do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-483/19: Order of the General Court of 6 March 2025 – Meggitt and Cavehurst v Commission (State aid – United Kingdom tax regime relating to group financing – Annulment of the contested act by the Court of Justice – Action which has become devoid of purpose – No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2025-03-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: State aid, United Kingdom, control of State aid, corporation tax, foreign enterprise, group of companies, tax exemption, tax law








C_202502668EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2668


19.5.2025






Order of the General Court of 6 March 2025 – Meggitt and Cavehurst v Commission


(Case T-483/19)
                (1)

(State aid - United Kingdom tax regime relating to group financing - Annulment of the contested act by the Court of Justice - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2025/2668)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Meggitt Ltd, formerly Meggitt plc (Christchurch, United Kingdom), Cavehurst Ltd (Christchurch) (represented by: M. Struys and F. Pili, lawyers, and K. Beal KC)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, S. Noë and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2019/1352 of 2 April 2019 on the State aid SA.44896 implemented by the United Kingdom concerning CFC Group Financing Exemption (OJ 2019 L 216, p. 1).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.










2.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application to intervene submitted by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.










3.


The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Meggitt Ltd and Cavehurst Ltd, with the exception of those relating to the application to intervene.










4.


Meggitt, Cavehurst, the Commission and the United Kingdom are to bear their own costs relating to the application to intervene.






(1)  
            OJ C 312, 16.9.2019.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2668/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-493/19: Order of the General Court of 6 March 2025 – International Personal Finance Investments v Commission (State aid – United Kingdom tax regime relating to group financing – Annulment of the contested act by the Court of Justice – Action which has become devoid of purpose – No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2025-03-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: State aid, United Kingdom, control of State aid, corporation tax, foreign enterprise, group of companies, tax exemption, tax law








C_202502867EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2867


2.6.2025






Order of the General Court of 6 March 2025 – International Personal Finance Investments v Commission


(Case T-493/19)
                (1)

(State aid - United Kingdom tax regime relating to group financing - Annulment of the contested act by the Court of Justice - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2025/2867)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: International Personal Finance Investments Ltd (Leeds, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Anderson, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, S. Noë and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2019/1352 of 2 April 2019 on the State aid SA.44896 implemented by the United Kingdom concerning CFC Group Financing Exemption (OJ 2019 L 216, p. 1).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.










2.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application to intervene submitted by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.










3.


The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by International Personal Finance Investments Ltd, with the exception of those relating to the application to intervene.










4.


International Personal Finance Investments, the Commission and the United Kingdom are to bear their own costs relating to the application to intervene.






(1)  
            OJ C 312, 16.9.2019.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2867/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-484/19: Order of the General Court of 6 March 2025 – Pearson Loan Finance and Others v Commission (State aid – United Kingdom tax regime relating to group financing – Annulment of the contested act by the Court of Justice – Action which has become devoid of purpose – No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2025-03-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: State aid, United Kingdom, control of State aid, corporation tax, foreign enterprise, group of companies, tax exemption, tax law








C_202502669EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2669


19.5.2025






Order of the General Court of 6 March 2025 – Pearson Loan Finance and Others v Commission


(Case T-484/19)
                (1)

(State aid - United Kingdom tax regime relating to group financing - Annulment of the contested act by the Court of Justice - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2025/2669)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Pearson Loan Finance Unlimited (London, United Kingdom), Pearson Overseas Holdings Ltd (London), Pearson International Finance Ltd (London) (represented by: A. von Bonin and O.W. Brouwer, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, S. Noë and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2019/1352 of 2 April 2019 on the State aid SA.44896 implemented by the United Kingdom concerning CFC Group Financing Exemption (OJ 2019 L 216, p. 1).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.










2.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application to intervene submitted by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.










3.


The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Pearson Loan Finance Unlimited, Pearson Overseas Holdings Ltd and Pearson International Finance Ltd, with the exception of those relating to the application to intervene.










4.


Pearson Loan Finance, Pearson Overseas Holdings, Pearson International Finance, the Commission and the United Kingdom are to bear their own costs relating to the application to intervene.






