do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-659/24: Action brought on 18 December 2024 – Bloom v Commission
Date: 2024-12-18
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: France, Mediterranean Sea, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, catch area, derogation from EU law, environmental protection, fishing net, fishing rights, sea fishing, territorial waters








C_202501437EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1437


10.3.2025






Action brought on 18 December 2024 – Bloom v Commission


(Case T-659/24)

(C/2025/1437)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Bloom (Paris, France) (represented by: F. Lafforgue, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the European Commission’s decision of 18 October 2024 to reject the request for internal review, for the purposes of Article 2(1)(g) of the Aarhus Regulation, concerning Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1382 of 23 May 2024 extending a derogation from Council Regulation (EC) No 1967/2006 as regards the prohibition to fish above protected habitats, the minimum distance from the coast and the minimum sea depth for the ‘gangui’ trawlers in certain territorial waters of France (Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur);










—


order the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law alleging an error of law and a manifest error of assessment by the Commission in that it considered that the implementing regulation does not contravene environmental law. The plea in law is divided into two parts:






—


the applicant claims, principally, that the derogation granted concerns, inter alia, an area covered by two protected marine areas falling within the scope of Article 4(4) of Regulation (EC) 1967/2006, in respect of which no derogation may be granted. The applicant further claims, in that regard, that even if it were considered that the derogation for trawl fishing above Posidonia seagrass beds can apply to protected marine areas falling within the scope of paragraph 4, those two protected marine areas have been designated not only for the conservation of the Posidonia seagrass beds, but also for other types of seagrass beds, in particular Cymodocea nodosa and coralligenous habitats. According to the applicant, no derogation may be granted for trawl fishing in the protected marine areas for the conservation of those habitats.










—


the applicant claims, in the alternative, that the implementing regulation is unlawful in that it does not limit the derogation.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1437/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.115637
Date: 2024-12-18
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Estonia, State aid, beverage industry, control of State aid, food production, leather industry








C_202407458EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7458


18.12.2024






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.115637
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/7458)








Date of adoption of the decision


4.10.2024




Aid number


SA.115637




Member State


Estonia




Region


Estonia




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Perioodi 2023–2027 kvaliteedikava raames toodetud toote teavitus- ja müügiedenduse toetus




Legal basis


Euroopa Liidu ühise põllumajanduspoliitika rakendamise seadus




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Aid for promotion measures in favour of agricultural products




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 3 000 000  EUR
Annual budget: 750 000  EUR




Intensity


70,0 %




Duration


Until 31.12.2029




Economic sectors


Manufacture of food products, Manufacture of beverages, Manufacture of leather and related products




Name and address of the granting authority







Põllumajanduse registrite ja informatsiooni amet




Tähe 4, Tartu 51010








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7458/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
P10_TA(2024)0071 – EC-Pacific States Interim Partnership Agreement: accession of Tuvalu – European Parliament legislative resolution of 18 December 2024 on the draft Council decision on the accession of Tuvalu to the Interim Partnership Agreement between the European Community, of the one part, and the Pacific States, of the other part (05757/2024 – C9-0033/2024 – 2023/0456(NLE)) (Consent)
Date: 2024-12-18
Institutions: Committee on Development, Committee on International Trade, European Parliament
Subjects: Tuvalu, accession to an agreement, cooperation agreement (EU), economic cooperation, interim agreement (EU)








C_202501987EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1987


11.4.2025






P10_TA(2024)0071
EC-Pacific States Interim Partnership Agreement: accession of Tuvalu
European Parliament legislative resolution of 18 December 2024 on the draft Council decision on the accession of Tuvalu to the Interim Partnership Agreement between the European Community, of the one part, and the Pacific States, of the other part (05757/2024 – C9-0033/2024 – 2023/0456(NLE))
(Consent)
(C/2025/1987)



The European Parliament,







—


having regard to the draft Council decision (05757/2024),










—


having regard to the Interim Partnership Agreement between the European Community, of the one part, and the Pacific States, of the other part (1),










—


having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 207(4), in conjunction with point (a)(v) of the second subparagraph of Article 218(6) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0033/2024),










—


having regard to Rule 107(1) and (4) and Rule 117(7) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A10-0025/2024),











1.


Gives its consent to Tuvalu’s accession to the agreement;










2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Tuvalu.






