do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-127/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 October 2024 – Falke KGaA v European Commission (Appeal – State aid – Article 107(3)(b) TFEU – Aid regime notified by the Federal Republic of Germany – Support for uncovered fixed costs in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Temporary Framework for State Aid – Decision of the European Commission not to raise any objections – Individual examination of the aid scheme notified – Aid aimed at remedying a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State Aide – Proportionality)
Date: 2024-10-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Germany, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid, coronavirus disease, epidemic, principle of proportionality








C_202407011EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7011


2.12.2024






Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 October 2024 – Falke KGaA v European Commission


(Case C-127/23 P)
                (1)

(Appeal - State aid - Article 107(3)(b) TFEU - Aid regime notified by the Federal Republic of Germany - Support for uncovered fixed costs in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic - Temporary Framework for State Aid - Decision of the European Commission not to raise any objections - Individual examination of the aid scheme notified - Aid aimed at remedying a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State Aide - Proportionality)
(C/2024/7011)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Falke KGaA (represented by: R. Velte, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka and C. Kovács, acting as Agents), Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: J. Möller and P.-L. Krüger, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Falke KGaA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission and the Federal Republic of Germany.






(1)  
            OJ C 155, 2.5.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7011/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.115173
Date: 2024-10-04
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Portugal, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid








C_202405960EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5960


4.10.2024






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.115173
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/5960)








Date of adoption of the decision


3.9.2024




Aid number


SA.115173




Member State


Portugal




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Alteração do mapa português dos auxílios com finalidade regional para Portugal (1 de janeiro de.2022 - 31 de dezembro de 2027) para o período compreendido entre 1 de janeiro de 2024 e 31 de dezembro de 2027 (exame intercalar)




Legal basis


-




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Regional development




Form of aid


 




Budget


Overall budget: 0 EUR
Annual budget: 0 EUR




Intensity


 




Duration


Until 31.12.2027




Economic sectors


All economic sectors eligible to receive aid




Name and address of the granting authority







Agência para o Desenvolvimento e Coesão, IP




Avenida 5 de Outubro 153, 1050-053 Lisboa








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5960/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11683 – TURNER / DORNAN)
Date: 2024-10-04
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: building industry, computer centre, economic concentration, electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, merger control, parent company, provision of services








C_202406133EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6133


10.10.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11683 – TURNER / DORNAN)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/6133)

On 4 October 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11683. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6133/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-237/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 October 2024 – Mylan IRE Healthcare Ltd v European Commission, UAB VVB (Appeal – Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 – Orphan medicinal products – Articles 3 and 8 – Concept of significant benefit – Concept of clinical superiority – Regulation (EC) No 847/2000 – Article 3 – Marketing authorisation for the medicinal product for human use Tobramycin VVB – Period of market exclusivity of Tobi Podhaler, containing the active substance tobramycin – Derogation from that market exclusivity)
Date: 2024-10-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: drug surveillance, market approval, orphan drug








C_202500873EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/873


17.2.2025






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 October 2024 – Mylan IRE Healthcare Ltd v European Commission, UAB VVB


(Case C-237/22 P)
                (1)

(Appeal - Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 - Orphan medicinal products - Articles 3 and 8 - Concept of ‘significant benefit’ - Concept of ‘clinical superiority’ - Regulation (EC) No 847/2000 - Article 3 - Marketing authorisation for the medicinal product for human use Tobramycin VVB - Period of market exclusivity of Tobi Podhaler, containing the active substance tobramycin - Derogation from that market exclusivity)
(C/2025/873)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Mylan IRE Healthcare Ltd (represented initially by: L. Bidaine and I. Vernimme, and subsequently by: L. Bidaine, Q. Declève and I. Vernimme, avocats)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented initially by: K. Mifsud-Bonnici and A. Sipos, and subsequently by: E. Mathieu, K. Mifsud-Bonnici, A. Sipos and A. Spina, acting as Agents), UAB VVB (represented by: V. Horcajuelo Rivera, E. Rivas Alba and M.C. Yáñez Cañas, abogados, and by: M. Martens and B. Mourisse, advocaten)

Intervener in support of the European Commission: European Medicines Agency (EMA) (represented initially by: S. Marino, S. Drosos and C. Schultheiss, subsequently by: S. Marino and S. Drosos, and finally by: S. Drosos, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal.










2.


