do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Judgment of the Court of 12 December 2024 in Case E-8/24 – Nordsjø Fjordbruk AS v The Norwegian State, represented by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries (Nærings- og fiskeridepartementet) (Animal health law – Regulation (EU) 2016/429 – Article 10 – Article 181 – Article 269 – Right of national competent authorities to prohibit movement of farmed fish between aquaculture establishments)
Date: 2024-12-12
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: European Economic Area, Norway, disease prevention, fish, fish disease, fish farming, fishery management, transport of animals, veterinary inspection








C_202502029EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2029


3.4.2025







            JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
         
of 12 December 2024
         
in Case E-8/24
Nordsjø Fjordbruk AS v The Norwegian State, represented by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries (Nærings- og fiskeridepartementet)


(Animal health law – Regulation (EU) 2016/429 – Article 10 – Article 181 – Article 269 – Right of national competent authorities to prohibit movement of farmed fish between aquaculture establishments)


(C/2025/2029)

In Case E-8/24, Nordsjø Fjordbruk AS v the Norwegian State, represented by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries (Nærings- og fiskeridepartemented) – REQUEST to the Court under Article 34 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice by the Supreme Court of Norway (Norges Høyesterett), concerning the interpretation of Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on transmissible animal diseases and amending and repealing certain acts in the area of animal health (‘Animal Health Law’), the Court, composed of Páll Hreinsson, President (Judge-Rapporteur), Bernd Hammermann and Michael Reiertsen, Judges, gave judgment on 12 December 2024, the operative part of which is as follows:
Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on transmissible animal diseases and amending and repealing certain acts in the area of animal health (‘Animal Health Law’), and in particular Article 269(1) thereof, permits the competent authorities to adopt a measure such as that at issue in the main proceedings, namely refusing to approve an operating plan of an aquaculture establishment at sea because the implementation of the operating plan would entail an unacceptable risk of the spread of disease. However, such a measure must comply with the requirements of the Regulation as regards risk assessment and management, and therefore in particular result from a specific risk assessment that is objective, independent and transparent and must not be based on a mere hypothetical risk.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2029/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-680/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 December 2024 – DD v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (Appeal – Civil service – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union – Members of the temporary staff – Disciplinary proceedings – Administrative investigation – Concept of plagiarism – Appointment by the appointing authority of an investigator with whom it has a business relationship – Conflict of interest – Article 41(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Objective impartiality – Article 17a – Official’s freedom of expression – Articles 11, 12 and 21 – Respect for the principles of loyalty and impartiality)
Date: 2024-12-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: conflict of interest, disciplinary proceedings, dismissal, freedom of expression, servant (EU), staff regulations (EU)








C_202500688EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/688


10.2.2025






Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 December 2024 – DD v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA)


(Case C-680/22 P)
                (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union - Members of the temporary staff - Disciplinary proceedings - Administrative investigation - Concept of ‘plagiarism’ - Appointment by the appointing authority of an investigator with whom it has a business relationship - Conflict of interest - Article 41(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Objective impartiality - Article 17a - Official’s freedom of expression - Articles 11, 12 and 21 - Respect for the principles of loyalty and impartiality)
(C/2025/688)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: DD (represented by: N. Lorenz, Rechtsanwältin)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (represented initially by M. O’Flaherty, and subsequently by S. Rautio, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, Rechtsanwalt)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders DD to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA).






(1)  
            OJ C 71, 27.2.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/688/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-527/23, Weatherford Atlas Gip: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 December 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Prahova – Romania) – Weatherford Atlas Gip SA v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală – Direcţia Generală de Soluţionare a Contestaţiilor, Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală – Direcţia Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 168 – Right to deduct VAT – Purchase of administrative services provided within the same group of companies – Refusal of the right of deduction)
Date: 2024-12-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, basis of tax assessment, group of companies, provision of services, tax relief








C_202500697EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/697


10.2.2025






Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 December 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Prahova – Romania) – Weatherford Atlas Gip SA v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală – Direcţia Generală de Soluţionare a Contestaţiilor, Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală – Direcţia Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili


(Case C-527/23,
                (1)
Weatherford Atlas Gip)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 168 - Right to deduct VAT - Purchase of administrative services provided within the same group of companies - Refusal of the right of deduction)
(C/2025/697)
Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Tribunalul Prahova

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Weatherford Atlas Gip SA

Defendants: Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală – Direcţia Generală de Soluţionare a Contestaţiilor, Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală – Direcţia Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili

Operative part of the judgment

Article 168 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as precluding national legislation or a national practice under which the tax authority refuses the right to deduct input value added tax paid by a taxable person when acquiring services from other taxable persons belonging to the same group of companies on the grounds that those services were supplied at the same time to other companies in that group and that their purchase was not necessary or appropriate, where it is established that those services are used by that taxable person for the purposes of its own taxed output transactions.


