do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Corrigendum to Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2023/381 of 20 February 2023 implementing Decision 2011/235/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Iran (OJ L 51 I, 20.2.2023)
Date: 2024-11-28
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Iran, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person, natural person




L_202490766EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2024/90766


28.11.2024






Corrigendum to Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2023/381 of 20 February 2023 implementing Decision 2011/235/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Iran
(
Official Journal of the European Union L 51 I of 20 February 2023
)

On page 38, in the Annex, in entry 176, in the column ‘Name’:







for:





                           ‘KARIMI Farzin





(a.k.a. KARIMI MAZLGHANCHAY Farzin)’,












read:





                           ‘KARIMI Farzin





(a.k.a. KARIMI MAZALGHANCHAY Farzin)’.







ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec_impl/2023/381/corrigendum/2024-11-28/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Case C-622/23, rhtb: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 November 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof – Austria) – rhtb: projekt gmbh v Parkring 14-16 Immobilienverwaltung GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 2(1)(c) – Scope – Taxable transactions – Contract for services for the carrying out of a building project – Termination of the contract by the customer – Concept of remuneration – Characterisation – Obligation to pay the total amount agreed after deduction of the costs saved by the supplier – Article 73 – Taxable amount)
Date: 2024-11-28
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, provision of services, taxable income








C_202500371EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/371


27.1.2025






Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 November 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof – Austria) – rhtb: projekt gmbh v Parkring 14-16 Immobilienverwaltung GmbH


(Case C-622/23,
                (1)
rhtb)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 2(1)(c) - Scope - Taxable transactions - Contract for services for the carrying out of a building project - Termination of the contract by the customer - Concept of ‘remuneration’ - Characterisation - Obligation to pay the total amount agreed after deduction of the costs saved by the supplier - Article 73 - Taxable amount)
(C/2025/371)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: rhtb: projekt gmbh

Defendant: Parkring 14-16 Immobilienverwaltung GmbH

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(1)(c) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax
must be interpreted as meaning that the amount contractually due following the termination, by the recipient of a supply of services, of a contract validly concluded for that supply of services, subject to value added tax, which the supplier had begun providing and which it was prepared to complete, must be regarded as constituting the remuneration for a supply of services for consideration, within the meaning of Directive 2006/112.


(1)  OJ C C/2023/1438.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/371/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Notice amending the publication of a vacancy for the function of Director-General of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) (grade AD 15) – Engagement of a Temporary Agent – (Article 2(a) of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants) – COM/2024/10450 (OJ C, C/2024/6496, 31.10.2024)
Date: 2024-11-28
Institutions: Directorate-General for Human Resources and Security, European Commission
Subjects: European Anti-fraud Office, administrator, competition (EU), job vacancy, managing director, recruitment, servant (EU)








C_202407199EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7199


28.11.2024






Notice amending the publication of a vacancy for the function of Director-General of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) (grade AD 15) – Engagement of a Temporary Agent – (Article 2(a) of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants) – COM/2024/10450

(
Official Journal of the European Union C, C/2024/6496, 31 October 2024
)

(C/2024/7199)

On page 5, ‘Closing date’:
for:


                  ‘The closing date for registration is 
                     29 November 2024, 12.00 noon Brussels time, following which registration is no longer possible.’,

read:


                  ‘The closing date for registration is 
                     6 December 2024, 12.00 noon Brussels time, following which registration is no longer possible.’.



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7199/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 27 November 2024
Date: 2024-11-28
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202406710EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6710


28.11.2024






Euro exchange rates (1)


            27 November 2024
         
(C/2024/6710)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0531 




JPY


Japanese yen


159,65 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4583 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,83400 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,5290 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9309 




ISK


Iceland króna


144,70 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,6900 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,267 




HUF


Hungarian forint


412,08 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3120 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9768 




TRY


Turkish lira


36,4981 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6247 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4807 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,1949 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7893 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4147 




KRW


South Korean won


1 466,33 




ZAR


South African rand


19,1091 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,6347 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 705,22 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6784 




PHP


Philippine peso


61,870 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,327 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,1293 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,8466 




INR


Indian rupee


88,8940 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6710/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-427/23: Order of the General Court of 28 November 2024 – SJ v Commission (Action for annulment – Directive 2014/25/EU – Procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors – Request to establish that Directive 2014/25 does not apply to public procurement in the field of railway passenger transport in Sweden – Article 35(1) of Directive 2014/25 – Letter from the Commission requesting additional information – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility)
Date: 2024-11-28
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Sweden, award of contract, carriage of passengers, public procurement, rail transport