(1)  
            OJ C 312, 16.9.2019.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2669/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-490/19: Order of the General Court of 6 March 2025 – Weston Investment and Others v Commission (State aid – United Kingdom tax regime relating to group financing – Annulment of the contested act by the Court of Justice – Action which has become devoid of purpose – No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2025-03-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: State aid, United Kingdom, control of State aid, corporation tax, foreign enterprise, group of companies, tax exemption, tax law








C_202502866EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2866


2.6.2025






Order of the General Court of 6 March 2025 – Weston Investment and Others v Commission


(Case T-490/19)
                (1)

(State aid - United Kingdom tax regime relating to group financing - Annulment of the contested act by the Court of Justice - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2025/2866)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Weston Investment Co. Ltd (London, United Kingdom), Precis (1814) Ltd (London), British American Tobacco Holdings Belgium NV (Brussels, Belgium), British American Tobacco International Holdings (UK) Ltd (London), British American Tobacco (GLP) Ltd (London) (represented by: M. Anderson, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, S. Noë and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2019/1352 of 2 April 2019 on the State aid SA.44896 implemented by the United Kingdom concerning CFC Group Financing Exemption (OJ 2019 L 216, p. 1).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.










2.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application to intervene submitted by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.










3.


The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Weston Investment Co. Ltd, Precis (1814) Ltd, British American Tobacco Holdings Belgium NV, British American Tobacco International Holdings (UK) Ltd and British American Tobacco (GLP) Ltd, with the exception of those relating to the application to intervene.










4.


Weston Investment Co., Precis (1814), British American Tobacco Holdings Belgium, British American Tobacco International Holdings (UK), British American Tobacco (GLP), the Commission and the United Kingdom are to bear their own costs relating to the application to intervene.






(1)  
            OJ C 312, 16.9.2019.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2866/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-756/19: Order of the General Court of 6 March 2025 – WPP Jubilee and Others v Commission (State aid – United Kingdom tax regime relating to group financing – Annulment of the contested act by the Court of Justice – Action which has become devoid of purpose – No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2025-03-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: State aid, United Kingdom, control of State aid, corporation tax, foreign enterprise, group of companies, tax exemption, tax law








C_202502887EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2887


2.6.2025






Order of the General Court of 6 March 2025 – WPP Jubilee and Others v Commission


(Case T-756/19)
                (1)

(State aid - United Kingdom tax regime relating to group financing - Annulment of the contested act by the Court of Justice - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2025/2887)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: WPP Jubilee Ltd (London, United Kingdom) and the eleven other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the order (represented by: B. Goren, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, S. Noë and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2019/1352 of 2 April 2019 on the State aid SA.44896 implemented by the United Kingdom concerning CFC Group Financing Exemption (OJ 2019 L 216, p. 1).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.










2.


The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by WPP Jubilee Ltd and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex.






(1)  
            OJ C 27, 27.1.2020.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2887/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/1510 of 27 May 2024 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ L, 2024/1510, 28.5.2024)
Date: 2025-03-06
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Syria, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person, natural person




L_202590216EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2025/90216


6.3.2025






Corrigendum to Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/1510 of 27 May 2024 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria
(
Official Journal of the European Union L, 2024/1510, 28 May 2024
)

On page 1, in Article 1:







for:









‘(1)


Article 34 is replaced by the following:
                                    “

‘Article 34

This Decision shall apply until 1 June 2025. It shall be kept under constant review. It may be renewed, or amended as appropriate, if the Council deems that its objectives have not been met.’”,

’
                                 














read:










‘(1)


in Article 34, the first paragraph is replaced by the following:
                                       “
‘This Decision shall apply until 1 June 2025. It shall be kept under constant review. It may be renewed, or amended as appropriate, if the Council deems that its objectives have not been met.’”.
’
                                    










ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2024/1510/corrigendum/2025-03-06/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Case C-163/23, Palognali: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 March 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di Bologna – Italy) – Governo della Repubblica italiana v UX (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to present the reasons justifying the need for an interpretation of certain provisions of European Union law by the Court of Justice – Lack of sufficient details – Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2025-03-06
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative sanction, equal treatment, full-time employment, independence of the judiciary, judge, magistrate, paid leave, recruitment, temporary employment, working conditions








C_202503256EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3256


24.6.2025






Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 March 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di Bologna – Italy) – Governo della Repubblica italiana v UX


(Case C-163/23,
                (1)
Palognali)
                (2)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Requirement to present the reasons justifying the need for an interpretation of certain provisions of European Union law by the Court of Justice - Lack of sufficient details - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2025/3256)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Giudice di pace di Bologna

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Governo della Repubblica italiana

Defendant: UX

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di Bologna (Magistrates’ Court, Bologna, Italy), made by decision of 25 January 2023, is manifestly inadmissible.


(1)  
            OJ C 189, 30.5.2023.

