do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
P10_TA(2025)0012 – VAT: rules for the digital age – European Parliament legislative resolution of 12 February 2025 on the draft Council directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC as regards VAT rules for the digital age (15159/2024 – C10-0170/2024 – 2022/0407(CNS)) (Special legislative procedure – renewed consultation)
Date: 2025-02-12
Institutions: Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, European Parliament
Subjects: VAT, e-invoicing, electronic commerce, electronic government, exchange of information, goods and services, intra-EU trade, provision of services, supply, tax evasion, tax harmonisation








C_202502256EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2256


29.4.2025






P10_TA(2025)0012

VAT: rules for the digital age


European Parliament legislative resolution of 12 February 2025 on the draft Council directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC as regards VAT rules for the digital age (15159/2024 – C10-0170/2024 – 2022/0407(CNS))


(Special legislative procedure – renewed consultation)

(C/2025/2256)



The European Parliament,







—


having regard to the Council draft (15159/2024),










—


having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2022)0701),










—


having regard to its position of 22 November 2023
                   (1),










—


having regard to Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament again (C10-0170/2024),










—


having regard to Rule 84 and 86 of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A10-0001/2025),










1.


Approves the Council draft;










2.


Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;










3.


Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend its draft substantially;










4.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.







(1)  
            OJ C, C/2024/4246, 24.7.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4246/oj.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2256/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-134/25, D: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla miasta stołecznego Warszawy w Warszawie (Poland) made on 12 February 2025 – D v P
Date: 2025-02-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: air traffic control, bad weather, carriage of passengers, civil aviation, indemnification, traveller








C_202502100EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2100


14.4.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla miasta stołecznego Warszawy w Warszawie (Poland) made on 12 February 2025 – D v P


(Case T-134/25, D)

(C/2025/2100)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Rejonowy dla miasta stołecznego Warszawy w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: D S. A.

Defendant: P S. A.

Questions referred







1.


Must Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, (1) be interpreted as meaning that every air traffic management decision, irrespective of its duration, constitutes an extraordinary circumstance, even if it does not of itself cause a delay of at least three hours?










2.


If not every air traffic management decision constitutes an extraordinary circumstance, should the national court examine what the basis for the air traffic management decision was, for example adverse weather conditions resulting in limited sector capacity on the route of the flight, and is it then entitled to assess whether or not it constituted an extraordinary circumstance?










3.


If a passenger’s flight is delayed for more than three hours, including as a result of an air traffic management decision imposed on the flight immediately preceding the passenger’s flight, in view of limited sector capacity the route of the flight resulting from adverse weather conditions, does that air traffic management decision constitute an extraordinary circumstance?










4.


In that situation, must the air traffic management decision concern directly the delayed flight or may it also concern an earlier flight in the rotation?






(1)  
            OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2100/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.104442
Date: 2025-02-12
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Estonia, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid








C_202501018EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1018


12.2.2025






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.104442
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/1018)








Date of adoption of the decision


28.5.2024




Aid number


SA.104442




Member State


Estonia




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


IPCEI Hydrogen Mobility and Transport – Hy2Move - ESTONIA




Legal basis


Draft Regulation of Ida-Viru R&D grant scheme (drafted, approved and opened in the autumn of 2022)




Type of measure


Ad Hoc Case


Skeleton Technologies OÜ




Objective


Execution of an important project of common European interest




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 18 770 000  EUR
Annual budget: 5 250 000  EUR




Intensity


 




Duration


From 1.7.2024




Economic sectors


All economic sectors eligible to receive aid




Name and address of the granting authority







Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications for the Republic of Estonia




Suur-Ameerika 1, Tallinn, 10122








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1018/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-187/24: Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2025 – Biif v EUIPO – Eddies Pizza (Caprizza) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark CAPRIZZA – Earlier EU figurative mark capizzi GASTROPIZZA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the services – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-02-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, bread, catering industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202501765EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1765


31.3.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2025 – Biif v EUIPO – Eddies Pizza (Caprizza)


