do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-277/23, Ministarstvo financija (Erasmus + grant): Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 January 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Ustavni sud – Croatia) – E. P. v Ministarstvo financija Republike Hrvatske, Samostalni sektor za drugostupanjski upravni postupak (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – Article 21(1) TFEU – Right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States – Tax legislation – Income tax – Calculation of the amount of the basic personal allowance for a dependent child who has received mobility support for educational purposes in the context of the Erasmus+ programme – Regulation (EU) No 1288/2013 – Taxation of grants to support the mobility of individuals covered by that regulation – Restriction on freedom of movement – Proportionality)
Date: 2025-01-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU programme, dependant, educational exchange, financial aid, freedom of movement, personal income tax, student mobility, tax relief, youth exchange scheme








C_202501392EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1392


10.3.2025






Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 January 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Ustavni sud – Croatia) – E. P. v Ministarstvo financija Republike Hrvatske, Samostalni sektor za drugostupanjski upravni postupak


(Case C-277/23,
                (1)
Ministarstvo financija (Erasmus + grant))

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Citizenship of the Union - Article 21(1) TFEU - Right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States - Tax legislation - Income tax - Calculation of the amount of the basic personal allowance for a dependent child who has received mobility support for educational purposes in the context of the Erasmus+ programme - Regulation (EU) No 1288/2013 - Taxation of grants to support the mobility of individuals covered by that regulation - Restriction on freedom of movement - Proportionality)
(C/2025/1392)
Language of the case: Croatian

Referring court

Ustavni sud

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: E. P.

Other party to the proceedings: Ministarstvo financija Republike Hrvatske, Samostalni sektor za drugostupanjski upravni postupak

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 20 and 21 TFEU, read in the light of the second indent of Article 165(2) TFEU, must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State which, in order to determine the amount of the basic personal allowance to which a taxpayer parent is entitled in respect of his or her dependent child, takes into account the support for learning mobility which that child has received under the Erasmus+ programme, with the result, as the case may be, that that parent loses the entitlement to the increase of that allowance for the purposes of calculating income tax.


(1)  
            OJ C 261, 24.7.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1392/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to Directive (EU) 2024/3019 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2024 concerning urban wastewater treatment (OJ L, 2024/3019, 12.12.2024)
Date: 2025-01-16
Institutions: Council of the European Union, European Parliament
Subjects: environmental protection, industrial pollution, pollution control measures, public health, urban area, wastewater, water pollutant, water pollution, water treatment








L_202590038EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2025/90038


16.1.2025






Corrigendum to Directive (EU) 2024/3019 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2024 concerning urban wastewater treatment
(
Official Journal of the European Union L, 2024/3019, 12 December 2024
)

On page 48, in Annex I, Part C:







for:





                              ‘Note 3: In exceptional situations due to specific local circumstances, natural nitrogen retention may be taken into account in the calculation of the minimum percentage reduction in Member States where natural nitrogen retention was taken into account in the calculation of the minimum percentage reduction of nitrogen referred to under Table 2 of Annex I to Directive 91/271/EEC and where it is demonstrated that part of the nitrogen originated from urban wastewater can be eliminated in the receiving waters until 31 December 2037 for the calculation of the minimum percentage reduction of nitrogen referred to in Table 2 of this Annex if all the following conditions are fulfilled:’,












read:





                              ‘Note 3: In exceptional situations due to specific local circumstances, natural nitrogen retention may be taken into account in the calculation of the minimum percentage reduction in Member States where natural nitrogen retention was taken into account in the calculation of the minimum percentage reduction of nitrogen referred to under Table 2 of Annex I to Directive 91/271/EEC and where it is demonstrated that part of the nitrogen originated from urban wastewater can be eliminated in the receiving waters until 31 December 2045 for the calculation of the minimum percentage reduction of nitrogen referred to in Table 2 of this Annex if all the following conditions are fulfilled:’.







ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/3019/corrigendum/2025-01-16/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 15 January 2025
Date: 2025-01-16
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202500019EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/19


16.1.2025






Euro exchange rates (1)


            15 January 2025
         
(C/2025/19)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0300 




JPY


Japanese yen


161,75 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4611 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84313 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,5015 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9394 




ISK


Iceland króna


144,70 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,7035 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,218 




HUF


Hungarian forint


410,63 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2613 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9742 




TRY


Turkish lira


36,5477 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6616 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4784 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,0201 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,8381 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4089 




KRW


South Korean won


1 503,15 




ZAR


South African rand


19,4319 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,5515 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 872,43 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6340 




PHP


Philippine peso


60,358 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


35,762 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,2377 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,0900 




INR


Indian rupee


89,0145 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/19/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-547/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 January 2025 – Região Autónoma da Madeira v European Commission (Appeal – State aid – Madeira Free Zone (Portugal) – Granting of tax advantages to undertakings – Aid scheme implemented by the Portuguese Republic – Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final – Decision taken by the European Commission pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 108(2) TFEU – Implementation of existing aid in breach of a condition ensuring compatibility of the aid with the internal market)
Date: 2025-01-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Madeira, Portugal, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid, corporation tax, regional aid, tax relief








C_202501398EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1398


10.3.2025






Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 January 2025 – Região Autónoma da Madeira v European Commission


(Case C-547/23 P)
                (1)

(Appeal - State aid - Madeira Free Zone (Portugal) - Granting of tax advantages to undertakings - Aid scheme implemented by the Portuguese Republic - Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final - Decision taken by the European Commission pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 108(2) TFEU - Implementation of existing aid in breach of a condition ensuring compatibility of the aid with the internal market)
(C/2025/1398)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties


Appellant: Região Autónoma da Madeira (represented by: M. Gorjão-Henriques and A. Saavedra, advogados)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: I. Barcew and P. Caro de Sousa, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.



