do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-153/25: Action brought on 7 March 2025 – Danube CCS Ventures v Commission
Date: 2025-03-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: State aid, Sweden, auction sale, carbon capture and storage, control of State aid, equal treatment, greenhouse gas, principle of proportionality








C_202502232EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2232


22.4.2025






Action brought on 7 March 2025 – Danube CCS Ventures v Commission


(Case T-153/25)

(C/2025/2232)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Danube CCS Ventures Kft. (Budapest, Hungary) (represented by: B. Hartnett and W. Sparks, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul Commission Decision C(2024) 4582 final of 2 July 2024 on State aid SA.107009 (2024/N) – Sweden – Swedish biogenic CCS auction (‘Contested Decision’; and










—


Order the defendant to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging that, by failing to open the formal investigation procedure, the Commission infringed Article 108(2) TFEU, in conjunction with Article 4(4) of the Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 of 13 July 2015 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (1), and essential principles of EU law including the principles of equal treatment and proportionality.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 296 TFEU on the ground that the Commission failed to state adequate reasoning in the Contested Decision.






(1)  
            OJ L 248, 24.9.2015, p. 9.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2232/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-157/25: Action brought on 7 March 2025 – Dermapharm v Parliament and Council
Date: 2025-03-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: equal treatment, extended producer responsibility, freedom of association, pharmaceutical industry, polluter pays principle, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, producer's liability, wastewater, water treatment








C_202502673EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2673


19.5.2025






Action brought on 7 March 2025 – Dermapharm v Parliament and Council


(Case T-157/25)

(C/2025/2673)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Dermapharm AG (Grünwald, Germany) (represented by: T. Voland, U. Reese, M. Petite, P. Leven, L.-I. Dietz, M. Steininger and K. Schroeder-Finckh, lawyers)

Defendants: European Parliament, Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare null and void Article 1, Article 2(19), (20) and (26), Article 9, Article 10, Article 30(1) sub-paragraph 2(c) and (g) and Annex III of the Directive (EU) 2024/3019 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2024 concerning urban wastewater treatment (‘UWWTD’) (1);










—


in the alternative declare these provisions null and void to the extent that they concern the applicant;










—


in the alternative declare null and void the entire UWWTD; and,










—


order the defendants to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on the same pleas in law as in Case T-156/25, Accord Healthcare France v Parliament and Council.


(1)  OJ 2024 L 3019.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2673/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.104897
Date: 2025-03-07
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Belgium, Flanders (Belgium), State aid, control of State aid, ferro-alloy, iron and steel industry








C_202501562EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1562


7.3.2025






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.104897
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/1562)








Date of adoption of the decision


22.6.2023




Aid number


SA.104897




Member State


Belgium




Region


VLAAMS GEWEST




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Aid to ArcelorMittal for project RecHycle in Ghent




Legal basis


Decree on economic support policy from 16 March 2012 and Decision of the Flemish government of Friday 24 June 2022 on the capital increase of FINOCAS




Type of measure


Ad Hoc Case


 




Objective


Environmental protection




Form of aid


Soft loan, Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 280 000 000  EUR




Intensity


 




Duration


 




Economic sectors


Manufacture of basic iron and steel and of ferro-alloys




Name and address of the granting authority







VLAIO (Vlaams Agenstchap Innoveren en Ondernemen)




Koning Albert II-laan 35 bus 12, 1030 Brussels








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1562/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-152/25: Action brought on 7 March 2025 – IA v Commission
Date: 2025-03-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Algeria, European official, allowances and expenses, interest, nationality, pay, workplace








C_202502231EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2231


22.4.2025






Action brought on 7 March 2025 – IA v Commission


(Case T-152/25)

(C/2025/2231)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: IA (represented by: L. Levi and M. Itani, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare the present action to be admissible and well-founded;










—


annul the decision set out in the applicant’s pay slip for June 2024 determining annual travel expenses based on the distance between his place of employment and his place of origin in Algiers (Algeria) only as from 2024 and not also in respect of the years 2014 to 2023;










—


in so far as is necessary, annul the decision of 28 November 2024 rejecting the complaint;










—


order the defendant to reimburse the applicant’s annual travel expenses based on the distance between his place of employment and his place of origin in respect of the years 2014 to 2023, that amount to be increased by default interest at the rate set by the European Central Bank for main refinancing operations;










—


order the defendant to pay all the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law which are identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-136/25, HV v EESC.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2231/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.108511
Date: 2025-03-07
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Germany, State aid, chemical industry, control of State aid








C_202501561EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1561


7.3.2025






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.108511
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/1561)








Date of adoption of the decision


18.12.2024




Aid number


SA.108511




Member State


Germany




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


H2Global Scheme - 2nd Funding Window




Legal basis


Federal Budget Code




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Environmental protection, Energy infrastructures, Renewable energy, Sectorial development




