do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-876/24, Vueling Airlines: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 1 de Fuenlabrada (Spain) lodged on 18 December 2024 – I.G.V. v Vueling Airlines, S.A.
Date: 2024-12-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, carriage of passengers, carrier, civil liability, contract of carriage, digital contract, indemnification, jurisdiction, personal effects, traveller








C_202502177EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2177


22.4.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 1 de Fuenlabrada (Spain) lodged on 18 December 2024 – I.G.V. v Vueling Airlines, S.A.


(Case C-876/24, Vueling Airlines)

(C/2025/2177)
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 1 de Fuenlabrada

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: I.G.V.

Defendant: Vueling Airlines, S.A.

Questions referred







1.


Must Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 (1) be interpreted as meaning that the liability of a Community air carrier in respect of the carriage of passengers and their baggage is also to be governed by Article 33 of the Montreal Convention in the case of carriage within a Member State of the European Union?










2.


May Article 33(1) of the Montreal Convention be interpreted as meaning that the place where the carrier has a place of business through which the air transport contract has been entered into could be the principal and permanent residence of the passenger, if the contract was entered into online?










3.


Must Article 33(1) of the Montreal Convention be interpreted as meaning that the place where the carrier has a place of business through which the contract has been entered into refers to the place in which the principal obligation of carriage by air was contracted for and not the place in which the ancillary service, from which the carrier’s liability arises, was contracted for, if the latter place differs from the former?






(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 of 9 October 1997 on air carrier liability in the event of accidents (OJ 1997 L 285, p. 1), as amended by Regulation (EC) No 889/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 May 2002 (OJ 2002 L 140, p. 2).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2177/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
P10_TA(2024)0068 – EC-Pacific States Interim Partnership Agreement: accession of Tonga – European Parliament legislative resolution of 18 December 2024 on the draft Council decision on the accession of the Kingdom of Tonga to the Interim Partnership Agreement between the European Community, of the one part, and the Pacific States, of the other part (07921/2024 – C10-0055/2024 – 2024/0048(NLE)) (Consent)
Date: 2024-12-18
Institutions: Committee on Development, Committee on Fisheries, Committee on International Trade, European Parliament
Subjects: Tonga, accession to an agreement, cooperation agreement (EU), economic cooperation, interim agreement (EU)








C_202501984EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1984


11.4.2025






P10_TA(2024)0068

EC-Pacific States Interim Partnership Agreement: accession of Tonga


European Parliament legislative resolution of 18 December 2024 on the draft Council decision on the accession of the Kingdom of Tonga to the Interim Partnership Agreement between the European Community, of the one part, and the Pacific States, of the other part (07921/2024 – C10-0055/2024 – 2024/0048(NLE))


(Consent)

(C/2025/1984)



The European Parliament,







—


having regard to the draft Council decision (07921/2024),










—


having regard to the Interim Partnership Agreement between the European Community, of the one part, and the Pacific States, of the other part (1),










—


having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207(4) first subparagraph and Article 218(6) second subparagraph, point (a)(v) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C10-0055/2024),










—


having regard to Rule 107(1) and (4) and Rule 117(7) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A10-0023/2024),










1.


Gives its consent to the accession of the Kingdom of Tonga to the agreement;










2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Kingdom of Tonga.







(1)  
            OJ L 272, 16.10.2009, p. 2, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/agree_internation/2009/729/oj.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1984/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-654/24: Action brought on 18 December 2024 – Attilah v EUIPO – Bella Tawziaa II and Groupe Bellakhdar (4011 B552)
Date: 2024-12-18
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, coffee, foodstuff, processed food product, processed foodstuff, registered trade mark, rice, sugar, tea, trade-mark law








C_202500745EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/745


10.2.2025






Action brought on 18 December 2024 – Attilah v EUIPO – Bella Tawziaa II and Groupe Bellakhdar (4011 B552)


(Case T-654/24)

(C/2025/745)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Driss El Hakmaoui Attilah (Alicante, Spain) (represented by: L. Flores Dreosti, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Bella Tawziaa II, SLU (Marbella, Spain) and Groupe Bellakhdar CO, Sarl (Casablanca, Morocco)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Figurative mark 4011 B552 – EU trade mark No 11 674 413
         

Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 October 2024 in Case R 403/2024-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision, rejecting the application for a declaration of invalidity of the trade mark at issue;










—


order the defendant to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/745/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)