do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-549/24: Action brought on 23 October 2024 – Schönegger Käse-Alm v EUIPO – Jumpseat3D plus Germany (Rebell)
Date: 2024-10-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, milk product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202407371EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7371


16.12.2024






Action brought on 23 October 2024 – Schönegger Käse-Alm v EUIPO – Jumpseat3D plus Germany (Rebell)


(Case T-549/24)

(C/2024/7371)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Schönegger Käse-Alm GmbH (Prem, Germany) (represented by: M. Pütz-Poulalion, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Jumpseat3D plus Germany GmbH (Berlin, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark Rebell – EU trade mark No 2 810 950

Proceedings before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 August 2024 in Case R 295/2022-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 72(6), in conjunction with Article 106(1)(b) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, in conjunction with Article 72(1) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;










—


Infringement of Article 63(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 60(1) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7371/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-404/22: Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2024 – Deutsche Kreditbank v SRB (Contributions ex ante 2022) (Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the ex ante contributions for the 2022 contribution period – Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Error of law – Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment)
Date: 2024-10-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank, bank resolution, company in difficulties, financing method, financing plan, fund (EU)








C_202407322EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7322


16.12.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2024 – Deutsche Kreditbank v SRB (Contributions ex ante 2022)


(Case T-404/22)
                (1)

(Economic and monetary union - Banking union - Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Single Resolution Fund (SRF) - Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the ex ante contributions for the 2022 contribution period - Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 - Error of law - Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment)
(C/2024/7322)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Deutsche Kreditbank AG (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: H. Berger, M. Weber and D. Schoo, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: K.-P. Wojcik, J. Kerlin, T. Wittenberg and D. Ceran, acting as Agents, and by H.-G. Kamann and P. Gey, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by: J. Etienne, M. Menegatti and G. Bartram, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: J. Haunold, J. Bauerschmidt and A. Westerhof Löfflerová, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Decision SRB/ES/2022/18 of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 11 April 2022 on the calculation of the 2022 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRF), in so far as that decision concerns it.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Decision SRB/ES/2022/18 of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 11 April 2022 on the calculation of the 2022 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRF) in so far as it concerns Deutsche Kreditbank AG;










2.


Maintains the effects of Decision SRB/ES/2022/18, in so far as it concerns Deutsche Kreditbank AG, until the SRB has taken the measures necessary to implement the present judgment, which must be within a reasonable period which cannot exceed six months from the day on which the present judgment becomes final;










3.


Orders the SRB to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Deutsche Kreditbank AG;










4.


Orders the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union to bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 380, 3.10.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7322/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1132/23: Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2024 – Olvi v EUIPO – Koninklijke De Kuyper (FIZZ Cider) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Figurative mark FIZZ Cider – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Descriptive character – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)
Date: 2024-10-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, alcoholic beverage, non-alcoholic beverage, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202407343EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7343


16.12.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2024 – Olvi v EUIPO – Koninklijke De Kuyper (FIZZ Cider)


(Case T-1132/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Figurative mark FIZZ Cider - Absolute grounds for invalidity - Descriptive character - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal - Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 - Obligation to state reasons - Right to be heard - Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)
(C/2024/7343)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Olvi Oyj (Iisalmi, Finland) (represented by: K. Rantala, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Klee, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Koninklijke De Kuyper BV (Schiedam, Netherlands)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 27 September 2023 (Case R 2011/2022-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/969, 29.1.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7343/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-59/24: Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2024 – BBF Company v EUIPO – Monster Energy (INSOMNIA ENERGY) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark INSOMNIA ENERGY – Earlier EU figurative mark MONSTER ENERGY – Relative grounds for invalidity – Damage to reputation – Taking unfair advantage of the distinctive character or repute of the earlier mark – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Date: 2024-10-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, aerated drink, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202407347EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7347


16.12.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2024 – BBF Company v EUIPO – Monster Energy (INSOMNIA ENERGY)


(Case T-59/24)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark INSOMNIA ENERGY - Earlier EU figurative mark MONSTER ENERGY - Relative grounds for invalidity - Damage to reputation - Taking unfair advantage of the distinctive character or repute of the earlier mark - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(C/2024/7347)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: BBF Company EOOD (Plovdiv, Bulgaria), authorised to replace Shoqëria Tregtare BBF Company SHPK (represented by: A. Kostov, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Monster Energy Co. (Corona, California, United States) (represented by: L. Junquera Lara, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 7 December 2023 (Case R 258/2023-4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Authorises BBF Company EOOD to replace Shoqëria Tregtare BBF Company SHPK as applicant;










2.


Dismisses the action;










3.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/2442, 8.4.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7347/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1185/23: Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2024 – Bimbo v EUIPO – Guangzhou Danxi Trade (Bimbys) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Bimbys – Earlier national word mark BIMBO – Relative ground for refusal – Damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2024-10-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, bread, cosmetic product, decorative item, gift item, household article, packaging product, paper, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202502066EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/2066


14.4.2025






Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2024 – Bimbo v EUIPO – Guangzhou Danxi Trade (Bimbys)


(Case T-1185/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark Bimbys - Earlier national word mark BIMBO - Relative ground for refusal - Damage to reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/2066)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Bimbo, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. Carbonell Callicó, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Guangzhou Danxi Trade Co. Ltd (Guangzhou, China)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 24 October 2023 (Case R 635/2023-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/1426, 19.2.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2066/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-722/24, Elektro bizness: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) (Latvia) lodged on 23 October 2024 – SIA Elektro bizness v Sabiedrisko pakalpojumu regulēšanas komisija
Date: 2024-10-23
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: electrical energy, electricity supply, energy distribution, energy grid, energy production, energy transport, ownership, power plant