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 2 649 000 000  EUR
Annual budget: 295 000 000  EUR




Intensity


100.0%




Duration


Until 31.12.2028




Economic sectors


Manufacture of industrial gases




Name and address of the granting authority







Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Klimaschutz




Scharnhorststr. 34-37, 10115 Berlin








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1561/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-162/25: Action brought on 7 March 2025 – Hexal v Parliament and Council
Date: 2025-03-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: equal treatment, extended producer responsibility, freedom of association, pharmaceutical industry, polluter pays principle, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, producer's liability, wastewater, water treatment








C_202502678EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2678


19.5.2025






Action brought on 7 March 2025 – Hexal v Parliament and Council


(Case T-162/25)

(C/2025/2678)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Hexal AG (Holzkirchen, Germany) (represented by: T. Voland, U. Reese, M. Petite, P. Leven, L.-I. Dietz, M. Steininger and K. Schroeder-Finckh, lawyers)

Defendants: European Parliament, Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare null and void Article 1, Article 2(19), (20) and (26), Article 9, Article 10, Article 30(1) sub-paragraph 2(c) and (g) and Annex III of the Directive (EU) 2024/3019 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2024 concerning urban wastewater treatment (‘UWWTD’) (1);










—


in the alternative declare these provisions null and void to the extent that they concern the applicant;










—


in the alternative declare null and void the entire UWWTD; and,










—


order the defendants to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on the same pleas in law as in Case T-156/25, Accord Healthcare France v Parliament and Council.


(1)  OJ 2024 L 3019.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2678/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-187/25, EVN Bulgaria Renewables: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Plovdiv (Bulgaria) lodged on 7 March 2025 – EVN Bulgaria Renewables EOOD v Direktor na Teritorialna direktsia Plovdiv na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite
Date: 2025-03-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU energy policy, electrical energy, energy production, equal treatment, maximum price, national law, price of energy, price regulations, principle of proportionality








C_202503263EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3263


24.6.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Plovdiv (Bulgaria) lodged on 7 March 2025 – EVN Bulgaria Renewables EOOD v Direktor na Teritorialna direktsia Plovdiv na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite


(Case C-187/25, EVN Bulgaria Renewables)

(C/2025/3263)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Administrativen sad Plovdiv

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: EVN Bulgaria Renewables EOOD

Defendant: Direktor na Teritorialna direktsia Plovdiv na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite

Questions referred







1.


Must Article 6(1) of Council Regulation (EU) 2022/1854 (1) of 6 October 2022 on an emergency intervention to address high energy prices be interpreted as meaning that the mandatory cap, introduced by that provision, on market revenues obtained from electricity produced from the sources listed in Article 7(1) of EUR 180 per MWh constitutes a single Union-wide cap on market revenues that applies in all Member States, and that the Member States may maintain or introduce other measures that further restrict the market revenues, inter alia, by setting a lower cap in the cases referred to in Article 8(1)(a), taking into account the requirements of Article 8(2) of the Regulation?










2.


Does the provision laid down in point 2 of Section 8(3) of the Transitional and Final Provisions of the Law on the Application of Budget Law Provisions 2022, according to which, for market revenues obtained from the production of electricity from the sources listed in Article 7(1) of Regulation (EU) 2022/1854 of 6 October 2022 on an emergency intervention to address high energy prices (OJ L 261 I, 7.10.2022, p. 1), by producers whose balancing premiums contracts pursuant to Section 68(1) in conjunction with paragraph (9) of the Law Amending and Supplementing the Energy Law concerning the relevant plant had not been terminated as of 8 October 2022, the cap on revenues is the level of the preferential price under the electricity purchase contract pursuant to Section 31 of the Law on Energy from Renewable Sources, meet the requirements laid down in Article 8(2) of the Regulation, in particular the requirements of proportionality and non-discrimination in point (a)?






(1)  OJ 2022. L 261 I, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3263/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-168/25: Action brought on 7 March 2025 – Zentiva and Others v Parliament and Council
Date: 2025-03-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: equal treatment, extended producer responsibility, freedom of association, pharmaceutical industry, polluter pays principle, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, producer's liability, wastewater, water treatment








C_202502684EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2684


19.5.2025






Action brought on 7 March 2025 – Zentiva and Others v Parliament and Council


(Case T-168/25)

(C/2025/2684)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Zentiva k.s. (Praha, Czech Republic) and five others (represented by: T. Voland, U. Reese, M. Petite, P. Leven, L.-I. Dietz, M. Steininger and K. Schroeder-Finckh, lawyers)

Defendants: European Parliament, Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:






—


declare null and void Article 1, Article 2(19), (20) and (26), Article 9, Article 10, Article 30(1) sub-paragraph 2(c) and (g) and Annex III of the Directive (EU) 2024/3019 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2024 concerning urban wastewater treatment (‘UWWTD’) (1);










—


in the alternative declare these provisions null and void to the extent that they concern the applicants;










—


in the alternative declare null and void the entire UWWTD; and,










—


order the defendants to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on the same pleas in law as in Case T-156/25, Accord Healthcare France v Parliament and Council.


