do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT of 26 February 2025 in Case E-14/24 – Elmatica AS v Confidee AS and Vidar Olsen (Directive (EU) 2016/943 – Rules on evidence and disclosure of confidential information – Trade secrets – Weighing-up of interests – Principle of effective judicial protection)
Date: 2025-02-26
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: European Economic Area, Norway, confidentiality, courts and tribunals, discretionary power, evidence, trade information








C_202503440EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3440


19.6.2025






JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
of 26 February 2025
         
in Case E-14/24
Elmatica AS v Confidee AS and Vidar Olsen


(Directive (EU) 2016/943 – Rules on evidence and disclosure of confidential information – Trade secrets – Weighing-up of interests – Principle of effective judicial protection)


(C/2025/3440)

In Case E-14/24, Elmatica AS v Confidee AS and Vidar Olsen – REQUEST to the Court under Article 34 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice by the Supreme Court of Norway (Norges Høyesterett), concerning the interpretation of Directive (EU) 2016/943 on the protection of undisclosed know-how and business information (trade secrets) against their unlawful acquisition, use and disclosure, the Court, composed of Páll Hreinsson, President, Bernd Hammermann (Judge-Rapporteur) and Michael Reiertsen, Judges, gave judgment on 26 February 2025, the operative part of which is as follows:






1.


In disputes concerning the unlawful acquisition, use or disclosure of trade secrets, EEA law requires national courts to weigh up the respective protected interests on a case-by-case basis in order to strike a balance between the requirements of effective legal protection or the interest of a due examination of the substance of a claim and the protection of business confidentiality including trade secrets.










2.


EEA law does not place an obligation on national courts in all cases to obtain and examine all disputed evidence which may contain trade secrets in order to determine whether that evidence is to be adduced in the proceedings. It is sufficient that national courts may, at their discretion, obtain the evidence in question in those cases where they deem it necessary in order to conduct a proper assessment of whether the evidence is to be adduced. Such a discretion must be exercised in accordance with general principles of EEA law.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3440/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-201/19: Order of the General Court of 26 February 2025 – BC v Commission
Date: 2025-02-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Germany, State aid, charges for use of infrastructure, control of State aid, electrical energy, electricity supply, energy consumption, energy supply, equal treatment, reimbursement of aid








C_202502577EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2577


12.5.2025






Order of the General Court of 26 February 2025 – BC v Commission


(Case T-201/19)
                (1)

(C/2025/2577)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Tenth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 213, 24.6.2019.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2577/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-219/19: Order of the General Court of 26 February 2025 – Julius Schulte Trebsen v Commission
Date: 2025-02-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Germany, State aid, charges for use of infrastructure, control of State aid, electrical energy, electricity supply, energy consumption, energy supply, equal treatment, reimbursement of aid








C_202502586EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2586


12.5.2025






Order of the General Court of 26 February 2025 – Julius Schulte Trebsen v Commission


(Case T-219/19)
                (1)

(C/2025/2586)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Tenth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 206, 17.6.2019.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2586/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-195/23: Order of the General Court of 26 February 2025 – Dansk Avis Omdeling Distribution v Commission (Action for annulment – State aid – Postal sector – Compensation for discharging the universal service obligation – Decision finding aid compatible with the internal market – Lack of individual concern – No substantial effect on the competitive position – Inadmissibility)
Date: 2025-02-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Denmark, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid, postal service, services of general interest, universal service








C_202502671EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2671


19.5.2025






Order of the General Court of 26 February 2025 – Dansk Avis Omdeling Distribution v Commission


(Case T-195/23)
                (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Postal sector - Compensation for discharging the universal service obligation - Decision finding aid compatible with the internal market - Lack of individual concern - No substantial effect on the competitive position - Inadmissibility)
(C/2025/2671)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Dansk Avis Omdeling Distribution A/S (Vejle, Denmark) (represented by: L. Sandberg-Mørch, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Nicolae, J. Carpi Badía and C. Faroghi, acting as Agents)

Intervening parties, in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Denmark (represented by: C. Maertens, acting as Agent, and by R. Holdgaard, lawyer), Post Danmark A/S (represented by: O. Koktvedgaard, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2023/2388 of 10 August 2022 on State aid SA.57991 – 2021/C (ex 2021/NN) implemented by Denmark for USO compensation to Post Danmark A/S for 2020 (OJ L 2023/2388).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


Dansk Avis Omdeling Distribution A/S shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission and Post Danmark A/S.










3.


The Kingdom of Denmark shall bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 252, 17.7.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2671/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-197/24: Judgment of the General Court of 26 February 2025 – eBilet Polska v EUIPO (eBilet) (EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark eBilet – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive nature – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-02-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, computer equipment, cultural event, registered trade mark, retail selling, service, software, sporting event, ticket, trade-mark law








C_202502203EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2203


22.4.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 26 February 2025 – eBilet Polska v EUIPO (eBilet)


(Case T-197/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU figurative mark eBilet - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive nature - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/2203)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: eBilet Polska sp. z o.o. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: P. Kurcman, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and alteration of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 14 February 2024 (Case R 695/2023-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/3478, 10.6.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2203/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-217/19: Order of the General Court of 26 February 2025 – Schott v Commission
Date: 2025-02-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Germany, State aid, charges for use of infrastructure, control of State aid, electrical energy, electricity supply, energy consumption, energy supply, equal treatment, reimbursement of aid








C_202502584EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2584


12.5.2025






Order of the General Court of 26 February 2025 – Schott v Commission


(Case T-217/19)
                (1)

(C/2025/2584)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Tenth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 206, 17.6.2019.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2584/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Notice concerning the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the United States of America setting forth security procedures for the launch of Galileo satellites from Unites States’ territory
Date: 2025-02-26
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: United States, agreement (EU), confidentiality, information security, launch facility, satellite, satellite communications, satellite navigation, space technology








L_202500366EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2025/366


26.2.2025






Notice concerning the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the United States of America setting forth security procedures for the launch of Galileo satellites from Unites States’ territory

The Agreement between the European Union and the United States of America setting forth security procedures for the launch of Galileo satellites from Unites States’ territory (1), signed in Brussels on 25 March 2024, entered into force on 18 January 2025, with the procedure provided for in Article 12(1) of the Agreement having been completed on 17 January 2025.


(1)  
            OJ L, 2024/1214, 3.5.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/agree_internation/2024/1214/oj.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/info/2025/366/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Case T-199/19: Order of the General Court of 26 February 2025 – Wiegand-Glashüttenwerke v Commission
Date: 2025-02-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Germany, State aid, charges for use of infrastructure, control of State aid, electrical energy, electricity supply, energy consumption, energy supply, equal treatment, reimbursement of aid








C_202502575EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2575


12.5.2025






Order of the General Court of 26 February 2025 – Wiegand-Glashüttenwerke v Commission


(Case T-199/19)
                (1)

(C/2025/2575)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Tenth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 206, 17.6.2019.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2575/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)