do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11820 – ITOCHU / KAWASAKI HEAVY INDUSTRIES / KAWASAKI MOTORS RETAIL FINANCE JV)
Date: 2025-01-15
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: United States, economic concentration, financial services, investment company, merger control, motor vehicle industry, retail trade, two-wheeled vehicle








C_202501000EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1000


10.2.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11820 – ITOCHU / KAWASAKI HEAVY INDUSTRIES / KAWASAKI MOTORS RETAIL FINANCE JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/1000)

On 15 January 2025, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32025M11820. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1000/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1064/23: Judgment of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – ADS L. Kowalik, B. Włodarczyk v EUIPO – ESSAtech (Accessory for wireless remote controls) (Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing an accessory for a wireless remote control – Ground for invalidity – Characteristics of the appearance of a product exclusively imposed by the technical function of that product – Articles 8(1) and 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Facts relied on or evidence adduced for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 63(2) of Regulation No 6/2002 and Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Rights of the defence – Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002 – Principle of sound administration – Article 41(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Obligation to state reasons – Article 41(2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)
Date: 2025-01-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: designs and models, electronic device








C_202501102EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1102


24.2.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – ADS L. Kowalik, B. Włodarczyk v EUIPO – ESSAtech (Accessory for wireless remote controls)


(Case T-1064/23)
                (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing an accessory for a wireless remote control - Ground for invalidity - Characteristics of the appearance of a product exclusively imposed by the technical function of that product - Articles 8(1) and 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Facts relied on or evidence adduced for the first time before the Board of Appeal - Article 63(2) of Regulation No 6/2002 and Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 - Rights of the defence - Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002 - Principle of sound administration - Article 41(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights - Obligation to state reasons - Article 41(2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)
(C/2025/1102)
Language of the case: Polish

Parties


Applicant: ADS L. Kowalik, B. Włodarczyk s.c. (Sosnowiec, Poland) (represented by: M. Oleksyn and M. Stępkowski, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Chylińska and J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: ESSAtech (Přistoupim, Czech Republic)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 6 September 2023 (Case R 1070/2020-3).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders ADS L. Kowalik, B. Włodarczyk s.c. to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C-2024/469, 3.1.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1102/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-552/17: Order of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – Maña and Others v SRB
Date: 2025-01-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, abuse of power, aid for restructuring, company in difficulties, credit institution, financial solvency, right to justice, right to property








C_202501910EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1910


7.4.2025






Order of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – Maña and Others v SRB


(Case T-552/17)
                (1)

(C/2025/1910)
Language of the case: Spanish
The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 369, 30.10.2017.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1910/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-520/17: Order of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – Gestvalor 2040 and Others v SRB
Date: 2025-01-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, abuse of power, aid for restructuring, company in difficulties, credit institution, damages, financial solvency, ownership, right to justice








C_202502107EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2107


14.4.2025






Order of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – Gestvalor 2040 and Others v SRB


(Case T-520/17)
                (1)

(C/2025/2107)
Language of the case: Spanish
The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 402, 27.11.2017.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2107/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Call for proposals and related activities under the 2025 work plan of the Clean Hydrogen Joint Undertaking
Date: 2025-01-15
Institutions: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, European Commission
Subjects: European Joint Undertaking, action programme, call for proposals, hydrogen








C_202500200EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/200


15.1.2025






Call for proposals and related activities under the 2025 work plan of the Clean Hydrogen Joint Undertaking
(C/2025/200)

Notice is hereby given of the launch of the call for proposals and related activities under the 2025 work plan of the Clean Hydrogen Joint Undertaking (CleanH2 JU).
This work plan, including deadlines and budgets for the activities, is available through the Participant Portal website (https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/home) along with information on the modalities of the call and related activities, and guidance for applicants on how to submit proposals. All this information will be updated as necessary on the same Participant Portal.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/200/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-18/25 P: Appeal brought on 15 January 2025 by Aeneas GmbH & Co. KG against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 13 November 2024 in Joined Cases T-64/23 to T-66/23, Aesculap AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office
Date: 2025-01-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, chemical product, consultancy, medical diagnosis, medical research, registered trade mark, research body, scientific apparatus, trade-mark law, veterinary medicine








C_202503629EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3629


14.7.2025






Appeal brought on 15 January 2025 by Aeneas GmbH & Co. KG against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 13 November 2024 in Joined Cases T-64/23 to T-66/23, Aesculap AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office