C_202500913EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/913


17.2.2025






Order of the General Court of 28 November 2024 – SJ v Commission


(Case T-427/23)
                (1)

(Action for annulment - Directive 2014/25/EU - Procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors - Request to establish that Directive 2014/25 does not apply to public procurement in the field of railway passenger transport in Sweden - Article 35(1) of Directive 2014/25 - Letter from the Commission requesting additional information - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility)
(C/2025/913)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: SJ AB (Stockholm, Sweden) (represented by: J. Karlsson and M. Johansson, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Wils, S. Baches Opi and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the purported decision of the European Commission contained in the letter sent by the latter to the former on 10 May 2023 requesting updated information from the applicant following the judgment of 1 February 2023, SJ v Commission (T-659/20, not published, EU:T:2023:32).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


SJ AB shall pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2023/141, 16.10.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/913/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Joined Cases C-129/23 and C-567/23, BG Technik and Others: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 November 2024 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud and the Krajský soud v Ostravě – Czech Republic) – BG Technik cs a.s. v Generální ředitelství cel (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Common Customs Tariff – Combined Nomenclature – Classification of goods – Tariff heading 8703 – Motor cars and other motor vehicles principally designed for the transport of persons – Tariff heading 8713 – Carriages for disabled persons – Regulation (EC) No 718/2009 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1367 – SELVO 4800 vehicle – Concept of disabled persons)
Date: 2024-11-28
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, common customs tariff, disabled person, electric vehicle, motor vehicle, personal mobility device, specification of tariff heading








C_202500365EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/365


27.1.2025






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 November 2024 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud and the Krajský soud v Ostravě – Czech Republic) – BG Technik cs a.s. v Generální ředitelství cel


(Joined Cases C-129/23 and C-567/23,
                (1)
BG Technik and Others)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Customs union - Common Customs Tariff - Combined Nomenclature - Classification of goods - Tariff heading 8703 - Motor cars and other motor vehicles principally designed for the transport of persons - Tariff heading 8713 - Carriages for disabled persons - Regulation (EC) No 718/2009 - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1367 - SELVO 4800 vehicle - Concept of ‘disabled persons’)
(C/2025/365)
Language of the case: Czech

Referring courts

Nejvyšší správní soud and Krajský soud v Ostravě

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: BG Technik cs a.s.

Defendant: Generální ředitelství cel

Operative part of the judgment

Heading 8713 of the Combined Nomenclature set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, in the version resulting from Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 927/2012 of 9 October 2012, Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1001/2013 of 4 October 2013, Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1101/2014 of 16 October 2014, and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1577 of 21 September 2020,
must be interpreted as meaning that it does not cover a product such as a four-wheel vehicle with an electric motor, which has one seat, which is adjustable and rotating and fitted with armrests, a separate steering column and an automatic electro-magnetic brake on the rear wheels, which are designed to prevent tipping, which is controlled with the use of handlebars of an oval, closed shape, mounted on the steering column, and of which the maximum speed is over 10 km/h, without however, surpassing 16 km/h.


(1)  
            OJ C 216, 19.6.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/365/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-49/24, Rzecznik Finansowy: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 November 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy – Poland) – Rzecznik Finansowy (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Effects of a finding that a term is unfair – Bank credit agreement containing unfair terms – Nullity of that agreement – Claims for restitution – Right of retention – Article 267 TFEU – Legal question put to a Supreme Court – No dispute – Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2024-11-28
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer credit, consumer protection, higher court, unfair terms of contract








C_202500519EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/519


3.2.2025






Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 November 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy – Poland) – Rzecznik Finansowy


(Case C-49/24,
                (1)
Rzecznik Finansowy)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Directive 93/13/EEC - Unfair terms in consumer contracts - Effects of a finding that a term is unfair - Bank credit agreement containing unfair terms - Nullity of that agreement - Claims for restitution - Right of retention - Article 267 TFEU - Legal question put to a Supreme Court - No dispute - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2025/519)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Najwyższy

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Rzecznik Finansowy

Interested party: Prokurator Generalny

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland), by decision of 6 October 2023, is manifestly inadmissible.