(2)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3256/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-747/19: Order of the General Court of 6 March 2025 – DS Smith and DS Smith International v Commission (State aid – United Kingdom tax regime relating to group financing – Annulment of the contested act by the Court of Justice – Action which has become devoid of purpose – No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2025-03-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: State aid, United Kingdom, control of State aid, corporation tax, foreign enterprise, group of companies, tax exemption, tax law








C_202502881EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2881


2.6.2025






Order of the General Court of 6 March 2025 – DS Smith and DS Smith International v Commission


(Case T-747/19)
                (1)

(State aid - United Kingdom tax regime relating to group financing - Annulment of the contested act by the Court of Justice - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2025/2881)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: DS Smith plc (London, United Kingdom), DS Smith International Ltd (London) (represented by: C. McDonnell, Barrister, P. Halford and M. Whitehouse, Solicitors)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, S. Noë and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2019/1352 of 2 April 2019 on the State aid SA.44896 implemented by the United Kingdom concerning CFC Group Financing Exemption (OJ 2019 L 216, p. 1).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.










2.


The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by DS Smith plc and DS Smith International Ltd.






(1)  
            OJ C 27, 27.1.2020.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2881/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-740/19: Order of the General Court of 6 March 2025 – Laird v Commission (State aid – United Kingdom tax regime relating to group financing – Annulment of the contested act by the Court of Justice – Action which has become devoid of purpose – No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2025-03-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: State aid, United Kingdom, control of State aid, corporation tax, foreign enterprise, group of companies, tax exemption, tax law








C_202502876EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2876


2.6.2025






Order of the General Court of 6 March 2025 – Laird v Commission


(Case T-740/19)
                (1)

(State aid - United Kingdom tax regime relating to group financing - Annulment of the contested act by the Court of Justice - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2025/2876)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Laird Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: D. Gillespie, Solicitor, and C. Quigley KC)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, S. Noë and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2019/1352 of 2 April 2019 on the State aid SA.44896 implemented by the United Kingdom concerning CFC Group Financing Exemption (OJ 2019 L 216, p. 1).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.










2.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application to intervene submitted by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.










3.


The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Laird Ltd, with the exception of those relating to the application to intervene.










4.


Laird, the Commission and the United Kingdom are to bear their own costs relating to the application to intervene.






(1)  
            OJ C 27, 27.1.2020.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2876/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-787/19: Order of the General Court of 6 March 2025 – The Sage Group and Others v Commission (State aid – United Kingdom tax regime relating to group financing – Annulment of the contested act by the Court of Justice – Action which has become devoid of purpose – No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2025-03-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: State aid, United Kingdom, control of State aid, corporation tax, foreign enterprise, group of companies, tax exemption, tax law








C_202503051EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3051


10.6.2025






Order of the General Court of 6 March 2025 – The Sage Group and Others v Commission


(Case T-787/19)
                (1)

(State aid - United Kingdom tax regime relating to group financing - Annulment of the contested act by the Court of Justice - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2025/3051)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: The Sage Group plc (Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom), Sage Treasury Company Ltd (Newcastle upon Tyne), Sage Irish Investments One Ltd (Newcastle upon Tyne), Sage Irish Investments Two Ltd (Newcastle upon Tyne) (represented by: J. Lesar, Solicitor, and K. Beal KC)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, S. Noë and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2019/1352 of 2 April 2019 on the State aid SA.44896 implemented by the United Kingdom concerning CFC Group Financing Exemption (OJ 2019 L 216, p. 1).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.










2.


The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by The Sage Group plc, Sage Treasury Company Ltd, Sage Irish Investments One Ltd and Sage Irish Investments Two Ltd.






(1)  
            OJ C 45, 10.2.2020.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3051/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-762/19: Order of the General Court of 6 March 2025 – Rio Tinto European Holdings and Others v Commission (State aid – United Kingdom tax regime relating to group financing – Annulment of the contested act by the Court of Justice – Action which has become devoid of purpose – No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2025-03-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: State aid, United Kingdom, control of State aid, corporation tax, foreign enterprise, group of companies, tax exemption, tax law








C_202502890EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2890


2.6.2025






Order of the General Court of 6 March 2025 – Rio Tinto European Holdings and Others v Commission


(Case T-762/19)
                (1)

(State aid - United Kingdom tax regime relating to group financing - Annulment of the contested act by the Court of Justice - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2025/2890)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Rio Tinto European Holdings Ltd (London, United Kingdom), Rio Tinto International Holdings Ltd (London), Rio Tinto Simfer UK Ltd (London) (represented by: B. Hoorelbeke, lawyer, and P. O’Gara, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, S. Noë and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2019/1352 of 2 April 2019 on the State aid SA.44896 implemented by the United Kingdom concerning CFC Group Financing Exemption (OJ 2019 L 216, p. 1).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.










2.


The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Rio Tinto European Holdings Ltd, Rio Tinto International Holdings Ltd and Rio Tinto Simfer UK Ltd.






(1)  
            OJ C 45, 10.2.2020.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2890/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)