do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.11851 – UNICREDIT / UNICREDIT ALLIANZ VITA) – Candidate case for simplified procedure
Date: 2025-03-12
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Italy, banking, credit institution, economic concentration, financial services, insurance company, life assurance, merger control, provision of services








C_202501614EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1614


12.3.2025






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.11851 – UNICREDIT / UNICREDIT ALLIANZ VITA)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/1614)


1.   
On 4 March 2025, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


UniCredit S.p.A. (‘UniCredit’, Italy),










—


UniCredit Allianz Vita S.p.A. (‘UAV’, Italy), jointly controlled by UniCredit and Allianz S.p.A. (‘Allianz’, Italy).




UniCredit will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of UAV.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:






—


UniCredit is an authorized credit institution providing various banking and financial services in the European Union, such as retail and corporate banking, financial market services and other financial services,










—


UAV is an authorized insurance company active in the provision of life insurance products in Italy.






3.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified treatment for certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.11851 – UNICREDIT / UNICREDIT ALLIANZ VITA
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  
            OJ C 160, 5.5.2023, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1614/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-349/23: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2025 – Semedo v Parliament (Law governing the institutions – Member of Parliament – Psychological harassment – Decisions of the President of the Parliament finding that an accredited parliamentary assistant suffered psychological harassment and imposing on a Member the penalty of forfeiture of entitlement to the subsistence allowance for 10 days – Right to be heard – Rights of the defence)
Date: 2025-03-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Member of the European Parliament, administrative sanction, disciplinary proceedings, harassment at work, parliamentary allowance, psychological harassment, rights of the defence, servant (EU), staff regulations (EU)








C_202502374EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2374


28.4.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2025 – Semedo v Parliament


(Case T-349/23)
                (1)

(Law governing the institutions - Member of Parliament - Psychological harassment - Decisions of the President of the Parliament finding that an accredited parliamentary assistant suffered psychological harassment and imposing on a Member the penalty of forfeiture of entitlement to the subsistence allowance for 10 days - Right to be heard - Rights of the defence)
(C/2025/2374)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Monica Semedo (Grevenmacher, Luxembourg) (represented by: T. Bontinck, A. Guillerme and L. Marchal, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: D. Boytha, N. Görlitz and A. Krachler, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decisions of the European Parliament of 17 April 2023 by which the Parliament, in the first place, found that certain acts which she was alleged to have engaged in, taken individually and as a whole, constituted psychological harassment within the meaning of Article 12a(3) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and, in the second place, imposed on her a penalty consisting in the forfeiture of entitlement to the subsistence allowance for a period of 10 days.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decisions of the President of the European Parliament of 17 April 2023 by which the President, in the first place, found that certain acts which Ms Monica Semedo was alleged to have engaged in constituted psychological harassment and, in the second place, imposed on Ms Semedo a penalty consisting in the forfeiture of entitlement to the subsistence allowance for a period of 10 days;










2.


Orders the Parliament to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 321, 11.9.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2374/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1143/23: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2025 – Enedo v EUIPO – Enedis (Enedo AMPS WITH PASSION) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Enedo AMPS WITH PASSION – Earlier EU word mark ENEDIS – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Restriction of the goods and services covered in the trade mark application)
Date: 2025-03-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, computer equipment, electricity storage device, electronic component, registered trade mark, scientific research, software, technology, trade-mark law








C_202502379EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2379


28.4.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2025 – Enedo v EUIPO – Enedis (Enedo AMPS WITH PASSION)


(Case T-1143/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark Enedo AMPS WITH PASSION - Earlier EU word mark ENEDIS - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Restriction of the goods and services covered in the trade mark application)
(C/2025/2379)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Enedo Oyj (Vantaa, Finland) (represented by: H.-M. Elo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Ringelhann, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Enedis (Paris, France) (represented by: C. Verneret and J.-B. Micard, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and the alteration of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 27 September 2023 (Case R 192/2023-4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Enedo Oyj to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Enedis;










3.


Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/976, 29.1.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2379/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11873 – QUATTROR / BC PARTNERS / CIGIERRE)
Date: 2025-03-12
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: France, Italy, Switzerland, catering industry, economic concentration, franchising, holding company, investment company, merger control








C_202501731EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1731


19.3.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11873 – QUATTROR / BC PARTNERS / CIGIERRE)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/1731)

On 12 March 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M11873. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1731/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11749 – AMD / ZT)
Date: 2025-03-12
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: computer centre, economic concentration, electronic component, information storage, merger control, network server, supplier








C_202600191EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2026/191


6.1.2026






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11749 – AMD / ZT)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2026/191)

On 12 March 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M11749. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/191/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
P10_TA(2025)0030 – Agreement between Canada and the European Union on the transfer and processing of Passenger Name Record (PNR) data – European Parliament legislative resolution of 12 March 2025 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between Canada and the European Union on the transfer and processing of Passenger Name Record data (08897/2024 – C10-0125/2024 – 2024/0051(NLE)) (Consent)
Date: 2025-03-12
Institutions: Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, Committee on Foreign Affairs, Committee on Transport and Tourism, European Parliament
Subjects: Canada, agreement (EU), air transport, cross-frontier data flow, data collection, data protection, exchange of information, personal data, ratification of an agreement, terrorism, traveller








C_202503164EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3164


20.6.2025






P10_TA(2025)0030

Agreement between Canada and the European Union on the transfer and processing of Passenger Name Record (PNR) data


European Parliament legislative resolution of 12 March 2025 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between Canada and the European Union on the transfer and processing of Passenger Name Record data (08897/2024 – C10-0125/2024 – 2024/0051(NLE))

(Consent)
(C/2025/3164)



The European Parliament,







—


having regard to the draft Council decision (08897/2024),










—


having regard to the draft Agreement between Canada and the European Union on the transfer and processing of Passenger Name Record data (08896/2024),










—


having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 16(2) and Article 87(2), point (a), and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C10-0125/2024),










—


having regard to Rule 107(1) and (4), and Rule 117(7) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A10-0013/2025),











1.


Gives its consent to the conclusion of the agreement;










2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Canada.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3164/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) 2025/219 of 30 January 2025 fixing for 2025 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks applicable in the Mediterranean and Black Seas (OJ L, 2025/219, 4.2.2025)
Date: 2025-03-12
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Black Sea, EU waters, Mediterranean Sea, catch by species, catch quota, fishing area, fishing rights, international waters, sea fish, sea fishing




L_202590231EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2025/90231


12.3.2025






Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) 2025/219 of 30 January 2025 fixing for 2025 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks applicable in the Mediterranean and Black Seas
(
Official Journal of the European Union L, 2025/219, 4 February 2025
)







1.


Page 10, Article 9, the Title











for:




‘Remedial measures for European hake in GFCM GSAs 1, 2, 5, 6 and 7, blue and red shrimp in GFCM GSAs 5, 6 and 7, giant red shrimp in GFCM GSAs 8, 9, 10 and 11, and Norway lobster in GFCM GSA 6.’,












read:




‘Remedial measures for European hake in GFCM GSAs 1, 2, 5, 6 and 7, blue and red shrimp in GFCM GSAs 5, 6 and 7, and Norway lobster in GFCM GSA 6.’.











2.


Page 10, Article 9(1)











for:





‘1.   This Article applies to fishing activities by Union vessels catching European hake (Merluccius merluccius) in GFCM GSAs 1, 2, 5, 6 and 7, Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in GFCM GSA 6, blue and red shrimp (Aristeus antennatus) in GFCM GSAs 5, 6 and 7, and giant red shrimp (Aristaeomorpha foliacea) in GFCM GSAs 8, 9, 10 and 11.’

