do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Election of the Vice-President of the Court
Date: 2024-11-25
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Court of Justice (EU), appointment of members, member of the Court of Justice (EU), vice-president of an institution








C_202407070EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7070


25.11.2024






Election of the Vice-President of the Court
(C/2024/7070)

At a meeting on 8 October 2024, the Judges of the Court of Justice elected, pursuant to Article 8(4) of the Rules of Procedure, Mr von Danwitz as Vice-President of the Court for the period from 8 October 2024 to 6 October 2027.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7070/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Election of the First Advocate General
Date: 2024-11-25
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: appointment of members, member of the Court of Justice (EU)








C_202407072EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7072


25.11.2024






Election of the First Advocate General
(C/2024/7072)

At a meeting on 8 October 2024, the Advocates General elected, pursuant to Article 14(1) of the Rules of Procedure, Mr Szpunar as First Advocate General for the period from 8 October 2024 to 6 October 2027.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7072/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-606/24: Action brought on 25 November 2024 – Deripaska v Council
Date: 2024-11-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russia, Russo-Ukrainian issue, Ukraine, economic sanctions, entrepreneur, fundamental rights, international sanctions, natural person, principle of proportionality








C_202500580EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/580


3.2.2025






Action brought on 25 November 2024 – Deripaska v Council


(Case T-606/24)

(C/2025/580)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Oleg Vladimirovich Deripaska (Khutor Sokolsky, Russia) (represented by: T. Bontinck, M. Brésart and J. Goffin, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2456 of 12 September 2024 in so far as it maintains the applicant’s name in the annex to Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP of 17 March 2014;










—


annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2455 of 12 September 2024 in so far as it maintains the applicant’s name in the annex to Council Regulation (EU) No 2014/269 of 17 March 2014;










—


in the alternative, declare unlawful the criterion referred to in Article (1)(g) and Article 2(1)(g) of amended Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP of 17 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine and in Article 3(1)(g) of amended Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 of 17 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, relating to businesspersons involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation;










—


order the Council to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging a manifest error or an error of assessment.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging breach of the principle of proportionality and violation of fundamental rights.










3.


Third plea in law, based on a plea of illegality relating to the criterion referred to in Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/580/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.104316
Date: 2024-11-25
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Alentejo, Portugal, State aid, chemical industry, control of State aid








C_202407084EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7084


25.11.2024






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.104316
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/7084)








Date of adoption of the decision


11.3.2024




Aid number


SA.104316




Member State


Portugal




Region


ALENTEJO




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


REPSOL POLÍMEROS, UNIPESSOAL LDA.




Legal basis


Decree-Law No. 162/2014, of 31 October 2014, as amended, and Ordinance No. 94/2015, of 27 March 2015.




Type of measure


Individual Application within scheme


REPSOL POLÍMEROS, UNIPESSOAL LDA.




Objective


Regional development (including territorial cooperation), Research, development and innovation




Form of aid


Tax advantage or tax exemption




Budget


Overall budget: 63 056 772  EUR
Annual budget: 63 056 772  EUR




Intensity


 




Duration


 




Economic sectors


Manufacture of basic chemicals, fertilisers and nitrogen compounds, plastics and synthetic rubber in primary forms




Name and address of the granting authority







Ministry of Finance




Avenida Infante Dom Henrique, 1 1100-016 Lisboa








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7084/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-609/24: Action brought on 25 November 2024 – GK v REA
Date: 2024-11-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU aid, EU financing, abuse of power, financial aid, interest, maladministration, payment, principle of proportionality, rights of the defence








C_202500735EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/735


10.2.2025






Action brought on 25 November 2024 – GK v REA


(Case T-609/24)

(C/2025/735)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: GK (represented by: S. Pappas and A. Pappas, lawyers)

Defendant: European Research Executive Agency

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare that the REA has breached its contractual obligations under the Grant Agreement 101135088 — SHIELD4GRAPE, and has acted beyond its competence by prohibiting the coordinator of the SHIELD4GRAPE project from transferring the initial pre-financing of 122 118,75 EUR to the applicant;










—


declare that, pursuant to Grant Agreement 101135088, the applicant was legally entitled to receive an initial pre-financing of 122 118,75 EUR, without unjustified delay, as from the 22 January 2024 or, in the alternative, from the moment the REA paid this pre-financing to the bank account of the coordinator of the SHIELD4GRAPE project;










—


declare that the REA is liable to pay to the applicant late-payment interest at the rate of 8 % for each day it has prevented the transfer of the initial pre-financing of 122 118,75 EUR to the applicant, and up to the day it withdraws its relevant instruction to the coordinator of the SHIELD4GRAPE project; and,










—


order the REA to bear its costs as well as the applicant’s costs for the current proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on six pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging that the REA infringed Article 41 of the Charter by failing to state reasons for the contested instruction.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging that the REA exceeded its powers under the Grant Agreement by issuing the contested instruction and that it infringed the provisions of the Grant Agreement regulating the payment of the pre-financing.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging that the REA infringed the applicant’s right to be heard, as enshrined in Article 41 of the Charter and Article 133 of the Financial Regulation.










