do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-600/24: Action brought on 22 November 2024 – Konov v Council
Date: 2024-11-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russo-Ukrainian issue, damages, economic sanctions, equal treatment, international sanctions, natural person, principle of proportionality, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_202500274EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/274


20.1.2025






Action brought on 22 November 2024 – Konov v Council


(Case T-600/24)

(C/2025/274)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Dmitry Konov (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: F. Bélot, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2456 (1) of 12 September 2024 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, in so far as it maintains the applicant’s name in the annex thereto while altering the grounds for his listing:










—


annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2455 (2) of 12 September 2024 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, in so far at it maintains the applicant’s name in the annex thereto while altering the grounds for his listing;










—


order the Council to pay EUR 500 000 on a provisional basis in respect of the damage suffered by the applicant;










—


order the Council to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law, which are identical or similar to those raised in Case T-326/22 Konov v Council. (3)



(1)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2456 of 12 September 2024 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ L 2024/2456).

(2)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2455 of 12 September 2024 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ L 2024/2455).

(3)  
            OJ 2022 C 276, p. 22.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/274/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-324/24 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 22 November 2024 – UniCredit v ECB (Interim measures – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Setting of prudential requirements – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency – No prima facie case – Balancing of interests)
Date: 2024-11-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, EU restrictive measure, Russia, bank, banking supervision, economic activity, financial supervision, subsidiary








C_202500268EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/268


20.1.2025






Order of the President of the General Court of 22 November 2024 – UniCredit v ECB


(Case T-324/24 R)

(Interim measures - Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 - Setting of prudential requirements - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency - No prima facie case - Balancing of interests)
(C/2025/268)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: UniCredit SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola, G. Lombardi, G. Rumi and L.-D. Tassinari Vittone, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: E. Yoo, A. Pizzolla and A. Lefterov, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, the applicant seeks the suspension of the operation of Decision ECB-SSM-2024-ITUNI-17 of the European Central Bank (ECB) of 22 April 2024 establishing the prudential requirements aimed at further reducing the risks related to its activities within the territory of the Russian Federation.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


The costs are reserved.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/268/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-604/24: Action brought on 22 November 2024 – Boguslayev v Council
Date: 2024-11-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russo-Ukrainian issue, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, presumption of innocence, principle of proportionality, protection of privacy, right to an effective remedy, right to property








C_202500578EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/578


3.2.2025






Action brought on 22 November 2024 – Boguslayev v Council


(Case T-604/24)

(C/2025/578)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Vyacheslav Aleksandrovich Boguslayev (Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine) (represented by: S. Bonifassi, E. Fedorova and J. Bastien, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2456 of 12 September 2024 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, in so far as it extends the application of the restrictive measures adopted against the applicant by Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/432 of 25 February 2023 and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/429 of 25 February 2023;










—


annul Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2455 of 12 September 2024 implementing Regulation (EU) 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, in so far as it extends the application of the restrictive measures adopted against the applicant by Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/432 of 25 February 2023 and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/429 of 25 February 2023;










—


order the Council to pay the sum of EUR 1 000 000 provisionally in respect of the non-material damage suffered by the applicant;










—


order the Council to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging violation of the right to effective judicial protection and breach of the duty to state reasons, in particular to the extent that the Council relies exclusively on the criminal proceedings brought against the applicant by the Ukrainian authorities without fulfilling the requirements to do so.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging an error of assessment in applying criteria (a) and (e) to the applicant.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging breach of the principle of proportionality.










4.


Fourth plea in law, alleging violation of the fundamental rights of the applicant, in particular his right to property, his right to respect for his private and family life and his right to the presumption of innocence.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/578/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11781 – CDPQ / ENGIE / FHH)
Date: 2024-11-22
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Canada, United Kingdom, economic concentration, electrical industry, electricity supply, energy production, investment company, merger control, natural gas, pension scheme








C_202407393EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7393


5.12.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11781 – CDPQ / ENGIE / FHH)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/7393)

On 22 November 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11781. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7393/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 21 November 2024
Date: 2024-11-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202406706EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6706


22.11.2024






Euro exchange rates (1)


            21 November 2024
         
(C/2024/6706)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0526 




JPY


Japanese yen


162,53 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4588 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,83273 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,6070 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9294 




ISK


Iceland króna


145,90 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,6200 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,346 




HUF


Hungarian forint


410,50 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3418 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9770 




TRY


Turkish lira


36,2958 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6141 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4700 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,1921 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7924 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4144 




KRW


South Korean won


1 471,60 




ZAR


South African rand


19,0284 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,6204 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 732,97 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6999 




PHP


Philippine peso


62,116 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,467 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,1277 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,4444 




INR


Indian rupee


88,9158 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6706/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-638/24, Finanzamt Österreich: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 22 November 2024 – Finanzamt Österreich
Date: 2024-11-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Austria, VAT, acquisition of property, intra-EU trade, intra-EU transport, invoicing, principle of proportionality, supply, tax exemption, tax law








C_202500923EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/923


17.2.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 22 November 2024 – Finanzamt Österreich


(Case T-638/24, Finanzamt Österreich)

(C/2025/923)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant on a point of law: Finanzamt Österreich

Interested party: D GmbH

Questions referred







1.


