do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-592/17: Order of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – Serra Noguera and Others v SRB
Date: 2025-01-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, abuse of power, aid for restructuring, company in difficulties, credit institution, damages, financial solvency, right to justice, right to property








C_202501913EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1913


7.4.2025






Order of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – Serra Noguera and Others v SRB


(Case T-592/17)
                (1)

(C/2025/1913)
Language of the case: Spanish
The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 374, 6.11.2017.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1913/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-597/17: Order of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – Poza Poza v SRB
Date: 2025-01-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, abuse of power, aid for restructuring, company in difficulties, credit institution, damages, financial solvency, right to justice, right to property, share








C_202501914EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1914


7.4.2025






Order of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – Poza Poza v SRB


(Case T-597/17)
                (1)

(C/2025/1914)
Language of the case: Spanish
The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 412, 4.12.2017.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1914/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-525/17: Order of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – Taberna Ángel Sierra and Others v SRB
Date: 2025-01-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, abuse of power, aid for restructuring, company in difficulties, credit institution, damages, financial solvency, right to justice, right to property








C_202501909EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1909


7.4.2025






Order of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – Taberna Ángel Sierra and Others v SRB


(Case T-525/17)
                (1)

(C/2025/1909)
Language of the case: Spanish
The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 357, 23.10.2017.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1909/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Statement by the Commission
Date: 2025-01-15
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: European security, artificial intelligence, commitment of expenditure, computer crime, digital literacy, distribution of EU funding, exchange of information, fight against crime, information security, information warfare








C_202500310EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/310


15.1.2025






Statement by the Commission
(C/2025/310)


1.   

The Commission’s Legislative Financial Statement accompanying the proposal on the Cyber Solidarity Act was published in April 2023. Since then, the relevant estimated figures have changed due to the adoption or expected adoption of other legislative acts.



2.   

On 5 March 2024, the co-legislators reached a preliminary political agreement to limit to EUR 22 million the reallocation from the Specific Objective 4 ‘Advanced Digital Skills’ to the Specific Objective 3 ‘Cybersecurity and Trust’ of the Digital Europe Programme foreseen in the Legislative Financial Statement.



3.   

To reflect the terms of the preliminary political agreement, the Commission updated the Legislative Financial Statement of the Cyber Solidarity Act with regards to the financial envelopes for the Specific Objectives 2 ‘Artificial Intelligence’, 3 ‘Cybersecurity and Trust’ and 4 ‘Advanced Digital Skills’, taking into account the reallocations as agreed by the co-legislators.



4.   
Accordingly, the financial envelopes for the period 2025-2027 presented in the updated Legislative Financial Statement, without prejudice to the powers of the Commission in the context of the annual budgetary procedure, are the following:






—


[EUR 544 726 000] for Specific Objective 2 ‘Artificial Intelligence’, taking into account EUR 65 million reallocated to Specific Objective 3 ‘Cybersecurity and Trust’,










—


[EUR 44 451 000] for Specific Objective 3 ‘Cybersecurity and Trust’ – part under the direct management of the Commission, including EUR 26 million reallocated from Specific Objectives 2 and 4,










—


[EUR 353 190 613] for Specific Objective 3 ‘Cybersecurity and Trust’ – part managed by the European Cybersecurity Competence Centre, including the reallocation of EUR 61 million from Specific Objectives 2 and 4,










—


[EUR 167 162 423] for Specific Objective 4 ‘Advanced Digital Skills’, taking into the reallocation of EUR 22 million to Specific Objective 3 ‘Cybersecurity and Trust’.






5.   

The EU Cybersecurity Reserve will be funded from the financial envelope of the Specific Objective 3 ‘Cybersecurity and Trust’ – part under the direct management of the Commission (which according to the updated LFS is estimated at EUR [44 451 000]).




ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/310/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-512/17: Order of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – OCU and Others v SRB
Date: 2025-01-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: abuse of power, aid for restructuring, company in difficulties, credit institution, damages, financial solvency, ownership, right to justice








C_202502106EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2106


14.4.2025






Order of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – OCU and Others v SRB


(Case T-512/17)
                (1)

(C/2025/2106)
Language of the case: Spanish
The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 338, 9.10.2017.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2106/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 14 January 2025
Date: 2025-01-15
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202500018EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/18


15.1.2025






Euro exchange rates (1)


            14 January 2025
         
(C/2025/18)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0245 




JPY


Japanese yen


161,63 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4607 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84288 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,5120 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9395 




ISK


Iceland króna


144,90 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,7195 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,294 




HUF


Hungarian forint


412,05 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2683 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9749 




TRY


Turkish lira


36,3634 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6601 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4744 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


7,9761 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,8324 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4036 




