do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11672 – ADRILL / ADH / EV)
Date: 2024-11-14
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: data processing, economic concentration, extraction of oil, gas industry, investment company, merger control, offshore oil structure, video surveillance








C_202407281EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7281


4.12.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11672 – ADRILL / ADH / EV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/7281)

On 14 November 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11672. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7281/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-197/23, S. (Modification of the formation of a court): Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 November 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Apelacyjny w Warszawie – Poland) – S. S.A. v C. sp. z o.o. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Remedies – Effective judicial protection – Independent and impartial tribunal established by law – National rules governing the random allocation of cases to the judges of a court and the modification of the formations of the court – Provision precluding reliance on the infringements of those rules in appeal proceedings)
Date: 2024-11-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: appeal, courts and tribunals, independence of the judiciary, judicial review, right to an effective remedy








C_202500131EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/131


13.1.2025






Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 November 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Apelacyjny w Warszawie – Poland) – S. S.A. v C. sp. z o.o.


(Case C-197/23,
                (1)
S. (Modification of the formation of a court))

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU - Remedies - Effective judicial protection - Independent and impartial tribunal established by law - National rules governing the random allocation of cases to the judges of a court and the modification of the formations of the court - Provision precluding reliance on the infringements of those rules in appeal proceedings)
(C/2025/131)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Apelacyjny w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: S. S.A.

Defendant: C. sp. z o.o.

Intervenering party: Prokurator Prokuratury Regionalnej w Warszawie

Operative part of the judgment

The second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU, read in the light of Article 2 TEU and of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
must be interpreted as precluding a national provision which in all circumstances prevents the appellate court from reviewing whether the reallocation of a case to the formation of the court which ruled on it at first instance was made in breach of the national rules on the reallocation of cases within the courts.


(1)  
            OJ C 252, 17.7.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/131/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-47/23: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 14 November 2024 – European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Environment – Directive 92/43/EEC – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Article 6(2) – Appropriate steps to avoid, in special areas of conservation, the deterioration of natural habitats – Habitat types 6510 (lowland hay meadows) and 6520 (mountain hay meadows) protected by the Natura 2000 network – Loss of area – No specific surveillance of natural habitats – General and structural failure – Article 4(1) – Proposal by each Member State of a list of sites indicating which natural habitat types and native species the sites host – Regular updating of information relating to those sites)
Date: 2024-11-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: biodiversity, biotope, grassland, infringement of EU law, national implementing measure, protected area, protection of animal life, protection of plant life








C_202500129EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/129


13.1.2025






Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 14 November 2024 – European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany


(Case C-47/23)
                (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Environment - Directive 92/43/EEC - Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora - Article 6(2) - Appropriate steps to avoid, in special areas of conservation, the deterioration of natural habitats - Habitat types 6510 (lowland hay meadows) and 6520 (mountain hay meadows) protected by the Natura 2000 network - Loss of area - No specific surveillance of natural habitats - General and structural failure - Article 4(1) - Proposal by each Member State of a list of sites indicating which natural habitat types and native species the sites host - Regular updating of information relating to those sites)
(C/2025/129)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: C. Hermes and M. Noll-Ehlers, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: J. Möller and A. Hoesch, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Declares that the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 6(2) of Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, as amended by Council Directive 2013/17/EU of 13 May 2013, by failing in a general and structural manner to take appropriate steps to avoid the deterioration of habitat types 6510 (lowland hay meadows) and 6520 (mountain hay meadows) protected by the Natura 2000 network, listed in Annex I to Directive 92/43, as amended, in the sites designated for those habitat types;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders the European Commission and the Federal Republic of Germany to bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 94, 13.3.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/129/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-535/23 P: Order of the President of the ninth Chamber of the Court of 14 November 2024 – Ryanair DAC, Airport Marketing Services Ltd v European Commission, Council of the European Union
Date: 2024-11-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: France, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid, low cost airline, market prices, marketing, proof, provision of services, reimbursement of aid








