do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-713/19: Order of the General Court of 6 March 2025 – Cobham and Lockman Investments v Commission (State aid – United Kingdom tax regime relating to group financing – Annulment of the contested act by the Court of Justice – Action which has become devoid of purpose – No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2025-03-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: State aid, United Kingdom, control of State aid, corporation tax, foreign enterprise, group of companies, tax exemption, tax law








C_202502873EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2873


2.6.2025






Order of the General Court of 6 March 2025 – Cobham and Lockman Investments v Commission


(Case T-713/19)
                (1)

(State aid - United Kingdom tax regime relating to group financing - Annulment of the contested act by the Court of Justice - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2025/2873)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Cobham Ltd (Bournemouth, United Kingdom), Lockman Investments Ltd (Bournemouth) (represented by: O.W. Brouwer, A. von Bonin and A. Pliego Selie, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, S. Noë and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2019/1352 of 2 April 2019 on the State aid SA.44896 implemented by the United Kingdom concerning CFC Group Financing Exemption (OJ 2019 L 216, p. 1).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.










2.


The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Cobham Ltd and Lockman Investments Ltd.






(1)  
            OJ C 10, 13.1.2020.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2873/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-769/19: Order of the General Court of 6 March 2025 – Informa and Others v Commission (State aid – United Kingdom tax regime relating to group financing – Annulment of the contested act by the Court of Justice – Action which has become devoid of purpose – No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2025-03-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: State aid, United Kingdom, control of State aid, corporation tax, foreign enterprise, group of companies, tax exemption, tax law








C_202502895EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2895


2.6.2025






Order of the General Court of 6 March 2025 – Informa and Others v Commission


(Case T-769/19)
                (1)

(State aid - United Kingdom tax regime relating to group financing - Annulment of the contested act by the Court of Justice - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2025/2895)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Informa plc (London, United Kingdom), Maypond Ltd (Dublin, Ireland), Tanahol Ltd (Dublin), Colonygrove Ltd (London) (represented by: B. Goren, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, S. Noë and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2019/1352 of 2 April 2019 on the State aid SA.44896 implemented by the United Kingdom concerning CFC Group Financing Exemption (OJ 2019 L 216, p. 1).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.










2.


The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Informa plc, Maypond Ltd, Tanahol Ltd and Colonygrove Ltd.






(1)  
            OJ C 45, 10.2.2020.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2895/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-767/19: Order of the General Court of 6 March 2025 – Markit Group v Commission (State aid – United Kingdom tax regime relating to group financing – Annulment of the contested act by the Court of Justice – Action which has become devoid of purpose – No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2025-03-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: State aid, United Kingdom, control of State aid, corporation tax, foreign enterprise, group of companies, tax exemption, tax law








C_202502893EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2893


2.6.2025






Order of the General Court of 6 March 2025 – Markit Group v Commission


(Case T-767/19)
                (1)

(State aid - United Kingdom tax regime relating to group financing - Annulment of the contested act by the Court of Justice - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2025/2893)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Markit Group Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Whitehouse and P. Halford, Solicitors)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, S. Noë and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2019/1352 of 2 April 2019 on the State aid SA.44896 implemented by the United Kingdom concerning CFC Group Financing Exemption (OJ 2019 L 216, p. 1).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.










2.


The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Markit Group Ltd.






(1)  
            OJ C 45, 10.2.2020.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2893/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-779/19: Order of the General Court of 6 March 2025 – Ashtead Financing v Commission (State aid – United Kingdom tax regime relating to group financing – Annulment of the contested act by the Court of Justice – Action which has become devoid of purpose – No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2025-03-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: State aid, United Kingdom, control of State aid, corporation tax, foreign enterprise, group of companies, tax exemption, tax law








C_202503046EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3046


10.6.2025






Order of the General Court of 6 March 2025 – Ashtead Financing v Commission


(Case T-779/19)
                (1)

(State aid - United Kingdom tax regime relating to group financing - Annulment of the contested act by the Court of Justice - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2025/3046)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Ashtead Financing Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: D. Gillespie, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, S. Noë and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2019/1352 of 2 April 2019 on the State aid SA.44896 implemented by the United Kingdom concerning CFC Group Financing Exemption (OJ 2019 L 216, p. 1).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.










2.


The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Ashtead Financing Ltd.