Orders Mylan IRE Healthcare Ltd to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 213, 30.5.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/873/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-761/23, Komise pro rozhodování ve věcech pobytu cizinců: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 October 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud – Czech Republic) – N.V.N. v Komise pro rozhodování ve věcech pobytu cizinců (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Directive 2011/98/EU – Issuance of a single permit for third-country nationals to reside and work in the territory of a Member State – Principle of equivalence – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Classified information – Access to the file)
Date: 2024-10-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: confidentiality, foreign national, residence permit, right to information, right to justice








C_202500239EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/239


20.1.2025






Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 October 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud – Czech Republic) – N.V.N. v Komise pro rozhodování ve věcech pobytu cizinců


(Case C-761/23,
                (1)
Komise pro rozhodování ve věcech pobytu cizinců)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law - Directive 2011/98/EU - Issuance of a single permit for third-country nationals to reside and work in the territory of a Member State - Principle of equivalence - Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Classified information - Access to the file)
(C/2025/239)
Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Nejvyšší správní soud

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: N.V.N.

Defendant: Komise pro rozhodování ve věcech pobytu cizinců

Operative part of the order

Articles 41 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, read in conjunction with the principle of equivalence, must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which prohibits a national court that is reviewing the lawfulness of a residence decision, taken pursuant to Directive 2011/98/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on a single application procedure for a single permit for third-country nationals to reside and work in the territory of a Member State and on a common set of rights for third-country workers legally residing in a Member State and which is based on classified information, from itself permitting the person concerned to have access to that information, where the court in question considers that not communicating that information to that person does not appear to be justified, even though it has such power in actions not concerned with proceedings on the right of residence of foreign nationals.


(1)  OJ C C/2024/2723.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/239/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Notice concerning the provisional application of the Framework Agreement on Comprehensive Partnership and Cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Kingdom of Thailand, of the other part
Date: 2024-10-04
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Thailand, cooperation agreement (EU), cooperation policy, framework agreement, interim agreement (EU)








L_202402648EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2024/2648


4.10.2024






Notice concerning the provisional application of the Framework Agreement on Comprehensive Partnership and Cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Kingdom of Thailand, of the other part

On 20 September 2024, the European Union and the Kingdom of Thailand have notified each other of the completion of the procedures necessary for the provisional application of the Framework Agreement on Comprehensive Partnership and Cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Kingdom of Thailand, of the other part (1). Consequently and in accordance with Article 59 of the Agreement, Thailand and the Union may provisionally apply mutually determined provisions of the Agreement as of 20 October 2024.
By virtue of Article 3 of Council Decision (EU) 2022/2562 (2) on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, and provisional application of the Framework Agreement, the following parts of the Agreement shall be applied provisionally between the Union and Thailand:






a)


Title I;










b)


Title II;










c)


Title III;










d)


Title IV: Articles 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29;










e)


Title V: Articles 30, 31, 32, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49;










f)


Title VI;










g)


Title VII;










h)


Title VIII;










i)


Joint declaration on Article 5;










j)


Joint declaration on Article 23.






(1)  
            OJ L 330, 23.12.2022, p. 72.

(2)  Council Decision (EU) 2022/2562 of 24 October 2022 on the signing, on behalf of the Union, and provisional application of the Framework Agreement on Comprehensive Partnership and Cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Kingdom of Thailand, of the other part (OJ L 330, 23.12.2022, p. 70).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/opin/2024/2648/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Case C-721/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 4 October 2024 – European Commission v PB, Council of the European Union (Appeal – Public service contracts – Irregularities in the procedure for the award of contracts – Regulation (EC) No 2988/95 – Articles 4, 5 and 7 – Decision for the recovery of amounts wrongly paid – Debit notes – Distinction between administrative measures and administrative penalties – Possibility of adopting an administrative measure in the absence of a sectoral rule – Recovery decision based on Regulation No 2988/95 and Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 – Regulation No 1605/2002 – Article 103 – Possibility of recovery from the director of the economic operator benefiting from European Union funds)
Date: 2024-10-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative measure, administrative sanction, company law, damages, debt, manager, private limited company, ruling








C_202407007EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7007


2.12.2024






Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 4 October 2024 – European Commission v PB, Council of the European Union


(Case C-721/22 P)
                (1)

(Appeal - Public service contracts - Irregularities in the procedure for the award of contracts - Regulation (EC) No 2988/95 - Articles 4, 5 and 7 - Decision for the recovery of amounts wrongly paid - Debit notes - Distinction between administrative measures and administrative penalties - Possibility of adopting an administrative measure in the absence of a sectoral rule - Recovery decision based on Regulation No 2988/95 and Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 - Regulation No 1605/2002 - Article 103 - Possibility of recovery from the director of the economic operator benefiting from European Union funds)
(C/2024/7007)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: European Commission (represented initially by B. Araujo Arce, J. Baquero Cruz and J. Estrada de Solà, acting as Agents, and subsequently by J. Baquero Cruz and J. Estrada de Solà, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings: PB (represented by: L. Levi, avocate), Council of the European Union

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 14 September 2022, PB v Commission (T-775/20, EU:T:2022:542);










2.


Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union in so far as it concerns the annulment of Commission Decision C(2020) 7151 final of 22 October 2020 concerning the application of an administrative measure against the director of the company [Confidential], withdrawing the amounts unduly received under the TACIS/2006/101-510 and CARDS/2008/166-429 contracts;










3.


