do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-1178/23: Order of the General Court of 24 January 2025 – Antimo Caputo v EUIPO – Barbato (NuvolaSuper) (European Union trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Withdrawal of the opposition – No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2025-01-24
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cereal product, coffee, confectionery, prepared foodstuff, processed foodstuff, registered trade mark, sugar, tea, trade-mark law








C_202502216EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2216


22.4.2025






Order of the General Court of 24 January 2025 – Antimo Caputo v EUIPO – Barbato (NuvolaSuper)


(Case T-1178/23)
                (1)

(European Union trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2025/2216)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Antimo Caputo Srl (Naples, Italy) (represented by: F. Musella, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Scardocchia and R. Raponi, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Pasquale Barbato (Villanova De Bellis, Italy) (represented by: A. Rizzoli, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and the alteration of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 17 October 2023 (Case R 2068/2022-5).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


Each party shall bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/1548, 26.2.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2216/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Call for Tenders for Enhanced Air Connectivity of Slovenia
Date: 2025-01-24
Institutions: European Commission, Secretariat-General
Subjects: Slovenia, State aid, air transport, carriage of passengers, carrier, control of State aid, invitation to tender, public procurement, tendering








C_202500599EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/599


24.1.2025






Call for Tenders for Enhanced Air Connectivity of Slovenia
(C/2025/599)

Notice is hereby given of the launch of the Call for Tenders for Enhanced Air Connectivity of Slovenia, the subject of which is the granting of state aid to air carriers for the start-up of operation of new air routes, for the carriage of passengers to or from a public airport in the territory of the Republic of Slovenia at which international air transport is performed, to a single landing point in the territory of the countries of the European Common Aviation Area (ECAA).
The text of the Tender (in the Slovene and English language) will be available on Government’s official website 
www.gov.si
 on the date of the publishment of this notice in the Official Journal of the European Union together with the Tender documentation.
The applications for aid must be submitted within 30 days of the publication of this notice in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Applicants may ask any questions regarding the Tender by sending an email to 
mzi.air-connect@gov.si
 with the subject: ‘Call for Tenders for Enhanced Air Connectivity of Slovenia’.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/599/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-46/25: Action brought on 24 January 2025 – Land Oberösterreich v EUIPO – Norma (Genussländer)
Date: 2025-01-24
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, fats, fish product, meat, meat product, milk product, poultry, processed foodstuff, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202501454EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1454


10.3.2025






Action brought on 24 January 2025 – Land Oberösterreich v EUIPO – Norma (Genussländer)


(Case T-46/25)

(C/2025/1454)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Land Oberösterreich (represented by: J. Hintermayr, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Norma Lebensmittelfilialbetrieb Stiftung & Co. KG (Nuremberg, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Genussländer’ – EU trade mark No 10 217 826
         

Proceedings before EUIPO: Revocation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 November 2024 in Case R 524/2024-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


in the alternative, amend the contested decision to the effect that the applicant’s complaint against the rejection of the application for revocation is upheld;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 19(1) of Council Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1454/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2025/37 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 December 2024 amending Regulation (EU) 2019/881 as regards managed security services (OJ L, 2025/37, 15.1.2025)
Date: 2025-01-24
Institutions: Council of the European Union, European Parliament
Subjects: computer crime, information security, information technology, provision of services, risk management, security services, trade licence








L_202590062EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2025/90062


24.1.2025






Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2025/37 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 December 2024 amending Regulation (EU) 2019/881 as regards managed security services
(
Official Journal of the European Union L, 2025/37, 15 January 2025
)

On page 12, in the Annex:







for:




                           ‘A statement has been made with regard to this act and can be found in OJ C, C/2025/307, 15.1.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/307/oj.’,












read:




                           ‘A statement has been made with regard to this act and can be found in OJ C, C/2025/309, 15.1.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/309/oj.’.







ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2025/37/corrigendum/2025-01-24/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11816 – OTPP / NORDIC CAPITAL XI / MAX MATTHIESSEN)
Date: 2025-01-24
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, economic concentration, insurance, investment company, merger control, pension scheme, service








C_202500987EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/987


11.2.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11816 – OTPP / NORDIC CAPITAL XI / MAX MATTHIESSEN)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/987)

On 24 February 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M11816. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/987/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-49/25: Action brought on 24 January 2025 – Mute v EUIPO – mute-labs (mute labs)
Date: 2025-01-24
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, furniture industry, metal structure, registered trade mark, sound insulation, telephone, trade-mark law








C_202501456EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1456


10.3.2025






Action brought on 24 January 2025 – Mute v EUIPO – mute-labs (mute labs)


(Case T-49/25)

(C/2025/1456)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Mute Sp. z o.o. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: B. Wojtkowska, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: mute-labs GmbH (Berlin, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative trade mark mute labs – Application for registration No 8 010 472
         

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 November 2024 in Case R 1285/2020-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1456/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-66/25, Banco Santander: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia no 5 de Cartagena (Spain) lodged on 24 January 2025 – Banco Santander, SA v EJ
Date: 2025-01-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer protection, debt, enforcement of ruling, proof, unfair terms of contract








C_202502515EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2515


12.5.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia no 5 de Cartagena (Spain) lodged on 24 January 2025 – Banco Santander, SA v EJ


(Case C-66/25, Banco Santander)

(C/2025/2515)
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de Primera Instancia no 5 de Cartagena

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Banco Santander, SA

Defendant: EJ

Questions referred







1.


Should Arts. 3, 6 and 7 of Directive 93/13/EEC (1) be interpreted as meaning that they preclude a national provision such as Article 695(1)(4) of the [Ley de Enjuiciamiento Civil (Civil Procedure Code)] as it is interpreted by the Provincial Courts, which prevents the assessment of the unfairness of clauses that have not been applied by the creditor when calculating the debt that it is claiming, but which were applied previously, and that assessment could make it possible to offset the amounts that were unduly paid?










2.


If it is possible to review the unfairness of those clauses, should Articles 6 and 7 of Directive 93/13/EEC and the principle of effectiveness be interpreted as meaning that they preclude a national provision such as Article 695(2) of the [Ley de Enjuiciamiento Civil (Civil Procedure Code)], which prevents consumers from submitting documentation after filing their opposition to enforcement, does not provide that the court may, of its own motion, obtain evidence in that regard and prevents the amount from being determined subsequent to the decision bringing an end to the opposition to the enforcement proceedings?






(1)  Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2515/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-52/25: Action brought on 24 January 2025 – Laboratorios ACPG v EUIPO – Laboratorio de Cosmetica Armonia (CAMALEON EL NATURALISTA)
Date: 2025-01-24
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetic product, essential oil, hairdressing and beauty care, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202501649EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1649


24.3.2025






Action brought on 24 January 2025 – Laboratorios ACPG v EUIPO – Laboratorio de Cosmetica Armonia (CAMALEON EL NATURALISTA)


(Case T-52/25)

(C/2025/1649)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Laboratorios ACPG, SA (Oricain, Spain) (represented by: J. Villamor Muguerza, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Laboratorio de Cosmetica Armonia, SA (La Cartuja Baja, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for the EU figurative mark CAMALEON EL NATURALISTA – Application No 18 656 540
         

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 November 2024 in Case R 270/2024-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision and refuse registration of EU trade mark No 18 656 540;










—


order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs of the present action and those incurred in the proceedings before the Fifth Board of Appeal.





Plea in law

Misapplication of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1649/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-51/25: Action brought on 24 January 2025 – HM v Commission
Date: 2025-01-24
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, allowances and expenses, discretionary power, expatriate worker, staff regulations (EU)








C_202501457EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1457


10.3.2025






Action brought on 24 January 2025 – HM v Commission


(Case T-51/25)

(C/2025/1457)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: HM (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare the present application admissible and well-founded;










—


annul the decision of 14 March corrected by the decision of 25 March 2024 in which the Commission decided not to grant the applicant the expatriation allowance;










—


annul, if necessary, the decision rejecting the complaint of 14 October 2024;










—


order the defendant to pay all the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 4(1)(b) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging failure to observe the principle of good administration and a manifest error of assessment on the part of the appointing authority in the exercise of its discretion.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1457/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)