do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-46/25 P: Appeal brought on 23 January 2025 by Sven Butzkies-Schiemann against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 13 November 2024 in Case T-1127/23, Butzkies-Schiemann v EUIPO – U.S. Corrosion Technologies (CorrosionX)
Date: 2025-01-23
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, chemical product, registered trade mark, special chemicals, trade-mark law








C_202504030EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4030


28.7.2025






Appeal brought on 23 January 2025 by Sven Butzkies-Schiemann against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 13 November 2024 in Case T-1127/23, Butzkies-Schiemann v EUIPO – U.S. Corrosion Technologies (CorrosionX)


(Case C-46/25 P)

(C/2025/4030)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Sven Butzkies-Schiemann (represented by: H.J. Haeseler and T. Honka, Rechtsanwälte)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), U.S. Corrosion Technologies LLC
By order of 17 June 2025, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that Mr Sven Butzkies-Schiemann should bear his own costs.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4030/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-677/23, Slovenská sporiteľňa (Information in consumer credit agreements): Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 January 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský súd v Prešove – Slovakia) – A. B., F. B. v Slovenská sporitel’ňa a.s. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Credit agreements for consumers – Directive 2008/48/EC – Requirements relating to information to be included in such a credit agreement – Duty to provide information – Duration of the agreement – Annual percentage rate of charge (APRC) – Assumptions used in order to calculate the APRC)
Date: 2025-01-23
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer credit, consumer information, cost of borrowing, unfair terms of contract








C_202501518EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1518


17.3.2025






Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 January 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský súd v Prešove – Slovakia) – A. B., F. B. v Slovenská sporitel’ňa a.s.


(Case C-677/23,
                (1)
Slovenská sporiteľňa (Information in consumer credit agreements))

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Consumer protection - Credit agreements for consumers - Directive 2008/48/EC - Requirements relating to information to be included in such a credit agreement - Duty to provide information - Duration of the agreement - Annual percentage rate of charge (APRC) - Assumptions used in order to calculate the APRC)
(C/2025/1518)
Language of the case: Slovak

Referring court

Krajský súd v Prešove

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: A. B., F. B.

Defendant: Slovenská sporitel’ňa a.s.

Operative part of the judgment







1.


Article 10(2)(c) of Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102/EEC, as amended by Commission Directive 2011/90/EU of 14 November 2011,
must be interpreted as meaning that a credit agreement need not necessarily specify the duration of that agreement expressly, provided that the terms of that agreement enable the consumer to determine that duration without difficulty and with certainty.










2.


Article 10(2)(g) of Directive 2008/48, as amended by Directive 2011/90,
must be interpreted as meaning that the assumptions used in order to calculate the annual percentage rate of charge (APRC) must be expressly identified in the credit agreement and that it is not sufficient in that regard that the consumer may himself or herself identify them by examining the terms of that agreement.






(1)  OJ C C/2024/1244.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1518/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.115121
Date: 2025-01-23
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Slovenia, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid








C_202500604EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/604


23.1.2025






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.115121
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/604)








Date of adoption of the decision


3.9.2024




Aid number


SA.115121




Member State


Slovenia




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Amendment to the Regional Aid Map for Slovenia for the period 2022–2027




Legal basis


 




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Regional development (including territorial cooperation)




Form of aid


 




Budget


 




Intensity


 




Duration


Until 31.12.2027




Economic sectors


All economic sectors eligible to receive aid




Name and address of the granting authority







Ministry of Cohesion and Regional Development




Kotnikova 5, 1000 Ljubljana, SI - Slovenia








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/604/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-48/25: Action brought on 23 January 2025 – NFL Properties Europe v EUIPO – Treets (SUPER BOWL)
Date: 2025-01-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, recording, registered trade mark, sport, sports equipment, trade-mark law








C_202501455EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1455


10.3.2025






Action brought on 23 January 2025 – NFL Properties Europe v EUIPO – Treets (SUPER BOWL)


(Case T-48/25)

(C/2025/1455)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: NFL Properties Europe GmbH (Eschborn, Germany) (represented by: M. Kloth and M. Tillwich, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Treets GmbH (Forchheim, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘SUPER BOWL’ – EU trade mark No 3 513 058
         

Proceedings before EUIPO: Revocation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 November 2024 in Case R 886/2024-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


amend the contested decision to the effect that the complaint is upheld in its entirety and the decision on revocation annulled, in so far as it found that the applicant’s EU mark has been revoked;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and of Article 27(2) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;










—


Infringement of Article 27(4) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1455/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.116082
Date: 2025-01-23
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Croatia, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid








C_202500600EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/600


23.1.2025






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.116082
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/600)








Date of adoption of the decision


18.12.2024




Aid number


SA.116082




Member State


Croatia




Region


Croatia




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Continuation of the exception clause for HBOR's short-term export credit insurance and reinsurance scheme




Legal basis


Act on the Croatian Bank for Reconstruction and Development (OG 138/06, 25/13); Regulation on Export Credit Insurance (OG 53/20)




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Promotion of export and internationalisation




Form of aid


Other




Budget


 




Intensity


 




Duration


Until 31.12.2030




Economic sectors


All economic sectors eligible to receive aid




Name and address of the granting authority







The Croatian Bank for Reconstruction and Development




Strossmayerov trg 9; Zagreb








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/600/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11836 – CDPQ / OTPP / CONNEXA)
Date: 2025-01-23
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Canada, New Zealand, economic concentration, investment company, merger control, mobile communication, pension scheme, teacher








C_202500814EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/814


31.1.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11836 – CDPQ / OTPP / CONNEXA)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/814)

On 23 January 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M11836. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/814/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-187/23, Albausy: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 January 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Lörrach – Germany) – proceedings brought by E. V. G.-T. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Concept of court or tribunal – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – European Certificate of Succession – Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 – Article 67(1) – Decisions taken by the issuing authority – No exercise of a judicial function – Inadmissibility)
Date: 2025-01-23
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: admissibility, challenge, inheritance, judicial cooperation in civil matters in the EU, law of succession, mutual recognition principle, official document








C_202501512EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1512


17.3.2025






Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 January 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Lörrach – Germany) – proceedings brought by E. V. G.-T.