(Case T-187/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark CAPRIZZA - Earlier EU figurative mark capizzi GASTROPIZZA - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the services - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/1765)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Biif Srl (Bergamo, Italy) (represented by: F. Musella, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Eddies Pizza, SL (Palafrugell, Spain)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and variation of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 9 February 2024 (Case R 1077/2023-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Biif Srl and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/3183, 21.5.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1765/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
P10_TA(2025)0013 – Administrative cooperation in the field of taxation – European Parliament legislative resolution of 12 February 2025 on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2011/16/EU on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation (COM(2024)0497 – C10-0169/2024 – 2024/0276(CNS)) (Special legislative procedure – consultation)
Date: 2025-02-12
Institutions: Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, European Parliament
Subjects: European tax cooperation, administrative cooperation, administrative formalities, domestic market, exchange of information, fraud, intra-EU trade, tax evasion, tax harmonisation, tax law








C_202502257EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2257


29.4.2025






P10_TA(2025)0013

Administrative cooperation in the field of taxation


European Parliament legislative resolution of 12 February 2025 on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2011/16/EU on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation (COM(2024)0497 – C10-0169/2024 – 2024/0276(CNS))


(Special legislative procedure – consultation)

(C/2025/2257)



The European Parliament,







—


having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2024)0497),










—


having regard to Articles 113 and 115 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C10-0169/2024),










—


having regard to Rule 84 of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A10-0002/2025),










1.


Approves the Commission proposal;










2.


Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;










3.


Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament;










4.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.







ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2257/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1161/23: Order of the General Court of 12 February 2025 – Bimbo v EUIPO – A3-MED (BimboDorm)
Date: 2025-02-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, medical device, registered trade mark, textile product, trade-mark law








C_202502592EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2592


12.5.2025






Order of the General Court of 12 February 2025 – Bimbo v EUIPO – A3-MED (BimboDorm)


(Case T-1161/23)
                (1)

(C/2025/2592)
Language of the case: Spanish
The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/1258, 12.2.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2592/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-501/24 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 12 February 2025 – Cluster Calzado Innovación v Commission (Interim measures – Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) – Grant agreement – Sohealthy project – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – Lack of any urgency)
Date: 2025-02-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Framework Programme for Research and Development, eligibility criteria, indemnification, innovation, project funding, research and development, research project








C_202502090EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2090


14.4.2025






Order of the President of the General Court of 12 February 2025 – Cluster Calzado Innovación v Commission


(Case T-501/24 R)

(Interim measures - Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) - Grant agreement - Sohealthy project - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Lack of any urgency)
(C/2025/2090)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Cluster Calzado Innovación (Elda, Spain) (represented by: R. Padilla Pascual, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Ortega Sánchez de Lerín and S. Romoli, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, the applicant seeks suspension of the operation of Commission Decision of 23 July 2024 ordering it to repay EUR 88 559,03 and to pay damages of EUR 8 855,90 for the commission of irregularities in the performance of the Sohealthy project of the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013).

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


The costs are reserved.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2090/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-434/23: Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2025 – Essity Hygiene and Health AB v EUIPO (Shape of a leaf) (EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark in the shape of a leaf – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Date: 2025-02-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, packaging product, pulp and paper industry, registered trade mark, toiletries, trade-mark law








C_202501759EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1759


31.3.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2025 – Essity Hygiene and Health AB v EUIPO (Shape of a leaf)


(Case T-434/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU figurative mark in the shape of a leaf - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(C/2025/1759)
Language of the case: Swedish

Parties


Applicant: Essity Hygiene and Health AB (Gothenburg, Sweden) (represented by: U. Wennermark, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl, acting as Agent)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 30 May 2023 (Case R 2196/2017-4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 314, 4.9.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1759/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11858 – DEUTSCHE BÖRSE / LINDNER / DIGITAL VAULT SERVICES)
Date: 2025-02-12
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: building industry, building services, economic concentration, financial services, merger control, software, stock exchange








C_202501193EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1193


19.2.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11858 – DEUTSCHE BÖRSE / LINDNER / DIGITAL VAULT SERVICES)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/1193)

On 12 February 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M11858. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1193/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)