Orders the Região Autónoma da Madeira to pay the costs.







(1)  OJ C C/2023/208.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1398/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-585/17: Order of the General Court of 16 January 2025 – Alonso Goñi and Others v SRB
Date: 2025-01-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, abuse of power, aid for restructuring, company in difficulties, credit institution, damages, financial solvency, ownership, right to justice








C_202502108EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2108


14.4.2025






Order of the General Court of 16 January 2025 – Alonso Goñi and Others v SRB


(Case T-585/17)
                (1)

(C/2025/2108)
Language of the case: Spanish
The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 402, 27.11.2017.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2108/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
Date: 2025-01-16
Institutions: Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, European Commission
Subjects: Atlantic Ocean, EU waters, Ireland, United Kingdom, catch by species, catch quota, fishing area, fishing rights, international waters, sea fish, sea fishing, territorial waters








C_202500410EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/410


16.1.2025






Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
(C/2025/410)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


19.12.2024




Duration


19.12.2024 - 31.12.2024




Member State


Ireland




Stock or Group of stocks


HAD/6B1214




Species


Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus)




Zone


United Kingdom, Union and international waters of 6b; international waters 12 and 14




Type(s) of fishing vessels


—




Reference number


36/TQ257






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/410/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-21/25 P: Appeal brought on 16 January 2025 by Puma SE against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 06 November 2024 in Case T-544/23, Puma / EUIPO – Zheng (Representation of an emblem)
Date: 2025-01-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202504029EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/4029


28.7.2025






Appeal brought on 16 January 2025 by Puma SE against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 06 November 2024 in Case T-544/23, Puma / EUIPO – Zheng (Representation of an emblem)


(Case C-21/25 P)

(C/2025/4029)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Puma SE (represented by: M. Schunke and P. Trieb, Rechtsanwälte)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
By order of 12 June 2025, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that Puma SE should bear its own costs.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4029/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Special report 02/2025: Urban pollution in the EU – Cities have cleaner air but are still too noisy
Date: 2025-01-16
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: air quality, atmospheric pollutant, environmental impact, noise level, noise pollution, pollution control, prevention of pollution, public health, quality of the environment, urban centre








C_202500359EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/359


16.1.2025






Special report 02/2025:

            ‘Urban pollution in the EU – Cities have cleaner air but are still too noisy’
         
(C/2025/359)

The European Court of Auditors has published its special report 02/2025: ‘Urban pollution in the EU – Cities have cleaner air but are still too noisy’.
The report can be consulted directly or downloaded at the European Court of Auditors’ website: https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/publications/sr-2025-02



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/359/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-23/25, Sutuska: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 16 January 2025 – AS v Bank Millennium S.A.
Date: 2025-01-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: bank, consumer credit, consumer protection, insurance contract, life assurance, principle of proportionality, property insurance, unfair terms of contract








C_202502059EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2059


14.4.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 16 January 2025 – AS v Bank Millennium S.A.


(Case C-23/25, Sutuska)
                (1)

(C/2025/2059)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: AS

Defendant: Bank Millennium S.A.

Question referred

In the context of a loan agreement concluded between a consumer and a bank being found to be invalid in its entirety on the grounds that the agreement contains unfair terms without which it cannot continue in existence, must Articles 6(1) and 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993
             (2) on unfair terms in consumer contracts and the principles of effectiveness and proportionality be interpreted as precluding a judicial interpretation of national law according to which:






—


the bank is required to reimburse the consumer for the equivalent of the bank’s risk insurance costs incurred by the consumer, such as high loan-to-value insurance and bridging insurance, which provided security for the repayment of the loan;










—


the bank is not required to reimburse the consumer for the equivalent of the consumer’s risk insurance costs incurred by the consumer, such as property insurance and life insurance, which provided security for the repayment of the loan?






(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(2)  
            OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2059/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-642/23, Flightright (Loyalty account): Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 January 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Düsseldorf – Germany) – Flightright GmbH v Etihad Airways P.J.S.C. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 8(1)(a) – Right to reimbursement of the cost of the airline ticket in the event of cancellation of a flight – Choice between reimbursement in money or in travel vouchers – Article 7(3) – Concept of the signed agreement of the passenger – Loyalty account set up by the passenger on the air carrier’s website)
Date: 2025-01-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: carriage of passengers, civil aviation, indemnification, passenger rights, payment, ticket, traveller








C_202501400EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1400


10.3.2025






Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 January 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Düsseldorf – Germany) – Flightright GmbH v Etihad Airways P.J.S.C.


