(C/2025/2908)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Freixenet, SA (Sant Sadurní d’Anoia, Spain) (represented by: J.M. Mora Cortés, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Alvear, SA (Montilla, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark CB – Application No 18 699 907
         

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 January 2025 in Case R 816/2024-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul/revoke the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO and the intervener (if the latter intervenes in this action) to pay the costs of the whole proceedings, including those relating to the proceedings before the Court, before the Opposition Division and before the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 47(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament of the Council, in conjunction with Article 18(1)(a) thereof;










—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2908/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-249/25, Jilin: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 2 April 2025 – Minister van Asiel en Migratie v UB
Date: 2025-04-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative procedure, aid to refugees, forced migration, international protection, right of asylum








C_202503632EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3632


14.7.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 2 April 2025 – Minister van Asiel en Migratie v UB


(Case C-249/25, Jilin)
                (1)

(C/2025/3632)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Raad van State

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Minister van Asiel en Migratie

Respondent: UB

Questions referred







1.


Must Article 17(2) of Directive 2001/55/EC (2) … be interpreted as conferring on Member States the power to suspend the examination of an application for international protection of a person enjoying temporary protection, during the period of temporary protection?










2.


Must the decision time limits in Article 31 of Directive 2013/32/EU (3) … be interpreted as meaning that, where an application for international protection was made before or during the period of temporary protection by a beneficiary of Directive 2001/55/EC, those time limits only start running or only resume running at the end of the period of temporary protection?






(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(2)  Council Directive 2001/55/EC of 20 July 2001 on minimum standards for giving temporary protection in the event of a mass influx of displaced persons and on measures promoting a balance of efforts between Member States in receiving such persons and bearing the consequences thereof (OJ 2001 L 212, p. 12).

(3)  Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection (OJ 2013 L 180, p. 60).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3632/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.116287
Date: 2025-04-02
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Canary Islands, Spain, State aid, control of State aid, fishing industry








C_202502035EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2035


2.4.2025






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.116287
(C/2025/2035)








Date of adoption of the decision


12.2.2025




Aid number


SA.116287




Member State


Spain




Region


Canarias




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


PESCA - Inversión en equipos que contribuyan a mejorar la seguridad para ampliar las zonas de pesca de los buques de menos de 12 metros de eslora total




Legal basis


PROYECTO DE ORDEN DE LA CONSEJERÍA DE AGRICULTURA, GANADERÍA, PESCA Y SOBERANÍA ALIMENTARIA POR LA QUE SE CONVOCAN DE MANERA ANTICIPADA PARA EL EJERCICIO 2025, LAS AYUDAS DESTINADAS A LA INVERSIÓN EN EQUIPOS QUE CONTRIBUYAN A MEJORAR LA SEGURIDAD Y AMPLIAR LAS ZONAS DE PESCA DE BUQUES PESQUEROS DE MENOS DE 12 METROS DE ESLORA TOTAL Y SE INCLUYEN LAS BASES REGULADORAS QUE HAN DE REGIR LA MISMA




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Fisheries and aquaculture




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 100 000  EUR




Intensity


100.0%




Duration


Until 31.12.2025




Economic sectors


Fishing




Name and address of the granting authority







Secretaría General Técnica de la Consejería de Agricultura, Ganadería, Pesca y Soberanía Alimentaria




Avda. José Manuel Guimerá, 10 Edf. Servicios Múltiples II Planta 4a 38071 Santa Cruz de Tenerife








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2035/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT of 2 April 2025 in Case E-20/24 – EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland (Failure by an EFTA State to fulfil its obligations – Failure to implement – Regulation (EU) 2022/750 – Benchmarks in OTC derivative contracts)
Date: 2025-04-02
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: EU financial instrument, European Economic Area, Iceland, contract, financial derivative, financial regulation, monetary relations, national implementing measure, technical standard








