do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-405/22: Judgment of the General Court of 22 January 2025 – UniCredit Bank v SRB (2022 ex ante contributions) (Economic and Monetary Union – Banking Union – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2022 ex ante contributions – Obligation to state reasons – Right to effective judicial protection – Plea of illegality)
Date: 2025-01-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank, bank resolution, company in difficulties, financing method, financing plan, fund (EU), legality, right to an effective remedy








C_202501420EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1420


10.3.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 22 January 2025 – UniCredit Bank v SRB (2022 ex ante contributions)


(Case T-405/22)
                (1)

(Economic and Monetary Union - Banking Union - Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Single Resolution Fund (SRF) - Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2022 ex ante contributions - Obligation to state reasons - Right to effective judicial protection - Plea of illegality)
(C/2025/1420)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: UniCredit Bank GmbH, formerly UniCredit Bank AG (Munich, Germany) (represented by: F. Schäfer, H. Großerichter, F. Kruis and N. Bartmann, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: K.-P. Wojcik, C. Flynn and D. Ceran, acting as Agents, and by G. Coppo and K. Bongs, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by: J. Etienne, M. Menegatti and G. Bartram, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: J. Bauerschmidt, J. Haunold and A. Westerhof Löfflerová, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Decision SRB/ES/2022/18 of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 11 April 2022 on the calculation of the 2022 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund, in so far as that decision concerns it.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders UniCredit Bank GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Single Resolution Board (SRB);










3.


Orders the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union to bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 359, 19.9.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1420/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-40/25: Action brought on 22 January 2025 – DecoTrend v EUIPO – B.K.Licht (lampshades)
Date: 2025-01-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: decorative item, designs and models, lighting equipment








C_202501551EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1551


17.3.2025






Action brought on 22 January 2025 – DecoTrend v EUIPO – B.K.Licht (lampshades)


(Case T-40/25)

(C/2025/1551)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: DecoTrend (Weiden in der Oberpfalz, Germany) (represented by: C. Klawitter, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: B.K.Licht GmbH & Co. KG (Munich, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant

Design at issue: EU design (lampshades) – EU design No 4 031 201-0004

Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 November 2024 in Case R 102/2023-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO and, as the case may be, the intervener to pay the costs.





Plea in law

Infringement of Article 60(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1551/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 21 January 2025
Date: 2025-01-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202500023EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/23


22.1.2025






Euro exchange rates (1)


            21 January 2025
         
(C/2025/23)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0357 




JPY


Japanese yen


161,26 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4614 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84553 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,4750 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9427 




ISK


Iceland króna


145,90 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,8170 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,178 




HUF


Hungarian forint


411,48 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2538 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9768 




TRY


Turkish lira


36,9008 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6639 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4963 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,0636 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,8406 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4078 




KRW


South Korean won


1 493,41 




ZAR


South African rand


19,2676 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,5443 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 921,73 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6353 




PHP


Philippine peso


60,621 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


35,281 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,2685 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,4878 




INR


Indian rupee


89,6860 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/23/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-41/25: Action brought on 22 January 2025 – DecoTrend v EUIPO – Light Tec (lampshades)
Date: 2025-01-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: decorative item, designs and models, lighting equipment








C_202501552EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1552


17.3.2025






Action brought on 22 January 2025 – DecoTrend v EUIPO – Light Tec (lampshades)


(Case T-41/25)

(C/2025/1552)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: DecoTrend GmbH (Weiden in der Oberpfalz, Germany) (represented by: C. Klawitter, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Light Tec Ltd (Tsuen Wan, Hong Kong, China)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant

Design at issue: EU design (lampshades) – EU design No 4 031 201-0001

Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 November 2024 in Case R 1858/2022-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO and, as the case may be, the intervener to pay the costs.





Plea in law

Infringement of Article 25(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1552/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-563/17: Order of the General Court of 22 January 2025 – Gayalex Proyectos v SRB (Economic and monetary policy – Applicant having ceased to reply to the Court's requests – No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2025-01-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, abuse of power, aid for restructuring, company in difficulties, credit institution, damages, financial solvency, ownership, right to justice








C_202502208EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2208


22.4.2025






Order of the General Court of 22 January 2025 – Gayalex Proyectos v SRB


(Case T-563/17)
                (1)

(Economic and monetary policy - Applicant having ceased to reply to the Court's requests - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2025/2208)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Gayalex Proyectos, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: A. Betancor Álamo and F. Cabrera Molina, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: H. Ehlers, M. Fernández Rupérez, A. Lapresta Bienz and J. Rius Riu, acting as Agents, and by B. Meyring, F. Fernández de Trocóniz Robles, T. Klupsch and S. Ianc, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of the Executive Session of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 7 June 2017 concerning the adoption of a resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español, SA.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene by the Kingdom of Spain, the European Commission, Banco Santander, SA and Banco Popular Español, SA.










