do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.58880
Date: 2025-02-13
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: State aid, Sweden, air transport, control of State aid








C_202501004EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1004


13.2.2025






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.58880
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/1004)








Date of adoption of the decision


26.11.2024




Aid number


SA.58880




Member State


Sweden




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


COVID-19: Aid to recapitalize Swedavia




Legal basis


Decision from the Swedish government which qualifies the amount to be approved through the Measure as compensation for the damage that Swedavia suffered as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.




Type of measure


Ad Hoc Case


 




Objective


Compensation of damage caused by natural disasters or exceptional occurrences




Form of aid


Equity instruments




Budget


Overall budget: 1 417 700 000  SEK
Annual budget: 0 SEK




Intensity


 




Duration


 




Economic sectors


Air transport




Name and address of the granting authority







The Swedish Legal, Finance and Administrative Services Agency




Slottsbacken 6, 111 30 Stockholm, SE








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1004/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-378/23: Order of the General Court of 13 February 2025 – Marcegaglia Specialties v Commission
Date: 2025-02-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Indonesia, Türkiye, anti-dumping duty, import (EU), industrial manufacturing, originating product, sheet, steel








C_202502591EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2591


12.5.2025






Order of the General Court of 13 February 2025 – Marcegaglia Specialties v Commission


(Case T-378/23)
                (1)

(C/2025/2591)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Eight Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 304, 28.8.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2591/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-486/24 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 13 February 2025 – NKL Associates v Commission (Interim relief – Digital services – Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 – Very large online platforms – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – Prima facie case – Urgency – Weighing up of interests)
Date: 2025-02-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Internet, advertising, confidentiality, data protection, disclosure of information, information storage, personal data, protection of privacy, provision of services, right of establishment, right to property








C_202502089EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2089


14.4.2025






Order of the President of the General Court of 13 February 2025 – NKL Associates v Commission


(Case T-486/24 R)

(Interim relief - Digital services - Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 - Very large online platforms - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Prima facie case - Urgency - Weighing up of interests)
(C/2025/2089)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: NKL Associates s.r.o. (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: M. Pinto de Lemos Fermiano Rato and A. Kontosakou, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P.-J. Loewenthal and J. Szczodrowski, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, the applicant seeks the suspension of operation of Commission Decision C(2024) 4936 final of 10 July 2024 designating the online platform XNXX as a very large online platform in accordance with Article 33(4) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council, in so far as that decision requires the applicant, in accordance with Article 39(1) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market For Digital Services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act) (OJ 2022 L 277, p. 1), to make publicly available the repository referred to in paragraph 2 of that article.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


The costs are reserved.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2089/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-136/25, Pemak: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 13 February 2025 – S O v G GmbH
Date: 2025-02-13
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: group of companies, temporary employment, temporary employment agency, transfer of businesses








C_202502643EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2643


19.5.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 13 February 2025 – S O v G GmbH


(Case C-136/25, Pemak)
                (1)

(C/2025/2643)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesarbeitsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: S O

Defendant: G GmbH

Questions referred







1.


When calculating a maximum assignment period laid down in national law in order to give specific expression to the criterion of ‘temporarily’ in Article 1(1) of Directive 2008/104/EC, (2) must, in the event of a transfer of undertakings, the transferor and the transferee always be regarded as one ‘user undertaking’ within the meaning of Article 3(1)(d) of Directive 2008/104?










2.


If the answer to the first question is in the negative:
When calculating a maximum assignment period laid down in national law in order to give specific expression to the criterion of ‘temporarily’ in Article 1(1) of Directive 2008/104, must, in the event of a transfer of undertakings, the transferor and the transferee be regarded as one ‘user undertaking’ within the meaning of Article 3(1)(d) of Directive 2008/104 if they belong to the same group of undertakings and the same temporary agency worker is assigned without interruption to the same job?










3.


If the answer to the first two questions is in the negative:
Must the transfer of a user establishment be taken into account in the context of monitoring whether, in the case of successive assignments of the same temporary agency worker, the duration can still be regarded as ‘temporary’ (Article 5(5) of Directive 2008/104)? If that question is to be answered in the affirmative, how is that transfer to be taken into account?






(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(2)  Directive 2008/104/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on temporary agency work (OJ 2008 L 327, p. 9).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2643/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-612/23, Verbraucherzentrale Berlin (Concept of initial commitment period): Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 February 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf – Germany) – Verbraucherzentrale Berlin eV v Vodafone GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2002/22/EC (Universal Service Directive) – Electronic communications networks and services – Universal service and users’ rights – Consumer protection – Contracts concluded between a consumer and an undertaking providing electronic communications services – Facilitating change of provider – Article 30(5) – Initial commitment period – Concept)
Date: 2025-02-13
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer protection, contract terms, provision of services, telecommunications, universal service








C_202501867EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1867


7.4.2025






Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 February 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf – Germany) – Verbraucherzentrale Berlin eV v Vodafone GmbH


(Case C-612/23,
                (1)
Verbraucherzentrale Berlin (Concept of initial commitment period))

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2002/22/EC (Universal Service Directive) - Electronic communications networks and services - Universal service and users’ rights - Consumer protection - Contracts concluded between a consumer and an undertaking providing electronic communications services - Facilitating change of provider - Article 30(5) - Initial commitment period - Concept)
(C/2025/1867)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Verbraucherzentrale Berlin eV

Defendant: Vodafone GmbH

Operative part of the judgment

Article 30(5) of Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (Universal Service Directive), as amended by Directive 2009/136/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009
         
must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of ‘initial commitment period’ referred to in that provision covers both the duration of the initial contract concluded between a consumer and a provider of electronic communications services and that of a subsequent contract concluded between the same parties and such that that subsequent contract may not impose a commitment period exceeding 24 months, including when it was signed and put into effect before the expiry of the initial contract.