C_202506206EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/6206


13.11.2025






JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
of 2 April 2025
         
in Case E-20/24
EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland


(Failure by an EFTA State to fulfil its obligations – Failure to implement – Regulation (EU) 2022/750 – Benchmarks in OTC derivative contracts)


(C/2025/6206)

In Case E-20/24, EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland – APPLICATION seeking a declaration that Iceland has failed to adopt the measures necessary to make the act referred to at point 31bcp of Annex IX to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/750 of 8 February 2022 amending the regulatory technical standards laid down in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2205 as regards the transition to new benchmarks referenced in certain OTC derivative contracts), as adapted by Protocol 1 to the EEA Agreement, part of its internal legal order, the Court, composed of Páll Hreinsson, President, Bernd Hammermann (Judge-Rapporteur) and Michael Reiertsen, Judges, gave judgment on 2 April 2025, the operative part of which is as follows:
The Court hereby:






1.


Declares that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 7 of the EEA Agreement by failing to make the act referred to at point 31bcp of Annex IX to the EEA Agreement (Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/750 of 8 February 2022 amending the regulatory technical standards laid down in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2205 as regards the transition to new benchmarks referenced in certain OTC derivative contracts), as adapted by Protocol 1 to the EEA Agreement, part of its internal legal order.










2.


Orders Iceland to bear the costs of the proceedings.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/6206/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-442/23: Judgment of the General Court of 2 April 2025 – Giuliani v EUIPO – H&H (Swisse) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Swisse – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Article 51(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 59(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Mark of such a nature as to deceive the public – Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Bad faith – Right to be heard – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)
Date: 2025-04-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, food supplement, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, vitamin








C_202502857EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2857


2.6.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 2 April 2025 – Giuliani v EUIPO – H&H (Swisse)


(Case T-442/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark Swisse - Absolute grounds for invalidity - Article 51(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 59(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Mark of such a nature as to deceive the public - Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation 2017/1001) - Bad faith - Right to be heard - Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)
(C/2025/2857)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Giuliani SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: S. de Bosio, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: V. Ruzek, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Health and Happiness (H&H) Hong Kong Ltd (Hong Kong, China) (represented by: S. Geerlings, lawyer, and N. Saunders, Barrister-at-Law)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 31 May 2023 (Case R 2185/2019-1 RENV), as corrected by the corrigendum of 27 May 2024.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Giuliani SpA to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 329, 18.9.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2857/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-477/22: Order of the General Court of 2 April 2025 – Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Others
Date: 2025-04-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, Spain, bank, bank resolution, financial solvency, indemnification, operation of the Institutions, price of securities, public statement, shareholder








C_202503431EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3431


30.6.2025






Order of the General Court of 2 April 2025 – Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Others


(Case T-477/22)
                (1)

(C/2025/3431)
Language of the case: Spanish
The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 398, 17.10.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3431/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.117027
Date: 2025-04-02
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Finland, State aid, control of State aid, farming sector, fishing industry, forestry policy








C_202502034EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2034


2.4.2025






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.117027
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/2034)








Date of adoption of the decision


14.2.2025




Aid number


SA.117027




Member State


Finland




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Temporary incentive scheme for the forestry sector




Legal basis


Laki metsätalouden määräaikaisesta kannustejärjestelmästä (71/2023), Valtioneuvoston asetus metsätalouden määräraikaisesta kannustejärjestelmästä (1021/2023)




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Forestry




Form of aid


 




Budget


 




Intensity


 




Duration


8.8.2023 - 31.12.2029




Economic sectors


AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHING




Name and address of the granting authority







Suomen metsäkeskus




Aleksanterinkatu 18 A, 15140 Lahti








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2034/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11839 – BLACKROCK / HPS)
Date: 2025-04-02
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: consultancy, economic concentration, financial services, investment company, merger control








C_202502165EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2165


9.4.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11839 – BLACKROCK / HPS)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/2165)