(Case C-642/23,
                (1)
Flightright (Loyalty account))

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Air transport - Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 - Article 8(1)(a) - Right to reimbursement of the cost of the airline ticket in the event of cancellation of a flight - Choice between reimbursement in money or in travel vouchers - Article 7(3) - Concept of the ‘signed agreement of the passenger’ - Loyalty account set up by the passenger on the air carrier’s website)
(C/2025/1400)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Flightright GmbH

Defendant: Etihad Airways P.J.S.C.

Operative part of the judgment

Article 8(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, read in conjunction with Article 7(3) of Regulation No 261/2004,
must be interpreted as meaning that, in the event of cancellation of a flight by the operating air carrier, a passenger is not to be deemed to have given his or her ‘signed agreement’ to reimbursement of the cost of the ticket in the form of travel vouchers where he or she has set up, on that carrier’s website, a loyalty account to which those vouchers were to be transferred, without having confirmed, by his or her express, definitive and unequivocal acceptance, his or her agreement to that method of reimbursement.


(1)  OJ C C/2024/936.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1400/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-22/25: Action brought on 16 January 2025 – HG v ESMA
Date: 2025-01-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, discrimination based on disability, equal treatment, indemnification, legality, medical report, principle of proportionality, staff regulations (EU), worker with disabilities








C_202501446EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1446


10.3.2025






Action brought on 16 January 2025 – HG v ESMA


(Case T-22/25)

(C/2025/1446)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: HG (represented by: N. Flandin, lawyer)

Defendant: European Securities and Markets Authority

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the ESMA decision of 26 April 2024 rejecting the request made by the applicant on the basis of Article 1d (4) of the Staff Regulations of the European Union (‘the Staff Regulations’) for reasonable accommodation;










—


in so far as necessary, annul the ESMA decision of 18 October 2024 rejecting the complaint filed by the applicant against the decision of 26 April 2024;










—


order the compensation of the moral prejudice suffered by the applicant;










—


order the defendant to pay all the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging that the contested decision, together with the decision rejecting the complaint, are illegal because they are based on the medical opinion of 22 March 2024 and on the note of 10 April 2024, which were both adopted within the wrong legal framework, namely the hybrid working decision, (1) and because they are vitiated by a manifest error of appreciation.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging that the contested decision and the decision rejecting the complaint are vitiated by a lack of motivation.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging that the contested decision and the decision rejecting the complaint are illegal in stating that the applicant infringes Article 20 of the Staff Regulations. Furthermore, the applicant raises a subsidiary plea of illegality regarding the said Article 20 of the Staff Regulations and also claims that the contested decision is disproportionate.










4.


Fourth plea in law, alleging that the contested decision and the decision rejecting the complaint are vitiated by a breach of the duty to provide reasonable accommodation. In addition, the applicant claims violation of the principle of non-discrimination, of equal treatment on the ground of disability and of the principle of proportionality.










5.


Fifth plea in law, alleging that the contested decision and the decision rejecting the complaint violate the duty of care.






(1)  Commission Decision C(2022) 1788 final of 24 March 2022 on working time and hybrid working.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1446/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-588/23, Scai: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 January 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale della Campania – Italy) – Scai Srl v Regione Campania (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Recovery of unlawful and incompatible aid – Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Article 16 – Beneficiary of individual aid identified in the European Commission recovery decision – Implementation of the recovery decision – Transfer of the aid to another undertaking after the recovery decision – Economic continuity – Assessment – Competent authority – Extension of the recovery obligation to the actual beneficiary – Audi alteram partem rule – Articles 41 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union)
Date: 2025-01-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: State aid, control of State aid, reimbursement of aid, right of action, rights of the defence








C_202501399EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1399


10.3.2025






Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 January 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale della Campania – Italy) – Scai Srl v Regione Campania


(Case C-588/23,
                (1)
Scai)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Recovery of unlawful and incompatible aid - Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 - Article 16 - Beneficiary of individual aid identified in the European Commission recovery decision - Implementation of the recovery decision - Transfer of the aid to another undertaking after the recovery decision - Economic continuity - Assessment - Competent authority - Extension of the recovery obligation to the actual beneficiary - Audi alteram partem rule - Articles 41 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union)
(C/2025/1399)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale della Campania

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Scai Srl

Defendant: Regione Campania

Operative part of the judgment

Article 108 and the fourth paragraph of Article 288 TFEU, Articles 16 and 31 of Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 of 13 July 2015, laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 [TFEU], and Articles 41 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
must be interpreted as meaning that in a situation where a decision of the European Commission orders the recovery of State aid from a beneficiary which it identifies, those provisions do not preclude national legislation under which the competent national authorities, in the context of their task of implementing that decision, may order the recovery of that aid from another undertaking on account of the existence of economic continuity between that undertaking and the beneficiary of the aid identified in that decision.


(1)  OJ C C/2023/1293.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1399/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)