do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-61/25 P: Appeal brought on 29 January 2025 by the European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 20 November 2024 in Case T-508/22, Spain v Commission
Date: 2025-01-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EAFRD, EAGF, agricultural expenditure, aid to agriculture, closing of accounts, eligibility criteria, proof








C_202501637EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1637


24.3.2025






Appeal brought on 29 January 2025 by the European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 20 November 2024 in Case T-508/22, Spain v Commission


(Case C-61/25 P)

(C/2025/1637)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Appellant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castilla Contreras and M. Salyková, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: Kingdom of Spain

Forms of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:






—


Set aside point 1 of the operative part of the judgment under appeal in so far as it upholds the second part of the first plea in law;










—


Dismiss the second part of the first plea in law as unfounded;










—


Refer the case back to the General Court for a ruling on the fifth and sixth parts of the first plea in law and on the second plea in law; and










—


Order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.





Grounds of appeal and main arguments







—


The first ground of appeal concerns an error in application of the rules on administration of the burden of proof in the context of the clearance of accounts procedure under Article 52(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 352/78, (EC) No 165/94, (EC) No 2799/98, (EC) No 814/2000, (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 485/2008. (1)











—


The second ground of appeal concerns an error of law in the interpretation of the obligations on Member States in relation to application of the statutory management requirements (‘SMR’) and the checks in order to verify compliance with those SMR by farmers, in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 352/78, (EC) No 165/94, (EC) No 2799/98, (EC) No 814/2000, (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 485/2008.






(1)  
            OJ 2013 L 347, p. 549.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1637/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-164/24: Order of the General Court of 29 January 2025 – Fashion Box v EUIPO – Ghostthinker (RE:PLAY) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark RE:PLAY – Earlier EU and national marks REPLAY and earlier international registrations of the mark REPLAY – Relative ground for refusal – Unfair advantage – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Date: 2025-01-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, audiovisual equipment, mobile application, multimedia, provision of services, registered trade mark, telecommunications, trade-mark law








C_202502399EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2399


28.4.2025






Order of the General Court of 29 January 2025 – Fashion Box v EUIPO – Ghostthinker (RE:PLAY)


(Case T-164/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark RE:PLAY - Earlier EU and national marks REPLAY and earlier international registrations of the mark REPLAY - Relative ground for refusal - Unfair advantage - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(C/2025/2399)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Fashion Box SpA (Asolo, Italy) (represented by: A. Parassina and A. Giovannardi, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Ghostthinker GmbH (Augsburg, Germany) (represented by: M. Zollner and D. Breuer, lawyers)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 25 January 2024 (Case R 0424/2023-1).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.










2.


Fashion Box SpA shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Ghostthinker GmbH.










3.


The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/3085, 13.5.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2399/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)