3.


Gayalex Proyectos, SL shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Single Resolution Board (SRB).










4.


The Kingdom of Spain and the Commission shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications for leave to intervene.










5.


Banco Santander shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Banco Popular Español relating to the applications for leave to intervene.






(1)  
            OJ C 374, 6.11.2017.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2208/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-498/19: Judgment of the General Court of 22 January 2025 – Banco Cooperativo Español v SRB (2019 ex ante contributions) (Economic and Monetary Union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the ex ante contributions for the 2019 contribution period – Articles 12 and 14 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63 – Concept of change of status – Institutional protection scheme – Plea of illegality)
Date: 2025-01-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank, bank resolution, company in difficulties, financing method, financing plan, fund (EU), legality








C_202501417EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1417


10.3.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 22 January 2025 – Banco Cooperativo Español v SRB (2019 ex ante contributions)


(Case T-498/19)
                (1)

(Economic and Monetary Union - Banking union - Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Single Resolution Fund (SRF) - Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the ex ante contributions for the 2019 contribution period - Articles 12 and 14 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63 - Concept of ‘change of status’ - Institutional protection scheme - Plea of illegality)
(C/2025/1417)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Banco Cooperativo Español, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: D. Sarmiento Ramírez-Escudero and J. Beltrán de Lubiano Sáez de Urabain, lawyers,)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: M. Rius Riu and C. De Falco, acting as Agents, and by B. Meyring, F.B. Fernández de Trocóniz Robles, T. Klupsch and S. Ianc, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Steiblytė, P. Němečková and D. Triantafyllou, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Decision SRB/ES/2022/47 of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 8 August 2022 withdrawing Decision SRB/ES/SRF/2019/10 of the SRB of 16 April 2019 on the 2019 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRF) in so far as it concerns the institutions listed in Annex I thereto and calculating the 2019 ex ante contributions of those institutions to the SRF in so far as it concerns the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Banco Cooperativo Español, SA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Single Resolution Board (SRB);










3.


Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 312, 16.9.2019.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1417/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-33/25: Action brought on 22 January 2025 – Quality First v EUIPO (CRAVE NO MORE)
Date: 2025-01-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, dietary product, food supplement, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202501449EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1449


10.3.2025






Action brought on 22 January 2025 – Quality First v EUIPO


(CRAVE NO MORE)


(Case T-33/25)

(C/2025/1449)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Quality First GmbH (Elmshorn, Germany) (represented by: J. Schneider and M. Kleinn, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark CRAVE NO MORE – Application No 18 959 151
         

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 November 2024 in Case R 793/2024-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision and EUIPO’s first-instance decision of 19 March 2024;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Breach of the principle of equal treatment.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1449/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-30/23: Judgment of the General Court of 22 January 2025 – Fly Persia and Ali Barmodeh v EUIPO – Dubai Aviation (flyPersia) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark flyPersia – Earlier EU figurative mark flydubai – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-01-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, airline, carriage of goods, civil aviation, provision of services, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202501422EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1422


10.3.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 22 January 2025 – Fly Persia and Ali Barmodeh v EUIPO – Dubai Aviation (flyPersia)


(Case T-30/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark flyPersia - Earlier EU figurative mark flydubai - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/1422)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Fly Persia IKE (Athens, Greece), Ali Barmodeh (Athens) (represented by: R. Marano, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: R. Raponi, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Dubai Aviation Corp. (Dubai, United Arab Emirates)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 24 November 2022 (Case R 1723/2021-4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 24 November 2022 (Case R 1723/2021-4);










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs necessarily incurred by Fly Persia IKE and Mr Ali Barmodeh for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO.