(1)  
            OJ C 45, 10.2.2020.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3046/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-745/19: Order of the General Court of 6 March 2025 – Spirax-Sarco Engineering and Spirax-Sarco Overseas v Commission (State aid – United Kingdom tax regime relating to group financing – Annulment of the contested act by the Court of Justice – Action which has become devoid of purpose – No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2025-03-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: State aid, United Kingdom, control of State aid, corporation tax, foreign enterprise, group of companies, tax exemption, tax law








C_202502880EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2880


2.6.2025






Order of the General Court of 6 March 2025 – Spirax-Sarco Engineering and Spirax-Sarco Overseas v Commission


(Case T-745/19)
                (1)

(State aid - United Kingdom tax regime relating to group financing - Annulment of the contested act by the Court of Justice - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2025/2880)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Spirax-Sarco Engineering plc (Cheltenham, United Kingdom), Spirax-Sarco Overseas Ltd (Cheltenham) (represented by: B. Goren, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, S. Noë and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2019/1352 of 2 April 2019 on the State aid SA.44896 implemented by the United Kingdom concerning CFC Group Financing Exemption (OJ 2019 L 216, p. 1).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.










2.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application to intervene submitted by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.










3.


The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Spirax-Sarco Engineering plc and Spirax-Sarco Overseas Ltd, with the exception of those relating to the application to intervene.










4.


Spirax-Sarco Engineering, Spirax-Sarco Overseas, the Commission and the United Kingdom are to bear their own costs relating to the application to intervene.






(1)  
            OJ C 27, 27.1.2020.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2880/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-717/19: Order of the General Court of 6 March 2025 – Associated British Foods and Others v Commission (State aid – United Kingdom tax regime relating to group financing – Annulment of the contested act by the Court of Justice – Action which has become devoid of purpose – No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2025-03-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: State aid, United Kingdom, control of State aid, corporation tax, foreign enterprise, group of companies, tax exemption, tax law








C_202502874EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2874


2.6.2025






Order of the General Court of 6 March 2025 – Associated British Foods and Others v Commission


(Case T-717/19)
                (1)

(State aid - United Kingdom tax regime relating to group financing - Annulment of the contested act by the Court of Justice - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2025/2874)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Associated British Foods plc (London, United Kingdom) and the five other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the order (represented by: J. Lesar, Solicitor, and K. Beal KC)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, S. Noë and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2019/1352 of 2 April 2019 on the State aid SA.44896 implemented by the United Kingdom concerning CFC Group Financing Exemption (OJ 2019 L 216, p. 1).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.










2.


The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Associated British Foods plc and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex.






(1)  
            OJ C 10, 13.1.2020.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2874/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-48/23, Alajärven Sähkö and Others: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 March 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the markkinaoikeus – Finland) – Alajärven Sähkö Oy and Others, Elenia Verkko Oyj v Energiavirasto (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market for electricity – Directive (EU) 2019/944 – Article 57(4) and (5) – Independence of national regulatory authority in the exercise of its duties and powers – Policy guidelines issued by a Member State – Legislative amendment aimed at reducing electricity distribution prices – Decision concerning methods for monitoring electricity system operation charges taken by the regulatory authority concerned following that amendment – Account taken of the travaux préparatoires relating to the law that introduced that amendment)
Date: 2025-03-06
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: electrical energy, electricity supply, energy distribution, energy law, price of energy, price regulations








C_202502335EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2335


28.4.2025






Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 March 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the markkinaoikeus – Finland) – Alajärven Sähkö Oy and Others, Elenia Verkko Oyj v Energiavirasto


(Case C-48/23,
                (1)
Alajärven Sähkö and Others)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Internal market for electricity - Directive (EU) 2019/944 - Article 57(4) and (5) - Independence of national regulatory authority in the exercise of its duties and powers - Policy guidelines issued by a Member State - Legislative amendment aimed at reducing electricity distribution prices - Decision concerning methods for monitoring electricity system operation charges taken by the regulatory authority concerned following that amendment - Account taken of the travaux préparatoires relating to the law that introduced that amendment)
(C/2025/2335)
Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Markkinaoikeus

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Alajärven Sähkö Oy and Others, Elenia Verkko Oyj

Defendant: Energiavirasto

Operative part of the judgment

Article 57(4) and (5)(a) of Directive (EU) 2019/944 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 on common rules for the internal market for electricity and amending Directive 2012/27/EU, read in conjunction with Article 59 thereof,
must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation whose purpose, as indicated in the travaux préparatoires relating thereto, is, inter alia, to influence electricity distribution prices without, as such, containing provisions specifically governing electricity transmission or distribution tariffs or the calculation methods thereof, but the effect of the entry into force of which has been that the national regulatory authority has changed its methods for monitoring electricity system operation tariffs before the expiry of the monitoring period ongoing on the date of that entry into force.


(1)  
            OJ C 127, 11.4.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2335/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)