do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-223/20: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Orion v Commission (Medicinal products for human use – Generic medicinal products – Decision granting marketing authorisation for the medicinal product for human use Dexmedetomidine Accord – dexmedetomidine – Eligibility of a medicinal product as a reference medicinal product – Article 10(1) and (2) of Directive 2001/83/EC)
Date: 2024-11-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: drug surveillance, generic drug, market approval








C_202500261EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/261


20.1.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Orion v Commission


(Case T-223/20)
                (1)

(Medicinal products for human use - Generic medicinal products - Decision granting marketing authorisation for the medicinal product for human use Dexmedetomidine Accord - dexmedetomidine - Eligibility of a medicinal product as a reference medicinal product - Article 10(1) and (2) of Directive 2001/83/EC)
(C/2025/261)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Orion Oyj (Espoo, Finland) (represented by: C. Schoonderbeek, lawyer, J. Mulryne and E. Amos, Solicitors, and J. Stratford, Barrister-at-Law)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Haasbeek, E. Mathieu and R. Lindenthal, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Accord Healthcare, SL (represented by: C. Drew, Solicitor, D. Piccinin, Barrister, and T. Johnston, Barrister-at-Law)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Implementing Decision C(2020) 942 (final) of 13 February 2020 granting marketing authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council [of 31 March 2004 laying down Union procedures for the authorisation and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use and establishing a European Medicines Agency (OJ 2004 L 136, p. 1)] for ‘Dexmedetomidine Accord – dexmedetomidine’, a medicinal product for human use.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Commission Implementing Decision C(2020) 942 (final) of 13 February 2020 granting marketing authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council [of 31 March 2004 laying down Union procedures for the authorisation and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use and establishing a European Medicines Agency] for the medicinal product for human use ‘Dexmedetomidine Accord – dexmedetomidine’;










2.


Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Orion Oyj;










3.


Orders Accord Healthcare, SL to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 209, 22.6.2020.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/261/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.58504
Date: 2024-11-13
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Germany, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid








C_202406806EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6806


13.11.2024






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.58504
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/6806)








Date of adoption of the decision


1.12.2020




Aid number


SA.58504




Member State


Germany




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Covid 19: Federal Scheme on Recapitalisation Measures




Legal basis


Regelung zur vorübergehenden Gewährung von Rekapitalisierungen und nachrangigem Fremdkapital im Geltungsbereich der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im Zusammenhang mit dem Ausbruch von COVID-19




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy




Form of aid


Equity instruments, Hybrid capital instruments (convertible bonds), Subordinated debt




Budget


Overall budget: 3 350 000 000  EUR
Annual budget: 0 EUR




Intensity


 




Duration


Until 30.9.2021




Economic sectors


All economic sectors eligible to receive aid




Name and address of the granting authority







Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie




Scharnhorststraße 34-37, D-10115 Berlin








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6806/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-614/23: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Praha Alfa-Med v EUIPO – Rifetech (Apparatus and installations for medical or laboratory diagnosis) (Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing apparatus and installations for medical or laboratory diagnosis – Prior design – Obligation to state reasons – No individual character – No different overall impression – Informed user – Degree of freedom of the designer – Articles 4 to 6, Article 25(1)(b) and Article 62 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)
Date: 2024-11-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: designs and models, medical device, medical diagnosis








C_202500176EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/176


13.1.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Praha Alfa-Med v EUIPO – Rifetech (Apparatus and installations for medical or laboratory diagnosis)


(Case T-614/23)
                (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing apparatus and installations for medical or laboratory diagnosis - Prior design - Obligation to state reasons - No individual character - No different overall impression - Informed user - Degree of freedom of the designer - Articles 4 to 6, Article 25(1)(b) and Article 62 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)
(C/2025/176)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Praha Alfa-Med s. r. o. (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: M. Edelmann, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Rifetech s. r. o. (Brno, Czech Republic)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 28 June 2023 (Case R 2504/2022-3).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders EUIPO and Praha Alfa-Med s. r. o. to bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2023/781, 20.11.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/176/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1124/23: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Dyadema v EUIPO – Pegador (PEGADOR) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark PEGADOR – Earlier EU word mark PECCATORE – Relative grounds for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2024-11-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clock and watch industry, jewellery and goldsmith's articles, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202500179EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/179


13.1.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Dyadema v EUIPO – Pegador (PEGADOR)


(Case T-1124/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark PEGADOR - Earlier EU word mark PECCATORE - Relative grounds for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/179)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Dyadema Srl (San Zenone degli Ezzelini, Italy) (represented by: F. Celluprica, F. Fischetti and F. De Bono, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Klee, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Pegador GmbH (Emsdetten, Germany) (represented by: E. Haag and S. Krämer, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 13 September 2023 (R 331/2023-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Dyadema Srl to bear its own costs and those incurred by Pegador GmbH;










3.


