do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-455/24 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 26 November 2024 – Advanz Pharma v Commission (Interim relief – Medicinal products for human use – Orphan medicinal product for human use Ocaliva – obeticholic acid – Revocation of a conditional marketing authorisation – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency)
Date: 2024-11-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: acid, drug surveillance, market approval, medicinal product, orphan disease, withdrawal from the market








C_202500570EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/570


3.2.2025






Order of the President of the General Court of 26 November 2024 – Advanz Pharma v Commission


(Case T-455/24 R)

(Interim relief - Medicinal products for human use - Orphan medicinal product for human use ‘Ocaliva - obeticholic acid’ - Revocation of a conditional marketing authorisation - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)
(C/2025/570)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Advanz Pharma Ltd (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: J. Bourgeois and M. Meulenbelt, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lindenthal, A. Spina and E. Mathieu, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, the applicant seeks suspension of the operation of Commission Implementing Decision C(2024) 6281 final of 30 August 2024 revoking, under Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council, the conditional marketing authorisation, granted by Implementing Decision C(2016) 8685 final, for ‘Ocaliva – obeticholic acid’, an orphan medicinal product for human use.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


The order of 4 September 2024, Advanz Pharma v Commission (T-455/24 R), is cancelled.










3.


The costs are reserved.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/570/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-812/24, LIPOR and PreZero Portugal: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) lodged on 26 November 2024 – LIPOR – Associação de Municípios para a Gestão Sustentável de Resíduos do Grande Porto, PreZero Portugal, S.A. v Semural Waste & Energy, S.A.
Date: 2024-11-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative sanction, public procurement, subcontracting, subsidiary, tendering








C_202501629EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1629


24.3.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) lodged on 26 November 2024 – LIPOR – Associação de Municípios para a Gestão Sustentável de Resíduos do Grande Porto, PreZero Portugal, S.A. v Semural Waste & Energy, S.A.


(Case C-812/24, LIPOR and PreZero Portugal)

(C/2025/1629)
Language of the case: Portugal

Referring court

Supremo Tribunal Administrativo

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellants:

LIPOR – Associação de Municípios para a Gestão Sustentável de Resíduos do Grande Porto,
PreZero Portugal, S.A.

Respondent: Semural Waste & Energy, S.A.

Questions referred







1.


Must Article 63(1) of Directive [2014/24/EU] (1) be interpreted as meaning that a situation in which an economic operator wishes to make use, in the performance of a contract, of the facilities of an undertaking (separate legal person) whose the share capital is wholly owned by that economic operator and one of whose directors is also a director of that economic operator constitutes ‘reliance on the capacities of other entities’?










2.


If the regulatory requirements for reliance on the capacities of other entities are regarded as satisfied, must the fact that the economic operator has not submitted, along with the tender, the [European Single Procurement Document (ESPD)] for the wholly owned undertaking be sanctioned with exclusion from the procurement procedure?






(1)  Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (OJ 2014 L 94, p. 65).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1629/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-40/24, Derterti: Order of the President of the Court of 26 November 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione – Italy) – GE, other party: Procura generale della Corte di cassazione
Date: 2024-11-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European arrest warrant, appeal, carrying out of sentence, criminal proceedings, fundamental rights, imprisonment, lawyer, rights of the defence








C_202501090EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1090


24.2.2025






Order of the President of the Court of 26 November 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione – Italy) – GE, other party: Procura generale della Corte di cassazione


(Case C-40/24,
                (1)
Derterti)
                (2)

(C/2025/1090)
Language of the case: Italian
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C C/2024/2141.

(2)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1090/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
P10_TA(2024)0037 – Partial renewal of a member of the Court of Auditors – Iliana Ivanova – European Parliament decision of 26 November 2024 on the nomination of Iliana Ivanova as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C10-0123/2024 – 2024/0804(NLE)) (Consultation)
Date: 2024-11-26
Institutions: Committee on Budgetary Control, European Parliament
Subjects: appointment of members, member of the Court of Auditors (EU)








C_202501810EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1810


4.4.2025






P10_TA(2024)0037

Partial renewal of a member of the Court of Auditors – Iliana Ivanova


European Parliament decision of 26 November 2024 on the nomination of Iliana Ivanova as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C10-0123/2024 – 2024/0804(NLE))


(Consultation)

(C/2025/1810)



The European Parliament,







—


having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C10-0123/2024),










—


having regard to Rule 133 of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A10-0018/2024),










A.


whereas, by letter of 9 October 2024, the Council consulted Parliament on the nomination of Iliana Ivanova as a Member of the Court of Auditors;










B.


whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control then proceeded to evaluate Iliana Ivanova’s credentials, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; whereas in carrying out that evaluation, the committee received a curriculum vitae from Iliana Ivanova, as well as the replies to the written questionnaire that she had been sent;










C.


whereas the committee subsequently held a hearing with Iliana Ivanova on 21 November 2024, at which she made an opening statement and then answered questions put by the members of the committee;










1.


Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council’s nomination of Iliana Ivanova as a Member of the Court of Auditors;










2.


Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, to the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States.







ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1810/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-476/24: Order of the General Court of 26 November 2024 – Manders v Parliament
Date: 2024-11-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Ombudsman, candidate, election, equal treatment, fundamental rights, indemnification








C_202500591EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/591


3.2.2025






Order of the General Court of 26 November 2024 – Manders v Parliament


(Case T-476/24)
                (1)

(C/2025/591)
Language of the case: Dutch
The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/7175, 9.12.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/591/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-809/24, Trenitalia: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 26 November 2024 – Trenitalia SpA v Regione Liguria
Date: 2024-11-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Liguria, award of contract, carriage of passengers, freedom to provide services, provision of services, public procurement, rail transport, services contract, services of general interest








C_202500536EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/536


3.2.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 26 November 2024 – Trenitalia SpA v Regione Liguria


(Case C-809/24, Trenitalia)

(C/2025/536)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Trenitalia SpA

Respondent: Regione Liguria

Questions referred







1.


Do Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 (1) – in particular, the second part of recital 27, Articles 1(2), 4(1) and 6(1), and paragraphs 2 and 6 of the annex to that regulation – and the principles and objectives of EU law laid down in the relevant provisions of the TFEU (Articles 14, 93 and 106 in particular) preclude – rendering the relevant provisions ineffective – a service contract, such as the one at issue in the present proceedings, that, in exchange for a total absence of risk on the part of the economic operator, entails a freely and knowingly accepted waiver of the right to a reasonable profit, where that waiver covers a limited period of time (three years), with a view to the direct award of a subsequent service contract for the maximum duration laid down in Article 5(6), read in conjunction with Article 4(4), of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007?










2.


If the answer to that first question is in the affirmative, do Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – in particular, the first part of recital 27, recital 28, Articles 4(1) and 6(1), and paragraph 5 of the annex to that regulation – and the principles and objectives of EU law laid down in the relevant provisions of the TFEU (Articles 14, 93 and 106 in particular) preclude a service contract, such as the one at issue in the present proceedings, that does not provide for separate accounting of the costs and revenue of a service that is in part of a commercial nature, in so far as it is characterised by increased tariffs, in order to avoid the risk of overcompensation, rendering the contract ineffective and unenforceable in that respect?






(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on public passenger transport services by rail and by road and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) Nos 1191/69 and 1107/70 (OJ 2007 L 315, p. 1).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/536/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 25 November 2024
Date: 2024-11-26
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202406708EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6708


26.11.2024






Euro exchange rates (1)


            25 November 2024
         
(C/2024/6708)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0495 




JPY


Japanese yen


161,64 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4586 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,83465 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,5030 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9324 




ISK


Iceland króna


145,30 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,5865 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,295 




HUF


Hungarian forint


409,78 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3185 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9767 




TRY


Turkish lira


36,3020 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6111 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4648 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,1659 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7926 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4128 




KRW


South Korean won


1 469,87 




ZAR


South African rand


18,9592 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,6018 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 651,89 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6724 




PHP


Philippine peso


61,936 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,271 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,0941 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,3301 




INR


Indian rupee


88,4595 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6708/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Information from the Commission pursuant to Council Decision (EU) 2024/2543
Date: 2024-11-26
Institutions: Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, European Commission
Subjects: ADN agreement, ADR agreement, common transport policy, international transport, revision of an agreement, transport of dangerous goods, transport safety








C_202407120EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7120


26.11.2024






Information from the Commission pursuant to Council Decision (EU) 2024/2543
(C/2024/7120)

Pursuant to Article 3 of Council Decision (EU) 2024/2543 of 23 September 2024 on the position to be adopted on behalf of the European Union on the amendments to the Annexes to the Agreement concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (ADR) and to the Regulations annexed to the European Agreement concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Inland Waterways (ADN) (1), the Commission informs that the decisions taken at the respective bodies and applicable from 1 January 2025 are available at:






 



CN.218.2024-Eng.pdf (un.org),










 



CN.217.2024-Eng.pdf (un.org) and










 



CN.335.2024-Eng.pdf (un.org)







(1)  
            OJ L, 2024/2543, 30.9.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2024/2543/oj .


