do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-402/22: Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2024 – DZ Hyp v SRB (Contributions ex ante 2022) (Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the ex ante contributions for the 2022 contribution period – Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Error of law – Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment)
Date: 2024-10-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank, bank resolution, company in difficulties, financing method, financing plan, fund (EU)








C_202407320EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7320


16.12.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2024 – DZ Hyp v SRB (Contributions ex ante 2022)


(Case T-402/22)
                (1)

(Economic and monetary union - Banking union - Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Single Resolution Fund (SRF) - Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the ex ante contributions for the 2022 contribution period - Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 - Error of law - Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment)
(C/2024/7320)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: DZ Hyp AG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: H. Berger, M. Weber and D. Schoo, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: K.-P. Wojcik, J. Kerlin, T. Wittenberg and D. Ceran, acting as Agents, and by H.-G. Kamann and P. Gey, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by: J. Etienne, M. Menegatti and G. Bartram, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: J. Haunold, J. Bauerschmidt and A. Westerhof Löfflerová, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Decision SRB/ES/2022/18 of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 11 April 2022 on the calculation of the 2022 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRF), in so far as that decision concerns it.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Decision SRB/ES/2022/18 of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) of 11 April 2022 on the calculation of the 2022 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRF) in so far as it concerns DZ Hyp AG;










2.


Maintains the effects of Decision SRB/ES/2022/18, in so far as it concerns DZ Hyp AG, until the SRB has taken the measures necessary to implement the present judgment, which must be within a reasonable period which cannot exceed six months from the day on which the present judgment becomes final;










3.


Orders the SRB to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by DZ Hyp AG;










4.


Orders the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union to bear their own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 380, 3.10.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7320/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-34/24: Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2024 – CA v Court of Auditors (Civil service – Officials – Promotion – 2023 promotion exercise – Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 8 – Article 45 of the Staff Regulations – Consideration of comparative merits – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Equal treatment – Principle of non-discrimination)
Date: 2024-10-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: administrator, equal treatment, promotion, staff assessment, staff regulations (EU)








C_202407346EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7346


16.12.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2024 – CA v Court of Auditors


(Case T-34/24)
                (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Promotion - 2023 promotion exercise - Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 8 - Article 45 of the Staff Regulations - Consideration of comparative merits - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment - Equal treatment - Principle of non-discrimination)
(C/2024/7346)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: CA (represented by: A. Tymen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Court of Auditors (represented by: K. Kantza, A.-M. Feipel-Cosciug and G.-M. Prantzos, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of decision No 20-2023 of the European Court of Auditors of 22 March 2023 not to promote him to grade AD 8 in the 2023 promotion exercise.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders CA to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/1880, 11.3.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7346/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-25/23: Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2024 – Orgatex v EUIPO – Longton (Floor markings) (Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing floor markings – Articles 3(a) and 25(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Unicity of the design – Consistency of views)
Date: 2024-10-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: designs and models








C_202407330EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7330


16.12.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2024 – Orgatex v EUIPO – Longton (Floor markings)


(Case T-25/23)
                (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing floor markings - Articles 3(a) and 25(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Unicity of the design - Consistency of views)
(C/2024/7330)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Orgatex GmbH & Co. KG (Langenfeld, Germany) (represented by: G. Jacobs, M. Maybaum and M. Dümenil, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Lawrence Longton (Brindle, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Haberl, lawyer)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 17 November 2022 (Case R 110/2022-3).

Operative part of the judgment.

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Orgatex GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 94, 13.3.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7330/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-689/22: Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2024 – SN v Commission (Civil service – Officials – Leave on personal grounds – Commission decision imposing restrictions on engaging in an outside activity – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality – Equal treatment)
Date: 2024-10-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, equal treatment, principle of proportionality, staff regulations (EU), unpaid leave








C_202407327EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7327


16.12.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2024 – SN v Commission


(Case T-689/22)
                (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Leave on personal grounds - Commission decision imposing restrictions on engaging in an outside activity - Obligation to state reasons - Proportionality - Equal treatment)
(C/2024/7327)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: SN (represented by: L. Levi and P. Baudoux, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr, acting as Agent)

Re:

By his action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the European Commission’s decision of 11 January 2022 imposing on him restrictions on engaging in an outside activity during his leave on personal grounds and of the decision of 27 July 2022 rejecting his complaint.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders SN to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 83, 6.3.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7327/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee – Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1115 as regards provisions relating to the date of application (COM(2024) 452 final — 2024/0249 (COD))
Date: 2024-10-23
Institutions: European Economic and Social Committee
Subjects: commodities market, deforestation, export (EU), market approval, primary product, reduction of gas emissions, third country, wood product








C_202500122EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/122


10.1.2025






Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1115 as regards provisions relating to the date of application



(COM(2024) 452 final — 2024/0249 (COD))


(C/2025/122)







Referral


European Parliament, 10.10.2024
Council, 11.10.2024




Legal basis


Article 192(1) and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union




Section responsible


Section for Agriculture, Rural Development and the Environment




Adopted at plenary session


23.10.2024




Plenary session No


591




Outcome of vote (for/against/abstentions)


235/1/2




Since the Committee has already set out its views on the content of the proposal in question in its opinions EESC-2024-01183-00-00-AC-TRA, adopted on 19.9.2024
          (1), and EESC-2021-05690-00-00-AC-TRA, adopted on 23.2.2022
          (2), it has decided not to draw up a new opinion on the subject, but to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned documents.