(Case C-18/25 P)

(C/2025/3629)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Aeneas GmbH & Co. KG (represented by: L. Ludwig, Rechtsanwältin, and I. Jung, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office, Aesculap AG
By order of 21 May 2025, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) did not allow the appeal to proceed and ordered the appellant to bear its own costs.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3629/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-18/25: Action brought on 15 January 2025 – Apellis Europe v Commission
Date: 2025-01-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: case-law (EU), drug surveillance, market approval, pharmaceutical product, rights of the defence








C_202501546EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1546


17.3.2025






Action brought on 15 January 2025 – Apellis Europe v Commission


(Case T-18/25)

(C/2025/1546)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Apellis Europe BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: A. Koyuncu, V. Sturla and M. Aretz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare the action admissible and well founded;










—


annul the Commission Decision C(2024) 9160 final of 16 December 2024, addressed to the Applicant and refusing marketing authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) for ‘Syfovre – Pegcetacoplan’ (the ‘Contested Decision’); and,










—


order the European Commission to pay the applicant’s costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging the infringement of Articles 10(1) and 12(2) of Regulation 726/2004 by proceeding with the decision-making process after the withdrawal of a Marketing Authorisation (MA) application. It is clear from the wording of Articles 10 and 12 that a Commission decision can only be adopted when there is still a pending application for an MA. This is confirmed by (i) the basic principles of EU pharmaceutical law, (ii) the case law of the CJEU as shown by Case C-477/11 P, Sepracor Pharmaceuticals (Ireland) v Commission (2), and (iii) other Commission precedents where the Commission did not adopt a formal decision in similar situations of withdrawn applications. EU law does not authorise nor oblige the Commission to adopt a formal decision on an MA application after the applicant withdraws the application.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging the infringement of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the general legal principle of the right to be heard. The Commission refused to forward the applicant’s submissions of 8 and 27 November 2024 to the members of the Standing Committee on Medicinal Products for Human Use, denying the applicant’s right to present arguments.






(1)  Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 laying down Community procedures for the authorisation and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use and establishing a European Medicines Agency (OJ 2004, L 136, p. 1).

(2)  Order of 14 May 2012, Sepracor Pharmaceuticals (Ireland) v Commission (C-477/11 P, not published, EU:C:2012:292).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1546/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-104/24: Judgment of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – Kokito I Punt v EUIPO – Fédération française de football (Representation of a rooster) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for a figurative EU trade mark representing a rooster – Earlier figurative EU trade mark FFF – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2025-01-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, footwear industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202501107EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1107


24.2.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – Kokito I Punt v EUIPO – Fédération française de football (Representation of a rooster)


(Case T-104/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for a figurative EU trade mark representing a rooster - Earlier figurative EU trade mark FFF - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/1107)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Kokito I Punt, SL (Gandia, Spain) (represented by: P. Bauzá Martínez, J. Gallego Jiménez, Y. Hernández Viñes and E. Sanz Valls, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Stoyanova-Valchanova, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Fédération française de football (Paris, France) (represented by: C. Bertheux Scotte, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 13 December 2023 (Case R 901/2023-4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Kokito I Punt, SL to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Fédération française de football;










3.


Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/2636, 22.4.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1107/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-700/17: Order of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – Travicar and Others v SRB
Date: 2025-01-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, abuse of power, aid for restructuring, company in difficulties, credit institution, damages, financial solvency, right to justice, right to property








C_202501917EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1917


7.4.2025






Order of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – Travicar and Others v SRB


(Case T-700/17)
                (1)

(C/2025/1917)
Language of the case: Spanish
The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 5, 8.1.2018.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1917/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-575/17: Order of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – Algebris (UK) and Anchorage Capital Group v SRB
Date: 2025-01-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, aid for restructuring, company in difficulties, credit institution, damages, financial solvency, professional secret, right to justice, right to property








C_202501912EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1912


7.4.2025






Order of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – Algebris (UK) and Anchorage Capital Group v SRB


(Case T-575/17)
                (1)

(C/2025/1912)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 382, 13.11.2017.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1912/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-705/17: Order of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – Temes Rial and Others v SRB
Date: 2025-01-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, abuse of power, aid for restructuring, company in difficulties, credit institution, damages, financial solvency, right to justice, right to property