4.


Fourth, in the alternative, it is argued that the REA infringed the principle of good faith.










5.


Fifth, on a subsidiary basis, it is argued that the REA infringed the principle of proportionality.










6.


Sixth, it is argued that the REA is liable to pay-late payment interest at the rate of 8 % for each day it has withheld, by virtue of its instruction, the pre-financing owed to the applicant.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/735/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-602/24: Action brought on 25 November 2024 – Timchenko v Council
Date: 2024-11-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russo-Ukrainian issue, economic sanctions, freedom of movement, international sanctions, natural person, ownership, principle of proportionality, protection of privacy, rights of the defence








C_202500275EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/275


20.1.2025






Action brought on 25 November 2024 – Timchenko v Council


(Case T-602/24)

(C/2025/275)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Elena Petrovna Timchenko (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: T. Bontinck, J. Goffin, S. Bonifassi and E. Fedorova, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2456 (1) of 12 September 2024, in so far as it extends the application of the restrictive measures adopted against the applicant by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/582 of 8 April 2022 and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/581 of 8 April 2022;










—


annul Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2455 (2) of 12 September 2024, in so far as it extends the application of the restrictive measures adopted against the applicant by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/582 of 8 April 2022 and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/581 of 8 April 2022;










—


order the Council to pay EUR 1 000 000 on a provisional basis for the non-material damage suffered by the applicant;
order the Council to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on six pleas in law, which are identical or similar to those raised in case T-1107/23, Timchenko v Council. (3)



(1)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2456 of 12 September 2024 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ L 2024/2456).

(2)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2455 of 12 September 2024 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ L 2024/2455).

(3)  OJ C C/2024/1869.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/275/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Taking of the oath by new Members of the Court of Justice
Date: 2024-11-25
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Court of Justice (EU), appointment of members, member of the Court of Justice (EU)








C_202407068EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7068


25.11.2024






Taking of the oath by new Members of the Court of Justice
(C/2024/7068)

Following their appointment as Judges at the Court of Justice for the period from 7 October 2024 to 6 October 2030 by decisions of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union of 27 March 2024, (1)
         22 May 2024, (2) and 3 July 2024, (3) Mr Stéphane Gervasoni, Mr Massimo Condinanzi, Ms Ramona Frendo, Mr Fredrik Schalin and Mr Bernardus Smulders took the oath before the Court of Justice on 7 October 2024.
Following his appointment as Judge at the Court of Justice for the period from 7 October 2024 to 6 October 2027 by decision of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union of 2 October 2024, (4) Mr Niels Fenger took the oath before the Court of Justice on 7 October 2024.
Following their appointment as Advocates General at the Court of Justice for the period from 7 October 2024 to 6 October 2030 by decisions of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union of 27 March 2024, 1
         3 July 2024, 3 and 2 October 2024, (5) Mr Dean Spielmann, Mr Rimvydas Norkus and Mr Andrea Biondi took the oath before the Court of Justice on 7 October 2024.


(1)  
            OJ L, 2024/1036, 3.4.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2024/1036/oj.

(2)  
            OJ L, 2024/1492, 27.5.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2024/1492/oj.

(3)  
            OJ L, 2024/1951, 11.7.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2024/1951/oj.

(4)  
            OJ L, 2024/2647, 4.10.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2024/2647/oj.

(5)  
            OJ L, 2024/2644, 4.10.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2024/2644/oj.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7068/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Election of the Presidents of the Chambers of five Judges
Date: 2024-11-25
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: appointment of members, member of the Court of Justice (EU)








C_202407071EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7071


25.11.2024






Election of the Presidents of the Chambers of five Judges
(C/2024/7071)

At a meeting on 8 October 2024, the Judges of the Court of Justice elected, pursuant to Article 12(1) of the Rules of Procedure, Mr Biltgen as President of the First Chamber, Ms Jürimäe as President of the Second Chamber, Mr Lycourgos as President of the Third Chamber, Mr Jarukaitis as President of the Fourth Chamber and Ms Arastey Sahún as President of the Fifth Chamber for the period from 8 October 2024 to 6 October 2027.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7071/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-599/24: Action brought on 25 November 2024 – LTV Leuchten & Lampen v EUIPO – XAL (Lights)
Date: 2024-11-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: designs and models, lighting








C_202500273EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/273


20.1.2025






Action brought on 25 November 2024 – LTV Leuchten & Lampen v EUIPO – XAL (Lights)


(Case T-599/24)

(C/2025/273)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: LTV Leuchten & Lampen Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH (Brunn am Gebirge, Austria) (represented by: C. Pilz, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: XAL GmbH (Graz, Austria)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Design at issue: Community design ‘Lights’ – Community design No 2 175 802-0003

Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 September 2024 in Case R 1885/2023-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


amend the contested decision to the effect that the appeal of the other party to the proceedings (opponent) of 4 September 2023 is dismissed as unfounded and that the decision of the Invalidity Division of EUIPO of 8 August 2023 (invalidity proceedings No ICD 119 619) is upheld or reinstated in its entirety;










—


order EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay all recoverable costs incurred by the applicant in the present proceedings and in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal pursuant to Article 134(1) of the Rules of Procedure.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of essential procedural requirements;










—


Infringement of Article 6(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;










—


Misuse of powers.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/273/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-603/24: Action brought on 25 November 2024 – Timchenko v Council
Date: 2024-11-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russo-Ukrainian issue, economic sanctions, freedom of movement, international sanctions, natural person, principle of proportionality, protection of privacy, right to property, rights of the defence








C_202500276EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/276


20.1.2025






Action brought on 25 November 2024 – Timchenko v Council


(Case T-603/24)

(C/2025/276)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Gennady Nikolayevich Timchenko (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: T. Bontinck, J. Goffin, S. Bonifassi and E. Fedorova, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2456 (1) of 12 September 2024 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, in so far as it extends the application of the restrictive measures adopted against the applicant by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/337 of 28 February 2022 and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/336 of 28 February 2022;










—


annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2455 (2) of 12 September 2024 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, in so far as it extends the application of the restrictive measures adopted against the applicant by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/337 of 28 February 2022 and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/336 of 28 February 2022;










—


provisionally order the Council to pay EUR 1 000 000 in respect of the non-material damage suffered by the applicant;










—


order the Council to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on seven pleas in law, which are identical or similar to those raised in Case T-285/24, Timchenko v Council. (3)



(1)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2456 of 12 September 2024 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ L 2024/2456).

(2)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2455 of 12 September 2024 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ L 2024/2455).

(3)  OJ C C/2024/4733.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/276/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Notice amending the vacancy notice for establishing a reserve list – Administrative Director (OJ C, C/2024/6309, 24.10.2024)
Date: 2024-11-25
Institutions: European Public Prosecutor’s Office
Subjects: Luxembourg, administrative personnel, administrator, competition (EU), job vacancy, managing director, recruitment, servant (EU)








C_202407110EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7110


25.11.2024






Notice amending the vacancy notice for establishing a reserve list – Administrative Director

(
Official Journal of the European Union C, C/2024/6309, 24 October 2024
)

(C/2024/7110)

On page 1:
for:


                  ‘
                  Closing date: 25 November 2024 23:59 (CET)
                  ’,

read:


                  ‘
                  Closing date: 16 December 2024 23:59 (CET)
                  ’.

On page 4, ‘How to apply’, third point:
for:


                  ‘
                  Send the completed EPPO Application form, in PDF format, to our Selection and Recruitment team
eu-eppo-recruitment@ec.europa.eu by 
                     25 November 2024 23:59 (CET).’,

read:


                  ‘
                  Send the completed EPPO Application form, in PDF format, to our Selection and Recruitment team eu-eppo-recruitment@ec.europa.eu by 16 December 2024 23:59 (CET).’.



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7110/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-607/24: Action brought on 25 November 2024 – SBK Art v Council
Date: 2024-11-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russia, Russo-Ukrainian issue, Ukraine, economic sanctions, infringement of EU law, international sanctions, legal person, principle of proportionality, rule of law








C_202500407EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/407


27.1.2025






Action brought on 25 November 2024 – SBK Art v Council


(Case T-607/24)

(C/2025/407)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: SBK Art OOO (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: G. Lansky and P. Goeth, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare the inapplicability of Article 2(1) final paragraph of Council Decision (CFSP) 2014/145, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/329, and of Article 3(1) final paragraph of Council Regulation (EU) 269/2014, as amended by Council Regulation (EU) 2022/330; and










—


annul, either in combination with the above or alternatively, Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2456 amending Council Decision (CFSP) 2014/145 as well as Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2455 implementing Regulation (EU) 269/2014, in so far as those acts concern the applicant (Listing Entry No. 174), and










—


order the Council to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging that the application of EU secondary law infringes the Treaties and the rule of law.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging unlawful infringement of the applicant’s procedural rights.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging disproportionality.










4.


Fourth plea in law, alleging an error of assessment, and unlawful infringement of the obligation to state reasons.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/407/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 22 November 2024
Date: 2024-11-25
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202406707EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6707


25.11.2024






Euro exchange rates (1)


            22 November 2024
         
(C/2024/6707)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0412 




JPY


Japanese yen


160,84 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4577 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,83205 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,5530 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9272 




ISK


Iceland króna


145,70 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,5680 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,358 




HUF


Hungarian forint


411,13 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3373 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9767 




TRY


Turkish lira


35,9737 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6018 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4561 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,1052 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7824 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4034 




KRW


South Korean won


1 464,43 




ZAR


South African rand


18,7942 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,5458 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 569,60 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6516 




PHP


Philippine peso


61,368 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


35,968 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,0483 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,2742 




INR


Indian rupee


87,9290 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6707/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)