(Case C-187/23,
                (1)
Albausy)
                (2)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 267 TFEU - Concept of ‘court or tribunal’ - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - European Certificate of Succession - Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 - Article 67(1) - Decisions taken by the issuing authority - No exercise of a judicial function - Inadmissibility)
(C/2025/1512)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Lörrach

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: E. V. G.-T.

Other interested parties: P. T., F. T., G. T.

Operative part of the judgment

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Lörrach (Local Court, Lörrach, Germany), made by decision of 21 March 2023, is inadmissible.


(1)  
            OJ C 235, 3.7.2023.

(2)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1512/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-40/25, CRIF: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien (Austria) lodged on 23 January 2025 – CRIF GmbH v YO
Date: 2025-01-23
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: data protection, data-processing law, database, disclosure of information, personal data, protection of privacy








C_202501880EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1880


7.4.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien (Austria) lodged on 23 January 2025 – CRIF GmbH v YO


(Case C-40/25, CRIF)

(C/2025/1880)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Wien

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant and original defendant party: CRIF GmbH

Respondent and original applicant: YO

Question referred

Must Article 17 of the GDPR (1) be interpreted as meaning that a data subject whose personal data have been unlawfully disclosed by the controller through onward transfer has the right to obtain a prohibitory injunction against the controller prohibiting further unlawful onward transfer of those data if the data subject does not request the controller to erase the data because the data subject cannot then be found in the controller’s database, which may make it difficult or even impossible to conclude a contract if the controller’s customers make their business decisions dependent on a successful search for the data subject in the controller’s database?


(1)  Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ 2016 L 119, p. 1).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1880/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-346/24: Order of the General Court of 23 January 2025 – Hilpisch v ECHA (Civil service – Temporary agents – Recruitment – Vacancy notice – Decision not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list – Infringement of the vacancy notice – Composition of the selection board – Manifest lack of jurisdiction in part – Action in part manifestly unfounded in law)
Date: 2025-01-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: competition (EU), job vacancy, jurisdiction, recruitment, servant (EU)








C_202502219EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2219


22.4.2025






Order of the General Court of 23 January 2025 – Hilpisch v ECHA


(Case T-346/24)
                (1)

(Civil service - Temporary agents - Recruitment - Vacancy notice - Decision not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list - Infringement of the vacancy notice - Composition of the selection board - Manifest lack of jurisdiction in part - Action in part manifestly unfounded in law)
(C/2025/2219)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Martin Hilpisch (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: Y. Wagener, lawyer)

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (represented by: T. Zbihlej and B. Broms, acting as Agents, and by A. Duron, lawyer)

Re:

By his action on the basis of Article 270 TFEU, the applicant, in essence, seeks annulment of the decision of the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) of 14 November 2023 to dismiss his request for review of the decision of the selection board of 6 November 2023 not to include his name on the reserve list for vacancy notice ECHA/TA/2023/005.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed, in part on the grounds of manifest lack of jurisdiction and in part as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.










2.


Mr Martin Hilpisch shall pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/5114, 26.8.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2219/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-490/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 January 2025 – Neos SpA v Ryanair DAC, European Commission, Blue panorama airlines SpA, Air Dolomiti SpA – Linee aeree regionali Europee (Appeal – State aid – Aid scheme – Measures intended to support airlines holding a national operating licence in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Decision by the European Commission not to raise any objections – Obligation to state reasons)
Date: 2025-01-23
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Italy, State aid, aid to undertakings, airline, control of State aid, coronavirus disease, epidemic, transport authorisation








C_202501515EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1515


17.3.2025






Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 January 2025 – Neos SpA v Ryanair DAC, European Commission, Blue panorama airlines SpA, Air Dolomiti SpA – Linee aeree regionali Europee


(Case C-490/23 P)
                (1)

(Appeal - State aid - Aid scheme - Measures intended to support airlines holding a national operating licence in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic - Decision by the European Commission not to raise any objections - Obligation to state reasons)
(C/2025/1515)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Neos SpA (represented by: A. Cogoni and M. Merola, avvocati)

Other parties to the proceeding: Ryanair DAC (represented by: F.-C. Laprévote and E. Vahida, avocats, and D. Pérez de Lamo and S. Rating, abogados), European Commission (represented by: J. Carpi Badía, L. Flynn and F. Tomat, acting as Agents), Blue panorama airlines SpA, Air Dolomiti SpA – Linee aeree regionali Europee (represented by: A. Cogoni and M. Merola, avvocati)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 24 May 2023, Ryanair v Commission (Italy; aid scheme; COVID-19) (T-268/21, EU:T:2023:279);










2.


Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union for judgment on the first to third pleas in law and on the second part of the fourth plea in law of Ryanair DAC’s action;










3.


Reserves the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 329, 18.9.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1515/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)