(1)  Date lodged: 25 January 2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/519/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-526/23, VariusSystems: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 November 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof – Austria) – VariusSystems digital solutions GmbH v GR, owner of the undertaking B & G (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Special jurisdiction – Claim in matters relating to a contract – Second indent of Article 7(1)(b) – Contract for the provision of services – Software developed in one Member State and adapted to the needs of a customer residing in another Member State – Place of performance)
Date: 2024-11-28
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: civil proceedings, contract, judicial cooperation in civil matters in the EU, jurisdiction, provision of services, residence, software








C_202500370EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/370


27.1.2025






Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 November 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof – Austria) – VariusSystems digital solutions GmbH v GR, owner of the undertaking B & G


(Case C-526/23,
                (1)
VariusSystems)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments - Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 - Special jurisdiction - Claim in matters relating to a contract - Second indent of Article 7(1)(b) - Contract for the provision of services - Software developed in one Member State and adapted to the needs of a customer residing in another Member State - Place of performance)
(C/2025/370)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: VariusSystems digital solutions GmbH

Defendant: GR, owner of the undertaking B & G

Operative part of the judgment

The second indent of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters
must be interpreted as meaning that the ‘place of performance’ of a contract for the development and ongoing operation of software designed to meet the needs of a customer established in a Member State other than that in which the company that created, designed and programmed that software is established is the place where that customer accesses the software, that is to say, consults and uses it.


(1)  OJ C C/2023/127.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/370/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.115710
Date: 2024-11-28
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Malta, State aid, control of State aid, livestock farming








C_202407121EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7121


28.11.2024






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.115710
(C/2024/7121)








Date of adoption of the decision


28.10.2024




Aid number


SA.115710




Member State


Malta




Region


Malta




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


State Aid for the Voluntary Dairy Cessation Scheme




Legal basis


Agriculture and Fishing Industries (Financial Assistance) Act, CAP 146 of the Laws of Malta (attached as Annex A).




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Agriculture; Forestry; Rural areas, Aid for closing of capacity for other reasons




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 6 000 000  EUR
Annual budget: 3 000 000  EUR




Intensity


100,0 %




Duration


Until 31.12.2025




Economic sectors


Raising of dairy cattle




Name and address of the granting authority







Agriculture and Rural Payments Agency




Luqa Road, Qormi, Malta








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7121/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-820/24, Strominator Elektro: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Austria) lodged on 28 November 2024 – Strominator Elektro GmbH v Bundesimmobiliengesellschaft mbH
Date: 2024-11-28
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU competition policy, invoicing, public contract, public procurement, remuneration of work








C_202500896EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/896


17.2.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Austria) lodged on 28 November 2024 – Strominator Elektro GmbH v Bundesimmobiliengesellschaft mbH


(Case C-820/24, Strominator Elektro)

(C/2025/896)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Strominator Elektro GmbH

Contracting authority: Bundesimmobiliengesellschaft mbH

Successful tenderer: Fiegl & Spielberger GmbH

Questions referred







1.


Is Article 72(5) of Directive 2014/24/EU (1) to be interpreted as meaning that a modification of a public contract after the end of the agreed performance period, the provision of non-cancelled services and the submission of the final invoice by the contractor but before the payment of the remuneration by the contracting authority is to be classed as modification of a public contract ‘during its term’?
If the answer to Question 1 is in the affirmative:










2.


Is Article 72(1)(c)(i) of Directive 2014/24/EU to be interpreted as meaning that circumstances which a diligent contracting authority ‘could not foresee’ also cover external circumstances which have arisen before the conclusion of the contract but whose repercussions on the public contract become apparent only after the contract has been concluded?
If the answers to Questions 1 and 2 are both in the affirmative:










3.


Is Article 72(1)(c)(i) of Directive 2014/24/EU, read in conjunction with Article 72(1)(c)(ii) of that directive, to be interpreted as meaning that there is ‘a need’ for modification of a public contract on account of circumstances which a diligent contracting authority could not foresee even if the modification is ‘appropriate’ but not ‘strictly necessary’, so long as the modification does not change the overall nature of the contract?






(1)  Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (OJ 2014 L 94, p. 65, corrigendum OJ 2022 L 192, p. 39).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/896/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-383/23: Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 November 2024 – Essilor International v EUIPO – Carl Zeiss Vision (MYOLUX)
Date: 2024-11-28
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, consultancy, optical industry, provision of services, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202500937EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/937


17.2.2025






Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 November 2024 – Essilor International v EUIPO – Carl Zeiss Vision (MYOLUX)


(Case T-383/23)
                (1)

(C/2025/937)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 304, 28.8.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/937/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)