do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-1135/23: Judgment of the General Court of 5 March 2025 – Funline International v EUIPO – MS Trade (JUNGLE PREMIUM) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark JUNGLE PREMIUM – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action for annulment – Representation by a lawyer – Admissibility)
Date: 2025-03-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, chemical product, cosmetic product, registered trade mark, sexuality, trade-mark law








C_202502378EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2378


28.4.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 5 March 2025 – Funline International v EUIPO – MS Trade (JUNGLE PREMIUM)


(Case T-1135/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark JUNGLE PREMIUM - Lack of genuine use of the mark - Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action for annulment - Representation by a lawyer - Admissibility)
(C/2025/2378)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Funline International Corp. (Wilmington, Delaware, United States) (represented by: S. Hejdová and J. Brauner, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Ringelhann, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: MS Trade s. r. o. (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: A. Daňková, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks, in essence, the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 11 September 2023 (Case R 2263/2022-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Funline International Corp. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO);










3.


Orders MS Trade s. r. o. to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/1251, 12.2.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2378/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-277/24: Judgment of the General Court of 5 March 2025 – People Against Dirty v EUIPO – Ningbo Future Houseware (ecovie) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark ecovie – Earlier EU figurative and word marks ECOVER and earlier EU word mark ECOVER ESSENTIAL – International registration of an earlier figurative mark ecover – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-03-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetic product, essential oil, furniture industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202502389EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2389


28.4.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 5 March 2025 – People Against Dirty v EUIPO – Ningbo Future Houseware (ecovie)


(Case T-277/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark ecovie - Earlier EU figurative and word marks ECOVER and earlier EU word mark ECOVER ESSENTIAL - International registration of an earlier figurative mark ecover - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/2389)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: People Against Dirty Holdings Ltd (Frimley, United Kingdom) (represented by: J. Quirin, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Ningbo Future Houseware Co. Ltd (Ningbo, China)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 20 March 2024 (Case R 1333/2023-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 20 March 2024 (Case R 1333/2023-2);










2.


Orders EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/4100, 8.7.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2389/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-73/24: Judgment of the General Court of 5 March 2025 – Purwana v EUIPO (EAST INDIES GIN) (EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark EAST INDIES GIN – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-03-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, alcoholic beverage, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202502385EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2385


28.4.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 5 March 2025 – Purwana v EUIPO (EAST INDIES GIN)


(Case T-73/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark EAST INDIES GIN - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/2385)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Victor Waskito Purwana (Petojo Utara, Indonesia) (represented by: N. Scholz-Recht, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: V. Ruzek, acting as Agent)

Re:

By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 29 November 2023 (Case R 1927/2023-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mr Victor Waskito Purwana and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) each to bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/2631, 22.4.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2385/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-278/24: Judgment of the General Court of 5 March 2025 – People Against Dirty v EUIPO – Ningbo Future Houseware (ecovie) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark ecovie – Earlier EU figurative and word marks ECOVER and earlier EU word mark ECOVER ESSENTIAL – International registration of an earlier figurative mark ecover – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-03-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetic product, furniture industry, polishing and scouring preparations, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202502390EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2390


28.4.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 5 March 2025 – People Against Dirty v EUIPO – Ningbo Future Houseware (ecovie)


(Case T-278/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark ecovie - Earlier EU figurative and word marks ECOVER and earlier EU word mark ECOVER ESSENTIAL - International registration of an earlier figurative mark ecover - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/2390)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: People Against Dirty Holdings Ltd (Frimley, United Kingdom) (represented by: J. Quirin, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Ningbo Future Houseware Co. Ltd (Ningbo, China)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 20 March 2024 (Case R 1331/2023-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 20 March 2024 (Case R 1331/2023-2);










2.


Orders EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/4101, 8.7.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2390/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-281/24: Judgment of the General Court of 5 March 2025 – People Against Dirty v EUIPO – Ningbo Future Houseware (ecovie) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark ecovie – Earlier EU figurative and word marks ECOVER and earlier EU word mark ECOVER ESSENTIAL – International registration of an earlier figurative mark ecover – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-03-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetic product, household article, polishing and scouring preparations, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202502392EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2392


28.4.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 5 March 2025 – People Against Dirty v EUIPO – Ningbo Future Houseware (ecovie)


(Case T-281/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark ecovie - Earlier EU figurative and word marks ECOVER and earlier EU word mark ECOVER ESSENTIAL - International registration of an earlier figurative mark ecover - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/2392)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: People Against Dirty Holdings Ltd (Frimley, United Kingdom) (represented by: J. Quirin, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Ningbo Future Houseware Co. Ltd (Ningbo, China)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 20 March 2024 (Case R 1334/2023-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 20 March 2024 (Case R 1334/2023-2);










2.