(1)  
            OJ L 272, 16.10.2009, p. 2, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/agree_internation/2009/729/oj.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1987/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-520/23: Judgment of the General Court of 18 December 2024 – Hecht Pharma v EUIPO – Gufic BioSciences (H 15 Gufic) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark H 15 Gufic – Genuine use of a mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Public and outward use – Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the mark was registered)
Date: 2024-12-18
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, medicinal product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202500912EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/912


17.2.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 18 December 2024 – Hecht Pharma v EUIPO – Gufic BioSciences (H 15 Gufic)


(Case T-520/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU figurative mark H 15 Gufic - Genuine use of a mark - Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Public and outward use - Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the mark was registered)
(C/2025/912)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Hecht Pharma GmbH (Bremervörde, Germany) (represented by: C. Sachs and J. Sachs, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Ringelhann, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Gufic Biosciences Ltd. (Mumbai, India) (represented by: A. Wehlau and T. Uhlenhut, lawyers)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and the alteration of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 13 June 2023 (Case R 902/2021-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Hecht Pharma GmbH to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2023/69, 9.10.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/912/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to Notice on Information gathering in relation to Information and Communication Technology goods subject to import duties by India and on possible EU commercial policy measures under Regulation (EU) No 654/2014 (OJ C, C/2024/90106, 12.12.2024)
Date: 2024-12-18
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: GATT, India, consultation of information, data collection, export (EU), goods, import, import levy, information technology, trade dispute








C_202490106EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/90106


18.12.2024






Corrigendum to Notice on Information gathering in relation to Information and Communication Technology goods subject to import duties by India and on possible EU commercial policy measures under Regulation (EU) No 654/2014

(
Official Journal of the European Union C, C/2024/7450, 12 December 2024
)


On page 1, under ‘Deadline to submit the information’:
for:


                  ‘60 days from the date of publication of this notice in the Official Journal of the European Union. [To be updated with precise date after OJ publication.]’,

read:


                  ‘
                  10 February 2025, 23:59 (CET)’.



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7450/corrigendum/2024-12-18/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
P10_TA(2024)0069 – United Nations Convention on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration – European Parliament legislative resolution of 18 December 2024 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the United Nations Convention on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration (07011/2024 – C10-0080/2024 – 2015/0012(NLE)) (Consent)
Date: 2024-12-18
Institutions: Committee on International Trade, European Parliament
Subjects: EU Member State, UN convention, administrative transparency, arbitration, commercial arbitration, foreign investment, international trade law, ratification of an agreement, third country








C_202501985EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1985


11.4.2025






P10_TA(2024)0069

United Nations Convention on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration


European Parliament legislative resolution of 18 December 2024 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the United Nations Convention on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration (07011/2024 – C10-0080/2024 – 2015/0012(NLE))


(Consent)

(C/2025/1985)



The European Parliament,







—


having regard to the draft Council decision (07011/2024),










—


having regard to the United Nations Convention on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration (07012/2024),










—


having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207(4) first subparagraph and Article 218(6) second subparagraph, point (a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C10-0080/2024),










—


having regard to Rule 107(1) and (4) and Rule 117(7) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A10-0021/2024),











1.


Gives its consent to the conclusion of the agreement;










2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States, as well as to the UNCITRAL Secretariat.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1985/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-346/24: Order of the President of the Court of 18 December 2024 – European Commission v Ireland
Date: 2024-12-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: infringement of EU law, national implementing measure, territorial waters, water management, water protection, water resources, watercourse








C_202501751EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1751


31.3.2025






Order of the President of the Court of 18 December 2024 – European Commission v Ireland


(Case C-346/24)
                (1)

(C/2025/1751)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C C/2024/3906.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1751/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-560/21: Judgment of the General Court of 18 December 2024 – TB v ENISA (Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Recruitment – Vacancy notice – Rejection of application – Action for annulment – Representation of an institution by one of its agents – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of good administration – Liability – Non-material damage)
Date: 2024-12-18
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: administrator, admissibility, competition (EU), executive, indemnification, job vacancy, recruitment, servant (EU)








C_202501095EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1095


24.2.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 18 December 2024 – TB v ENISA


(Case T-560/21)
                (1)