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7120/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-810/24, Urban Vision: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 26 November 2024 – Urban Vision SpA v Comune di Milano, A&C Network Srl
Date: 2024-11-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: freedom to provide services, principle of proportionality, provision of services, right of establishment, service concession








C_202501521EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1521


17.3.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 26 November 2024 – Urban Vision SpA v Comune di Milano, A&C Network Srl


(Case C-810/24, Urban Vision)

(C/2025/1521)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Urban Vision SpA

Respondents: Comune di Milano, A&C Network Srl

Question referred

Do the principles of freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services laid down in Articles 49 and 56 TFEU, as well as Directive 2014/23/EU, (1) interpreted in the light of the principles of proportionality, good administration and efficiency, and Article 12 of Directive 2006/123/EC (2) – in the event that the Court considers it to be applicable – [preclude] the national rules on pre-emption contained in Article 183(15) of Legislative Decree No 50/2016?


(1)  Directive 2014/23/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on the award of concession contracts (OJ 2014 L 94,p. 1).

(2)  Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market (OJ 2006 L 376, p. 36).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1521/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-611/24: Action brought on 26 November 2024 – Homestar v EUIPO – General Sanitary (THERMATEC)
Date: 2024-11-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, air conditioning, heat pump, heating, maintenance, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202500408EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/408


27.1.2025






Action brought on 26 November 2024 – Homestar v EUIPO – General Sanitary (THERMATEC)


(Case T-611/24)

(C/2025/408)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Homestar sp. z o.o. (Katowice, Poland) (represented by: P. Gwoździewicz-Matan, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: General Sanitary, SLU (Cerdanyola del Valles, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark THERMATEC – Application for registration No 18 790 365

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 September 2024 in Case R 856/2024-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision and remit the case to EUIPO for reconsideration;










—


in the alternative, amend the contested decision by declaring that there are no relative grounds for refusal of registration of the trade mark at issue with respect to all goods in Classes 11 and 37, and that the trade mark should be registered in its entirety;










—


order EUIPO and the intervener, if any, to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/408/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-808/24, Zálečta: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Lučenec (Slovakia) lodged on 26 November 2024 – M. R. v Ministerstvo vnútra Slovenskej republiky
Date: 2024-11-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: damages, indemnification, infringement of EU law, labour law, working time








C_202501217EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1217


3.3.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Lučenec (Slovakia) lodged on 26 November 2024 – M. R. v Ministerstvo vnútra Slovenskej republiky


(Case C-808/24, Zálečta)
                (1)

(C/2025/1217)
Language of the case: Slovak

Referring court

Okresný súd Lučenec

Parties to the main proceedings


Party initiating the proceedings before the referring court: M. R.

Other party to the proceedings: Ministerstvo vnútra Slovenskej republiky

Questions referred







1.


Does the fact that, pursuant to national legislation, an employee’s on-call duty is not counted as working time, contrary to Article 2(1) of Directive 2003/88/EC (2) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time, provide a basis for a claim for damages against a Member State for an infringement of EU law without the need to demonstrate that Article 6(b) of that directive was also infringed in relation to that employee?










2.


If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, should the national court, in determining whether the amount of compensation is appropriate, take into account the number of hours of on-call duty which, as a result of the national legislation, was not included in the employee’s working time, or should the amount of compensation payable by the Member State be determined on the basis of the duration of the unlawful situation arising from the national legislation, which allows on-call duty hours not to be included in the employee’s working time, contrary to Directive 2003/88?










3.


If the answer to the second question is in the negative, should the national court, in determining whether the amount of compensation is appropriate, take into account the number of hours during which Article 6(b) of the directive was infringed, or should the amount of compensation payable by the Member State be determined on the basis of the duration of the unlawful situation arising from the national legislation, which allows on-call duty hours not to be included in the employee’s working time, contrary to Directive 2003/88?






(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(2)  
            OJ 2003 L 299, p. 9.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1217/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11615 – JBT / MAREL)
Date: 2024-11-26
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, fish product, food industry, industrial equipment, machinery, meat product, merger control, pharmaceutical industry








C_202501263EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1263


20.2.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11615 – JBT / MAREL)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/1263)

On 26 November 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11615. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1263/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11662 – FNAC DARTY / UNIEURO)
Date: 2024-11-26
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Belgium, France, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, economic concentration, electronic commerce, electronic equipment, household electrical appliance, merger control, retail trade, service








C_202407261EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7261


3.12.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11662 – FNAC DARTY / UNIEURO)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/7261)

On 26 November 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11662. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7261/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)