(1)  OJ C C/2024/708.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1867/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.57025
Date: 2025-02-13
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: State aid, Sweden, air transport, carriage of passengers, control of State aid, property leasing








C_202501005EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1005


13.2.2025






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.57025
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/1005)








Date of adoption of the decision


26.11.2024




Aid number


SA.57025




Member State


Sweden




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Sweden – Aid to Swedavia




Legal basis


Decision from the Swedish government which qualifies the amount to be approved through the Measure as compensation for the damage that Swedavia suffered as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.




Type of measure


Ad Hoc Case


Swedavia AB




Objective


Compensation of damage caused by natural disasters or exceptional occurrences




Form of aid


Other forms of equity intervention, Equity instruments




Budget


Overall budget: 1 417 700 000  SEK
Annual budget: 0 SEK




Intensity


 




Duration


 




Economic sectors


Passenger air transport, Rental and operating of own or leased real estate




Name and address of the granting authority







The Swedish Legal, Finance and Administrative Services Agency




Slottsbacken 6, 111 30 Stockholm, SE








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1005/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-109/25: Action brought on 13 February 2025 – Bulkhead/EUIPO – Ubisoft Entertainment (WARDOGS)
Date: 2025-02-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, online game, optical industry, registered trade mark, software, trade-mark law








C_202501780EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1780


31.3.2025






Action brought on 13 February 2025 – Bulkhead/EUIPO – Ubisoft Entertainment (WARDOGS)


(Case T-109/25)

(C/2025/1780)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Bulkhead Ltd (Derby, United Kingdom) (represented by: D. Selmi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ubisoft Entertainment (Carentoir, France)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark WARDOGS – Application for registration No 18 716 754
         

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 December 2024 in Case R 1314/2024-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


examine the contested EUTM and make an order for the registration of the contested EUTM for all of the contested goods and services that were held not to be registrable, namely:
Class 9: All goods in Class 9 except for sunglasses; cases, straps and chains for sunglasses; decorative magnets; fridge magnets.
Class 41: All services in Class 41;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Plea in law

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1780/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-107/25: Action brought on 13 February 2025 – Circle Internet Financial/EUIPO – de la Fuente Martínez (Eurocoin)
Date: 2025-02-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, financial services, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202501895EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1895


7.4.2025






Action brought on 13 February 2025 – Circle Internet Financial/EUIPO – de la Fuente Martínez (Eurocoin)


(Case T-107/25)

(C/2025/1895)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Circle Internet Financial Ltd (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: A. Renck and C. Stöber, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Maria Luisa de la Fuente Martínez (Léon, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark Eurocoin – European Union trade mark No 18 272 015

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 December 2024 in Case R 401/2024-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs and in the event that the other party before the Board of Appeal joins the proceedings, order that other party to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1895/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.11749 – AMD / ZT)
Date: 2025-02-13
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: computer centre, economic concentration, electronic component, information storage, merger control, network server, supplier








C_202501132EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1132


13.2.2025






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.11749 – AMD / ZT)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/1132)


1.   
On 5 February 2025, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (‘AMD’, United States of America),










—


ZT Group Int’l, Inc. (‘ZT’, United States of America).




AMD will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of ZT.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:






—


AMD: global semiconductor company that develops computer processors and related technologies,










—


ZT: designer and supplier of server and storage solutions for data centers.






3.   

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.



4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.11749 – AMD / ZT
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1132/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 12 February 2025
Date: 2025-02-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202500788EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/788


13.2.2025






Euro exchange rates (1)


            12 February 2025
         
(C/2025/788)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0370 




JPY


Japanese yen


159,22 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4583 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,83338 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,2895 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9457 




ISK


Iceland króna


146,40 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,6620 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,075 




HUF


Hungarian forint


402,63 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1713 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9767 




TRY


Turkish lira


37,4321 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6525 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4830 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,0769 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,8391 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4031 




KRW


South Korean won


1 505,97 




ZAR


South African rand


19,1398 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,5794 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 953,65 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6354 




PHP


Philippine peso


60,291 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


35,367 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,9812 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,3163 




INR


Indian rupee


90,1010 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/788/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-361/24: Order of the General Court of 13 February 2025 – Reckitt Benckiser Finish v EUIPO (Device of a cleaning capsule) (EU trade mark – Application for an EU figurative mark representing a cleaning capsule – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Date: 2025-02-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, polishing and scouring preparations, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202502552EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2552


12.5.2025






Order of the General Court of 13 February 2025 – Reckitt Benckiser Finish v EUIPO (Device of a cleaning capsule)


(Case T-361/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for an EU figurative mark representing a cleaning capsule - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(C/2025/2552)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Reckitt Benckiser Finish BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: J.-C. Rebling, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: V. Ruzek, acting as Agent)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 17 May 2024 (Case R 2561/2023-4).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


Each party shall bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/5123, 26.8.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2552/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)