do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
C-595/23, Cuprea: Order of the President of the Court of 29 January 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte di appello di Napoli – Italy) – EDS
Date: 2025-01-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European arrest warrant, Schengen Information System, carrying out of sentence, enforcement of ruling








C_202502192EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2192


22.4.2025






Order of the President of the Court of 29 January 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte di appello di Napoli – Italy) – EDS


(C-595/23,
                (1)
Cuprea)
                (2)

(C/2025/2192)
Language of the case: Italian
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C C/2023/753.

(2)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2192/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-334/22: Judgment of the General Court of 29 January 2025 – Danske Fragtmænd v Commission (Action for annulment – State aid – Postal sector – Capital contribution in favour of Post Danmark – Decision finding no State aid – Capital contribution in favour of PostNord – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market – Lack of individual concern – No substantial effect on the competitive position – Inadmissibility)
Date: 2025-01-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Denmark, State aid, Sweden, admissibility, aid to undertakings, capital increase, control of State aid, postal service, reimbursement of aid








C_202501419EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1419


10.3.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 29 January 2025 – Danske Fragtmænd v Commission


(Case T-334/22)
                (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Postal sector - Capital contribution in favour of Post Danmark - Decision finding no State aid - Capital contribution in favour of PostNord - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market - Lack of individual concern - No substantial effect on the competitive position - Inadmissibility)
(C/2025/1419)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Danske Fragtmænd A/S (Åbyhøj, Denmark) (represented by: L. Sandberg-Mørch, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Carpi Badía and L. Nicolae, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the applicant: UPS Europe NV/SA (Brussels, Belgium) and Dansk Avis Omdeling A/S (Vejle, Denmark) (represented by: L. Sandberg-Mørch, lawyer)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Denmark (represented by: C. Maertens, acting as Agent, and by R. Holdgaard, lawyer), Kingdom of Sweden (represented by: C. Meyer-Seitz, F.-L. Göransson, H. Eklinder and R. Shahsavan Eriksson, acting as Agents), Post Danmark A/S (Copenhagen, Denmark) and PostNord Group AB (Solna, Sweden) (represented by: O. Koktvedgaard, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2022/459 of 10 September 2021 on the State aid SA.49668 (2019/C) (ex 2017/FC) and SA.53403 (2019/C) (ex 2017/FC) implemented by Denmark and Sweden for PostNord AB and Post Danmark A/S (OJ 2022 L 93, p. 146).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action as inadmissible;










2.


Orders Danske Fragtmænd A/S to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission, Post Danmark A/S and PostNord Group AB;










3.


Orders the Kingdom of Denmark, the Kingdom of Sweden, UPS Europe NV/SA and Dansk Avis Omdeling A/S to bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 326, 29.8.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1419/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-62/25, Staubsaugerservice: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 29 January 2025 – Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände – Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V. v JZ
Date: 2025-01-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer price, consumer protection, selling price








C_202502514EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2514


12.5.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 29 January 2025 – Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände – Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V. v JZ


(Case C-62/25, Staubsaugerservice)

(C/2025/2514)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant and appellant on a point of law: Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände – Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V.

Defendant and respondent in the appeal on a point of law: JZ

Question referred

Must a flat-rate handling fee which is waived only if the total order value exceeds a minimum amount be factored into the selling price to be indicated for a unit of measurement of the product within the meaning of Article 2(a) of Directive 98/6/EC? (1)



(1)  Directive 98/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 1998 on consumer protection in the indication of the prices of products offered to consumers (OJ 1998 L 80, p. 27).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2514/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-21/24: Judgment of the General Court of 29 January 2025 – Atusa Grupo Empresarial v EUIPO – Hans Sasserath (SYC) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark SYC – International registration of the earlier word mark SYR – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-01-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, heating, household electrical appliance, plumbing equipment, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, water supply








C_202501645EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1645


24.3.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 29 January 2025 – Atusa Grupo Empresarial v EUIPO – Hans Sasserath (SYC)


(Case T-21/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark SYC - International registration of the earlier word mark SYR - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/1645)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Atusa Grupo Empresarial, SA (Salvatierra, Spain) (represented by: J.L. Rivas Zurdo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Ringelhann, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Hans Sasserath GmbH & Co. KG (Korschenbroich, Germany) (represented by: C. Onken and L. Bieber, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 2 November 2023 (Case R 452/2023-4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Atusa Grupo Empresarial, SA to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Hans Sasserath GmbH & Co. KG;










3.


Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/1559, 26.2.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1645/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-73/25: Action brought on 29 January 2025 – Viva Credit v EUIPO – Viva Wallet (Viva)
Date: 2025-01-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cloud computing, communications systems, electronic money, registered trade mark, reservation, software, trade-mark law








C_202501658EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1658


24.3.2025






Action brought on 29 January 2025 – Viva Credit v EUIPO – Viva Wallet (Viva)


(Case T-73/25)

(C/2025/1658)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Viva Credit IFN SA (Bucharest, Romania) (represented by: E. Cammareri and B. Marone, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Viva Wallet AE Symmetochon – Anaptyxis Logismikoy (Marousi, Greece)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark Viva – European Union trade mark No 11 741 188
         

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 November 2024 in Case R 2367/2023-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


partially annul the contested decision, in order to keep the registration of the trade mark at issue for the services allowed in the decision of the Cancellation Division; or, in the alternative,










—


remit the case for a new examination of the appeal lodged with the Board of Appeal;










—


order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of the proceedings before the General Court and the Board of Appeal.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) and 58(2) in conjunction with Article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Articles 263 and 296 TFEU in conjunction with Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1658/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-178/23: Judgment of the General Court of 29 January 2025 – Ben Ali v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Tunisia – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concepts of persons responsible for misappropriation of Tunisian State funds and natural or legal persons or entities associated with those responsible for misappropriation of Tunisian State funds – New plea – Obligation to state reasons – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to work)
Date: 2025-01-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Tunisia, breach of trust, economic sanctions, freezing of assets, international sanctions, natural person, right to work








C_202501641EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1641


24.3.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 29 January 2025 – Ben Ali v Council


(Case T-178/23)
                (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Tunisia - Freezing of funds - List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds - Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list - Concepts of ‘persons responsible for misappropriation of Tunisian State funds’ and ‘natural or legal persons or entities associated with those responsible for misappropriation of Tunisian State funds’ - New plea - Obligation to state reasons - Freedom to conduct a business - Right to work)
(C/2025/1641)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Halima Bent Zine El Abidine Ben Haj Hamda Ben Ali (Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates) (represented by: É. Deprez, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: L. Vétillard and S. Lejeune, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment, first, of Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/159 of 23 January 2023 amending Decision 2011/72/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia (OJ 2023 L 22, p. 18), in so far as that act concerns her, and, second, of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/156 of 23 January 2023 implementing Regulation No 101/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Tunisia (OJ 2023 L 22, p. 8).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Ms Halima Bent Zine El Abidine Ben Haj Hamda Ben Ali to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 205, 12.6.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1641/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-168/24: Judgment of the General Court of 29 January 2025 – Quality is Our Recipe v EUIPO – Granizados Maresme (Frosty) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Frosty – Earlier national figurative mark FROSTY – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-01-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, coffee, confectionery, milk product, non-alcoholic beverage, registered trade mark, tea, trade-mark law








C_202501646EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1646


24.3.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 29 January 2025 – Quality is Our Recipe v EUIPO – Granizados Maresme (Frosty)


(Case T-168/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark Frosty - Earlier national figurative mark FROSTY - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/1646)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Quality is Our Recipe LLC (Dublin, Ohio, United States) (represented by: A. Ortiz López and M. Polo Carreño, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: R. Raponi, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Granizados Maresme SLL (Pineda de Mar, Spain)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 30 January 2024 (Case R 1086/2023-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/3086, 13.5.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1646/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-607/23: Judgment of the General Court of 29 January 2025 – Desimo v EUIPO – Dulces y conservas Helios (ELIOS) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark ELIOS – Earlier EU word mark HELIOS and earlier national figurative mark HELIOS – Relative grounds for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Cross-claim)
Date: 2025-01-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, alcoholic beverage, foodstuff, fruit, non-alcoholic beverage, registered trade mark, retail trade, trade-mark law, vegetable








C_202501642EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1642


24.3.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 29 January 2025 – Desimo v EUIPO – Dulces y conservas Helios (ELIOS)


(Case T-607/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark ELIOS - Earlier EU word mark HELIOS and earlier national figurative mark HELIOS - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Damage to reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Cross-claim)
(C/2025/1642)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Desimo, Lda (Lisbon, Portugal) (represented by: J. Mioludo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Dulces y conservas Helios, SA (Arroyo de la Encomienda, Spain) (represented by K. Guridi Sedlak, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 17 July 2023 (Joined Cases R 1826/2022-5 and R 1833/2022-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 17 July 2023 (Joined Cases R 1826/2022-5 and R 1833/2022-5) in so far as it dismissed the appeal filed by the intervener in relation to the ‘sowing seeds’, ‘pet food’ and ‘cat litter’ in Class 31 covered by the mark applied for;










2.