KRW


South Korean won


1 496,39 




ZAR


South African rand


19,4143 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,5108 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 708,88 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6154 




PHP


Philippine peso


60,196 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


35,612 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,2299 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,1339 




INR


Indian rupee


88,6925 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/18/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.113458
Date: 2025-01-15
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Mazovia province, Poland, State aid, control of State aid, museum








C_202500411EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/411


15.1.2025






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.113458
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/411)








Date of adoption of the decision


21.10.2024




Aid number


SA.113458




Member State


Poland




Region


Miasto Warszawa




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Pomoc dla Muzeum Historii Polski w Warszawie




Legal basis


Uchwała nr 118/2015 Rady Ministrów z dnia 21 lipca 2015 r. w sprawie ustanowienia programu wieloletniego „Budowa Muzeum Historii Polski w Warszawie” (RM-111-115-15), zmieniona uchwałą nr 165/2017 Rady Ministrów z dnia 17 października 2017 r. (RM-111-169-17), uchwałą nr 55/2018 Rady Ministrów z dnia 20 marca 2018 r. (RM-111-50-18), uchwałą nr 17/2021 Rady Ministrów z dnia 1 lutego 2021 r. (RM-06111-17-21), uchwałą nr 117/2023 Rady Ministrów z dnia 29 czerwca 2023 r. (RM-06111-126-23) oraz uchwałą nr 147/2023 Rady Ministrów z dnia 16 sierpnia 2023 r. (RM-06111-156-23). W uzupełnieniu zob. Załącznik nr 2.




Type of measure


Ad Hoc Case


Museum of Polish History




Objective


Culture




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 362 268 000  PLN




Intensity


 




Duration


From 01.01.2016




Economic sectors


Museums activities




Name and address of the granting authority


Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
ul. Krakowskie Przedmieście 15, 00-071 Warszawa




Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at: https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/411/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-69/25, A GmbH: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 15 January 2025 – A v Hauptzollamt C
Date: 2025-01-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, alloy, dental medicine, mercury








C_202501556EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1556


17.3.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 15 January 2025 – A v Hauptzollamt C


(Case T-69/25, A GmbH)

(C/2025/1556)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant and appellant in the appeal on a point of law: A GmbH

Defendant and respondent in the appeal on a point of law: Hauptzollamt C

Question referred

Does the term ‘set’ within the meaning of Note 3 to Section VI of the Combined Nomenclature (1) cover capsule systems in which two components – alloy powder and liquid mercury – for mixing silver amalgam dental fillings are contained in separate chambers which cannot be separated in a non-destructive manner?


(1)  Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1), as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1101/2014 of 16 October 2014 (OJ 2014 L 312, p. 1).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1556/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1162/23: Order of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – Primagran v EUIPO – Primagaz (PRIMA)
Date: 2025-01-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, gas industry, gas supply, heating, maintenance, miscellaneous industries, pressure equipment, registered trade mark, storage of hydrocarbons, trade-mark law








C_202501787EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1787


31.3.2025






Order of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – Primagran v EUIPO – Primagaz (PRIMA)


(Case T-1162/23)
                (1)

(C/2025/1787)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/1259, 12.2.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1787/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-17/25, Società Cattolica di Assicurazione: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 15 January 2025 – LS, KV, RY, UJ, TM v Società Cattolica di Assicurazione SpA
Date: 2025-01-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: civil liability proceedings, death, family, insurance claim, motor vehicle insurance, right of action, third-party insurance, transport accident








C_202501749EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1749


31.3.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 15 January 2025 – LS, KV, RY, UJ, TM v Società Cattolica di Assicurazione SpA


(Case C-17/25, Società Cattolica di Assicurazione)

(C/2025/1749)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte suprema di cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellants: LS, KV, RY, UJ, TM

Respondents: Società Cattolica di Assicurazione SpA

Questions referred







1.


Does Article 2 of Directive 84/5/EEC, (1) in a situation such as the one at issue in these proceedings, preclude national legislation which, by reason of the fact that a judgment has acquired the force of res judicata in Italian civil proceedings, prevents raising for the first time before the Supreme Court of Cassation the nullity of a clause, included in a [motor vehicle civil liability] insurance contract, which, in breach of that directive, allows the insurer to bring an action for recovery against the person transported who is both the injured and insured party?










2.


Does the principle that the effectiveness of [EU] law takes precedence over the force of res judicata apply even where: (a) the force of res judicata adversely affects the right to compensation for damage, conferred by Article 2 of Directive 84/5/EEC on members of the family of the person who has died as a result of a road traffic accident, from the [motor vehicle civil liability] insurer; (b) the holder of that right has acted in a wholly passive manner in the proceedings which were concluded as a result of the force of res judicata adversely affecting EU law?