C_202501919EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1919


7.4.2025






Order of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – Temes Rial and Others v SRB


(Case T-705/17)
                (1)

(C/2025/1919)
Language of the case: Spanish
The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 424, 11.12.2017.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1919/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-701/17: Order of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – OCU v SRB
Date: 2025-01-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, abuse of power, aid for restructuring, company in difficulties, credit institution, damages, financial solvency, right to justice, right to property








C_202501918EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1918


7.4.2025






Order of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – OCU v SRB


(Case T-701/17)
                (1)

(C/2025/1918)
Language of the case: Spanish
The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 5, 8.1.2018.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1918/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Statement by the Commission
Date: 2025-01-15
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: computer crime, information security, information technology, provision of services, risk management, security services, trade licence








C_202500309EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/309


15.1.2025






Statement by the Commission
(C/2025/309)

This Regulation amending the Cybersecurity Act adds the possibility to develop European certification cybersecurity schemes for managed security services. At the same time, it is acknowledged that a thorough review of the Cybersecurity Act is of utmost importance, including the assessment of the procedures leading to the preparation, adoption and review of European cybersecurity certification schemes. This review should be based on a deep analysis and broad consultation on the impact, effectiveness and efficiency of the functioning of the European cybersecurity certification framework. The analysis carried out as part of the evaluation established in Article 67 of the Cybersecurity Act should include on-going scheme development activities, such as the one concerning European cybersecurity certification scheme for cloud services (EUCS) as well as those of adopted schemes such as the one concerning the European Common Criteria-based cybersecurity certification scheme (EUCC).
In particular, the review should identify the strengths and weaknesses of the procedures leading to cybersecurity certification schemes and formulate recommendations for future improvements. It should also address aspects relating to stakeholder consultations and transparency of the process.
Accordingly, the Commission, which is responsible for the review of the Cybersecurity Act, shall ensure that the review takes into account as appropriate the necessary elements mentioned in light of Article 67 when presenting the review to the co-legislators.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/309/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-566/17: Order of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – Molina García v SRB
Date: 2025-01-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, abuse of power, aid for restructuring, company in difficulties, credit institution, damages, financial solvency, right to justice, right to property








C_202501911EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1911


7.4.2025






Order of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – Molina García v SRB


(Case T-566/17)
                (1)

(C/2025/1911)
Language of the case: Spanish
The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 374, 6.11.2017.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1911/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-581/23: Judgment of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – La Maison de l’Union syndicale v Council (Action for annulment – Institutional law – Civil service – Promotion – Refusal to promote an official proposed by the Advisory Committee on Promotion – Professional association – Standing to bring proceedings – Lack of direct concern – Lack of individual concern – Inadmissibility)
Date: 2025-01-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: admissibility, assistant, professional association, promotion








C_202501101EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1101


24.2.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – La Maison de l’Union syndicale v Council


(Case T-581/23)
                (1)

(Action for annulment - Institutional law - Civil service - Promotion - Refusal to promote an official proposed by the Advisory Committee on Promotion - Professional association - Standing to bring proceedings - Lack of direct concern - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility)
(C/2025/1101)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: La Maison de l’Union syndicale (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and I. Demoulin, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment in part of Note ORG.1.A/1123/23 of 14 July 2023 establishing the list of officials in function group AST (grades 1 to 5) promoted in the 2023 exercise, in so far as it departs from the proposal relating to promotions to grade AST 5 submitted by the competent Advisory Committee on Promotion to the Director-General for Organisational Development and Services of the Council.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders La Maison de l’Union syndicale to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2023/541, 6.11.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1101/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-478/17: Order of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v SRB
Date: 2025-01-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: appeal, company in difficulties, credit institution, financial instrument, principle of proportionality, right of establishment, right to justice, right to property, rights of the defence








C_202501908EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1908


7.4.2025






Order of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v SRB


(Case T-478/17)
                (1)

(C/2025/1908)
Language of the case: Spanish
The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 318, 25.9.2017.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1908/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-687/17: Order of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – Vendrell Marti v SRB
Date: 2025-01-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, abuse of power, aid for restructuring, company in difficulties, credit institution, damages, financial solvency, right to justice, right to property








C_202501916EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1916


7.4.2025






Order of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – Vendrell Marti v SRB


(Case T-687/17)
                (1)

(C/2025/1916)
Language of the case: Spanish
The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 5, 8.1.2018.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1916/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)