(1)  
            OJ C 104, 20.3.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1422/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-511/17: Order of the General Court of 22 January 2025 – Corra González and Others v SRB (Action for annulment – Economic and monetary policy – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms – Resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español – Act not amenable to review – Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2025-01-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, abuse of power, aid for restructuring, company in difficulties, credit institution, damages, financial solvency, ownership, right to justice








C_202502068EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2068


14.4.2025






Order of the General Court of 22 January 2025 – Corra González and Others v SRB


(Case T-511/17)
                (1)

(Action for annulment - Economic and monetary policy - Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms - Resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español - Act not amenable to review - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2025/2068)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicants: José María Francisco Corra González (Madrid, Spain) and the seven other applicants whose names are set out in the annex to the order (represented by: C. de Santiago Álvarez and J. Redondo Martín, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: H. Ehlers, M. Fernández Rupérez, A. Lapresta Bienz and J. Rius Riu, acting as Agents, and by B. Meyring, F. Fernández de Trocóniz Robles, T. Klupsch and S. Ianc, lawyers)

Re:

By their action brought under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek annulment of Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of the Executive Session of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 7 June 2017 concerning the adoption of a resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español, SA.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible.










2.


There is no need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene made by the Kingdom of Spain, the European Commission, Banco Santander, SA and Banco Popular Español, SA.










3.


Mr José María Francisco Corra González and the other applicants whose names are set out in the annex shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the Single Resolution Board (SRB).










4.


The Kingdom of Spain and the Commission shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications to intervene.










5.


Banco Santander shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Banco Popular Español relating to the applications to intervene.






(1)  
            OJ C 357, 23.10.2017.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2068/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1053/23: Judgment of the General Court of 22 January 2025 – Tecom Master v EUIPO – Michael Kors (Switzerland) International (MK MICHAEL MICHELE) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark MK MICHAEL MICHELE – Earlier EU figurative mark MK MICHAEL KORS – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 57(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 64(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 8(5) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Date: 2025-01-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, footwear industry, personal effects, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202501427EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1427


10.3.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 22 January 2025 – Tecom Master v EUIPO – Michael Kors (Switzerland) International (MK MICHAEL MICHELE)


(Case T-1053/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark MK MICHAEL MICHELE - Earlier EU figurative mark MK MICHAEL KORS - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 57(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 64(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Relative ground for invalidity - Article 8(5) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(C/2025/1427)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Tecom Master, SL (Alicante, Spain) (represented by: T. Villate Consonni, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Stoyanova-Valchanova, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Michael Kors (Switzerland) International GmbH (Manno, Switzerland) (represented by: J. van Manen, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 4 September 2023 (Case R 1959/2021-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Tecom Master, SL to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Michael Kors (Switzerland) International GmbH;










3.


Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/430, 3.1.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1427/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-530/17: Order of the General Court of 22 January 2025 – López Campo and Others v SRB (Action for annulment and for damages – Economic and monetary policy – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms – Resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español – Act not open to challenge – Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2025-01-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, abuse of power, aid for restructuring, company in difficulties, credit institution, damages, financial solvency, ownership, right to justice








C_202502078EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2078


14.4.2025






Order of the General Court of 22 January 2025 – López Campo and Others v SRB


(Case T-530/17)
                (1)

(Action for annulment and for damages - Economic and monetary policy - Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms - Resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español - Act not open to challenge - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2025/2078)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicants: Mario López Campo (Pontevedra, Spain) and the eight other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the order (represented by: F. Cabadas García, lawyer)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: H. Ehlers, M. Fernández Rupérez, A. Lapresta Bienz and J. Rius Riu, acting as Agents, and by B. Meyring, F. Fernández de Trocóniz Robles, T. Klupsch and S. Ianc, lawyers)

Re:

By their action, the applicants seek, first, under Article 263 TFEU, the annulment of Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of the Executive Session of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 7 June 2017 concerning the adoption of a resolution scheme in respect of Banco Popular Español, SA, and, secondly, compensation for the loss in value of their shares arising from the adoption of that decision.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.










2.


There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene by the Kingdom of Spain, the European Commission, Banco Santander, SA and Banco Popular Español, SA.










3.


Mr Mario López Campo and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the Single Resolution Board (SRB).










4.


The Kingdom of Spain and the Commission shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications for leave to intervene.










5.


Banco Santander shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Banco Popular Español relating to the applications for leave to intervene.






(1)  
            OJ C 369, 30.10.2017.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2078/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)