do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-178/25, Flightright: Order of the President of the General Court of 27 March 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Königs Wusterhausen – Germany) – Flightright GmbH v Ryanair DAC (Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Compensation and assistance to passengers – Long delay of a flight – Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation – Extraordinary circumstances – Allocation of delayed departure slots due to capacity problems in the airspace – Meteorological conditions)
Date: 2025-03-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: air space, atmospheric conditions, carriage of passengers, carrier, civil aviation, indemnification, passenger rights, transport capacity, traveller








C_202503059EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3059


10.6.2025






Order of the President of the General Court of 27 March 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Königs Wusterhausen – Germany) – Flightright GmbH v Ryanair DAC


(Case T-178/25,
                (1)
Flightright)

(Air transport - Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 - Compensation and assistance to passengers - Long delay of a flight - Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation - Extraordinary circumstances - Allocation of delayed departure slots due to capacity problems in the airspace - Meteorological conditions)
(C/2025/3059)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Königs Wusterhausen

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Flightright GmbH

Defendant: Ryanair DAC

Operative part of the order

Case T-178/25 is removed from the register of the General Court.


(1)  Date lodged: 20.2.2025.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3059/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Information relating to the entry into force, for the Principality of Liechtenstein, of the Protocol between the European Union, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland regarding the access to Eurodac for law enforcement purposes
Date: 2025-03-27
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Liechtenstein, Switzerland, agreement (EU), application of EU law, biometrics, database management system, police cooperation, protocol to an agreement, right of asylum








L_202500629EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2025/629


27.3.2025






Information relating to the entry into force, for the Principality of Liechtenstein, of the Protocol between the European Union, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland regarding the access to Eurodac for law enforcement purposes

The Protocol between the European Union, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland regarding the access to Eurodac for law enforcement purposes (1), signed at Brussels on 27 June 2019, entered into force on 1 May 2022 for the European Union and the Swiss Confederation (2), in accordance with Article 4(2) of the Protocol. It has entered into force, for the Principality of Liechtenstein, on 12 March 2025, the procedures necessary for the entry into force having been completed.


(1)  
            OJ L 32, 4.2.2020, p. 3.

(2)  
            OJ L 240, 16.9.2022, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/info/2025/629/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Case C-351/24, C/C (Proof of the origin of goods): Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 March 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Veszprémi törvényszék – Hungary) – C/C Vámügynöki Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of goods – Customs union – Union Customs Code – Article 119(3) – Error made when issuing movement certificates – Repayment or remission of import or export duties – Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin – Appendix I – Article 32 – Administrative cooperation – Verification of proofs of origin)
Date: 2025-03-27
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative cooperation, customs document, customs formalities, originating product, preferential agreement, tariff preference








C_202502834EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2834


2.6.2025






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 March 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Veszprémi törvényszék – Hungary) – C/C Vámügynöki Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága


(Case C-351/24, C/C (Proof of the origin of goods))
                (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Free movement of goods - Customs union - Union Customs Code - Article 119(3) - Error made when issuing movement certificates - Repayment or remission of import or export duties - Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin - Appendix I - Article 32 - Administrative cooperation - Verification of proofs of origin)
(C/2025/2834)
Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Veszprémi törvényszék

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: C/C Vámügynöki Kft.

Defendant: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága

Operative part of the judgment

The first subparagraph of Article 119(3) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code, read in conjunction with Article 32 of Appendix I to the Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin, approved on behalf of the European Union by Council Decision 2013/94/EU of 26 March 2012,
must be interpreted as not precluding a national practice under which, where the movement certificate issued by the authorities of a country or territory outside the customs territory of the European Union is vitiated by a manifest error of law relating to the possibility for those goods to benefit from preferential treatment under that convention, the customs authorities of the importing contracting party may legitimately establish that error without initiating the verification procedure provided for in Article 32 of the Regional Convention.


(1)  OJ C C/2024/4449.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2834/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Special report 10/2025: Labour market reforms in the national recovery and resilience plans – Some results, but not sufficient to address structural challenges
Date: 2025-03-27
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: EU aid, EU financing, employment policy, epidemic, equal treatment, labour market, social security, structural adjustment, unemployment, working conditions








C_202501950EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1950


27.3.2025






Special report 10/2025:

            ‘Labour market reforms in the national recovery and resilience plans – Some results, but not sufficient to address structural challenges’
         
(C/2025/1950)

The European Court of Auditors has published its special report 10/2025: ‘Labour market reforms in the national recovery and resilience plans – Some results, but not sufficient to address structural challenges’.
The report can be consulted directly or downloaded at the European Court of Auditors’ website: https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/publications/sr-2025-10.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1950/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
State aid – Decision to raise no objections
Date: 2025-03-27
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: European Economic Area, Iceland, State aid, audiovisual programme, control of State aid, cultural pluralism, film production, television








C_202501932EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1932


27.3.2025






State aid – Decision to raise no objections
(C/2025/1932)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:






Date of adoption of the decision


11 December 2024




Case No


93162




Decision No


210/24/COL




EFTA State


Iceland




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


The Dubbing and Subtitling Fund




Legal basis


Regulations on the allocation of grants from the Dubbing and Subtitling Fund.