Orders the European Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/966, 29.1.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/179/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-791/24, TERVE Production: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky (Slovakia) lodged on 13 November 2024 – TERVE Production, spol. s r.o. v Intesa Sanpaolo Holding International S.A.
Date: 2024-11-13
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: contract, judicial cooperation in civil matters in the EU, jurisdiction, preliminary issue, purchase, share, shareholder








C_202501077EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1077


24.2.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky (Slovakia) lodged on 13 November 2024 – TERVE Production, spol. s r.o. v Intesa Sanpaolo Holding International S.A.


(Case C-791/24, TERVE Production)

(C/2025/1077)
Language of the case: Slovak

Referring court

Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky

Parties to the main proceedings


Party initiating the proceedings before the referring court: TERVE Production, spol. s r.o.

Other party to the proceedings: Intesa Sanpaolo Holding International S.A.

Questions referred







1.


Must the provisions of Article 7(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (recast) (‘Regulation No 1215/2012’) be interpreted as meaning that an action to substitute the approval of the appellant’s draft agreement concerning the purchase of shares with a court ruling should be considered an action ‘in matters relating to a contract’?










2.


If the first question is answered in the negative, must the provisions of Article 7(2) of Regulation No 1215/2012 be interpreted as meaning that an action to substitute the approval of the appellant’s draft agreement concerning the purchase of shares with a court ruling should be considered an action ‘in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict’?










3.


Must the provisions of Article 24(2) of Regulation No 1215/2012 be interpreted as also applying to the main proceedings in view of the fact that the appellant requests that the court in the main proceedings consider, as a preliminary issue, its plea that the resolution of the general meeting approving the transfer of the shares of the other shareholders (including the appellant’s shares) to the respondent is non-existent or invalid?






(1)  
            OJ 2012 L 351, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1077/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1050/23: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Markov v Commission (Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Notice of competition – Open competition EPSO/AD/383/21 – Decision not to include the applicant on the reserve list – Obligation to state reasons – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Principle of good administration – Right to be heard – Liability)
Date: 2024-11-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EPSO, administrator, competition (EU), indemnification, information profession, legal profession, principle of legal certainty, recruitment, rights of the defence








C_202500177EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/177


13.1.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Markov v Commission


(Case T-1050/23)
                (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Recruitment - Notice of competition - Open competition EPSO/AD/383/21 - Decision not to include the applicant on the reserve list - Obligation to state reasons - Legal certainty - Legitimate expectations - Principle of good administration - Right to be heard - Liability)
(C/2025/177)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Yavor Markov (Sofia, Bulgaria) (represented by: I. Stoynev, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland and G. Niddam, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of 28 February 2023 by which the selection board for competition EPSO/AD/383/21 decided not to include him on the reserve list for the competition and, second, compensation for the damage which he claims to have suffered as a result of the failure to include his name on the reserve list for the competition.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mr Yavor Markov and the European Commission to bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/440, 3.1.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/177/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-800/24 P: Appeal brought on 13 November 2024 by Tertianum Services AG against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 04 September 2024 in Case T-73/23, Tertianum v EUIPO – DPF (TERTIANUM)
Date: 2024-11-13
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, business management, consultancy, health service, nursing care, property leasing, provision of services, registered trade mark, tourism, trade-mark law








C_202503861EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/3861


21.7.2025






Appeal brought on 13 November 2024 by Tertianum Services AG against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 04 September 2024 in Case T-73/23, Tertianum v EUIPO – DPF (TERTIANUM)


(Case C-800/24 P)

(C/2025/3861)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Tertianum Services AG (represented by: S. Frohlich, M. Hartmann and H. Lerchl, Rechtsanwälte)

