do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-639/24, FLO VENEER: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Upravni sud u Zagrebu (Croatia) lodged on 30 September 2024 – FLO VENEER d.o.o. v Ministarstvo financija Republike Hrvatske, Samostalni sektor za drugostupanjski upravni postupak
Date: 2024-09-30
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, carriage of goods, evidence, intra-EU trade, intra-EU transport, supply, tax exemption








C_202407308EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7308


16.12.2024






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Upravni sud u Zagrebu (Croatia) lodged on 30 September 2024 – FLO VENEER d.o.o. v Ministarstvo financija Republike Hrvatske, Samostalni sektor za drugostupanjski upravni postupak


(Case C-639/24, FLO VENEER)

(C/2024/7308)
Language of the case: Croatian

Referring court

Upravni sud u Zagrebu

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: FLO VENEER d.o.o.

Other party to the proceedings: Ministarstvo financija Republike Hrvatske, Samostalni sektor za drugostupanjski upravni postupak

Question referred

Should Article 138(1) of the VAT Directive, (1) which concerns exemptions from VAT on intra-Community supplies of goods, and Article 45a of Implementing Regulation No 282/2011, (2) which concerns evidence that goods have been dispatched or transported from a Member State to a destination outside its territory but within the Community, be interpreted as meaning that a supplier should be denied an exemption from VAT if it has failed to provide evidence that the conditions outlined in Article 45a of Implementing Regulation No 282/2011 have been met, or is the tax authority obliged – in the event that the supplier is not in possession of sufficient evidence for the presumption referred to in Article 45a of Implementing Regulation No 282/2011 to be made, but is in possession of evidence proving the physical movement of the goods from one Member State to the other – to examine the evidence presented and determine the facts and circumstances that are relevant to the exemption provided for in Article 138 of the VAT Directive, namely whether the goods were dispatched or transported from the Member State to a destination outside its territory but within the Community?


(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

(2)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 282/2011 of 15 March 2011 laying down implementing measures for Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax (recast) (OJ 2011 L 77, p. 1).


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7308/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Information on the date of entry into force of the Protocol on regular and special regular carriage of passengers by coach and bus (Interbus Agreement)
Date: 2024-09-30
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: agreement (EU), bus, carriage of passengers, international transport, protocol to an agreement








L_202402593EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
L series













2024/2593


30.9.2024






Information on the date of entry into force of the Protocol on regular and special regular carriage of passengers by coach and bus (Interbus Agreement)

The Protocol (1) to the Agreement on the international occasional carriage of passengers by coach and bus (Interbus Agreement) (2) regarding the international regular and special regular carriage of passengers by coach and bus enters into force on 1 October 2024 in accordance with its article 17(1)(b). It has been approved or ratified by the European Union, Moldova and Bosnia and Herzegovina.


(1)  
            OJ L 122, 5.5.2023, p. 3


(2)  
            OJ L 321, 26.11.2002, p. 13



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/info/2024/2593/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Case C-108/23, SmartSport Reisen: Order of the President of the Court of 30 September 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Groß-Gerau – Germany) – PU v SmartSport Reisen GmbH
Date: 2024-09-30
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: claim, consumer, contract, judicial cooperation in civil matters in the EU, jurisdiction, residence, travel agency, traveller








C_202500055EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/55


6.1.2025






Order of the President of the Court of 30 September 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Groß-Gerau – Germany) – PU v SmartSport Reisen GmbH


(Case C-108/23,
                (1)
SmartSport Reisen)

(C/2025/55)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  
            OJ C 173, 15.5.2023.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/55/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-505/24: Action brought on 30 September 2024 – KenWave Solutions v EUIPO (DYNAMIC RESPONSE IMAGING)
Date: 2024-09-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, consultancy, public sanitation, registered trade mark, sewage sludge, trade-mark law








C_202406946EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6946


25.11.2024






Action brought on 30 September 2024 – KenWave Solutions v EUIPO (DYNAMIC RESPONSE IMAGING)


(Case T-505/24)

(C/2024/6946)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: KenWave Solutions Inc. (Mississauga, Canada) (represented by: L. Andersen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark DYNAMIC RESPONSE IMAGING – Application for registration No 1 760 659
         

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 July 2024 in Case R 939/2024-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


remit the matter to EUIPO with a view to accepting the EU designation of the trade mark at issue;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal and the General Court.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6946/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections – SA.113059
Date: 2024-09-30
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Czechia, State aid, animal production, control of State aid








C_202405872EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5872


30.9.2024






Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
SA.113059
(C/2024/5872)








Date of adoption of the decision


13.9.2024




Aid number


SA.113059




Member State


Czechia




Region


 




Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)


DP 20.G. Zlepšení životních podmínek v chovu ovcí a koz




Legal basis


Act No 252/1997 on agriculture; Principles laying down the conditions for granting subsidies for the year concerned on the basis of Sections 1, 2 and 2d of Act No 252/1997 on agriculture; (Zákon č. 252/1997 Sb., o zemědělství; Zásady, kterými se stanovují podmínky pro poskytování dotací pro příslušný rok na základě § 1, § 2 a § 2d zákona č. 252/1997 Sb., o zemědělství)




Type of measure


Scheme


 