C_202501089EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1089


24.2.2025






Order of the President of the ninth Chamber of the Court of 14 November 2024 – Ryanair DAC, Airport Marketing Services Ltd v European Commission, Council of the European Union


(Case C-535/23 P)
                (1)

(C/2025/1089)
Language of the case: English
The President of the ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C C/2023/45.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1089/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-394/22, Oilchart International: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 14 November 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the hof van beroep te Antwerpen – Belgium) – Oilchart International NV v O.W. Bunker (Netherlands) BV, ING Bank NV (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Scope – Article 1(2)(b) – Exclusion – Concept of bankruptcy, proceedings relating to the winding-up of insolvent companies or other legal persons, judicial arrangements, compositions and analogous proceedings – Action deriving directly from insolvency proceedings and closely linked with them – Action for the payment of a claim lodged after the debtor company was put into liquidation and the declaration of that claim lodged in the insolvency estate – Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000)
Date: 2024-11-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: bankruptcy, claim, debt, financial solvency, judicial cooperation in civil matters in the EU, jurisdiction








C_202500126EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/126


13.1.2025






Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 14 November 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the hof van beroep te Antwerpen – Belgium) – Oilchart International NV v O.W. Bunker (Netherlands) BV, ING Bank NV


(Case C-394/22,
                (1)
Oilchart International)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters - Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 - Scope - Article 1(2)(b) - Exclusion - Concept of ‘bankruptcy, proceedings relating to the winding-up of insolvent companies or other legal persons, judicial arrangements, compositions and analogous proceedings’ - Action deriving directly from insolvency proceedings and closely linked with them - Action for the payment of a claim lodged after the debtor company was put into liquidation and the declaration of that claim lodged in the insolvency estate - Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000)
(C/2025/126)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hof van beroep te Antwerpen

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Oilchart International NV

Defendants: O.W. Bunker (Netherlands) BV, ING Bank NV

Operative part of the judgment

Article 1(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters,
must be interpreted as not applying to an action brought in a Member State against a company seeking payment for goods delivered which does not mention either the insolvency proceedings opened previously against that company in another Member State or the fact that the claim was already declared in the insolvency estate.


(1)  
            OJ C 359, 19.9.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/126/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-588/24: Action brought on 14 November 2024 – OT v Council
Date: 2024-11-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russia, Russo-Ukrainian issue, Ukraine, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, rights of the defence








C_202500402EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/402


27.1.2025






Action brought on 14 November 2024 – OT v Council


(Case T-588/24)

(C/2025/402)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: OT (represented by: J.-P. Hordies and P. Blanchetier, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2456 of 12 September 2024 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ L, 13.9.2024), in so far as it concerns the applicant;










—


annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2455 of 12 September 2024 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ L, 13.9.2024), in so far as it concerns the applicant (Annex A1);










—


as a consequence, order the Council to remove the applicant’s name from the annexes to Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2456 of 12 September 2024 and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2455 of 12 September 2024 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine;










—


order the Council to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred by the applicant.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging that the Council erred in its assessment of the facts.






—


The applicant submits, in the first place, that the evidence put forward by the Council is inconclusive and unconvincing.










—


In the second place, the applicant submits that the allegations relating to the applicant’s material and financial support to the Russian decision-makers responsible for the annexation of Crimea or the destabilisation of Ukraine are unfounded.














2.


Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the rights of the defence.






—


The applicant argues that the evidence put forward by the Council in order to justify the applicant being listed on the sanctions list is obsolete and irrelevant.










ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/402/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-390/24: Order of the President of the Court of 14 November 2024 – European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium
Date: 2024-11-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European arrest warrant, criminal proceedings, detention before trial, imprisonment, infringement of EU law, national implementing measure, rights of the defence








C_202501094EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1094


24.2.2025






Order of the President of the Court of 14 November 2024 – European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium


(Case C-390/24)
                (1)

(C/2025/1094)
Language of the case: French
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C C/2024/4580.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1094/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-585/24: Action brought on 14 November 2024 – Doors Bulgaria v EUIPO – Top ten (Doors)
Date: 2024-11-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: building materials, designs and models








C_202500400EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/400


27.1.2025






Action brought on 14 November 2024 – Doors Bulgaria v EUIPO – Top ten (Doors)


(Case T-585/24)

(C/2025/400)
Language in which the application was lodged: Bulgarian

Parties


Applicant: Doors Bulgaria (Sofia, Bulgaria) (represented by: M. Todorov, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Top ten (Plovdiv, Bulgaria)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant

Design at issue: Community design No 3 119 601-0012 (Doors)

Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 September 2024 in Case R 469/2024-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision and stay the proceedings at issue;










—


in the alternative, annul the contested decision, declare the action before the Board of Appeal to be admissible and well founded and annul the decision of the Invalidity Division;










—


in the further alternative, annul the contested decision and order EUIPO to decide on the merits of the action before the Board of Appeal.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 57 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;










—


Infringement of Article 25 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;










—


Infringment of the first sentence of Article 91(2) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/400/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11732 – CARLYLE / VANTIVE)
Date: 2024-11-14
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, investment company, kidney disease, medical device, merger control, supply, therapeutics








C_202407102EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7102


25.11.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11732 – CARLYLE / VANTIVE)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/7102)

On 14 November 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11732. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7102/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
P10_TA(2024)0033 – Faster and Safer Relief of Excess Withholding Taxes – European Parliament legislative resolution of 14 November 2024 on the draft Council directive on Faster and Safer Relief of Excess Withholding Taxes (09925/2024 – C10-0002/2024 – 2023/0187(CNS)) (Special legislative procedure – renewed consultation)
Date: 2024-11-14
Institutions: Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, European Parliament
Subjects: European tax cooperation, digital single market, investment abroad, securities, tax collection, tax law, tax on investment income, tax relief, taxpayer








C_202500812EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/812


11.2.2025






P10_TA(2024)0033

Faster and Safer Relief of Excess Withholding Taxes


European Parliament legislative resolution of 14 November 2024 on the draft Council directive on Faster and Safer Relief of Excess Withholding Taxes (09925/2024 – C10-0002/2024 – 2023/0187(CNS))


(Special legislative procedure – renewed consultation)

(C/2025/812)



The European Parliament,







—


having regard to the Council draft (09925/2024),










—


having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2023)0324),










—


having regard to its position of 28 February 2024
                   (1),










—


having regard to Article 115 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament again (C10-0002/2024),










—


having regard to Rule 84 and 86 of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A10-0011/2024),











1.


Approves the Council draft;










2.


Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;










3.


Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament;










4.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.






(1)  Texts adopted, P9_TA(2024)0102.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/812/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
P10_TA(2024)0034 – Amendment of the EIB's Statute – European Parliament legislative resolution of 14 November 2024 on the draft Council decision on amendment of the EIB's Statute (13182/2024 – C10-0105/2024 – 2024/0803(CNS)) (Special legislative procedure – consultation)
Date: 2024-11-14
Institutions: Committee on Budgets, Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, European Parliament
Subjects: EIB loan, European Investment Bank, credit control, financial risk, investment promotion, regulation of investments








C_202500813EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/813


11.2.2025






P10_TA(2024)0034

Amendment of the EIB's Statute


European Parliament legislative resolution of 14 November 2024 on the draft Council decision on amendment of the EIB's Statute (13182/2024 – C10-0105/2024 – 2024/0803(CNS))


(Special legislative procedure – consultation)

(C/2025/813)



The European Parliament,







—


having regard to the proposal of the European Investment Bank to the Council to amend the Statute of the European Investment Bank (13182/2024),










—


having regard to Article 308 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C10-0105/2024),










—


having regard to Rule 84 of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets (A10-0013/2024),











1.


Approves the proposal;










2.


Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;










3.


Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament;










4.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission, the European Investment Bank and the national parliaments.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/813/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)