Do Articles 40, 41 and 203 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (‘the VAT Directive’) (1) as well as the principles of proportionality and neutrality preclude the application of a national provision (second sentence of Article 3(8) of the Umsatzsteuergesetz (2) (Law on turnover tax)) whereby an acquisition is deemed to have been effected in the territory of the Member State whose VAT identification number was used by the person acquiring the goods until the person acquiring the goods establishes that the acquisition was taxed in the Member State in which the goods are located at the end of the transport or dispatch in those cases where the intra-Community acquisition is accompanied by an intra-Community supply which was treated in Austria as an exempt supply but where, because Austrian VAT is entered on the invoice, there is a tax liability for that supply on the basis of the invoice issued?










2.


If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative, does the removal, as a result of a subsequent adjustment of the invoice by the issuer, of the VAT wrongly entered on the invoice relating to the exempt intra-Community supply give rise to an intra-Community acquisition within the meaning of Article 41 of the VAT Directive and, if so, at what point in time is that intra-Community acquisition made?






(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

(2)  Bundesgesetz über die Besteuerung der Umsätze (Umsatzsteuergesetz 1994 – UStG 1994) (Federal Law on the Taxation of Turnover (Law on Turnover Tax – UstG 1994)), BGBl. Nr. 663/1994 in the version applicable before the Abgabenänderungsgesetz 2023 (Law on Tax Amendment 2023), BGBl. I 110/2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/923/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11796 – AUSTRALIANSUPER / DIGITALBRIDGE / SWISS LIFE / DBUPH)
Date: 2024-11-22
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: computer centre, data processing, digital technology, economic concentration, financial services, investment company, life assurance, merger control, pension scheme, transmission network








C_202407207EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7207


29.11.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11796 – AUSTRALIANSUPER / DIGITALBRIDGE / SWISS LIFE / DBUPH)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/7207)

On 22 November 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11796. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7207/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.107987
Date: 2024-11-22
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Luxembourg, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid








C_202407054EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7054


22.11.2024






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.107987
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/7054)








Date of adoption of the decision


11.10.2024




Aid number


SA.107987




Member State


Luxembourg




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


TCTF 2.6/2.8 - Aid for the transition towards a net-zero economy




Legal basis


Régime d’aides en faveur de la transition vers une économie à zéro émission nette




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 520 000 000  EUR
Annual budget: 520 000 000  EUR




Intensity


 




Duration


Until 31.12.2025




Economic sectors


All economic sectors eligible to receive aid




Name and address of the granting authority







Ministry of the Economy




19-21, boulevard Royal, L-2449 Luxembourg








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7054/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Special report 25/2024: Digitalisation of healthcare – EU support for member states effective overall, but difficulties in using EU funds
Date: 2024-11-22
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: EU Member State, digital single market, digitisation, distribution of EU funding, e-Health, health care, health care system, information technology applications, innovation, medical data








C_202407090EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7090


22.11.2024






Special report 25/2024:

            ‘Digitalisation of healthcare – EU support for member states effective overall, but difficulties in using EU funds’
         
(C/2024/7090)

The European Court of Auditors has published its special report 25/2024: ‘Digitalisation of healthcare – EU support for member states effective overall, but difficulties in using EU funds’.
The report can be consulted directly or downloaded at the European Court of Auditors’ website: https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/publications/sr-2024-25



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7090/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11736 – CARLYLE / SEIDOR SOLUTIONS AND LOGISTICS)
Date: 2024-11-22
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: consultancy, economic concentration, information technology industry, investment company, merger control, provision of services








C_202407208EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7208


29.11.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11736 – CARLYLE / SEIDOR SOLUTIONS AND LOGISTICS)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/7208)

On 22 November 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11736. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7208/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
CaseC-336/24, SINHRON INVEST: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 November 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad – Bulgaria) – SINHRON INVEST EOOD v Sofiyska gradska prokuratura (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions referred for a preliminary ruling that are identical to questions on which the Court has already ruled – Article 48 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Presumption of innocence and rights of the defence – Imposition of a criminal penalty on a legal person for an offence relating to value added tax (VAT) committed by the representative of that legal person – Parallel criminal proceedings against that representative that have not been concluded)
Date: 2024-11-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, criminal proceedings, legal person, managing director, penalty, presumption of innocence, rights of the defence, tax offence








C_202500372EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/372


27.1.2025






Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 November 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad – Bulgaria) – ‘SINHRON INVEST’ EOOD v Sofiyska gradska prokuratura


(CaseC-336/24,
                (1)
SINHRON INVEST)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Questions referred for a preliminary ruling that are identical to questions on which the Court has already ruled - Article 48 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Presumption of innocence and rights of the defence - Imposition of a criminal penalty on a legal person for an offence relating to value added tax (VAT) committed by the representative of that legal person - Parallel criminal proceedings against that representative that have not been concluded)
(C/2025/372)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Sofiyski gradski sad

Parties to the main proceedings


Main party:
            ‘SINHRON INVEST’ EOOD

Other party: Sofiyska gradska prokuratura

Operative part of the order

The answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling by the Sofiyski gradski sad (Sofia City Court, Bulgaria) by decision of 28 February 2022 appears in the judgment of 10 November 2022, DELTA STROY 2003 (C-203/21, EU:C:2022:865, paragraphs 67 and 68 and operative part).


(1)  Date lodged: 3.5.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/372/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)