(1)  OJ 2024 L 3019.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2684/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-166/25: Action brought on 7 March 2025 – E G Labo – Laboratoires Eurogenerics v Parliament and Council
Date: 2025-03-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: equal treatment, extended producer responsibility, freedom of association, pharmaceutical industry, polluter pays principle, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, producer's liability, wastewater, water treatment








C_202502682EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2682


19.5.2025






Action brought on 7 March 2025 – E G Labo – Laboratoires Eurogenerics v Parliament and Council


(Case T-166/25)

(C/2025/2682)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: E G Labo - Laboratoires Eurogenerics (Issy-les-Moulineaux, France) (represented by: T. Voland, U. Reese, M. Petite, P. Leven, L.-I. Dietz, M. Steininger and K. Schroeder-Finckh, lawyers)

Defendants: European Parliament, Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare null and void Article 1, Article 2(19), (20) and (26), Article 9, Article 10, Article 30(1) sub-paragraph 2(c) and (g) and Annex III of the Directive (EU) 2024/3019 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2024 concerning urban wastewater treatment (‘UWWTD’) (1);










—


in the alternative declare these provisions null and void to the extent that they concern the applicant;










—


in the alternative declare null and void the entire UWWTD; and,










—


order the defendants to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on the same pleas in law as in Case T-156/25, Accord Healthcare France v Parliament and Council.


(1)  OJ 2024 L 3019.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2682/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.110056
Date: 2025-03-07
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Netherlands, State aid, chemical industry, control of State aid








C_202501560EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1560


7.3.2025






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.110056
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/1560)








Date of adoption of the decision


18.12.2024




Aid number


SA.110056




Member State


Netherlands




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


NL_KGG_K&E - SA.110056 - H2Global Scheme - 2nd Funding Window (joint scheme with Germany notified by them under SA.108511)




Legal basis


Article 2 (1a) Kaderwet EZK- en LNV-subsidies




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Renewable energy, Energy infrastructures




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 300 000 000  EUR
Annual budget: 30 000 000  EUR




Intensity


100.0%




Duration


Until 31.12.2028




Economic sectors


Manufacture of industrial gases




Name and address of the granting authority







Minister of Climate Policy and Green Growth




Bezuidenhoutseweg 73, 2594 AC Den Haag








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1560/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-165/25: Action brought on 7 March 2025 – Puren Pharma v Parliament and Council
Date: 2025-03-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: equal treatment, extended producer responsibility, freedom of association, pharmaceutical industry, polluter pays principle, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, producer's liability, wastewater, water treatment








C_202502681EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2681


19.5.2025






Action brought on 7 March 2025 – Puren Pharma v Parliament and Council


(Case T-165/25)

(C/2025/2681)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Puren Pharma GmbH & Co. KG (München, Germany) (represented by: T. Voland, U. Reese, M. Petite, P. Leven, L.-I. Dietz, M. Steininger and K. Schroeder-Finckh, lawyers)

Defendants: European Parliament, Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare null and void Article 1, Article 2(19), (20) and (26), Article 9, Article10, Article 30(1) sub-paragraph 2(c) and (g) and Annex III of the Directive (EU) 2024/3019 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2024 concerning urban wastewater treatment (‘UWWTD’) (1);










—


in the alternative declare these provisions null and void to the extent that they concern the applicant;










—


in the alternative declare null and void the entire UWWTD; and,










—


order the defendants to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on the same pleas in law as in Case T-156/25, Accord Healthcare France v Parliament and Council.


(1)  OJ 2024 L 3019.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2681/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 6 March 2025
Date: 2025-03-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202501159EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1159


7.3.2025






Euro exchange rates (1)


            6 March 2025
         
(C/2025/1159)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0796 




JPY


Japanese yen


159,24 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4593 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,83790 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,9620 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9565 




ISK


Iceland króna


146,90 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,7160 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,047 




HUF


Hungarian forint


400,68 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1770 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9754 




TRY


Turkish lira


39,3233 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,7037 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5509 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,3922 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,8810 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4387 




KRW


South Korean won


1 563,53 




ZAR


South African rand


19,7579 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8247 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 670,84 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7799 




PHP


Philippine peso


61,924 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,399 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,2088 




MXN


Mexican peso


22,0272 




INR


Indian rupee


94,0080 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1159/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)