C_202500152EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/152


13.1.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) (Latvia) lodged on 23 October 2024 – SIA ‘Elektro bizness’ v Sabiedrisko pakalpojumu regulēšanas komisija


(Case C-722/24, Elektro bizness)

(C/2025/152)
Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Augstākā tiesa (Senāts)

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant at first instance and appellant in cassation: SIA ‘Elektro bizness’
         

Defendant: Sabiedrisko pakalpojumu regulēšanas komisija

Questions referred

For the purposes of point 41 of Article 2 of Directive (EU) 2019/944 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 on common rules for the internal market for electricity and amending Directive 2012/27/EU (recast): (1)







(a)


Must the concept of ‘isolated generation site’ used in that provision be construed as also including an electricity line owned by a producer, connected to a generating station, intended to transmit generated electricity and extending beyond the boundaries of the location (postal address) of the generating station?










(b)


Does the definition of ‘direct line’ contained in that provision include an electricity line connecting a customer to an electricity generation site (cogeneration plant) through the deployment of a connection to a pre-constructed electricity line owned by a producer and intended to transmit electricity, if this has the result of ensuring the supply of electricity from the producer to the customer without the intermediation of the distribution network operator’s network? Would it have any bearing on the answer to this question if the pre-constructed electricity line owned by the producer and intended to transmit electricity, to which the proposed line would be connected in order to reach the new customer, were already being used to supply electricity to other customers?






(1)  
            OJ 2019 L 158, p. 125.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/152/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.11723 – ONEX / QH / MARS DEBTCO) – Candidate case for simplified procedure
Date: 2024-10-23
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: aircraft, economic concentration, engine, holding company, investment company, logistics, merger control, spare part, supply chain








C_202406457EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6457


23.10.2024






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.11723 – ONEX / QH / MARS DEBTCO)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/6457)


1.   
On 16 October 2024, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


Onex Corporation (‘Onex’, Canada),










—


Qatar Holding LLC (‘QH’, Qatar),










—


Mars Debtco Limited (‘Mars Debtco’, United Kingdom).




Onex and QH will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the whole of Mars Debtco.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:






—


Onex: company that invests in industrial services, healthcare, consumer and retail services, financial services and private credit strategies.










—


QH: a global investment holding company founded by the Qatar Investment Authority. Invests in a range of asset classes and regions.










—


Mars Debtco: a special purpose vehicle holding all shares in Farsound Aviation Limited, a United Kingdom based global supply chain and logistics solution provider of small spare parts for aircraft engines.






3.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified treatment for certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.11723 - ONEX / QH / MARS DEBTCO
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  
            OJ C 160, 5.5.2023, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6457/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Special report 22/2024: Double funding from the EU budget – Control systems lack essential elements to mitigate the increased risk resulting from the RRF model of financing not linked to costs
Date: 2024-10-23
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: EU aid, EU budget, EU financial instrument, EU financing arrangements, economic and social cohesion, financial risk, financial supervision, financial transparency, investment








C_202406375EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6375


23.10.2024






Special report 22/2024:

            ‘Double funding from the EU budget – Control systems lack essential elements to mitigate the increased risk resulting from the RRF model of financing not linked to costs’
         
(C/2024/6375)

The European Court of Auditors has published its special report 22/2024: ‘Double funding from the EU budget – Control systems lack essential elements to mitigate the increased risk resulting from the RRF model of financing not linked to costs’.
The report can be consulted directly or downloaded at the European Court of Auditors’ website: https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/publications/sr-2024-22



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6375/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1167/23: Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2024 – Daimler Truck v EUIPO (TRUCKS YOU CAN TRUST) (EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark TRUCKS YOU CAN TRUST – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2024-10-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, commercial vehicle, maintenance, motor vehicle, registered trade mark, toy industry, trade-mark law, vehicle parts








C_202407345EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7345


16.12.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2024 – Daimler Truck v EUIPO (TRUCKS YOU CAN TRUST)


(Case T-1167/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - International registration designating the European Union - Word mark TRUCKS YOU CAN TRUST - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2024/7345)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Daimler Truck AG (Leinfelden-Echterdingen, Germany) (represented by: P. Kohl, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Klee, acting as Agent)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 19 September 2023 (Case R 485/2023-2).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Daimler Truck AG to bear its own costs;










3.


Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/1113, 5.2.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7345/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-1048/23: Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2024 – Grupo Bimbo v EUIPO (Shape of a flat and round biscuit) (EU trade mark – Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark – Shape of a flat and round biscuit – Absolute ground for invalidity – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2024-10-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, confectionery, confectionery product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_202407341EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7341


16.12.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2024 – Grupo Bimbo v EUIPO (Shape of a flat and round biscuit)


(Case T-1048/23)
                (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark - Shape of a flat and round biscuit - Absolute ground for invalidity - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2024/7341)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Grupo Bimbo, SAB de CV (Mexico City, Mexico) (represented by: N. Fernández Fernández-Pacheco, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 1 September 2023 (Case R 950/2023-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Grupo Bimbo, SAB de CV and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/462, 3.1.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7341/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)