do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-285/24, Coopservice: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 March 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato – Italy) – Coopservice soc. coop. p.a, acting on its own behalf and as agent of GME constituted with the principals Natuna Srl and XC Srl v Consip SpA (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Public procurement – Exclusion of a tenderer from the award procedure – Enforcement of the provisional security – Automatic application of that penalty – Tenderer having already been awarded a lot of the same call for tenders – Principle of proportionality – Requirement to present the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling – Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2025-03-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative sanction, award of contract, guarantee, principle of proportionality, public procurement, tendering








C_202503389EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3389


30.6.2025






Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 March 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato – Italy) – Coopservice soc. coop. p.a, acting on its own behalf and as agent of GME constituted with the principals Natuna Srl and XC Srl v Consip SpA


(Case C-285/24,
                (1)
Coopservice)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Public procurement - Exclusion of a tenderer from the award procedure - Enforcement of the provisional security - Automatic application of that penalty - Tenderer having already been awarded a lot of the same call for tenders - Principle of proportionality - Requirement to present the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2025/3389)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Coopservice soc. coop. p.a, acting on its own behalf and as agent of GME constituted with the principals Natuna Srl and XC Srl

Defendant: Consip SpA

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Council of State, Italy), made by decision of 18 April 2024, is manifestly inadmissible.


(1)  Dated lodged: 22.4.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3389/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-596/22: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2025 – PGI Spain and Others v Commission (State aid – Measure to reduce wholesale electricity prices in the Iberian Peninsula – Energy crisis – Decision not to raise objections – No serious difficulties – Principle of non-discrimination – Proportionality – Legitimate expectations)
Date: 2025-03-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Portugal, State aid, control of State aid, electrical energy, electricity supply, equal treatment, price of energy, price reduction, principle of proportionality, wholesale price








C_202502373EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2373


28.4.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2025 – PGI Spain and Others v Commission


(Case T-596/22)
                (1)

(State aid - Measure to reduce wholesale electricity prices in the Iberian Peninsula - Energy crisis - Decision not to raise objections - No serious difficulties - Principle of non-discrimination - Proportionality - Legitimate expectations)
(C/2025/2373)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: PGI Spain, SL (Barcelona, Spain), Berry Superfos Pamplona, SA (Navarre, Spain), Promens Packaging, SA (Barcelona), RPC Envases, SA (Madrid, Spain), Zeller Plastik España, SL (Barcelona) (represented by: P. Holtrop, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Scharf, I. Georgiopoulos and C.-M. Carrega, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: A. Gavela Llopis and M. Morales Puerta, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of the Commission’s Decision C(2022) 3942 final of 8 June 2022 on State aid SA.102454 (2022/N) – Spain and SA.102569 (2022/N) – Portugal – Production cost adjustment mechanism for the reduction of the electricity wholesale price in the Iberian market.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders PGI Spain, SL, Berry Superfos Pamplona, SA, Promens Packaging, SA, RPC Envases, SA and Zeller Plastik España, SL to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;










3.


Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 482, 19.12.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2373/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-293/24: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2025 – Gürok v EUIPO – Lavalle Martínez (LavalleGlass) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark LavalleGlass – Earlier EU figurative mark LAV – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No likelihood of confusion)
Date: 2025-03-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, ceramics, glass, household article, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202502393EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2393


28.4.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2025 – Gürok v EUIPO – Lavalle Martínez (LavalleGlass)


(Case T-293/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark LavalleGlass - Earlier EU figurative mark LAV - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - No likelihood of confusion)
(C/2025/2393)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik AŞ (Kütahya, Türkiye) (represented by: M. López Camba, E. Seijo Veiguela and J. Vicente Martínez, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Joaquín Lavalle Martínez (Son Caliu, Spain)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 4 April 2024 (Case R 1310/2023-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik AŞ and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)each to bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/4342, 15.7.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2393/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-307/24: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2025 – Shorts International v EUIPO (SHORTS) (EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark SHORTS – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-03-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, audiovisual industry, broadcasting, film production, programmes industry, registered trade mark, software, telecommunications, telecommunications industry, trade-mark law








C_202502394EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2394


28.4.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2025 – Shorts International v EUIPO (SHORTS)


(Case T-307/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark SHORTS - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/2394)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Shorts International Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister-at-Law)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 4 April 2024 (Case R 2199/2023-4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Shorts International Ltd and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) each to bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/4609, 29.7.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2394/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-202/25, Tadmur: Request for a preliminary ruling from the rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Roermond (Netherlands) lodged on 12 March 2025 – HG v Minister van Asiel en Migratie
Date: 2025-03-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: foreign national, illegal migration, international protection, removal, return migration








C_202503397EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3397


30.6.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Roermond (Netherlands) lodged on 12 March 2025 – HG v Minister van Asiel en Migratie


(Case C-202/25, Tadmur)
                (1)

(C/2025/3397)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Roermond

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: HG

Defendant: Minister van Asiel en Migratie

Question referred

Is Article 6 of Directive 2008/115, (2) in conjunction with Articles 3, 5, 8 and 9(1)(a) of Directive 2008/115, and in conjunction with Articles 17 and 19(2) and (3)(a) of Directive 2011/95, (3) to be interpreted as meaning that, subject to the exceptions set out in Article 6(2) to (5) of Directive 2008/115, the Member State is obliged to issue a return decision in respect of a third-country national staying illegally on its territory who is excluded from subsidiary protection, and that if removal to the country of destination is contrary to the principle of non-refoulement, the Member State is obliged, at the same time as issuing a return decision, to confirm in writing that the removal of that third-country national has been postponed?