Other parties to the proceedings: Tertianum AG (represented by: S. Frohlich and M. Hartmann, Rechtsanwälte), European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: D. Stoyanova-Valchanova, agent), DPF AG (represented by: A. Nordemann, Rechtsanwalt)
By order of 05 June 2025, the Court of Justice (Tenth Chamber) held that the appeal was dismissed as manifestly inadmissible and that Tertianum Services AG, Tertianum AG, the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and DPF AG shall bear their own costs.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3861/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-82/24: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Administration of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine v EUIPO (RUSSIAN WARSHIP, GO F**K YOURSELF) (EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark RUSSIAN WARSHIP, GO F**K YOURSELF – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Political slogan – Equal treatment – Principle of sound administration – Article 71(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)
Date: 2024-11-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, Russo-Ukrainian issue, decorative item, jewellery and goldsmith's articles, measuring equipment, packaging product, registered trade mark, software, sports equipment, trade-mark law








C_202500186EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/186


13.1.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Administration of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine v EUIPO (RUSSIAN WARSHIP, GO F**K YOURSELF)


(Case T-82/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU figurative mark RUSSIAN WARSHIP, GO F**K YOURSELF - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Political slogan - Equal treatment - Principle of sound administration - Article 71(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)
(C/2025/186)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Administration of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine (Kyiv, Ukraine) (represented by: P. Holý, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf, acting as Agent)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 1 December 2023 (Case R 438/2023-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Administration of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) each to bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/2447, 8.4.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/186/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 12 November 2024
Date: 2024-11-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202406699EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6699


13.11.2024






Euro exchange rates (1)


            12 November 2024
         
(C/2024/6699)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0617 




JPY


Japanese yen


163,71 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4591 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,82835 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,5420 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9354 




ISK


Iceland króna


147,90 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,7385 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,390 




HUF


Hungarian forint


410,70 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3503 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9763 




TRY


Turkish lira


36,5039 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6206 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4799 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,2586 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7848 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4204 




KRW


South Korean won


1 492,15 




ZAR


South African rand


19,1584 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,6781 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 770,14 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7139 




PHP


Philippine peso


62,273 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,942 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,1131 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,6428 




INR


Indian rupee


89,5888 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6699/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-3/24: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – DDCF v EUIPO (SUSTAINABLE BY DESIGN) (EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark SUSTAINABLE BY DESIGN – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2024-11-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, leather, personal effects, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202500267EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/267


20.1.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – DDCF v EUIPO (SUSTAINABLE BY DESIGN)


(Case T-3/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark SUSTAINABLE BY DESIGN - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/267)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Delvaux design coordination et finance (DDCF) (Etterbeek, Belgium) (represented by: M. Hartmann, S. Fröhlich and T. Ntinas, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: R. Raponi, acting as Agent)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 18 October 2023 (Case R 1075/2023-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Delvaux design coordination et finance (DDCF) and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) each to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/1430, 19.2.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/267/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-64/20: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Deutsche Telekom v Commission (Competition – Concentrations – German markets for TV services and telecommunications services – Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement – Commitments – Assessment of the horizontal and vertical effects of the transaction on competition – Competitive relationship between the parties to the concentration – Merger-specific change – Manifest error of assessment)
Date: 2024-11-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Economic Area, Germany, competition, economic concentration, merger control, provision of services, retail trade, telecommunications, television








C_202500259EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/259


20.1.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Deutsche Telekom v Commission


(Case T-64/20)
                (1)

(Competition - Concentrations - German markets for TV services and telecommunications services - Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement - Commitments - Assessment of the horizontal and vertical effects of the transaction on competition - Competitive relationship between the parties to the concentration - Merger-specific change - Manifest error of assessment)
(C/2025/259)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Deutsche Telekom AG (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: C. von Köckritz, U. Soltész, M. Wirtz, M. Schulz, P. Lohs and S. Zinndorf, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Conte, J. Szczodrowski and C. Urraca Caviedes, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Vodafone Group plc, (Newbury, United Kingdom) (represented by: V. Vollmann, Solicitor, C. Jeffs, A. Chadd and D. Seeliger, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision C(2019) 5187 final of 18 July 2019 declaring the concentration involving the acquisition by Vodafone Group plc of certain assets of Liberty Global plc to be compatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/M.8864 – Vodafone/Certain Liberty Global Assets).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Deutsche Telekom AG to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 95, 23.3.2020.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/259/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)