(1)  OJ C C/2023/748.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/697/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
NOTICE PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 29(2) OF THE STAFF REGULATIONS – Publication of a vacancy for a function of Director Resources (AD 14) in the Directorate-General Translation (DG DGT) – COM/2024/10459
Date: 2024-12-12
Institutions: Directorate-General for Human Resources and Security, European Commission
Subjects: Luxembourg, administrator, competition (EU), job vacancy, managing director, recruitment, translation








C_202407436EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7436


12.12.2024






NOTICE PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 29(2) OF THE STAFF REGULATIONS
Publication of a vacancy for a function of Director ‘Resources’ (AD 14) in the Directorate-General Translation (DG DGT)
COM/2024/10459
(C/2024/7436)


          
      
The European Commission has published a vacancy notice (reference COM/2024/10459) for a function of Director ‘Resources’ (AD 14) in Luxembourg.
To consult the text of the vacancy notice in 24 languages and to submit your application, please visit this dedicated webpage on the European Commission’s website: https://europa.eu/!B6PwDP.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7436/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-772/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 December 2024 – European Association of Non-Integrated Metal Importers & Distributors (Euranimi) v European Commission (Appeal – Common rules for imports – Safeguard measures – Regulation (EU) 2015/478 – Article 19(2) – Extension of a safeguard measure – Conditions – Steel products market – Import of certain steel products – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1029)
Date: 2024-12-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: import (EU), iron and steel product, originating product, surveillance concerning imports, tariff quota








C_202500699EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/699


10.2.2025






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 December 2024 – European Association of Non-Integrated Metal Importers & Distributors (Euranimi) v European Commission


(Case C-772/23 P)
                (1)

(Appeal - Common rules for imports - Safeguard measures - Regulation (EU) 2015/478 - Article 19(2) - Extension of a safeguard measure - Conditions - Steel products market - Import of certain steel products - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1029)
(C/2025/699)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: European Association of Non-Integrated Metal Importers & Distributors (represented by: M. Campa and V. Villante, avvocati, and by D. Rovetta, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: G. Luengo and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:
Dismisses the appeal.
Orders European Association of Non-Integrated Metal Importers & Distributors (Euranimi) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.


(1)  OJ C, C/2024/1089.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/699/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 11 December 2024
Date: 2024-12-12
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202407245EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7245


12.12.2024






Euro exchange rates (1)


            11 December 2024
         
(C/2024/7245)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0507 




JPY


Japanese yen


160,35 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4574 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,82458 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,5165 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9280 




ISK


Iceland króna


145,90 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,7120 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,117 




HUF


Hungarian forint


409,48 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2643 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9674 




TRY


Turkish lira


36,6380 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6525 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4905 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,1677 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,8180 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4114 




KRW


South Korean won


1 502,88 




ZAR


South African rand


18,6794 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,6318 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 740,07 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6578 




PHP


Philippine peso


61,266 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


35,603 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,3431 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,2325 




INR


Indian rupee


89,1495 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7245/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-910/24, Calmit Hungária Mészművek: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Győri Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 12 December 2024 – Calmit Hungária Mészművek Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága
Date: 2024-12-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Emissions Trading Scheme, EU emission allowance, Hungary, greenhouse gas, loss, oxide, right to property, state of emergency, subsidiary, tradeable emission permit








C_202501747EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1747


31.3.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Győri Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 12 December 2024 – Calmit Hungária Mészművek Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága


(Case C-910/24, Calmit Hungária Mészművek)

(C/2025/1747)
Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Győri Törvényszék

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Calmit Hungária Mészművek Kft.

Defendant: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága

Questions referred







(1)


Should Articles 49 TFEU, 54 TFEU and 56 TFEU and Article 16(1) of Directive 2006/123/EC (1) on services in the internal market be interpreted as meaning that, if legislation of a Member State, invoking an emergency situation, establishes liability for a carbon dioxide quota tax on the basis of average annual carbon dioxide emissions and the free allocation of emission allowances equivalent to a minimum of 50 % of the average total carbon dioxide emissions, in such a way that the aforementioned liability has the effect that only subsidiaries – manufacturing and selling lime products in Hungary – of companies established in other Member States of the European Union are taxed, such legislation complies with those provisions?










(2)


Should Article 1 and Article 10b(1) of Directive 2003/87/EC (2) establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC of the Council, and Articles 16 and 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, be interpreted as meaning that, if legislation of a Member State, invoking an emergency situation, establishes liability for a carbon dioxide quota tax on the basis, in particular, of the free allocation of emission allowances equivalent to a minimum of 50 % of average total carbon dioxide emissions, which leads to operating at a loss and loss of profits only in the case of subsidiaries – manufacturing and selling lime products in Hungary – of companies established in other Member States of the European Union, such legislation complies with those provisions?






(1)  
            OJ 2006 L 376, p. 36.

(2)  
            OJ 2003 L 275, p. 32.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1747/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)