(1)  Second Council Directive 84/5/EEC of 30 December 1983 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles (OJ 1984 L 8, p. 17).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1749/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-14/25, Thüringer Aufbaubank: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 15 January 2025 – Thüringer Aufbaubank v LN
Date: 2025-01-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: claim, enforcement of ruling, judicial cooperation in civil matters in the EU, judicial review, notary








C_202502178EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2178


22.4.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 15 January 2025 – Thüringer Aufbaubank v LN


(Case C-14/25, Thüringer Aufbaubank)

(C/2025/2178)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant on a point of law: Thüringer Aufbaubank

Respondent in the appeal on a point of law: LN

Question referred

Is Article 21(2) in conjunction with Article 25 of Regulation No 805/2004 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that certification of an enforceable authentic instrument (in this case, an enforceable notarial instrument drawn up by a German notary) as a European Enforcement Order, issued by the competent authority in the Member State of origin using the standard form in Annex III to that regulation, may not be reviewed in the Member State of enforcement even where – having regard to the date on which the authentic instrument was drawn up – the temporal scope of that regulation has manifestly not been respected?


(1)  Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 creating a European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims (OJ 2004 L 143, p. 15).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2178/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-484/17: Order of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – Fidesban and Others v SRB
Date: 2025-01-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: aid for restructuring, appeal, company in difficulties, credit institution, financial solvency, ownership, right of establishment, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_202502105EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2105


14.4.2025






Order of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – Fidesban and Others v SRB


(Case T-484/17)
                (1)

(C/2025/2105)
Language of the case: Spanish
The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 330, 2.10.2017.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2105/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-619/17: Order of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – de la Fuente Martín and Others v SRB
Date: 2025-01-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, abuse of power, aid for restructuring, company in difficulties, credit institution, damages, financial solvency, right to justice, right to property, share








C_202501915EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1915


7.4.2025






Order of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – de la Fuente Martín and Others v SRB


(Case T-619/17)
                (1)

(C/2025/1915)
Language of the case: Spanish
The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 5, 8.1.2018.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1915/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1065/23: Judgment of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – ADS L. Kowalik, B. Włodarczyk v EUIPO – ESSAtech (Accessory for wireless remote controls) (Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing an accessory for a wireless remote control – Ground for invalidity – Characteristics of the appearance of a product dictated exclusively by its technical function – Article 8(1) and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Facts relied on or evidence adduced for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 63(2) of Regulation No 6/2002 and Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Rights of the defence – Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002 – Principle of sound administration – Article 41(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Obligation to state reasons – Article 41(2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)
Date: 2025-01-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: designs and models, electronic device








C_202501103EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1103


24.2.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – ADS L. Kowalik, B. Włodarczyk v EUIPO – ESSAtech (Accessory for wireless remote controls)


(Case T-1065/23)
                (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing an accessory for a wireless remote control - Ground for invalidity - Characteristics of the appearance of a product dictated exclusively by its technical function - Article 8(1) and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Facts relied on or evidence adduced for the first time before the Board of Appeal - Article 63(2) of Regulation No 6/2002 and Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 - Rights of the defence - Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002 - Principle of sound administration - Article 41(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights - Obligation to state reasons - Article 41(2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)
(C/2025/1103)
Language of the case: Polish

Parties


Applicant: ADS L. Kowalik, B. Włodarczyk s.c. (Sosnowiec, Poland) (represented by: M. Oleksyn and M. Stępkowski, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Chylińska and J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: ESSAtech (Přistoupim, Czech Republic)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 6 September 2023 (Case R 1072/2020-3).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders ADS L. Kowalik, B. Włodarczyk s.c. to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/426, 3.1.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1103/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1142/23: Judgment of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – Enedo v EUIPO – Enedis (ENEDO) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark ENEDO – Earlier EU word mark ENEDIS – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Restriction of the goods and services covered in the trade mark application)
Date: 2025-01-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, computer equipment, electricity storage device, electronic component, registered trade mark, scientific research, software, technology, trade-mark law








C_202501105EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1105


24.2.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – Enedo v EUIPO – Enedis (ENEDO)


(Case T-1142/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark ENEDO - Earlier EU word mark ENEDIS - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Restriction of the goods and services covered in the trade mark application)
(C/2025/1105)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Enedo Oyj (Vantaa, Finland) (represented by: H.-M. Elo and E. Hodge, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Ringelhann, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Enedis (Paris, France) (represented by: C. Verneret and J.-B. Micard, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and the alteration of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 27 September 2023 (Case R 190/2023-4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Enedo Oyj, in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay those incurred by Enedis;










3.


Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/975, 29.1.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1105/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)