do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-78/24: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Golden Support v EUIPO – Sky International (Skyliner) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Skyliner – Earlier EU figurative mark SKY – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2024-11-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, consultancy, provision of services, registered trade mark, software, telecommunications, trade-mark law








C_202500185EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/185


13.1.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Golden Support v EUIPO – Sky International (Skyliner)


(Case T-78/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark Skyliner - Earlier EU figurative mark SKY - Relative ground for invalidity - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/185)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Golden Support s. r. o. (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: P. Cink, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Sky International AG (Zurich, Switzerland)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and the alteration of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 14 December 2023 (Case R 421/2023-4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Golden Support s. r. o. and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to each bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/2633, 22.4.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/185/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-104/23: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – PAN Europe v Commission (Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Preparatory documents of the Commission relating to a request for internal review of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2049 as regards the renewal of the approval of the active substance cypermethrin – Partial refusal to grant access – Article 4(2) of Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings)
Date: 2024-11-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: access to EU information, market approval, plant health control, plant health product








C_202500166EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/166


13.1.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – PAN Europe v Commission


(Case T-104/23)
                (1)

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Preparatory documents of the Commission relating to a request for internal review of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2049 as regards the renewal of the approval of the active substance cypermethrin - Partial refusal to grant access - Article 4(2) of Regulation No 1049/2001 - Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings)
(C/2025/166)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: A. Bailleux, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Burón Pérez and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision C(2022) 9583 of 12 December 2022, by which the Commission partially refused the applicant access to certain documents, requested pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 179, 22.5.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/166/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-302/21: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Aboca and Others v Commission (Consumer protection – Substances prohibited, restricted or under EU scrutiny – Article 8(1) and (2) of, and Annex III to, Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 – Prohibition and placing under control of certain substances and preparations containing hydroxyanthracene derivatives – First, second and third entries in Article 1(1), and Article 1(2), of Regulation (EU) 2021/468 – Concepts of substance, ingredient and preparations – Error of law)
Date: 2024-11-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: consumer protection, food safety, food supplement, health risk, inorganic chemical product, market approval








C_202500161EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/161


13.1.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Aboca and Others v Commission


(Case T-302/21)
                (1)

(Consumer protection - Substances prohibited, restricted or under EU scrutiny - Article 8(1) and (2) of, and Annex III to, Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 - Prohibition and placing under control of certain substances and preparations containing hydroxyanthracene derivatives - First, second and third entries in Article 1(1), and Article 1(2), of Regulation (EU) 2021/468 - Concepts of ‘substance’, ‘ingredient’ and ‘preparations’ - Error of law)
(C/2025/161)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Aboca SpA Soc. agr. (Sansepolcro, Italy), Coswell SpA (Funo di Argelato, Italy), Associação portuguesa de suplementos alimentares (Apard) (Lisbon, Portugal) (represented by: B. Kelly, Solicitor, K. Ewert, lawyer, D. Scannell and C. Thomas, Barristers-at-Law)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: I. Galindo Martín, K. Mifsud-Bonnici and B. Rous Demiri, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek annulment of Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/468 of 18 March 2021 amending Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards botanical species containing hydroxyanthracene derivatives (OJ 2021 L 96, p. 6), in so far as, by the first, second and third entries in Article 1(1) of that regulation and by Article 1(2) thereof, the European Commission included certain hydroxyanthracene derivatives and certain preparations in Parts A and C of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on the addition of vitamins and minerals and of certain other substances to foods (OJ 2006 L 404, p. 26).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the first, second and third entries in Article 1(1), and Article 1(2), of Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/468 of 18 March 2021 amending Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards botanical species containing hydroxyanthracene derivatives;










2.


Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 289, 19.7.2021.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/161/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-583/24: Action brought on 13 November 2024 – Yanukovych v Council
Date: 2024-11-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russia, Russo-Ukrainian issue, Ukraine, economic sanctions, freezing of assets, international sanctions, natural person, territorial dispute








C_202500196EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/196


13.1.2025






Action brought on 13 November 2024 – Yanukovych v Council


(Case T-583/24)

(C/2025/196)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych (Rostov-on-Don, Russia) (represented by: B. Kennelly, Solicitor)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul, insofar as it applies to the applicant, Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2456 of 12 September 2024 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine; (1)











—


annul, insofar as it applies to the applicant, Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2455 of 12 September 2024 implementing Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine; (2)











—


order the Council to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on one plea in law, alleging that the Council made manifest errors of assessment in determining that the designation criterion had been satisfied. In particular, the applicant alleges that the Council accepted at face value, without any attempted verification whatsoever, unsubstantiated and largely historic assertions, allegations and even opinions from various media reports of questionable reliability. The Council presented these claims and accusations as fact, despite the many inaccuracies and inconsistencies identified by the applicant in his observations. By designating the applicant on the basis of past acts, which have exhausted their effects at the time when they were carried out and/or in any event long before September 2024, the Council has impermissibly and unlawfully frozen the applicant’s situation in the past and deprived the required periodic review of all practical effects.


(1)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2456 of 12 September 2024 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ L, 2024/2456).

(2)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2455 of 12 September 2024 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ L, 2024/2455).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/196/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-69/20: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Tele Columbus v Commission (Competition – Concentrations – German markets for TV services and telecommunications services – Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement – Commitments – Assessment of the horizontal and vertical effects of the transaction on competition – Competitive relationship between the parties to the concentration – Merger-specific change – Manifest error of assessment)
Date: 2024-11-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Economic Area, Germany, competition, economic concentration, merger control, provision of services, retail trade, telecommunications, television








C_202500260EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/260


20.1.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Tele Columbus v Commission


(Case T-69/20)
                (1)

(Competition - Concentrations - German markets for TV services and telecommunications services - Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement - Commitments - Assessment of the horizontal and vertical effects of the transaction on competition - Competitive relationship between the parties to the concentration - Merger-specific change - Manifest error of assessment)
(C/2025/260)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Tele Columbus AG (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: C. Wagner and J. Hackl, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Conte, A. Keidel, J. Szczodrowski and C. Vollrath, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Vodafone Group plc (Newbury, United Kingdom) (represented by: V. Vollmann, Solicitor, C. Jeffs, A. Chadd and D. Seeliger, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision C(2019) 5187 final of 18 July 2019 declaring the concentration involving the acquisition by Vodafone Group plc of certain assets of Liberty Global plc to be compatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/M.8864 – Vodafone/Certain Liberty Global Assets).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Tele Columbus AG to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 95, 23.3.2020.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/260/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-189/21: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Aloe Vera of Europe v Commission (Consumer protection – Substances prohibited, restricted or under EU scrutiny – Article 8(1) and (2) of, and Annex III to, Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 – Prohibition of preparations from the leaf of Aloe species containing hydroxyanthracene derivatives – Third entry in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EU) 2021/468)
Date: 2024-11-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: consumer protection, food safety, food supplement, health risk, market approval, medical plant








C_202500158EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/158


13.1.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Aloe Vera of Europe v Commission


(Case T-189/21)
                (1)

(Consumer protection - Substances prohibited, restricted or under EU scrutiny - Article 8(1) and (2) of, and Annex III to, Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 - Prohibition of preparations from the leaf of Aloe species containing hydroxyanthracene derivatives - Third entry in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EU) 2021/468)
(C/2025/158)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Aloe Vera of Europe BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: B. Van Vooren and P. Bogaert, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Rous Demiri, I. Galindo Martín and K. Mifsud-Bonnici, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/468 of 18 March 2021 amending Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards botanical species containing hydroxyanthracene derivatives (OJ 2021 L 96, p. 6), in so far as, by the third entry in Article 1(1) of that regulation, the European Commission included ‘preparations from the leaf of Aloe species containing hydroxyanthracene derivatives’ in Part A of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on the addition of vitamins and minerals and of certain other substances to foods (OJ 2006 L 404, p. 26).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the third entry in Article 1(1) of Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/468 of 18 March 2021 amending Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards botanical species containing hydroxyanthracene derivatives, by which ‘preparations from the leaf of Aloe species containing hydroxyanthracene derivatives’ were included in Part A of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on the addition of vitamins and minerals and of certain other substances to foods;










2.