Type of measure


Scheme




Objective


Language diversity




Form of aid


Grant




Budget


ISK 60 million annually




Intensity


80%




Duration


11 October 2024 to 31 December 2027




Economic sectors


NACE:
59.12: Motion picture, video and television programme post-production activities
60.20: Television programming and broadcasting activities




Name and address of the granting authority







The Icelandic Ministry of Culture and Business Affairs




Sölvhólsgata 7




101 Reykjavík




Iceland








 


 




 


 




The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1932/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-214/25: Action brought on 27 March 2025 – IR v Council
Date: 2025-03-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, administrative sanction, demotion, pay scale, principle of proportionality, staff regulations (EU)








C_202502700EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2700


19.5.2025






Action brought on 27 March 2025 – IR v Council


(Case T-214/25)

(C/2025/2700)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: IR (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of 18 July 2024 imposing to the applicant the disciplinary penalty of downgrading by two grades, to step 1, in the same function group, as from 1 November 2024;










—


as far as necessary, annul the decision of 20 December 2024 rejecting the applicant’s complaint of 17 October 2024;










—


order the defendant to reimburse the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging a breach of Article 10 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations (principle of proportionality).










2.


Second plea in law, alleging lack of evidence to justify the gravity of the penalty imposed.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging manifest errors of assessment in striking the balance between aggravating and attenuating circumstances.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2700/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union
Date: 2025-03-27
Institutions: Directorate-General for Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, common customs tariff, glass, plumbing equipment








C_202501923EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1923


27.3.2025






Explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union
(C/2025/1923)

Pursuant to Article 9(1), point (a), of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1), the Explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are amended as follows:

on page 289,


point 3. of the Explanatory notes to Chapter 70, General, is replaced by the following:







‘3.


for doors (excluding glass shower doors of heading 7020 ), windows of buildings, etc. (headings 4418 , 7610 , etc.).’





on page 294, the following explanatory note is inserted:








‘7020 00 80




Other

This subheading includes all types of glass shower doors, panels or enclosures, including those with partially or fully framed sections. See also the HS classification opinions 7020 00/1 and 7020 00/2.’
            







(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/1987/2658/oj).

(2)  
            OJ C 119, 29.3.2019, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1923/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-91/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 March 2025 – XH v Commission (Appeal – Civil service – Official – Refusal to amend the official’s personal file – Decision not to include the official’s name on the list of persons promoted in 2020 – Action for annulment and for damages – Time limits for bringing proceedings – Starting point – Application for legal aid – Suspension of time limits – Article 148(9) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Order of the General Court refusing the applicant that aid – Service by registered post, with a form for acknowledgement of receipt, to the address mentioned in the application for legal aid – Unforeseeable circumstances or force majeure – Excusable error)
Date: 2025-03-27
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European official, damages, legal aid, limitation of legal proceedings, promotion, staff assessment, staff regulations (EU)








C_202502822EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2822


2.6.2025






Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 March 2025 – XH v Commission


(Case C-91/23 P)
                (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Official - Refusal to amend the official’s personal file - Decision not to include the official’s name on the list of persons promoted in 2020 - Action for annulment and for damages - Time limits for bringing proceedings - Starting point - Application for legal aid - Suspension of time limits - Article 148(9) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court - Order of the General Court refusing the applicant that aid - Service by registered post, with a form for acknowledgement of receipt, to the address mentioned in the application for legal aid - Unforeseeable circumstances or force majeure - Excusable error)
(C/2025/2822)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: XH (represented by: K. Górny, adwokat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: M. Brauhoff and L. Vernier, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders XH to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 271, 31.7.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2822/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.109742
Date: 2025-03-27
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: France, Ile-de-France, State aid, carriage of passengers, control of State aid, taxi








C_202501921EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1921


27.3.2025






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.109742
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/1921)








Date of adoption of the decision


27.2.2025




Aid number


SA.109742




Member State


France




Region


Paris




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Aides d’État présumées dans le secteur des taxis dédiés au transport de personnes à mobilité réduite dans le cadre des Jeux Olympiques de Paris 2024




Legal basis


Arrêté n°2023-01424 du 17 novembre 2023 portant attribution des autorisations de stationnement à titre expérimental dans le cadre de l’article 26 de la loi n°2023-380 du 19 mai 2023 relative aux Jeux Olympiques et Paralympiques.