Objective


Agriculture; Forestry; Rural areas, Aid for animal welfare commitments




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


Overall budget: 420 000 000  CZK
Annual budget: 60 000 000  CZK




Intensity


100,0 %




Duration


Until 31.12.2030




Economic sectors


Animal production




Name and address of the granting authority







Státní zemědělský intervenční fond




Ve Smečkách 33, 110 00 Praha








Other information


 




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5872/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case C-634/24, Lenaimon: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 30 September 2024 – M.P. v Migracijos departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos
Date: 2024-09-30
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Canada, EU visa policy, Israel, Lithuania, Russia, admission of aliens, agreement (EU), citizenship, foreign national, residence permit








C_202500246EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/246


20.1.2025






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 30 September 2024 – M.P. v Migracijos departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos


(Case C-634/24, Lenaimon)
                (1)

(C/2025/246)
Language of the case: Lithuanian

Referring court

Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: M.P.

Defendant: Migracijos departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos

Questions referred







1.


Should Article 30.6 of the EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (2) be interpreted as precluding a person holding Canadian, Israeli and Russian citizenship from relying on the provisions of that agreement in an appeal to a national court regarding a permit to reside temporarily in the Republic of Lithuania in circumstances such as those of the present case?










2.


Is Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1806 (3) of the European Parliament and of the Council on 14 November 2018 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement, read in conjunction with Annex II, to be interpreted as not precluding national legislation valid for a limited period, under which a Russian citizen seeking to apply for a permit to reside temporary in the Republic of Lithuania is subject to a requirement to present a valid visa or residence permit, notwithstanding the fact that such a person has entered the Republic of Lithuania under a visa-free regime as a national of a State listed in Annex II to Regulation 2018/1806, while at the same time raising the question of the compatibility of those provisions of Regulation 2018/1806 with CETA in circumstances such as those of the present case?






(1)  The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(2)  
            OJ 2017 L 11, p. 23.

(3)  
            OJ 2018 L 303, p. 39.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/246/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11559 – EXYTE / KINETICS)
Date: 2024-09-30
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: advanced technology industry, air conditioning, building industry, civil engineering, computer centre, economic concentration, heating, merger control, plumbing equipment








C_202501730EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/1730


19.3.2025






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11559 – EXYTE / KINETICS)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2025/1730)

On 30 September 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11559. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1730/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11682 – UTMOST GROUP / LOMBARD INTERNATIONAL ASSURANCE HOLDINGS)
Date: 2024-09-30
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, insurance, merger control, provision of services, wealth








C_202405999EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5999


4.10.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11682 – UTMOST GROUP / LOMBARD INTERNATIONAL ASSURANCE HOLDINGS)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/5999)

On 30 September 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11682. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5999/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Euro exchange rates – 27 September 2024
Date: 2024-09-30
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_202405034EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5034


30.9.2024






Euro exchange rates (1)


            27 September 2024
         
(C/2024/5034)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1158 




JPY


Japanese yen


159,63 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4570 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,83338 




SEK


Swedish krona


11,2730 




CHF


Swiss franc


0,9420 




ISK


Iceland króna


150,70 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,7575 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,158 




HUF


Hungarian forint


396,95 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2738 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9764 




TRY


Turkish lira


38,1336 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6180 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5036 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,6737 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7649 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,4305 




KRW


South Korean won


1 462,76 




ZAR


South African rand


19,1092 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8230 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 859,24 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6027 




PHP


Philippine peso


62,591 




RUB


Russian rouble


 




THB


Thai baht


36,135 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,0668 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,8374 




INR


Indian rupee


93,3840 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5034/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Case T-506/24: Action brought on 30 September 2024 – FL v Eurojust and Europol
Date: 2024-09-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: criminal proceedings, damages, data protection, indemnification, judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the EU, personal data, protection of communications








C_202407039EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7039


2.12.2024






Action brought on 30 September 2024 – FL v Eurojust and Europol


(Case T-506/24)

(C/2024/7039)
Language of the case: Dutch

Parties


Applicant: FL (represented by: J. Reisinger, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust) and European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


under Article 268 TFEU, read in conjunction with Article 340 TFEU, Article 50 of Regulation 2016/794 (1) and Article 47 of Regulation 2018/1727, (2) award compensation in the amount of EUR 15 000 – in order to assess the damage, reference is made to the compensation in Case C-755/21 P, Kočner v Europol, (3) the difference being that the damage here is even greater and more comprehensive – for the non-material damage suffered in the context of the ‘Exclu’ operation and the related acts of Eurojust and Europol;










—


order the defendants to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law which are essentially identical or comparable to the pleas that have been put forward in Case T-148/24, CW v Eurojust and Europol. (4)



(1)  Regulation (EU) 2016/794 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) and replacing and repealing Council Decisions 2009/371/JHA, 2009/934/JHA, 2009/935/JHA, 2009/936/JHA and 2009/968/JHA (OJ 2016 L 135, p. 53).

(2)  Regulation (EU) 2018/1727 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 November 2018 on the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust), and replacing and repealing Council Decision 2002/187/JHA (OJ 2018 L 295, p. 138).

(3)  
            OJ C C/2024/202, 5.3.2024.

(4)  
            OJ C C/2024/3175, 21.5.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7039/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)