Brussels, 23 October 2024.


The President


of the European Economic and Social Committee

Oliver RÖPKE
               





(1)  Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee – Deforestation of the Amazon rainforest – impact on climate change and the global environment; consequences for companies, workers and population (own-initiative opinion) (OJ C, C/2024/6882, 28.11.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6882/oj).

(2)  Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the making available on the Union market as well as export from the Union of certain commodities and products associated with deforestation and forest degradation and repealing Regulation (EU) No 995/2010 (COM(2021) 706 final – 2021/0366(COD)) (
OJ C 275, 18.7.2022, p. 88).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/122/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-281/22: Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2024 – Xpand Consortium and Others v Commission (Public service contracts – Tendering procedure – Development, implementation, maintenance/operations, advice and consultancy services in accounting/finance and financial IT systems – Cancellation of the procurement procedure – Article 171 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Obligation to state reasons)
Date: 2024-10-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: accounting system, award of contract, computer system, public procurement, service, services contract, tendering








C_202407313EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7313


16.12.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2024 – Xpand Consortium and Others v Commission


(Case T-281/22)
                (1)

(Public service contracts - Tendering procedure - Development, implementation, maintenance/operations, advice and consultancy services in accounting/finance and financial IT systems - Cancellation of the procurement procedure - Article 171 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 - Obligation to state reasons)
(C/2024/7313)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Xpand Consortium (Brussels, Belgium), NTT Data Belgique (Brussels), Sopra Steria Benelux (Brussels), Fujitsu Technology Solutions (Brussels) (represented by: M. Troncoso Ferrer and L. Lence de Frutos, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. André and M. Ilkova, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Arhs developments SA (Belvaux, Luxembourg) (represented by: P. Teerlinck, M.-R. Gherghinaru, L. Panepinto, Z. Irusta Ortega and M. Nuytten, lawyers)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of decision Ares(2022) 1579941 of the Commission of 3 March 2022 by which it cancelled the procurement procedure relating to call for tenders BUDG 19/PO/04, in so far as it concerns Lot No 2, in accordance with Article 171 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, amending Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014, and Decision No 541/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 (OJ 2018 L 193, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls decision Ares(2022) 1579941 of the Commission of 3 March 2022 by which it cancelled the procurement procedure relating to call for tenders BUDG 19/PO/04, in so far as it concerns Lot No 2;










2.


Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Xpand Consortium, NTT Data Belgique, Sopra Steria Benelux and Fujitsu Technology Solutions, including the costs relating to the interim proceedings;










3.


Orders Arhs developments SA to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 294, 1.8.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7313/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-519/23: Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2024 – Keserű Művek v European Union (Non-contractual liability – Control of the acquisition and possession of weapons – Implementing Directive (EU) 2019/69 – Causal link – Concept of firearm – Concept of alarm and signal weapons)
Date: 2024-10-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: arms trade, designs and models, firearms and munitions, implementing directive, liability, non-proliferation of arms, technical specification, turnover








C_202407338EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7338


16.12.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2024 – Keserű Művek v European Union


(Case T-519/23)
                (1)

(Non-contractual liability - Control of the acquisition and possession of weapons - Implementing Directive (EU) 2019/69 - Causal link - Concept of ‘firearm’ - Concept of ‘alarm and signal weapons’)
(C/2024/7338)
Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties


Applicant: Keserű Művek Fegyvergyár Kft. (Budapest, Hungary) (represented by: A. Grád, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union (represented by: K. Talabér-Ritz and R. Tricot, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: French Republic (represented by: B. Fodda, R. Bénard and O. Duprat-Mazaré, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 268 TFEU and the second paragraph of Article 340 TFEU, the applicant seeks compensation for the damage which it allegedly suffered as a result of the adoption of Commission Implementing Directive (EU) 2019/69 of 16 January 2019 laying down technical specifications for alarm and signal weapons under Council Directive 91/477/EEC on control of the acquisition and possession of weapons (OJ 2019 L 15, p. 22).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Keserű Művek Fegyvergyár Kft. to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Union, represented by the European Commission;










3.


Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C C/2023/68, 9.10.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7338/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)