do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Regulation (EU) 2025/639 of 1 April 2025 correcting the Slovenian language version of Annex to Regulation (EU) 2020/354 establishing a list of intended uses of feed intended for particular nutritional purposes
Date: 2025-04-01
Institutions: Directorate-General for Translation, European Commission
Subjects: animal feedingstuffs, dietary product, labelling, market approval, marketing standard








L_202500639EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2025/639


2.4.2025







            COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) 2025/639
of 1 April 2025
         
correcting the Slovenian language version of Annex to Regulation (EU) 2020/354 establishing a list of intended uses of feed intended for particular nutritional purposes
(Text with EEA relevance)


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 767/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on the placing on the market and use of feed, amending European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 and repealing Council Directive 79/373/EEC, Commission Directive 80/511/EEC, Council Directives 82/471/EEC, 83/228/EEC, 93/74/EEC, 93/113/EC and 96/25/EC and Commission Decision 2004/217/EC (1), and in particular Article 10(5) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


The Slovenian language version of Annex to Commission Regulation (EU) 2020/354 (2) contain errors in Part A, points 9 and 10, as well as in Part B, in the table, entry number 60, column ‘Essential nutritional characteristics (GP1)’, third row, as regards the type of feed covered by the requirements set out in those provisions. The errors affect the scope of those provisions.












(2)


The Slovenian language version of Regulation (EU) 2020/354 should therefore be corrected accordingly. The other language versions are not affected.












(3)


The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed delivered prior to the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2020/354,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1

(Does not concern the English language)



Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 1 April 2025.


For the Commission


The President

Ursula VON DER LEYEN
            





(1)  
            OJ L 229, 1.9.2009, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2009/767/oj.

(2)  Commission Regulation (EU) 2020/354 of 4 March 2020 establishing a list of intended uses of feed intended for particular nutritional purposes and repealing Directive 2008/38/EC (OJ L 67, 5.3.2020, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2020/354/oj).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2025/639/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Case C-248/25 P: Appeal brought on 1 April 2025 by ADS L. Kowalik, B. Włodarczyk s.c. against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 15 January 2025 in Case T-1065/23, ADS L. Kowalik, B. Włodarczyk v EUIPO
Date: 2025-04-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: designs and models, electronic device








C_202506150EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/6150


24.11.2025






Appeal brought on 1 April 2025 by ADS L. Kowalik, B. Włodarczyk s.c. against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 15 January 2025 in Case T-1065/23, ADS L. Kowalik, B. Włodarczyk v EUIPO


(Case C-248/25 P)

(C/2025/6150)
Language of the case: Polish

Parties


Appellant: ADS L. Kowalik, B. Włodarczyk s.c. (represented by: M. Oleksyn, M. Stępkowski, radcowie prawni)

Respondent: European Union Intellectual Property Office
By order of 11 September 2025, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/6150/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.11807 – UNITED GROUP / MOTOR OIL (HELLAS) / ALPHA SATELLITE TV)
Date: 2025-04-01
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Cyprus, Greece, biofuel, economic concentration, merger control, oil refining, petroleum product, provision of services, telecommunications, television








C_202501998EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1998


1.4.2025






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.11807 – UNITED GROUP / MOTOR OIL (HELLAS) / ALPHA SATELLITE TV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/1998)


1.   
On 21 March 2025, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


United Group B.V. (‘United Group’, Netherlands), solely controlled by BC Partners LLP (United Kingdom),










—


Motor Oil (Hellas) Corinth Refineries S.A. (‘Motor Oil (Hellas)’, Greece),










—


Alpha Satellite Television S.A. (‘Alpha Satellite TV’, Greece), currently jointly controlled by Motor Oil (Hellas) and Primos Media S.à.r.l (Luxembourg).




United Group and Motor Oil (Hellas) will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of Alpha Satellite TV.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:






—


United Group is active in the provision of media and telecommunication services in Southeast Europe, including in Greece and Cyprus,










—


Motor Oil (Hellas) operates mainly in the petroleum refining sector. It is also active in the sale of petroleum products, such as automotive and aviation fuels, fuel oil, domestic heating oil, liquified petroleum gas, and biofuels,










—


Alpha Satellite TV operates the free-to-air TV channel ‘ALPHA TV’ in Greece.






3.   

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.



