do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-648/24, Ryanair: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Königs Wusterhausen (Germany) lodged on 27 November 2024 – EO and DC v Ryanair
Date: 2024-11-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: air traffic control, airline, carriage of passengers, carrier, civil aviation, indemnification, passenger rights, traveller








C_202501230EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1230


3.3.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Königs Wusterhausen (Germany) lodged on 27 November 2024 – EO and DC v Ryanair


(Case T-648/24, Ryanair)

(C/2025/1230)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Königs Wusterhausen

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: EO and DC

Defendant: Ryanair

Questions referred

The following questions are referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU on the interpretation of Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council: (1)







1.


Is a cancellation or a long delay equivalent to a cancellation always caused by extraordinary circumstances where the cancellation or long delay in arrival is due to slot allocations by the competent air traffic control authority, without the air carrier’s having triggered the delayed slot allocation[s] through circumstances for which it is itself responsible?










2.


In the event that the Court answers the first question in the negative:
Is a cancellation or a long delay equivalent to a cancellation always caused by extraordinary circumstances where the cancellation or long delay in arrival is due to slot allocations by the competent air traffic control authority, without the air carrier’s having triggered the delayed slot allocation[s] through circumstances for which it is itself responsible, and the air traffic control authority cites to the air carrier as the reason for the delay IATA Delay Code 81 (
                        ‘Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) due to ATC EN-ROUTE DEMAND/CAPACITY, standard demand/capacity problems’
                     )?






(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1230/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11778 – VREP / SÜDBG / DEKOM / DEKOM UNITED)
Date: 2024-11-27
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: audiovisual communications policy, consultancy, economic concentration, investment company, merger control, provision of services, video communications, video conference








C_202407286EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7286


4.12.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11778 – VREP / SÜDBG / DEKOM / DEKOM UNITED)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/7286)

On 27 November 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in German language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11778. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7286/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/379 of 20 February 2023 implementing Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran (OJ L 51 I, 20.2.2023)
Date: 2024-11-27
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Iran, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person, natural person








L_202490749EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2024/90749


27.11.2024






Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/379 of 20 February 2023 implementing Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran
(
Official Journal of the European Union L 51 I of 20 February 2023
)

On page 16, in the Annex, in entry 176, in the column ‘Name’:







for:





                           ‘KARIMI Farzin
فرزین کریمی مزلقان چای
(a.k.a. KARIMI MAZLGHANCHAY Farzin)’,












read:





                           ‘KARIMI Farzin
فرزین کریمی مزلقان چای
(a.k.a. KARIMI MAZALGHANCHAY Farzin)’.







ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2023/379/corrigendum/2024-11-27/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Case T-276/24: Judgment of the General Court of 27 November 2024 – Vino Vintana v EUIPO – Torrevento (SINCE 1974 PRIMITIVO DI MANDURIA) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark SINCE 1974 PRIMITIVO DI MANDURIA DENOMINAZIONE DI ORIGINE CONTROLLATA Una antica tradizione familiar – Absolute ground for invalidity – Lack of distinctive character – Article 52(1)(a) and Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(a) and Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Date: 2024-11-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, wine








C_202500567EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/567


3.2.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 27 November 2024 – Vino Vintana v EUIPO – Torrevento (SINCE 1974 PRIMITIVO DI MANDURIA)


(Case T-276/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark SINCE 1974 PRIMITIVO DI MANDURIA DENOMINAZIONE DI ORIGINE CONTROLLATA Una antica tradizione familiar - Absolute ground for invalidity - Lack of distinctive character - Article 52(1)(a) and Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(a) and Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(C/2025/567)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Vino Vintana AG (Ebikon, Switzerland) (represented by: F.-M. Orou, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: V. Ruzek, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Torrevento Srl (Corato, Italy)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 26 March 2024 (Case R 1483/2021-4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/4339, 15.7.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/567/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-799/21: Judgment of the General Court of 27 November 2024 – European Food v EUIPO – Société des produits Nestlé (FITNESS) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark FITNESS – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Submission of evidence for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2024-11-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cereal product, foodstuff, milk product, non-alcoholic beverage, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202500545EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/545


3.2.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 27 November 2024 – European Food v EUIPO – Société des produits Nestlé (FITNESS)


(Case T-799/21)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark FITNESS - Absolute grounds for invalidity - Submission of evidence for the first time before the Board of Appeal - Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/545)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: European Food SA (Păntășești, Romania) (represented by: I. Speciac, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: V. Ruzek, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Société des produits Nestlé SA (Vevey, Switzerland) (represented by: A. Jaeger-Lenz, A. Lambrecht and A.-C. Salger, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and alteration of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 12 October 2021 (Case R 894/2020-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 12 October 2021 (Case R 894/2020-1);










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders EUIPO and Société des produits Nestlé SA to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 84, 21.2.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/545/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-561/21: Judgment of the General Court of 27 November 2024 – HSBC Holdings and Others v Commission (Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Euro Interest Rate Derivatives sector – Decision establishing an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement – Failure to discharge the obligation to state reasons – Annulment in part of the decision by a judgment of the General Court – Amending decision – Fines – Limitation – Basic amount – Value of sales – Article 23(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Equal treatment – Proportionality – Unlimited jurisdiction)
Date: 2024-11-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Euribor, equal treatment, euro, financial derivative, interest, jurisdiction, limitation of legal proceedings, principle of proportionality, restriction on competition, sanction (EU)








C_202500544EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/544


3.2.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 27 November 2024 – HSBC Holdings and Others v Commission


(Case T-561/21)
                (1)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Euro Interest Rate Derivatives sector - Decision establishing an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - Failure to discharge the obligation to state reasons - Annulment in part of the decision by a judgment of the General Court - Amending decision - Fines - Limitation - Basic amount - Value of sales - Article 23(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Equal treatment - Proportionality - Unlimited jurisdiction)
(C/2025/544)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: HSBC Holdings plc (London, United Kingdom), HSBC Bank plc (London), HSBC Continental Europe (Paris, France) (represented by: M. Demetriou and D. Bailey, Barristers-at-Law, C. Angeli, M. Giner Asins and C. Chevreste, lawyers, and by M. Simpson, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Baumé, P. Berghe and M. Farley, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek, first, the annulment of Article 1 of Commission Decision C(2021) 4600 final of 28 June 2021 amending Commission Decision C(2016) 8530 final of 7 December 2016 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.39914 – Euro Interest Rate Derivatives) and the annulment of Article 2(b) of Commission Decision C(2016) 8530 final of 7 December 2016 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 [TFEU] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.39914 – Euro Interest Rate Derivatives (EIRD)), as amended, and, second, in the alternative, a reduction in the amount of the fine imposed on them in the 2021 Decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders HSBC Holdings plc, HSBC Bank plc and HSBC Continental Europe to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 431, 25.10.2021.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/544/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)