do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-194/25, Scrap-Transporteur: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 5 March 2025 – Hauptzollamt A v Scrap-Transporteur
Date: 2025-03-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: excise duty, smoking, tobacco








C_202502568EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2568


12.5.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 5 March 2025 – Hauptzollamt A v Scrap-Transporteur


(Case T-194/25, Scrap-Transporteur)

(C/2025/2568)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings


Defendant and appellant on a point of law: Hauptzollamt A

Applicant and respondent in the appeal on a point of law: Scrap-Transporteur

Questions referred







1.


Is the concept ‘tobacco which … is capable of being smoked’ in Article 5(1)(a) of Directive 2011/64/EU (1) to be interpreted as meaning that such capability exists only in the case of products which, in accordance with public perception, are smoked?










2.


Is the concept ‘without further industrial processing’ in Article 5(1)(a) of Directive 2011/64 to be interpreted as also including more complex methods which consumers can use at home






(1)  Council Directive 2011/64/EU of 21 June 2011 on the structure and rates of excise duty applied to manufactured tobacco (OJ 2011 L 176, p. 24).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2568/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1144/23: Judgment of the General Court of 5 March 2025 – Enedo v EUIPO – Enedis (Enedo RESHAPING ELECTRICITY) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Enedo RESHAPING ELECTRICITY – Earlier EU word mark ENEDIS – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Restriction of the goods and services covered in the trade mark application)
Date: 2025-03-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, assembly line production, electricity storage device, electronic component, electronic device, maintenance, measuring equipment, registered trade mark, scientific research, trade-mark law








C_202502380EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2380


28.4.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 5 March 2025 – Enedo v EUIPO – Enedis (Enedo RESHAPING ELECTRICITY)


(Case T-1144/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark Enedo RESHAPING ELECTRICITY - Earlier EU word mark ENEDIS - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Restriction of the goods and services covered in the trade mark application)
(C/2025/2380)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Enedo Oyj (Vantaa, Finland) (represented by: H.-M. Elo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Ringelhann, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Enedis (Paris, France) (represented by: C. Verneret and J.-B. Micard, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and the alteration of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 27 September 2023 (Case R 191/2023-4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Enedo Oyj to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Enedis;










3.


Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/1107, 5.2.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2380/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)