Orders the European Commission to pay the costs, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings.






(1)  
            OJ C 206, 31.5.2021.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/158/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Joined Cases C-104/24 and C-105/24, Questore della Provincia di Ragusa et Ministero dell'Interno: Order of the President of the Court of 13 November 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione – Italy) – Questore della Provincia di Ragusa, Ministero dell'Interno v D. A. (C-104/24), M. A. (C-105/24)
Date: 2024-11-13
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: asylum seeker, detention before trial, guarantee, international protection, principle of proportionality, right of asylum








C_202500903EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/903


17.2.2025






Order of the President of the Court of 13 November 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione – Italy) – Questore della Provincia di Ragusa, Ministero dell'Interno v D. A. (C-104/24), M. A. (C-105/24)


(Joined Cases C-104/24 and C-105/24,
                (1)
Questore della Provincia di Ragusa et Ministero dell'Interno)

(C/2025/903)
Language of the case: Italian
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C, C/2024/2929.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/903/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-426/23: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Chiquita Brands v EUIPO – Compagnie financière de participation (Representation of a blue and yellow oval) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark representing a blue and yellow oval – Absolute ground for invalidity – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001))
Date: 2024-11-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, confectionery, confectionery product, foodstuff, fresh fruit, fresh vegetable, fruit juice, processed foodstuff, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202500171EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/171


13.1.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Chiquita Brands v EUIPO – Compagnie financière de participation (Representation of a blue and yellow oval)


(Case T-426/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark representing a blue and yellow oval - Absolute ground for invalidity - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - No distinctive character acquired through use - Article 7(3) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001))
(C/2025/171)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Chiquita Brands LLC (Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States) (represented by: R. Dissmann and L. Jones, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Compagnie financière de participation (Marseilles, France) (represented by: B. Fontaine, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment in part of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 23 May 2023 (Case R 2243/2021-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Chiquita Brands LLC to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 321, 11.9.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/171/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11739 – INVESTCORP / PSP / PKF OCONNOR DAVIES ADVISORY)
Date: 2024-11-13
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: accounting, audit, consultancy, economic concentration, investment company, merger control, pension scheme, tax system








C_202407093EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7093


22.11.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11739 – INVESTCORP / PSP / PKF OCONNOR DAVIES ADVISORY)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/7093)

On 13 November 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11739. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7093/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-582/24: Action brought on 13 November 2024 – Claims Balkans v EUIPO (CLAIMS)
Date: 2024-11-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, audit, business data processing, consultancy, dissemination of information, legal adviser, registered trade mark, trade information, trade-mark law, traineeship








C_202500575EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/575


3.2.2025






Action brought on 13 November 2024 – Claims Balkans v EUIPO (CLAIMS)


(Case T-582/24)

(C/2025/575)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Claims Balkans d.o.o. Beograd (Belgrade, Serbia) (represented by: I. Luzhnova, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark CLAIMS – Application for registration No 18 788 206

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 September 2024 in Case R 1833/2023-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, of the principle of sound administration, as well as of the obligation to state reasons;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/575/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Annual report on EU Joint Undertakings for the financial year 2023
Date: 2024-11-13
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: European Joint Undertaking, Framework Programme for Research and Development, activity report, administration of the Institutions, audit, auditing, budgetary control, financial control








C_202406841EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6841


13.11.2024






Annual report on EU Joint Undertakings for the financial year 2023
(C/2024/6841)

The European Court of Auditors will publish its annual report for the financial year 2023 on EU Joint Undertakings, together with their replies, on 13 November 2024.
The report can be consulted directly or downloaded, from 17:00 on 13 November 2024, at the European Court of Auditors’ website:

https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/publications/SAR-JUS-2023



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6841/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)