4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.11807 – UNITED GROUP / MOTOR OIL (HELLAS) / ALPHA SATELLITE TV
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1998/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-356/24: Order of the General Court of 1 April 2025 – Lithuania v Commission
Date: 2025-04-01
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU financial instrument, EU financing arrangements, cost-benefit analysis, economic recovery, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, tax exemption, tax law








C_202503087EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3087


10.6.2025






Order of the General Court of 1 April 2025 – Lithuania v Commission


(Case T-356/24)
                (1)

(C/2025/3087)
Language of the case: Lithuanian
The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/5424, 16.9.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3087/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1027/23: Order of the General Court of 1 April 2025 – Fast Retailing v EUIPO – Gonarrue (GU) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Withdrawal of the opposition – No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2025-04-01
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, footwear industry, registered trade mark, sports equipment, trade-mark law








C_202503053EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3053


10.6.2025






Order of the General Court of 1 April 2025 – Fast Retailing v EUIPO – Gonarrue (GU)


(Case T-1027/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2025/3053)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Fast Retailing Co. Ltd (Yamaguchi, Japan) (represented by: J.M. Mora Cortés, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Nicolás Gómez, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Gonarrue, SL (San Sebastián, Spain)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 5 July 2023 (Case R 0636/2022-2).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.










2.


Each party shall bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2023/1171, 4.12.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3053/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-244/25, Cabify España: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Madrid (Spain) lodged on 1 April 2025 – Cabify España, S.L.U. v Auro New Transport Concept, S.L.
Date: 2025-04-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: arbitration, commercial arbitration, infringement of EU law, judicial review, jurisdiction, primacy of EU law, public policy, right to justice








C_202504566EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4566


25.8.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Madrid (Spain) lodged on 1 April 2025 – Cabify España, S.L.U. v Auro New Transport Concept, S.L.


(Case C-244/25, Cabify España)

(C/2025/4566)
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Madrid

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Cabify España, S.L.U.

Defendant: Auro New Transport Concept, S.L.

Questions referred







1.


Is it compatible with the first paragraph of Article 47 and Article 51(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Article 19(1) TEU, and the principles of primacy, effectiveness and unity of EU law, for the judicial review of the validity of an arbitral award for infringement of fundamental rules of EU public policy (in casu, Article 101 TFEU) to be purely external, so that the competent court, in accordance with the Law – Articles 8(5) and 41(1) of the Ley de Arbitraje (1) (Law on Arbitration; LA) – cannot review, with full jurisdiction and in accordance with the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the decision of the arbitrators not to apply mandatory EU law?










2.


Is it compatible with the first paragraph of Article 47 and Article 51(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Article 19(1) TEU, and the principles of primacy, effectiveness and unity of EU law, for the judicial review of the validity of an arbitral award for infringement of fundamental rules of EU public policy (in casu, Article 101 TFEU) to be purely external, so that the competent court, in accordance with the Law – Articles 8(5) and 41(1) of the LA – cannot review, with full jurisdiction and in accordance with the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, whether the arbitrators have correctly applied mandatory Union law in accordance with the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union?










3.


Is it compatible with the first paragraph of Article 47 and Article 51(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Article 19(1) TEU, and the principles of primacy, effectiveness and unity of EU law, for the judicial review of the validity of an arbitral award for infringement of fundamental rules of EU public policy (in casu, Article 101 TFEU) to be limited by the case-law and criteria set out in the ruling of the Tribunal Constitucional (Constitutional Court, Spain) No 146/2024 of 2 December 2024?






(1)  Law 60/2003 of 23 December on Arbitration.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4566/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-699/24, Kołama: Order of the President of the Court of 1 April 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie – Poland) – mBank S.A. v AZ, MZ
Date: 2025-04-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer credit, consumer protection, interest, judicial review, loan, principle of proportionality, right of action, unfair terms of contract








C_202503882EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3882


21.7.2025






Order of the President of the Court of 1 April 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie – Poland) – mBank S.A. v AZ, MZ


(Case C-699/24,
                (1)
Kołama
                (2)
)

(C/2025/3882)
Language of the case: Polish
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C, C/2025/380.

(2)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3882/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-268/25, Sampension Livsforsikring: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret (Denmark) lodged on 1 April 2025 – Sampension Livsforsikring A/S v Skatteministeriet
Date: 2025-04-01
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: VAT, group of companies, tax law








C_202503421EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3421


30.6.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret (Denmark) lodged on 1 April 2025 – Sampension Livsforsikring A/S v Skatteministeriet


(Case T-268/25, Sampension Livsforsikring)

(C/2025/3421)
Language of the case: Danish

Referring court

Østre Landsret

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Sampension Livsforsikring A/S

Defendant: Skatteministeriet

Questions referred







1.


Is the first paragraph of Article 11 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, (1) read in conjunction with the second paragraph thereof, to be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State, such as that at issue in the present case, under which eligibility for creating a VAT group comprising persons not engaged in activity subject to registration or not engaged in economic activity subject to the condition that one person in the VAT group directly or indirectly owns 100 % of the other person or persons in the VAT group?










2.


If question 1 is answered in the affirmative, does Article 11 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax then have direct effect in the Member States, with the result that taxable persons are entitled, vis-à-vis a Member State, to be registered as a VAT group in cases where the legislation of that Member State does not comply with that provision and cannot be interpreted in accordance therewith?






(1)  
            OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3421/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)