(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(2)  Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals (OJ 2008 L 348, p. 98).

(3)  Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted (OJ 2011 L 337, p. 9).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3397/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-485/22: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2025 – Sweden v Commission (EAGF and EAFRD – Expenditure excluded from financing – Eligibility of parcels declared by Sweden – Expenditure incurred in the financial years 2017-2019 – Financial corrections – Key controls – Cross-checks and updating of the land parcel identification system – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment concerning non-compliance of a key control – Proportionality)
Date: 2025-03-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EAFRD, EAGF, agricultural expenditure, agricultural land, aid to agriculture, eligibility criteria, principle of proportionality, reimbursement of aid








C_202502372EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2372


28.4.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2025 – Sweden v Commission


(Case T-485/22)
                (1)

(EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from financing - Eligibility of parcels declared by Sweden - Expenditure incurred in the financial years 2017-2019 - Financial corrections - Key controls - Cross-checks and updating of the land parcel identification system - Obligation to state reasons - Error of assessment concerning non-compliance of a key control - Proportionality)
(C/2025/2372)
Language of the case: Swedish

Parties


Applicant: Kingdom of Sweden (represented by: H. Shev, F. L. Göransson and C. Meyer-Seitz, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Aquilina and P. Carlin, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Czech Republic (represented by: M. Smolek, J. Vláčil, O. Serdula and J. Očková, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the Kingdom of Sweden, supported by the Czech Republic, seeks the annulment of European Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/908 of 8 June 2022 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2022 L 157, p. 15), in so far as that decision entails a flat-rate correction of 5 %, corresponding to a sum of EUR 13 856 996,64 in respect of aid paid for the 2017 to 2019 claim years.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs;










3.


Orders the Czech Republic to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 380, 3.10.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2372/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1158/23: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2025 – deluxe holding v EUIPO – Piffany Copenhagen (Electric candles) (Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing electric candles – Ground for invalidity – Lack of individual character – Degree of freedom of the designer – No different overall impression – Articles 4 and 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Rights of the defence – Scope of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal)
Date: 2025-03-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: decorative item, designs and models, electronic equipment, lighting equipment








C_202502381EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2381


28.4.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2025 – deluxe holding v EUIPO – Piffany Copenhagen (Electric candles)


(Case T-1158/23)
                (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing electric candles - Ground for invalidity - Lack of individual character - Degree of freedom of the designer - No different overall impression - Articles 4 and 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Rights of the defence - Scope of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal)
(C/2025/2381)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: deluxe holding ApS (Kolding, Denmark) (represented by: J. Løje, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Piffany Copenhagen ApS (Helsinge, Denmark) (represented by: J. Petersen, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 9 October 2023 (Case R 810/2022-3).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders deluxe holding ApS to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and Piffany Copenhagen ApS.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/1108, 5.2.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2381/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/74 of 13 January 2025 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of lysine originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ L, 2025/74, 14.1.2025)
Date: 2025-03-12
Institutions: Directorate-General for Trade and Economic Security, European Commission
Subjects: China, amino acid, animal feedingstuffs, anti-dumping duty, food additive, import (EU), originating product








L_202590208EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2025/90208


12.3.2025






Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/74 of 13 January 2025 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of lysine originating in the People’s Republic of China

(
Official Journal of the European Union L, 2025/74, 14 January 2025
)


On page 57 of OJ L, 2025/74 of 14.1.2025, in the table in the Annex, as corrected on page 1 of OJ L, 2025/90094 of 5.2.2025

for:







‘Qiqihar Longjiang Fufeng Biotechnology Co., Ltd.


89IK’





read:







‘Qiqihar Longjiang Fufeng Biotechnologies Co., Ltd.


89IK’







ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2025/74/corrigendum/2025-03-12/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 11 March 2025
Date: 2025-03-12
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202501506EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1506


12.3.2025






Euro exchange rates (1)


            11 March 2025
         
(C/2025/1506)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0912 




JPY


Japanese yen


161,52 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4587 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84374 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,9815 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9608 




ISK


Iceland króna


146,90 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,6340 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,963 




HUF


Hungarian forint


401,78 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2003 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9771 




TRY


Turkish lira


39,9270 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,7357 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5731 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,4784 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,9130 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4535 




KRW


South Korean won


1 586,56 




ZAR


South African rand


19,9287 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8929 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 937,42 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,8155 




PHP


Philippine peso


62,518 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,855 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,3688 




MXN


Mexican peso


22,2142 




INR


Indian rupee


95,1455 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1506/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)