On 2 April 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M11839. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2165/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-44/24: Judgment of the General Court of 2 April 2025 – Porczyńska v EUIPO – Gap (ITM) (gappol) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark gappol – Earlier EU word mark GAP – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No limitation in consequence of acquiescence – Article 54(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 61(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 57(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 64(2) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Article 56(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 63(3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Reimbursement of the costs of representation – Article 109(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-04-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, footwear industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202502859EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2859


2.6.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 2 April 2025 – Porczyńska v EUIPO – Gap (ITM) (gappol)


(Case T-44/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark gappol - Earlier EU word mark GAP - Relative ground for invalidity - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - No limitation in consequence of acquiescence - Article 54(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 61(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 57(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 64(2) of Regulation 2017/1001) - Article 56(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 63(3) of Regulation 2017/1001) - Reimbursement of the costs of representation - Article 109(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)
(C/2025/2859)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Marzena Porczyńska (Łódź, Poland) (represented by: P. Matyjek and J. Porczyński, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Gap (ITM), Inc. (San Francisco, California, United States) (represented by: M. Siciarek, lawyer)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and alteration of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 4 December 2023 (Case R 634/2023-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Marzena Porczyńska to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/1884, 11.3.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2859/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-398/21: Judgment of the General Court of 2 April 2025 – Ryanair and Ryanair Sun v Commission (State aid – Polish air transport market – Aid granted by Poland to LOT in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Subsidised loan and capital injection – Decision not to raise any objections – Article 107(3)(b) TFEU – Temporary Framework for State aid measures – Principle of non-discrimination – Freedom to provide services – Freedom of establishment – Obligation to state reasons)
Date: 2025-04-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Poland, State aid, aid to undertakings, air transport, capital increase, control of State aid, coronavirus disease, epidemic, equal treatment, loan








C_202502852EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2852


2.6.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 2 April 2025 – Ryanair and Ryanair Sun v Commission


(Case T-398/21)
                (1)

(State aid - Polish air transport market - Aid granted by Poland to LOT in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic - Subsidised loan and capital injection - Decision not to raise any objections - Article 107(3)(b) TFEU - Temporary Framework for State aid measures - Principle of non-discrimination - Freedom to provide services - Freedom of establishment - Obligation to state reasons)
(C/2025/2852)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Ryanair DAC (Swords, Ireland), Ryanair Sun S.A. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: F.-C. Laprévote, E. Vahida, S. Rating, D. Pérez de Lamo and C. Cozzani, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, F. Tomat and C. Georgieva, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, M. Rzotkiewicz, S. Żyrek and J. Florecka, acting as Agents), Polskie Linie Lotnicze ‘LOT’ S.A. (Warsaw) (represented by: M. Krakowiak and A. Glapa, lawyers)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of Commission Decision C(2020) 9606 final of 22 December 2020 on State aid SA.59158 (2020/N) – Poland – COVID-19: Aid to LOT (OJ 2021 C 260, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Ryanair DAC and Ryanair Sun S.A. to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;










3.


Orders the Republic of Poland and Polskie Linie Lotnicze ‘LOT’ S.A. to bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 338, 23.8.2021.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2852/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.11955 – APAX PARTNERS / NORVA24 GROUP) – Candidate case for simplified procedure
Date: 2025-04-02
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: consultancy, economic concentration, investment, maintenance, merger control, provision of services, public sanitation








C_202502112EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2112


2.4.2025






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.11955 – APAX PARTNERS / NORVA24 GROUP)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/2112)


1.   
On 26 March 2025, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


Apax Partners LLP (‘Apax Partners’, United Kingdom),










—


Norva24 Group AB (‘Norva24’, Sweden).




Apax Partners will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Norva24.
The concentration is accomplished by way of public bid announced on 10 March 2025.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:






—


Apax Partners provides investment advisory services to privaty equity funds investing in a range of industry sectors,










—


Norva24 provides Underground Infrastructure Maintenance services including emptying, inspection and maintenance services for underground pipes and tanks.






3.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified treatment for certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.11955 – APAX PARTNERS / NORVA24 GROUP
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  
            OJ C 160, 5.5.2023, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2112/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)