Orders EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/4104, 8.7.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2392/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-148/25: Action brought on 5 March 2025 – Ryanair v Commission
Date: 2025-03-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Germany, Rhineland-Palatinate, State aid, aid to undertakings, airport, control of State aid, limitation of legal proceedings, low cost airline, reimbursement of aid








C_202502104EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2104


14.4.2025






Action brought on 5 March 2025 – Ryanair v Commission


(Case T-148/25)

(C/2025/2104)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Ryanair DAC (Swords, Ireland) (represented by: E. Vahida, B. Byrne, S. Rating, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the European Commission Decision (EU) of 9 September 2024 on State aid SA.43260 (2018/C) implemented by Germany in favour of Flughafen Frankfurt Hahn GmbH and Ryanair DAC (1) insofar as it finds that unlawful and incompatible State aid was granted to Ryanair, and










—


order the European Commission to pay the costs related to the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on six pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging that the Decision violates Articles 41 and 52 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging that the Commission violated the limitation period for the recovery of State aid and failed to discharge its burden of proof and/or failed to provide adequate reasoning.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging that the Commission committed manifest errors of assessment of the renewability and profitability of the 2005 Marketing Agreement when applying the Market Economy Investor Test.










4.


Fourth plea in law, alleging that the Commission committed a manifest error of assessment of the indirect beneficiary of the 2017 Marketing Agreement, i.e. Frankfurt Hahn Airport, based on an incomplete assessment of the relevant facts.










5.


Fifth plea in law, alleging that the Commission disregarded the Land Rheinland Pfalz and Frankfurt Hahn Airport’s actual need for the marketing services, and the resultant satisfaction of the Market Economy Purchaser Test.










6.


Sixth plea in law alleging that the Commission committed a manifest error of assessment of the amount of alleged State aid.






(1)  Commission Decision (EU) 2024/3021 of 9 September 2024 on the measures SA.43260 (2018/C) implemented by Germany in favour of Flughafen Frankfurt-Hahn GmbH and Ryanair DAC (OJ L, 2024/3021).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2104/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Update of the list of national services responsible for border control as referred to in Article 16(2) of Regulation (EC) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code)
Date: 2025-03-05
Institutions: Directorate-General for Migration and Home Affairs, European Commission
Subjects: Portugal, Schengen Agreement, border control, external border of the EU, foreign national, identity document, residence permit








C_202500835EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/835


5.3.2025






Update of the list of national services responsible for border control as referred to in Article 16(2) of Regulation (EC) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (1)

(C/2025/835)

The publication of the list of national services responsible for border control as referred to in Article 16(2) of Regulation (EC) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (2) is based on the information communicated by the Member States to the Commission in conformity with Article 39 of the Schengen Borders Code.
In addition to the publication in the Official Journal, a regular update is available on the website of the Directorate-General for Migration and Home Affairs.

LIST OF NATIONAL SERVICES RESPONSIBLE FOR BORDER CONTROL

PORTUGAL

Replacement of the information published in 
OJ C 247, 13.10.2006, p. 17
.






—


for the Portuguese Republic: Polícia de Segurança Pública (The Public Security Police); Guarda Nacional Republicana (The Republican National Guard);





List of previous publications


OJ C 247, 13.10.2006, p. 17.

OJ C 77, 5.4.2007, p. 11.

OJ C 153, 6.7.2007, p. 1.

OJ C 164, 18.7.2007, p.45.

OJ C 153, 6.7.2007, p. 21.

OJ C 331, 31.12.2008, p. 15


OJ C 87, 1.4.2010, p. 15.

OJ C 180, 21.6.2012, p. 2.

OJ C 98, 5.4.2013, p. 2.

OJ C 256, 5.9.2013, p. 14.

OJ C 360, 10.12.2013, p. 17.

OJ C 218, 7.7.2017, p. 19.

OJ C 431, 15.12.2017, p. 8.

OJ C 345, 27.9.2018, p. 4.

OJ C 375, 17.10.2018, p. 5.

OJ C 74, 3.3.2021, p. 5.

OJ C 141, 22.4.2021, p. 2.

OJ C 298, 23.8.2023, p. 5.

OJ C, C/2024/1172, 26.1.2024.


(1)  See the list of previous publications at the end of this update.

