do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-516/24: Action brought on 7 October 2024 – Vintae Luxury Wine Specialists v EUIPO – R. Lopez de Heredia Viña Tondonia (LOPEZ DE HEREDIA)
Date: 2024-10-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, wine








C_202407354EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7354


16.12.2024






Action brought on 7 October 2024 – Vintae Luxury Wine Specialists v EUIPO – R. Lopez de Heredia Viña Tondonia (LOPEZ DE HEREDIA)


(Case T-516/24)

(C/2024/7354)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Vintae Luxury Wine Specialists SLU (Logroño, Spain) (represented by: L. Broschat García and L. Polo Flores, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: R. Lopez de Heredia Viña Tondonia SA (Haro, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Word mark LOPEZ DE HEREDIA – European Union trade mark No 14 342 182
         

Proceedings before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 August 2024 in Case R 1872/2023-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


declare the revocation of the trade mark at issue;










—


order any party opposing this application to pay the costs.





Plea in law

Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7354/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 4 October 2024
Date: 2024-10-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202405887EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5887


7.10.2024






Euro exchange rates (1)


            4 October 2024
         
(C/2024/5887)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1029 




JPY


Japanese yen


161,69 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4579 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,83735 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,3375 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9394 




ISK


Iceland króna


149,10 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,6845 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,347 




HUF


Hungarian forint


401,33 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3145 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9769 




TRY


Turkish lira


37,7762 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6121 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4952 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,5629 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7779 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4314 




KRW


South Korean won


1 478,24 




ZAR


South African rand


19,2809 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,7407 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 164,54 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6542 




PHP


Philippine peso


62,126 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,484 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,0570 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,2688 




INR


Indian rupee


92,6095 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5887/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-517/24: Action brought on 7 October 2024 – Froneri Bulgaria v EUIPO – DAESF (Box with lid)
Date: 2024-10-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: dairy ice cream, designs and models, foodstuff, packaging product, plastics








C_202407041EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7041


2.12.2024






Action brought on 7 October 2024 – Froneri Bulgaria v EUIPO – DAESF (Box with lid)


(Case T-517/24)

(C/2024/7041)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Froneri Bulgaria EOOD (Sofia, Bulgaria) (represented by: K. Gogov, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: DAESF AD (Sofia, Bulgaria)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Design at issue: Community design No 4 660 454-0001 (Boxes with lids, boxes [packaging], packaging for foodstuffs, flexible opening containers, ice-cream boxes)

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 July 2024 in Case R 995/2023-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


declare that registered Community design No 4 660 454-0001 is invalid;










—


order EUIPO and the proprietor of the design at issue to pay the costs for these proceedings before the General Court and for the proceedings before the Invalidity Division of EUIPO and before the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO.





Plea in law

Infringement of Article 5(1)(b) and Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 25(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7041/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11687 – ALFI RE / ERSTE / PLANET KOPER)
Date: 2024-10-07
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Croatia, Slovenia, banking, consultancy, economic concentration, investment company, merger control, pension scheme, real estate business, rental business








C_202406670EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6670


30.10.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11687 – ALFI RE / ERSTE / PLANET KOPER)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/6670)

On 7 October 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11687. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6670/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11678 – KBC BANK / BNP PARIBAS FORTIS / JOYN INTERNATIONAL)
Date: 2024-10-07
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: banking, digital technology, economic concentration, financial services, insurance, marketing, merger control, provision of services, retail trade, service








C_202406304EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6304


21.10.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11678 – KBC BANK / BNP PARIBAS FORTIS / JOYN INTERNATIONAL)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/6304)

On 7 October 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11678. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6304/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11708 – SAGITTA / RDE GROUP)
Date: 2024-10-07
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Italy, building industry, economic concentration, investment company, merger control








C_202406601EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6601


30.10.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11708 – SAGITTA / RDE GROUP)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/6601)

On 7 October 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11708. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6601/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-653/24, Regione Emilia-Romagna: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte costituzionale (Italy) lodged on 7 October 2024 – Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri v Regione Emilia-Romagna
Date: 2024-10-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: electrical energy, energy production, freedom to provide services, pump, renewable energy, renewable resources, service, service concession, use of water, water resources








C_202500048EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/48


6.1.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte costituzionale (Italy) lodged on 7 October 2024 – Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri v Regione Emilia-Romagna


(Case C-653/24, Regione Emilia-Romagna)

(C/2025/48)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte costituzionale

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri

Defendant: Regione Emilia-Romagna

Questions referred for a preliminary hearing







1.


Must Article 12(1) and (2) of Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market (1) be interpreted as meaning that it also applies to power plants engaged in the mere production of electricity, such as small-scale diversion hydroelectric plants?










2.


If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, must Article 12(1) and (2) of Directive 2006/123/EC be interpreted as meaning that the reference to the condition of scarcity of natural resources precludes legislation of a Member State which is based on – as an abstract and general criterion for determining whether or not diversion plants are capable of causing water scarcity – the difference between large and small-scale plants (which produce motive power with an annual average nominal power exceeding 3000 kW, and motive power with an annual average nominal power inferior or equal to 3 000 kW, respectively)?










3.


Last, if the answer to the first and second questions is in the affirmative, must Article 12(2) of Directive 2006/123/EC be interpreted as meaning that it precludes legislation of a Member State which provides for an extension of the duration of the concession in order to allow the concessionaire to make full use of incentives granted for the production of energy from renewable sources, up to the maximum duration (thirty years) which may, from the outset, be granted to a concession of a small-scale diversion?






(1)  
            OJ 2006 L 376, p. 36.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/48/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)