(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Recruitment - Vacancy notice - Rejection of application - Action for annulment - Representation of an institution by one of its agents - Interest in bringing proceedings - Admissibility - Obligation to state reasons - Principle of good administration - Liability - Non-material damage)
(C/2025/1095)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: TB (represented by: L. Levi and N. Flandin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (represented by: C. Chalanouli, acting as Agent, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

By her action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks (i) the annulment, first, of the decision of the Selection Board of the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) of 10 November 2020 not to place her name on the list of successful candidates in respect of the post of Head of Unit ‘Executive Director Office’ and, second, in essence, of the decision of the Selection Board of ENISA of 12 January 2021 not to accept her application for the post of Head of Unit ‘Corporate Support Services’, and (ii) compensation for the non-material damage which she claims to have suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Selection Board of the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) not to place TB’s name on the list of successful candidates in respect of the post of Head of Unit ‘Executive Director Office’ (ENISA-TA70-AD-2020-04);










2.


Annuls the decision of the Selection Board of ENISA not to accept TB’s application for the post of Head of Unit ‘Corporate Support Services’ (ENISA-TA71-AD-2020-05);










3.


Dismisses the remainder of the claims set out in the application;










4.


Orders ENISA to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 481, 29.11.2021.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1095/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-134/23: Judgment of the General Court of 18 December 2024 – Institut Jožef Stefan v Commission (Award of grants in the field of defence – EDF – Funding of research actions – Call for proposals EDF-2021-MCBRN-R – Rejection of the applicant’s proposal on account of non-compliance with the admissibility conditions and criteria – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of sound administration – Right to be heard – Error of assessment)
Date: 2024-12-18
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Development Fund, European defence policy, call for proposals, consortium, research project, rights of the defence








C_202500909EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/909


17.2.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 18 December 2024 – Institut Jožef Stefan v Commission


(Case T-134/23)
                (1)

(Award of grants in the field of defence - EDF - Funding of research actions - Call for proposals EDF-2021-MCBRN-R - Rejection of the applicant’s proposal on account of non-compliance with the admissibility conditions and criteria - Obligation to state reasons - Principle of sound administration - Right to be heard - Error of assessment)
(C/2025/909)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Institut Jožef Stefan (Ljubljana, Slovenia) (represented by: A. Bochon, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Tricot, E. Stamate and T. Isacu de Groot, Agents)

Re:

By its action brought pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, coordinator of the PANDORA consortium, seeks annulment of the Decision of the European Commission of 3 January 2023 rejecting the project proposal with reference 101075036-PANDORA, submitted in response to European Defence Fund (EDF) call for proposals EDF-2021-MCBRN-R.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Institut Jožef Stefan to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 271, 31.7.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/909/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11765 – SEGRO / PSPIB / REGENSBURG ASSET)
Date: 2024-12-18
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Canada, Germany, economic concentration, investment company, logistics, merger control, pension scheme, property leasing, real estate business, storage








C_202407557EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7557


23.12.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11765 – SEGRO / PSPIB / REGENSBURG ASSET)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/7557)

On 18 December 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11765. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7557/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-658/24: Action brought on 18 December 2024 – Warbud v Frontex
Date: 2024-12-18
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: award of contract, public procurement, tendering








C_202501436EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1436


10.3.2025






Action brought on 18 December 2024 – Warbud v Frontex


(Case T-658/24)

(C/2025/1436)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Warbud S.A. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: K. Kuźma, M. Gajdek, W. Hartung and D. Sarmiento Ramírez-Escudero, lawyers)

Defendant: European Border and Coast Guard Agency

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare Frontex’s decision, notified to the applicant on 23 October 2024, not to award the contract to the applicant in the award procedure FRONTEX/CD/1217/2021/RS – FRONTEX Permanent Premises, and award it to another tenderer, void pursuant to Article 264 TFEU;










—


order the defendant to bear the applicant’s costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging that the contested decision breaches Article 296 TFEU, inasmuch Frontex infringed its duty to state the reasons that justify that the successful tenderer’s proposal was not considered abnormally low and that the applicant’s tender was not considered successful.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging that the contested decision breaches Paragraph 23.1 of Annex I of Regulation 2018/1046 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018, on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, inasmuch Frontex failed to review the successful tenderer’s offer to determine it as abnormally low.






(1)  Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, amending Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014, and Decision No 541/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 (OJ 2018, L 193, p. 1).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1436/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)