(2)  
            
OJ L 77, 23.3.2016, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/835/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Council Decision of 5 March 2025 replacing a member of the Management Board of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions for Ireland
Date: 2025-03-05
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Eurofound, Ireland, appointment of members, decision-making body (EU)








C_202501609EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1609


11.3.2025







            COUNCIL DECISION
         
of 5 March 2025
         
replacing a member of the Management Board of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions for Ireland
(C/2025/1609)


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2019/127 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 January 2019 establishing the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Eurofound), and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 1365/75 (1), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


By Decision of 28 March 2023 (2), the Council appointed members and alternate members of the Management Board of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions for the period from 1 April 2023 to 31 March 2027.












(2)


A seat as member in the government representatives category has fallen vacant as a result of the resignation of Mr Marcus BREATHNACH.












(3)


The Government of Ireland has designated a candidate for the vacant seat,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Mr Diarmaid SMYTH is appointed member of the Management Board of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions in place of Mr Marcus BREATHNACH for the remainder of the current term of office, ending on 31 March 2027.


Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.




Done at Brussels, 5 March 2025.


For the Council


The President

T. SIEMONIAK
            





(1)  
            OJ L 30, 31.1.2019, p. 74.

(2)  Council Decision of 28 March 2023 appointing members and alternate members of the Management Board of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Eurofound) (OJ C 116, 31.3.2023, p. 23).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1609/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-90/24: Judgment of the General Court of 5 March 2025 – Kapitan Navi Elżbieta Stramek i Waldemar Karpiński v EUIPO – Homann Feinkost (Matjeshappen nach Kolberger Art) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Matjeshappen nach Kolberger Art – Absolute grounds for invalidity – No distinctive character – Descriptive character – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Date: 2025-03-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, fish product, preserved product, registered trade mark, sea fish, trade-mark law








C_202502387EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2387


28.4.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 5 March 2025 – Kapitan Navi Elżbieta Stramek i Waldemar Karpiński v EUIPO – Homann Feinkost (Matjeshappen nach ‘Kolberger Art’)


(Case T-90/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark Matjeshappen nach ‘Kolberger Art’ - Absolute grounds for invalidity - No distinctive character - Descriptive character - No distinctive character acquired through use - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(C/2025/2387)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Kapitan Navi Elżbieta Stramek i Waldemar Karpiński sp.j. (Trzebiatów, Poland) (represented by: A. Brudnoch, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: R. Raponi, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Homann Feinkost GmbH (Bad Essen, Germany) (represented by: C. von Nussbaum, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and the alteration of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 14 December 2023 (Case R 286/2023-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Kapitan Navi Elżbieta Stramek i Waldemar Karpiński sp.j., in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay those incurred by Homann Feinkost GmbH for the purposes of the proceedings before the Court;










3.


Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/2332, 2.4.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2387/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) 2025/395 of 24 February 2025 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ L, 2025/395, 24.2.2025)
Date: 2025-03-05
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russia, Russo-Ukrainian issue, Ukraine, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person, natural person, territorial dispute, territorial law, trade restriction




L_202590213EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2025/90213


5.3.2025






Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) 2025/395 of 24 February 2025 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine
(
Official Journal of the European Union L, 2025/395, 24 February 2025
)







1.


On page 22, Article 1, point (31):











for:









‘(31)


Article 11c is replaced by the following:

“1.   No injunction, order, relief, …”’
;



,











read:









‘(31)


Article 11c is replaced by the following:

“Article 11c


1.   No injunction, order, relief, …”;’.
















2.


On page 238, Annex III











for:





                           ‘Annex VII to Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 is replaced by the following:


                                       “
                                       ANNEX VII

List of goods and technology referred to in Articles 2a(1) and 2b(1)
Part A
General Notes, Acronyms and Abbreviations, and Definitions in Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2021/821 apply to this Annex, with the exception of ‘Part I – General Notes, Acronyms and Abbreviations, and Definitions, General Notes to Annex I, point 2’.
Definitions of Terms used in the Common Military List (CML) of the European Union (2020/C 85/01) apply to this Annex.”.’,













read:





                           ‘Annex VII to Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 is replaced by the following:


                                       “
                                       ANNEX VII

List of goods and technology referred to in Articles 2a(1) and 2b(1)
Part A
General Notes, Acronyms and Abbreviations, and Definitions in Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2021/821 apply to this Annex, with the exception of ‘Part I – General Notes, Acronyms and Abbreviations, and Definitions, General Notes to Annex I, point 2’.
Definitions of Terms used in the Common Military List (CML) of the European Union (C/2024/1945) apply to this Annex.”.’.








ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2025/395/corrigendum/2025-03-05/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)