do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-508/24: Action brought on 27 September 2024 – SJ v Commission
Date: 2024-09-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Skåne county, Stockholm, Sweden, Västra Götaland county, award of contract, carriage of passengers, provision of services, public procurement, rail transport








C_202407351EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/7351


16.12.2024






Action brought on 27 September 2024 – SJ v Commission


(Case T-508/24)

(C/2024/7351)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: SJ AB (Stockholm, Sweden) (represented by: J. Karlsson and M. Johansson, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul Article 1 of Commission’s Implementing Decision of 18 July 2024 on the applicability of Article 34 of Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council to commercial railway passenger transport in Sweden, C(2024) 4998 final (the ‘Decision’) in its entirety or, in the second place, at least in so far as it provides that the directive shall continue to apply to contracts awarded by contracting entities and intended to enable activities related to provision of commercially operated railway passenger transport services to be carried out on the Stockholm - Gothenburg route and the Gothenburg - Malmö route ; and,










—


order the Commission to pay the costs incurred by the applicant.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging that the Decision has not been adopted within the applicable time period.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging that the Commission erroneously concluded that the provision of commercial railway passenger services is not directly exposed to competition within the meaning of Article 34(1) of Directive 2014/25/EU at the national level, at the (aggregated) route level and on the Stockholm–Gothenburg route, even if railway passenger services provided under public service obligation are included in the same market as commercial railway passenger services.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging that the Commission has erred by concluding that Directive 2014/25/EU shall continue to apply to procurements for commercial railway passenger services on the Gothenburg - Malmö route, despite having found this route to be directly exposed to competition.






ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7351/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.11705 – TIKEHAU CAPITAL / BOUYGUES / SERENA INDUSTRIAL PARTNERS / BELLOVA JV)
Date: 2024-09-27
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: air transport, building industry, economic concentration, investment company, means of communication, merger control, public works, service concession, telecommunications, transport infrastructure








C_202406180EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/6180


15.10.2024






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.11705 – TIKEHAU CAPITAL / BOUYGUES / SERENA INDUSTRIAL PARTNERS / BELLOVA JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(C/2024/6180)

On 27 September 2024, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32024M11705. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6180/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Special report 19/2024: Organic farming in the EU – Gaps and inconsistencies hamper the success of the policy
Date: 2024-09-27
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: agricultural expenditure, aid to agriculture, common agricultural policy, fund (EU), land use, organic farming, organic product, sustainable agriculture








C_202405866EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5866


27.9.2024






Special report 19/2024:

            ‘Organic farming in the EU – Gaps and inconsistencies hamper the success of the policy’
         
(C/2024/5866)

The European Court of Auditors has published its special report 19/2024: ‘Organic farming in the EU – Gaps and inconsistencies hamper the success of the policy’.
The report can be consulted directly or downloaded at the European Court of Auditors’ website: https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/publications/sr-2024-19



ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5866/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Call for Tenders for Enhanced Air Connectivity of Slovenia
Date: 2024-09-27
Institutions: European Commission, Secretariat-General
Subjects: Slovenia, State aid, air transport, carriage of passengers, carrier, control of State aid, invitation to tender, public procurement, tendering








C_202405876EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2024/5876


27.9.2024






Call for Tenders for Enhanced Air Connectivity of Slovenia
(C/2024/5876)

Notice is hereby given of the launch of the Call for Tenders for Enhanced Air Connectivity of Slovenia, the subject of which is the granting of state aid to air carriers for the start-up of operation of new air routes, for the carriage of passengers to or from a public airport in the territory of the Republic of Slovenia at which international air transport is performed, to a single landing point in the territory of the countries of the European Common Aviation Area (ECAA).
The text of the Tender (in the Slovene and English language) will be available on Government’s official website 
www.gov.si
 on the date of the publishment of this notice in the Official Journal of the European Union together with the Tender documentation.
The applications for aid must be submitted within 30 days of the publication of this notice in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Applicants may ask any questions regarding the Tender by sending an email to 
mzi.air-connect@gov.si
 with the subject: ‘Call for Tenders for Enhanced Air Connectivity of Slovenia’.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5876/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Eidsivating Court of Appeal dated 27 September 2024 in the case of Dartride AS v Norwegian State, represented by the Ministry of Justice and Public Security (Case E-25/24)
Date: 2024-09-27
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: European Economic Area, Norway, civil proceedings, courts and tribunals, damages, liability of the State








C_202500940EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
C series













C/2025/940


6.2.2025






Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Eidsivating Court of Appeal dated 27 September 2024 in the case of Dartride AS v Norwegian State, represented by the Ministry of Justice and Public Security
(Case E-25/24)
(C/2025/940)

A request has been made to the EFTA Court dated 27 September 2024 by Eidsivating Court of Appeal (Eidsivating lagmannsrett), which was received at the Court Registry on 27 September 2024, for an Advisory Opinion in the case of Dartride AS v Norwegian State, represented by the Ministry of Justice and Public Security (Staten v/Justis- og beredskapsdepartementet), on the following questions:






1.


Do the EEA Agreement and [the principle of] State liability under EEA law entail that the State can be liable for damages for errors by the courts in the application of the EEA rules?










2.


If question 1 is answered in the affirmative:






a.


Which decisions by national courts can trigger liability for EEA States?










b.


Is it compatible with EEA law for the possibility of filing a lawsuit concerning damages for errors by the courts in their application of the EEA rules to be subject to fulfilment of conditions laid down in the third paragraph of section 200 of the Courts of Justice Act?










ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/940/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)