Reserves the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 35, 30.1.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7007/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 3 October 2024
Date: 2024-10-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202405886EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5886


4.10.2024






Euro exchange rates (1)


            3 October 2024
         
(C/2024/5886)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1039 




JPY


Japanese yen


161,98 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4595 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84258 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,3610 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9387 




ISK


Iceland króna


149,30 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,7195 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,357 




HUF


Hungarian forint


401,43 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3058 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9766 




TRY


Turkish lira


37,7045 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6124 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4945 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,5734 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7749 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4315 




KRW


South Korean won


1 472,89 




ZAR


South African rand


19,3017 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,7477 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 075,07 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6601 




PHP


Philippine peso


62,315 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,567 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,0304 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,5389 




INR


Indian rupee


92,7230 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5886/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Corrigendum to Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/1744 of 24 June 2024 amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ L, 2024/1744, 24.6.2024)
Date: 2024-10-04
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russia, Russo-Ukrainian issue, Ukraine, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person, natural person, territorial dispute, territorial law, trade restriction




L_202490605EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2024/90605


4.10.2024






Corrigendum to Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/1744 of 24 June 2024 amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine
(
Official Journal of the European Union L, 2024/1744, 24 June 2024
)







1.


On page 362, in the Annex, in entry 661, under the column ‘Name’











for:





                           ‘M Star International Trading Company LimitedLocal name: 




美星國際貿易(香港)有限公司;






美星國際貿易有限公司

A.k.a: M-Star International Trading Co., Ltd.;
Meixing International Trade Co., Ltd’,












read:





                           ‘M Star International Trading Company LimitedLocal name: 




美星國際貿易有限公司

A.k.a: M-Star International Trading Co., Ltd.;
Meixing International Trade Co., Ltd’.











2.


On page 362, in the Annex, in entry 661, under the column ‘Identifying Information’











for:





                           ‘Address(es): Room 2501, International Science & Technology
Building, Futian District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People’s
Republic of China; No 52, Fu Hang Road, Tuen Mun, NT, Hong
Kong; Flat/Rm D19 3/F, Wong King Industrial Building, No 2 Tai
Yau Street, KL, Hong Kong
Telephone: + 86 15818601197
Website: http://www.m-starit.com

Email: sales@m-starit.com
Registration number: 61365134 (USCC); 2025579 (CR No.)’,












read:





                           ‘Address(es): Room 2501, International Science & Technology
Building, Futian District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People’s
Republic of China; Flat/Rm D19 3/F, Wong King Industrial Building, No 2 Tai
Yau Street, KL, Hong Kong
Telephone: + 86 15818601197
Website: http://www.m-starit.com

Email: sales@m-starit.com
Registration number: 61365134 (BRN)’.







ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2024/1744/corrigendum/2024-10-04/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Case T-514/24: Action brought on 4 October 2024 – FS v EIB
Date: 2024-10-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European civil service, equal treatment, fundamental rights, harassment at work, indemnification, principle of proportionality, probationary period, psychological harassment, rights of the defence, teleworking








C_202407353EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7353


16.12.2024






Action brought on 4 October 2024 – FS v EIB


(Case T-514/24)

(C/2024/7353)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: FS (represented by: B. Maréchal, lawyer)

Defendant: European Investment Bank

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the Decision of the President of the EIB dated 24 June 2024, endorsing the conclusions of the Final Report of the EIB Dignity at Work Panel rendered in the formal investigation procedure launched against the applicant (‘the contested decision’);










—


grant compensation for the moral damage suffered by the applicant amounting to EUR 50 000;










—


grant compensation for the legal fees incurred by the applicant for the current application to EUR 35 000 (including VAT).





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on the following pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging an improper conduct of the dignity at work procedure in breach of the applicant’s right of defence and right to good administration and of the principle of proportionality, considering:






—


the failure to conduct proceedings in compliance with the principles of impartiality and independence in breach of the applicant’s right to a fair trial;










—


a conflict of interest of the director general of Personnel.














2.


Second plea in law, alleging the illegality of the contested decision insofar as the alleged moral harassment was not established. The contested decision has been vitiated by errors of assessment concerning:






—


the alleged lack of truthful, accurate and timely feedback during the mid-term evaluation;










—


the extension of the complainant’s probationary period;










—


the personal and family-related comments;










—


the use of the EIB’s teleworking arrangements;










—


the instance of differential treatment, undue pressure and exacerbated control;










—


the accusations and/or insinuations among colleagues of inaccuracies in the complainant’s CV;










—


the measures put in place during the probationary period and its extension;
and, as a conclusion, there is no evidence of psychological harassment.














3.


Third plea in law, alleging the liability of the defendant for damages suffered by the applicant as a result of the contested decision and related violations of his fundamental rights.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7353/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)