Dismisses the main action;










3.


Dismisses the cross-claim as to the remainder;










4.


Orders Desimo, Lda to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Dulces y conservas Helios, SA relating to the main action;










5.


Orders Dulces y conservas Helios and Desimo to bear their own costs relating to the cross-claim;










6.


Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2023/676, 13.11.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1642/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Withdrawal of Commission proposals
Date: 2025-01-29
Institutions: Directorate-General for Energy, European Commission
Subjects: proposal (EU)








C_202500677EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/677


29.1.2025






Withdrawal of Commission proposals
(C/2025/677)








Document


Inter-institutional procedure


Title




COM(2022) 521 final


2022/0324 (NLE)


Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION
on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the 33rd meeting of the Energy Charter Conference






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/677/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-64/25 P: Appeal brought on 29 January 2025 by BT Solar d.o.o. and RC-Log d.o.o. against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 20 November 2024 in Case T-660/20, Zhejiang Beyondsun Green Energy Technology v Commission
Date: 2025-01-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: China, anti-dumping duty, countervailing charge, import (EU), invoicing, originating product, photovoltaic cell, semi-metal, solar collector








C_202501535EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1535


17.3.2025






Appeal brought on 29 January 2025 by BT Solar d.o.o. and RC-Log d.o.o. against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 20 November 2024 in Case T-660/20, Zhejiang Beyondsun Green Energy Technology v Commission


(Case C-64/25 P)

(C/2025/1535)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellants: BT Solar d.o.o., RC-Log d.o.o. (represented by: B. Natens, A. Willems, advocaten, L. Hammoud, avocate)

Other parties to the proceedings: Zhejiang Beyondsun Green Energy Technology Co. Ltd, European Commission, Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The appellants claim that the Court should:






—


set aside the judgment under appeal;










—


uphold the application at first instance and annul the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1216 (1) of 24 August 2020 invalidating invoices issued by Zhejiang Trunsun Solar Co Ltd. in breach of the undertaking repealed by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1570 (‘contested Regulation’);










—


order the Commission to pay appellants’ costs, and its own costs, at first and on appeal, and order any other parties to the appeal to pay their own costs;










—


in alternative, refer the case back to the General Court; and










—


reserve the costs of the proceeding before the General Court and on appeal and order any other parties to the appeal to pay their own costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the appeal, the appellants rely on two grounds of appeal.
First, the General Court erred in law in finding that contested Regulation did not violate Article 8 of Regulation 2016/1036 (2) (‘BADR’) and Article 13 of Regulation 2016/1037 (3) (‘BASR’), and is not vitiated by a manifest error of assessment.
Second, the General Court erred in law in finding that Article 8(9) BADR and Article 13(9) BASR are a valid legal basis for the contested Regulation.


(1)  
            OJ 2020, L 276, p. 1.

(2)  Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (OJ 2016, L 176, p. 21).

(3)  Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Union (OJ 2016, L 176, p. 55).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1535/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 28 January 2025
Date: 2025-01-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202500028EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/28


29.1.2025






Euro exchange rates (1)


            28 January 2025
         
(C/2025/28)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0421 




JPY


Japanese yen


161,86 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4626 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,83868 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,4780 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9441 




ISK


Iceland króna


146,10 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,7785 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,091 




HUF


Hungarian forint


408,13 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2078 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9749 




TRY


Turkish lira


37,2705 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6698 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5019 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,1189 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,8439 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4087 




KRW


South Korean won


1 506,81 




ZAR


South African rand


19,4839 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,5517 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 907,81 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,5779 




PHP


Philippine peso


60,900 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


35,306 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,1535 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,5381 




INR


Indian rupee


90,1955 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/28/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-750/23, BMW: Order of the President of the Court of 29 January 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Duisburg – Germany) – SP v BMW Bayerische Motorenwerke AG
Date: 2025-01-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European standard, approval, court of civil jurisdiction, damages, environmental standard, jurisdiction, motor vehicle, motor vehicle industry, motor vehicle pollution, proof








C_202502194EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2194


22.4.2025






Order of the President of the Court of 29 January 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Duisburg – Germany) – SP v BMW Bayerische Motorenwerke AG


(Case C-750/23,
                (1)
BMW)

(C/2025/2194)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C C/2024/2914.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2194/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)