do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-242/17 RENV-OP: Judgment of the General Court of 6 November 2024 – SC v Eulex Kosovo (Arbitration clause – Common foreign and security policy – Civilian international staff of EU international missions – Consecutive fixed-term employment contracts – Internal competition – Non-renewal of a fixed-term contract – Contractual liability – Admissibility – Judgment by default – Application to set aside)
Date: 2024-11-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU police mission, Kosovo, admissibility, competition (EU), damages, indemnification, servant (EU), temporary employment, termination of employment, work contract








C_202500058EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/58


6.1.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 6 November 2024 – SC v Eulex Kosovo


(Case T-242/17 RENV-OP)
                (1)

(Arbitration clause - Common foreign and security policy - Civilian international staff of EU international missions - Consecutive fixed-term employment contracts - Internal competition - Non-renewal of a fixed-term contract - Contractual liability - Admissibility - Judgment by default - Application to set aside)
(C/2025/58)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant in the main proceedings: SC (represented by: A. Kunst, lawyer)

Defendant in the main proceedings: Eulex Kosovo (Pristina, Kosovo) (represented by: L.-G. Wigemark, acting as Agent, and by E. Raoult, lawyer)

Re:

By its application under Article 166(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Eulex Kosovo seeks to have set aside the judgment of 19 October 2022, SC v Eulex Kosovo (T-242/17 RENV, not published, EU:T:2022:637), by which the General Court, judging by default in favour of the applicant in the main proceedings, SC (‘the applicant’), pursuant to Article 123(3) of those rules, ordered Eulex Kosovo to pay her compensation in respect of the material damage suffered, equivalent to 19 months’ gross salary, to which the daily subsistence allowance and the salary increase should be added, to correspond to the situation in which the applicant’s final employment contract was renewed until 14 June 2018, together with compensation for the non-material damage suffered, assessed ex æquo et bono at EUR 50 000.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Sets aside the judgment of 19 October 2022, SC v Eulex Kosovo (T-242/17 RENV);










2.


Dismisses the action registered under Case number T-242/17;










3.


Orders Eulex Kosovo and SC to bear their own costs relating to Cases T-242/17 and T-242/17 RENV-OP;










4.


Orders Eulex Kosovo to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by SC relating to Cases T-242/17 RENV and C-730/18 P.






(1)  
            OJ C 231, 17.7.2017.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/58/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/2759 of 19 July 2024 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2015/760 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying when derivatives will be used solely for hedging the risks inherent to other investments of the European long-term investment fund (ELTIF), the requirements for an ELTIF’s redemption policy and liquidity management tools, the circumstances for the matching of transfer requests of units or shares of the ELTIF, certain criteria for the disposal of ELTIF assets, and certain elements of the costs disclosure (OJ L, 2024/2759, 25.10.2024)
Date: 2024-11-06
Institutions: European Commission, Secretariat-General
Subjects: exchange of information, financial instrument, financial legislation, financial risk, investment company, investment protection, issue of securities, long-term financing, securities, technical standard








L_202490705EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2024/90705


6.11.2024






Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/2759 of 19 July 2024 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2015/760 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying when derivatives will be used solely for hedging the risks inherent to other investments of the European long-term investment fund (ELTIF), the requirements for an ELTIF’s redemption policy and liquidity management tools, the circumstances for the matching of transfer requests of units or shares of the ELTIF, certain criteria for the disposal of ELTIF assets, and certain elements of the costs disclosure

(
Official Journal of the European Union L, 2024/2759, 25 October 2024
)








(1)


On page 12, in Article 8(4), chapeau:




for:


                  ‘With respect to the requirement, laid down in Article 19(2a), point (b), of Regulation (EU) 2015/760, that where there is a mismatch between existing and potential investors, matching is to be carried out on a pro rata basis, the policy for matching requests of the ELTIF shall specify all of the following:’,

read:


                  ‘With respect to the requirement, laid down in Article 19(2a), point (b), of Regulation (EU) 2015/760, that where there is a mismatch between exiting and potential investors, matching is to be carried out on a pro rata basis, the policy for matching requests of the ELTIF shall specify all of the following:’;







(2)


On page 12, in Article 9(1), point (e):




for:







‘(e)


any exit or subscription fees, charges or costs related to the matching of transfer requests that are to be borne by existing or potential investors;’,





read:







(e)


‘any exit or subscription fees, charges or costs related to the matching of transfer requests that are to be borne by exiting or potential investors;’.







ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2024/2759/corrigendum/2024-11-06/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 5 November 2024
Date: 2024-11-06
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202406692EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6692


6.11.2024






Euro exchange rates (1)


            5 November 2024
         
(C/2024/6692)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0897 




JPY


Japanese yen


165,93 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4586 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,83920 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,6665 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9402 




ISK


Iceland króna


148,90 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,9600 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,343 




HUF


Hungarian forint


409,25 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3580 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9756 




TRY


Turkish lira


37,4292 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6452 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5128 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,4687 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,8169 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4351 




KRW


South Korean won


1 503,71 




ZAR


South African rand


19,0277 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,7405 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 180,21 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7353 




PHP


Philippine peso


63,553 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,652 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,3039 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,9579 




INR


Indian rupee


91,6565 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6692/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-641/22: Judgment of the General Court of 6 November 2024 – Portigon v SRB (2017 ex ante contributions) (Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2017 ex ante contributions – Obligation to state reasons)
Date: 2024-11-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank, bank resolution, company in difficulties, financing method, financing plan, fund (EU)








C_202500163EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/163


13.1.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 6 November 2024 – Portigon v SRB (2017 ex ante contributions)


(Case T-641/22)
                (1)

(Economic and monetary union - Banking union - Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Single Resolution Fund (SRF) - Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2017 ex ante contributions - Obligation to state reasons)
(C/2025/163)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Portigon AG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: D. Bliesener, V. Jungkind and C. van Kampen, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: J. Kerlin, D. Ceran and T. Wittenberg, acting as Agents, and by B. Meyring and T. Klupsch, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by: G. Bartram, J. Etienne and M. Menegatti, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: J. Haunold, J. Bauerschmidt and A. Westerhof Löfflerová, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Decision SRB/ES/2022/41 of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 25 July 2022 on the calculation of the 2017 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund of Hypo Vorarlberg Bank AG and Portigon AG, in so far as it concerns it.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Decision SRB/ES/2022/41 of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 25 July 2022 on the calculation of the 2017 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund of Hypo Vorarlberg Bank AG and Portigon AG, in so far as it concerns Portigon AG;










2.


Maintains the effects of Decision SRB/ES/2022/41 in so far as it concerns Portigon until the entry into force, within a reasonable period which cannot exceed six months from the date of delivery of the present judgment, of a new decision of the SRB fixing that institution’s ex ante contribution to the Single Resolution Fund for the 2017 contribution period;










3.


Orders the SRB, in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay those incurred by Portigon;










4.


Declares that the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union are to bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 451, 28.11.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/163/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-136/23: Judgment of the General Court of 6 November 2024 – Vintae Luxury Wine Specialists v EUIPO – Grande Vitae (vintae) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Vintae – Earlier national word mark VITAE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – No limitation in consequence of acquiescence – Article 53(2) of Regulation No 40/94)
Date: 2024-11-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, alcoholic beverage, registered trade mark, retail trade, trade-mark law, wholesale trade








C_202500064EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/64


6.1.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 6 November 2024 – Vintae Luxury Wine Specialists v EUIPO – Grande Vitae (vintae)


(Case T-136/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark Vintae - Earlier national word mark VITAE - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal - Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 - No limitation in consequence of acquiescence - Article 53(2) of Regulation No 40/94)
(C/2025/64)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Vintae Luxury Wine Specialists SLU (Logroño, Spain) (represented by: L.M. Broschat García and L.M. Polo Flores, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Klee, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Grande Vitae GmbH (Delmenhorst, Germany) (represented by: C. Saettel, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 16 January 2023 (Case R 2238/2021-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Vintae Luxury Wine Specialists SLU to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Grande Vitae GmbH;










3.


Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 173, 15.5.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/64/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-544/23: Judgment of the General Court of 6 November 2024 – Puma v EUIPO – Zheng (Representation of an emblem) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for an EU figurative mark representing an emblem – Earlier EU figurative marks representing a stripe – Relative ground for refusal – No similarity of the signs – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001)
Date: 2024-11-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202500174EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/174


13.1.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 6 November 2024 – Puma v EUIPO – Zheng (Representation of an emblem)


(Case T-544/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for an EU figurative mark representing an emblem - Earlier EU figurative marks representing a stripe - Relative ground for refusal - No similarity of the signs - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - No damage to reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001)
(C/2025/174)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: M. Schunke and P. Trieb, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Yukai Zheng (Zhongshan, China)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 16 June 2023 (Case R 1956/2022-4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Puma SE to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2023/146, 16.10.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/174/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-573/24: Action brought on 6 November 2024 – Romagnoli Fratelli v CPVO (Melrose)
Date: 2024-11-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: coronavirus disease, epidemic, pip fruit, plant breeding, plant variety right








C_202500918EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/918


17.2.2025






Action brought on 6 November 2024 – Romagnoli Fratelli v CPVO (Melrose)


(Case T-573/24)

(C/2025/918)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Romagnoli Fratelli SpA (Bologna, Italy) (represented by: E. Truffo and A. Iurato, lawyers)

Defendant: Community Plant Variety Office

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Community Plant Variety at issue: Variety Melrose – Community Plant Variety Right No EU 31618

Contested decision: Restitutio in Integrum Decision of the Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) of 3 August 2024 in file No 2009/2240

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order CPVO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Force majeure and hardship due to the Covid-19 pandemic;










—


Excusable error;










—


Missed or inaccurate interpretation of evidence; and










—


Infringement of Article 65 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 874/2009.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/918/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
Date: 2024-11-06
Institutions: Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, European Commission
Subjects: Atlantic Ocean, France, United Kingdom, catch area, catch by species, catch quota, fishing rights, international waters, sea fish, sea fishing, territorial waters








C_202406737EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6737


6.11.2024






Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
(C/2024/6737)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


22.5.2024




Duration


22.5.2024 - 31.12.2024




Member State


France




Stock or Group of stocks


HER/5B6ANB




Species


Herring (Clupea harengus)




Zone


6b and 6aN; United Kingdom and international waters of 5b




Type(s) of fishing vessels


—




Reference number


20/TQ257






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6737/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-241/24, Tsenochev: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 November 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okrazhen sad – Pleven, Bulgaria) – criminal proceedings against M. N. D., Y. G. Ts. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to set out the factual and legislative context of the dispute or the proceedings in the main action and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2024-11-06
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Bulgaria, criminal proceedings, damages, disciplinary proceedings, help for victims, imprisonment, judge, organised crime, right to an effective remedy, trafficking in human beings








C_202500881EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/881


17.2.2025






Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 November 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okrazhen sad – Pleven, Bulgaria) – criminal proceedings against M. N. D., Y. G. Ts.


(Case C-241/24,
                (1)
Tsenochev
                (2)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Requirement to set out the factual and legislative context of the dispute or the proceedings in the main action and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling - Lack of sufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2025/881)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Okrazhen sad – Pleven

Parties in the main criminal proceedings

M. N. D.,
Y. G. Ts.

interested party: Okrazhna prokuratura – Pleven

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Okrazhen sad – Pleven (Regional Court, Pleven, Bulgaria), made by decision of 3 April 2024, is manifestly inadmissible.


(1)  OJ C C/2024/3448.

(2)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/881/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1146/23: Judgment of the General Court of 6 November 2024 – W.L. Gore & Associates v EUIPO – Angiokard med. Spritzguß (Cardioflow) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Cardioflow – Earlier EU word mark CARDIOFORM – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2024-11-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, medical device, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202500181EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/181


13.1.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 6 November 2024 – W.L. Gore & Associates v EUIPO – Angiokard med. Spritzguß (Cardioflow)


(Case T-1146/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark Cardioflow - Earlier EU word mark CARDIOFORM - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/181)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: W.L. Gore & Associates Inc. (Newark, Delaware, United States) (represented by: C. Tenkhoff and T. Herzog, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Angiokard med. Spritzguß GmbH (Friedeburg, Germany)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 27 September 2023 (Case R 739/2023-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/977, 29.1.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/181/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)