,










read:





‘1.   This Article applies to fishing activities by Union vessels catching European hake (Merluccius merluccius) in GFCM GSAs 1, 2, 5, 6 and 7, Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in GFCM GSA 6, and blue and red shrimp (Aristeus antennatus) in GFCM GSAs 5, 6 and 7.’.












3.


Page 10, Article 9(3)











for:





‘3.   Member States shall adopt a minimum conservation reference size for blue and red shrimp and for giant red shrimp of at least 25 mm CL.’

,










read:





‘3.   Member States shall adopt a minimum conservation reference size for blue and red shrimp of at least 25 mm CL.’.








ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2025/219/corrigendum/2025-03-12/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.11746 – DSV / SCHENKER)
Date: 2025-03-12
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: air transport, carriage for hire or reward, economic concentration, logistics, maritime transport, merger control, provision of services, road transport








C_202501615EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1615


12.3.2025






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.11746 – DSV / SCHENKER)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/1615)


1.   
On 4 March 2025, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


DSV A/S (‘DSV’, Denmark),










—


Schenker Aktiengesellschaft (‘Schenker’, Germany), currently a wholly owned subsidiary of Deutsche Bahn Aktiengesellschaft (‘DB’, Germnay).




DSV will acquire, within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation, sole control of the whole of Schenker.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:






—


DSV: The provision of freight forwarding, covering land, air and sea freight, and contract logistics services. The service portfolio is organised into three lines of business: (i) DSV Air & Sea, (ii) DSV Road and (iii) DSV Solutions (contract logistics services). DSV is active in Europe, the Americas, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East and Africa,










—


Schenker: The provision of freight forwarding services, covering land, air and sea freight, and contract logistics services. Schenker is active in Europe, the Americas, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East and Africa. DB acquired Schenker in 2002 and has since held 100 % of the shares in Schenker.






3.   

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.



4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.11746 – DSV / SCHENKER
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1615/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-66/24: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2025 – Lidl v EUIPO – Liquidleds Lighting (LED light bulbs) (Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a LED light bulb – Disclosure of the earlier design not taken into account – Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Requirements – Burden of proof)
Date: 2025-03-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: designs and models, lighting equipment








C_202502384EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2384


28.4.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2025 – Lidl v EUIPO – Liquidleds Lighting (LED light bulbs)


(Case T-66/24)
                (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing a LED light bulb - Disclosure of the earlier design not taken into account - Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Requirements - Burden of proof)
(C/2025/2384)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Lidl Vertriebs GmbH & Co. KG (Anzing, Germany) (represented by: T. Dolde, C. Zimmer and M. Hawkins, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Liquidleds Lighting Corp. (Taipei, Taiwan) (represented by: S. Beckmann, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 27 November 2023 (Case R 2336/2022-3).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Lidl Vertriebs GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/2321, 2.4.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2384/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1092/23: Order of the General Court of 12 March 2025 – Slovak Telekom v Commission
Date: 2025-03-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: indemnification, interest, sanction (EU), telecommunications








C_202502918EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2918


2.6.2025






Order of the General Court of 12 March 2025 – Slovak Telekom v Commission


(Case T-1092/23)
                (1)

(C/2025/2918)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/568, 8.1.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2918/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.114440
Date: 2025-03-12
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Estonia, State aid, control of State aid, electrical energy, energy production, renewable energy








C_202501601EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1601


12.3.2025






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.114440
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/1601)








Date of adoption of the decision


9.12.2024




Aid number


SA.114440




Member State


Estonia




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


TCTF: scheme to support offshore wind




Legal basis


 




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Energy




Form of aid


 




Budget


Overall budget: 2 600 000 000  EUR
Annual budget: 130 000 000  EUR




Intensity


 




Duration


Until 31.12.2025




Economic sectors


Production of electricity




Name and address of the granting authority







Elering




Kadaka tee 42, Tallinn Estonia








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1601/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)