do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-211/24: Order of the General Court of 2 October 2024 – SZ DJI Technology v EUIPO – Vision Research (PHANTOM)
Date: 2024-10-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, computer equipment, consultancy, electronic device, electronic equipment, recording equipment, registered trade mark, software, trade-mark law








C_202406951EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6951


25.11.2024






Order of the General Court of 2 October 2024 – SZ DJI Technology v EUIPO – Vision Research (PHANTOM)


(Case T-211/24)
                (1)

(C/2024/6951)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C C/2024/3486, 10.6.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6951/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-606/23: Judgment of the General Court of 2 October 2024 – Soares v Commission (Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents in the administrative file relating to a Commission State aid decision – Refusal of access – Exceptions relating to the protection of court proceedings and the purpose of investigations – General presumption of confidentiality – Overriding public interest – Obligation to state reasons)
Date: 2024-10-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Madeira, Portugal, State aid, access to EU information, administrative transparency, control of State aid, judicial proceedings, right to information








C_202406939EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6939


25.11.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 2 October 2024 – Soares v Commission


(Case T-606/23)
                (1)

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents in the administrative file relating to a Commission State aid decision - Refusal of access - Exceptions relating to the protection of court proceedings and the purpose of investigations - General presumption of confidentiality - Overriding public interest - Obligation to state reasons)
(C/2024/6939)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties


Applicant: Sara Soares (Porto, Portugal) (represented by: S. Gemas Donário, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Burón Pérez and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Commission Decision C(2023) 4938 final of 17 July 2023 refusing her access to documents which are part of the Commission’s administrative file relating to Commission Decision C(2020) 8550 final of 4 December 2020 on aid scheme SA.21259 (2018/C) (ex 2018/NN) implemented by Portugal for the Madeira Free Trade Zone (Zona Franca da Madeira – ZFM) – Regime III (OJ 2022 L 217, p. 49).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Ms Sara Soares to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  
            OJ C/2023/1169, 4.12.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6939/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11691 – MARUBENI / NAP / FMG / AQUAGREEN)
Date: 2024-10-02
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: biotechnology, clean technology, economic concentration, investment company, merger control, sewage sludge, water treatment








C_202406121EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6121


9.10.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11691 – MARUBENI / NAP / FMG / AQUAGREEN)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/6121)

On 2 October 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11691. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6121/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-448/22: Judgment of the General Court of 2 October 2024 – PW v EEAS (Civil service – Contract staff – Refusal to reimburse annual travel expenses for dependent children – Article 8(1) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations – Action for annulment – Act adversely affecting an official – Decision which definitively lays down the position of the administration – Admissibility – Principle of sound administration – Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff)
Date: 2024-10-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, allowances and expenses, dependant, staff regulations (EU)








C_202406931EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6931


25.11.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 2 October 2024 – PW v EEAS


(Case T-448/22)
                (1)

(Civil service - Contract staff - Refusal to reimburse annual travel expenses for dependent children - Article 8(1) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Action for annulment - Act adversely affecting an official - Decision which definitively lays down the position of the administration - Admissibility - Principle of sound administration - Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff)
(C/2024/6931)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: PW (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: European External Action Service (EEAS) (represented by: A. Ireland, S. Falek and R. Coesme, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the implied decision of 30 July 2021 rejecting his request for payment of annual travel expenses for the whole of 2020 as regards his dependent children.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders the European External Action Service (EEAS) to pay its own costs and half of the costs incurred by PW;










3.


Orders PW to pay half of his own costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 380, 3.10.2022.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6931/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-11/23: Judgment of the General Court of 2 October 2024 – XH v Commission (Civil service – Officials – Promotion – 2017 promotion exercise – Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 6 – Article 45 of the Staff Regulations – Implementation of a judgment of the General Court – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of impartiality – Manifest error of assessment)
Date: 2024-10-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Anti-fraud Office, administrator, indemnification, promotion, rights of the defence, staff regulations (EU)








C_202406937EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6937


25.11.2024






Judgment of the General Court of 2 October 2024 – XH v Commission


(Case T-11/23)
                (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Promotion - 2017 promotion exercise - Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 6 - Article 45 of the Staff Regulations - Implementation of a judgment of the General Court - Right to be heard - Obligation to state reasons - Principle of impartiality - Manifest error of assessment)
(C/2024/6937)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: XH (represented by: K. Górny, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Hohenecker, A. Sauka and L. Vernier, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, in essence, first, the annulment of the decision of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) of 31 May 2022 by which her name was not included in the list of officials promoted to grade AD 6 under the 2017 promotion exercise, as published in Administrative Notices No 25-2017 of 13 November 2017 and, secondly, compensation for the damage which she claims to have suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders XH to pay the costs.






(1)  
            OJ C 223, 26.6.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6937/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.110551
Date: 2024-10-02
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: France, State aid, clean technology, control of State aid








C_202405921EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5921


2.10.2024






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.110551
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/5921)








Date of adoption of the decision


30.5.2024




Aid number


SA.110551




Member State


France




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


Aides potentielles liées au Fonds Écotechnologies




Legal basis


No aid in the sense of Art. 107(1) TFEU)




Type of measure


Ad Hoc Case


 




Objective


 




Form of aid


 




Budget


 




Intensity


Measure does not constitute aid




Duration


 




Economic sectors


 




Name and address of the granting authority


-




Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5921/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)