do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Withdrawal of Commission proposals
Date: 2025-01-09
Institutions: Directorate-General for Energy, European Commission
Subjects: proposal (EU)








C_202500315EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/315


9.1.2025






Withdrawal of Commission proposals
(C/2025/315)








Document


Inter-institutional procedure


Title




COM(2022) 522 final


2022/0323 (NLE)


Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION
on the position to be taken on behalf of Euratom in the 33rd meeting of the Energy Charter Conference






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/315/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-10/25, Elettronica Industriale: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 9 January 2025 – Elettronica Industriale SpA v Ministero delle Imprese e del Made in Italy
Date: 2025-01-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer protection, principle of proportionality, provision of services, public finance, regulation of telecommunications, tax system, transmission network








C_202502058EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2058


14.4.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 9 January 2025 – Elettronica Industriale SpA v Ministero delle Imprese e del Made in Italy


(Case C-10/25, Elettronica Industriale)

(C/2025/2058)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Elettronica Industriale SpA

Defendant: Ministero delle Imprese e del Made in Italy

Question referred

Does Article 13 of Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002
             (1) on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services, in conjunction with Article 8 of Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002
             (2) on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services, as well as the principle [of EU law] of proportionality, preclude the introduction, by the legislature of a Member State, of a criterion for calculating ‘fees for granting rights of use and rights to install facilities’, imposed on operators with a view to generating specific overall tax revenues and thus related to general public finance targets, regardless of the need to ensure the proper functioning of the electronic communications market and the protection of users, and must the national court disapply that provision?


(1)  Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (Authorisation Directive) (OJ 2002 L 108, p. 21).

(2)  Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive) (OJ 2002 L 108, p. 33).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2058/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-578/23, Česká republika – Generální finanční ředitelství: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 January 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud – Czech Republic) – Česká republika – Generální finanční ředitelství v Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public contracts – Directive 2004/18/EC – Article 31(1)(b) – Negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice – Conditions – Technical reasons – Reasons connected with the protection of exclusive rights – Attributable to the contracting authority – Factual and legal circumstances to be taken into consideration)
Date: 2025-01-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: award of contract, invitation to tender, services contract, tendering








C_202501204EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1204


3.3.2025






Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 January 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud – Czech Republic) – Česká republika – Generální finanční ředitelství v Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže


(Case C-578/23,
                (1)
Česká republika – Generální finanční ředitelství)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Public contracts - Directive 2004/18/EC - Article 31(1)(b) - Negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice - Conditions - Technical reasons - Reasons connected with the protection of exclusive rights - Attributable to the contracting authority - Factual and legal circumstances to be taken into consideration)
(C/2025/1204)
Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Nejvyšší správní soud

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Česká republika – Generální finanční ředitelství

Defendant: Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže

Operative part of the judgment

Article 31(1)(b) of Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts
must be interpreted as meaning that in order to justify the use of the negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice, within the meaning of that provision, the contracting authority may not invoke the protection of exclusive rights where the reason for such protection is attributable to it. The attributing of such a reason is to be assessed on the basis not only of the factual and legal circumstances surrounding the conclusion of a contract for an initial service, but also of all those which characterise the period between the date of concluding that contract and the date on which the contracting authority chooses the procedure to be followed for the award of a subsequent public contract.


(1)  OJ C C/2023/1291.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1204/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
State aid – Decision to raise no objections
Date: 2025-01-09
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: European Economic Area, Norway, State aid, control of State aid, newspaper, publishing








C_202500223EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/223


9.1.2025






State aid – Decision to raise no objections
(C/2025/223)

The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:






Date of adoption of the decision


29 August 2024




Case No


92535




Decision No


123/24/COL




EFTA State


Norway




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


Amendments to the Production grant scheme for news and current affairs media 2023-2029




Legal basis


Act No. 153 of 18 December 2020 on economic support to the media, and Regulation on production grant for news and current affairs media




Type of measure


Scheme




Objective


Media diversity and -pluralism




Form of aid


Grant




Budget


NOK 400 million annually




Duration


Until 1 January 2029




Economic sectors


NACE 58.12 – publishing of newspapers




Name and address of the granting authority







Norwegian Media Authority




Nygata 4




1607 Fredrikstad




NORWAY








The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/223/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 8 January 2025
Date: 2025-01-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202500014EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/14


9.1.2025






Euro exchange rates (1)


            8 January 2025
         
(C/2025/14)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0286 




JPY


Japanese yen


162,94 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4608 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,83403 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,5125 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9379 




ISK


Iceland króna


145,10 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,7380 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,150 




HUF


Hungarian forint


416,25 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2765 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9739 




TRY


Turkish lira


36,3952 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6600 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4803 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,0018 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,8383 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4096 




KRW


South Korean won


1 503,50 




ZAR


South African rand


19,4357 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,5413 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 719,53 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6313 




PHP


Philippine peso


60,192 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


35,682 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,3075 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,0093 




INR


Indian rupee


88,3520 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/14/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-9/25: Action brought on 9 January 2025 – Kct v EUIPO (Movement of a clip window)
Date: 2025-01-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, glass, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, vehicle parts








C_202501122EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1122


24.2.2025






Action brought on 9 January 2025 – Kct v EUIPO (Movement of a clip window)


(Case T-9/25)

(C/2025/1122)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Kct GmbH & Co. KG (Rosenfeld, Germany) (represented by: M. Braun, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the EU motion mark, consisting of the movement of a clip window – Application No 18 906 690
         

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 October 2024 in Case R 740/2024-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1122/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-11/25, Jelgavas valstspilsētas pašvaldība: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) (Latvia) lodged on 9 January 2025 – Jelgavas valstspilsētas pašvaldība v Konkurences padome
Date: 2025-01-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: award of contract, dominant position, legal person, municipality, provision of services, public sector, services contract, waste management








C_202501748EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1748


31.3.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) (Latvia) lodged on 9 January 2025 – Jelgavas valstspilsētas pašvaldība v Konkurences padome


(Case C-11/25, Jelgavas valstspilsētas pašvaldība)

(C/2025/1748)
Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Augstākā tiesa (Senāts)

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant on a point of law and applicant at first instance: Jelgavas valstspilsētas pašvaldība

Other party in the appeal on a point of law and defendant at first instance: Konkurences padome

Questions referred

Must Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union be interpreted as meaning that, in view of the circumstances of the case, the scope of that provision includes a decision made by a subsidiary legal person under public law about how waste management in a municipal area is organised, which, in the present case, consisted of the decision to organise the provision of services through an in-house procedure, awarding the right to provide those services to a company partially owned by a city council?
In particular, can a city council be considered as acting as a market operator or undertaking within the meaning of Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union when it takes a decision to organise the provision of municipal waste management services by awarding, through an in-house procedure, the right to provide those services to a company that is partially owned by that city council?


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1748/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)