Type of measure


Ad Hoc Case


 




Objective


 




Form of aid


Other




Budget


 




Intensity


Measure does not constitute aid




Duration


From 17.11.2023




Economic sectors


Taxi operation




Name and address of the granting authority







Préfecture de Police de Paris




1 bis Rue de Lutèce, 75004 Paris, France








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1921/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-234/25, Sky Österreich Fernsehen: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 27 March 2025 – Sky Österreich Fernsehen GmbH v Verein für Konsumenteninformation
Date: 2025-03-27
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Internet, broadcasting, consumer protection, digital content, downloading, network server, supply








C_202503499EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3499


7.7.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 27 March 2025 – Sky Österreich Fernsehen GmbH v Verein für Konsumenteninformation


(Case C-234/25, Sky Österreich Fernsehen)

(C/2025/3499)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant in the appeal on a point of law: Sky Österreich Fernsehen GmbH

Respondent in the appeal on a point of law: Verein für Konsumenteninformation

Question referred

Must Article 16(m) of Directive 2011/83/EU (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, read in conjunction with Article 2(11) thereof, be interpreted as meaning that the offering of streaming services, where the digital content made available for viewing is located on a server which may be accessed by customers from their terminal via a link or an app, who then can watch the programmes included in their subscription both ‘live’ and ‘on demand’ via the internet or, alternatively, can download the digital content and store it in the memory of their own device and, independently of online access, view it once within 48 hours, constitutes a supply of ‘digital content’ within the meaning of those provisions?


(1)  Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2011 L 304, p. 64).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3499/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-237/25, Mettler-Toledo: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 27 March 2025 – Land North Rhine-Westphalia v Mettler-Toledo GmbH
Date: 2025-03-27
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: harmonisation of standards, market approval, measuring equipment, technical standard








C_202503037EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3037


10.6.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 27 March 2025 – Land North Rhine-Westphalia v Mettler-Toledo GmbH


(Case C-237/25, Mettler-Toledo)

(C/2025/3037)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings


Defendant, respondent and appellant on a point of law: Land North Rhine-Westphalia

Applicant, appellant and respondent on a point of law: Mettler-Toledo GmbH

Other party: The representative of the federal interest at the Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Question referred

Does a non-automatic weighing instrument meet the requirements of the second subparagraph of Article 6(5) of [Directive 2014/31/EU (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to the making available on the market of non-automatic weighing instruments (‘Directive 2014/31’)], read in conjunction with points 1.1.(iv), 1.1.(v) and 1.1.(vi) of Annex III thereto, if the indications of maximum capacity, minimum capacity and verification scale interval are not physically affixed to the instrument, but are displayed only digitally and in alternation when the weighing instrument is in operation?


(1)  Directive 2014/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to the making available on the market of non-automatic weighing instruments (recast) (OJ 2014 L 96, p. 107).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3037/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-666/24 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 27 March 2025 – Teva Pharma v EMA (Interim relief – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to the EMA’s scientific advice given pursuant to Article 57(1)(n) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Decision to grant a third party access to the documents – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency)
Date: 2025-03-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: access to EU information, confidentiality, consultancy, disclosure of information, medicinal product








C_202502557EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2557


12.5.2025






Order of the President of the General Court of 27 March 2025 – Teva Pharma v EMA


(Case T-666/24 R)

(Interim relief - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to the EMA’s scientific advice given pursuant to Article 57(1)(n) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 - Decision to grant a third party access to the documents - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)
(C/2025/2557)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Teva Pharma BV (Haarlem, Netherlands) (represented by: C. Lindenthal and A. Säurig, lawyers)

Defendant: European Medicines Agency (represented by: G. Gavriilidou, S. Drosos and G. Ramo, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, the applicant seeks suspension of the operation of Decision EMA/391476/2024 Rev.1 of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) of 28 October 2024 granting a third party, under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43), access to a document relating to scientific advice concerning the medicinal product ferric carboxymaltose, subject to certain redactions.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


The order of 30 December 2024, Teva Pharma v EMA (T-666/24 R), is cancelled.










3.


The costs are reserved.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2557/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)